Search

Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.

BACKGROUND: Excision is routinely recommended for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) found on core biopsy given cancer upstage rates of near 20%. Identifying a cohort at low-risk for upstage may avoid low-value surgery. Objectives were to elucidate factors predictive of upstage in ADH, specifically near-complete core sampling, to potentially define a group at low upstage risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional, multi-institutional study from 2015 to 2019 of 221 ADH lesions in 216 patients who underwent excision or active observation (≥ 12 months imaging surveillance, mean follow-up 32.6 months) evaluated clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and procedural factors for association with upstage. Radiologists prospectively examined imaging for lesional size and sampling proportion. RESULTS: Upstage occurred in 37 (16.7%) lesions, 25 (67.6%) to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 12 (32.4%) to invasive cancer. Factors independently predictive of upstage were lesion size ≥ 10 mm (OR 5.47, 95% CI 2.03-14.77, p < 0.001), pathologic suspicion for DCIS (OR 12.29, 95% CI 3.24-46.56, p < 0.001), and calcification distribution pattern (OR 8.08, 95% CI 2.04-32.00, p = 0.003, regional; OR 19.28, 95% CI 3.47-106.97, p < 0.001, linear). Near-complete sampling was not correlated with upstage (p = 0.64). All three significant predictors were absent in 65 (29.4%) cases, with a 1.5% upstage rate. CONCLUSIONS: The upstage rate among 221 ADH lesions was 16.7%, highest in lesions ≥ 10 mm, with pathologic suspicion of DCIS, and linear/regional calcifications on mammography. Conversely, 30% of the cohort exhibited all low-risk factors, with an upstage rate < 2%, suggesting that active surveillance may be permissible in lieu of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Following a breast cancer diagnosis, it is uncertain whether womens breast density knowledge influences their willingness to undergo pre-operative imaging to detect additional cancer in their breasts. We evaluated womens breast density knowledge and their willingness to delay treatment for pre-operative testing. METHODS: We surveyed women identified in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium aged ≥ 18 years, with first breast cancer diagnosed within the prior 6-18 months, who had at least one breast density measurement within the 5 years prior to their diagnosis. We assessed womens breast density knowledge and correlates of willingness to delay treatment for 6 or more weeks for pre-operative imaging via logistic regression. RESULTS: Survey participation was 28.3% (969/3,430). Seventy-two percent (469/647) of women with dense and 11% (34/322) with non-dense breasts correctly knew their density (p

The breasts undergo marked physiologic changes during lactation that can make conventional imaging evaluation with mammography and US challenging. MRI can be a valuable diagnostic aid to differentiate physiologic and benign processes from malignancy in patients who are lactating. In addition, MRI may allow more accurate delineation of disease involvement than does conventional imaging and assists in locoregional staging, screening of the contralateral breast, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgical planning. Although the American College of Radiology recommends against patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI during pregnancy because of fetal safety concerns, contrast-enhanced MRI is safe during lactation. As more women delay childbearing, the incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and breast cancer in lactating women beyond the 1st year after pregnancy is increasing. Thus, MRI is increasingly being performed in lactating women for diagnostic evaluation and screening of patients at high risk. PABC is associated with a worse prognosis than that of non-PABCs, with delays in diagnosis contributing to an increased likelihood of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. Familiarity with the MRI features of the lactating breast and the appearance of various pathologic conditions is essential to avoid diagnostic pitfalls and prevent delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment. The authors review clinical indications for breast MRI during lactation, describe characteristic features of the lactating breast at MRI, and compare MRI features of a spectrum of benign and malignant breast abnormalities. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Chikarmane in this issue.

Purpose: Women with a personal history of breast cancer have an increased risk of subsequent breast malignancy and may benefit from more sensitive surveillance than conventional mammography (MG). We previously reported outcomes for first surveillance episode using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), demonstrating higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to MG. We now report CEM performance for subsequent surveillance. Methods: A retrospective study of 1,190 women in an Australian hospital setting undergoing annual surveillance following initial surveillance CEM between June 2016 and December 2022. Outcome measures were recall rate, cancer detection rate, contribution of contrast to recalls, false positive rate, interval cancer rate and characteristics of surveillance detected and interval cancers. Results: 2,592 incident surveillance episodes were analysed, of which 93% involved contrast-based imaging. Of 116 (4.5%) recall episodes, 40/116 (34%) recalls were malignant (27 invasive; 13 ductal carcinoma in situ), totalling 15.4 cancers per 1000 surveillance episodes. 55/116 (47%) recalls were contrast-directed including 17/40 (43%) true positive recalls. Tumour features were similar for contrast-directed recalls and other diagnoses. 8/9 (89%) of contrast-directed invasive recalls were Grade 2–3, and 5/9 (56%) were triple negative breast cancers. There were two symptomatic interval cancers (0.8 per 1000 surveillance episodes, program sensitivity 96%). Conclusion: Routine use of CEM in surveillance of women with PHBC led to an increase in the detection of clinically significant malignant lesions, with a low interval cancer rate compared to previous published series. Compared to mammographic surveillance, contrast-enhanced mammography increases the sensitivity of surveillance programs for women with PHBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Early diagnosis and screening of breast cancer are of vital importance in the fight against the disease. It is crucial to identify the underlying barriers that prevent women from undergoing mammography and to develop necessary strategies to overcome these obstacles. The purpose of this study was to adapt "The Perceived Barriers of Mammography Scale (PBMS‐23)" into Turkish and to conduct a validity and reliability study. Methods: This study used a methodological approach. The study was conducted with 233 women admitted to the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic of a university hospital. Data were collected by using the Introductory Information Form, PBMS‐23, Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS‐MS). Psychometric properties of the scale were tested with content validity, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability coefficient. Results: Content validity confirmatory factor analysis resulted in 휒2/SD = 1.67; CFI = 0.97, NFI = 0.92, GFI = 0.86, RMSEA = 0.054. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, while the subscales had Cronbach's alpha values of 0.34 to 0.80. The intraclass correlation coefficient values calculated for the test–retest reliability were between 0.83 and 0.96 for the subscales and 0.96 for the overall scale. There is a positive and statistically significant relationship (p < 0.01) between the CHBMS‐MS barriers dimension and prejudices dimension scores and all subdimensions and the total of the PBMS‐23. Conclusion: The PBMS‐23 was accepted as a valid and reliable tool with 23 items and eight‐factor structure that can be useful in measuring Turkish women's barriers to mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To identify barriers to surveillance mammography adherence in Korean breast cancer survivors (BCSs), which is crucial for early detection of recurrence and new cancers. SAMPLE & SETTING: 195 BCSs were recruited from a breast cancer clinic and its support groups at a South Korean hospital. METHODS & VARIABLES: This descriptive study used a cross-sectional design. Participants completed a self-administered multi-instrument survey based on a comprehensive framework for adherence, including individual characteristics, symptoms, quality of life, cognitive appraisal, social support, and healthcare system factors. RESULTS: Having had a mammogram within the past year was considered adherent (n = 177), and no mammography within the past year was considered nonadherent (n = 18). Logistic regression revealed that longer time since diagnosis (p < 0.001), greater depression (p = 0.024), and higher health services utilization (p < 0.001) were predictors of lower mammography adherence (c² = 76.618, p < 0.001, R² = 58%). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This is the first study to identify depression as a barrier to surveillance mammography in BCSs, suggesting that depression screening and treatment may be important for increasing adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the features and outcomes of breast cancer in high-risk subgroups. Materials and Methods: REB approved an observational study of women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2019. Three radiologists, using the BI-RADS lexicon, blindly reviewed mammogram and MRI screenings without a washout period. Consensus was reached with 2 additional reviewers. Inter-rater agreement was measured by Fleiss Kappa. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square tests for cohort analysis, and Kaplan-Meier for survival rates, with a Cox model for comparative analysis using gene mutation as a reference. Results: The study included 140 high-risk women, finding 155 malignant lesions. Significant age differences noted: chest radiation therapy (median age 44, IQR: 37.0-46.2), gene mutation (median age 49, IQR: 39.8-58.0), and familial risk (median age 51, IQR: 44.5-56.0) (P =.007). Gene mutation carriers had smaller (P =.01), higher-grade tumours (P =.002), and more triple-negative ER- (P =.02), PR- (P =.002), and HER2- (P =.02) cases. MRI outperformed mammography in all subgroups. Substantial to near-perfect inter-rater agreement observed. Over 10 years, no deaths occurred in chest radiation group, with no significant survival difference between gene mutation and familial risk groups, HR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.27, 3.26), P =.92. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of age and specific tumour characteristics in identifying high-risk breast cancer subgroups. MRI is confirmed as an effective screening tool. Despite the aggressive nature of cancers in gene mutation carriers, early detection is crucial for survival outcomes. These insights, while necessitating further validation with larger studies, advocate for a move toward personalized medical care, strengthening the existing healthcare guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: Breast cancer threatens the lives of many women around the world each year. Although mammography is considered the gold standard for early detection of early-stage breast cancer, different diagnostic methods such as the Breastlight device have been proposed for cancer screening in recent years. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Breastlight and mammography in women referred to clinics in Khorramabad, Iran in 2018. Materials & Methods: In this clinical trial, 252 women older than 40 years of age who were eligible for breast cancer screening or had breast complaints were included. The breast tissue was first assessed using a Breastlight device in a dark room. Then, all participants were re-examined by mammography. The results of Breastlight and mammography methods including true positive rate, true negative rate, false positive rate, and false negative rate were compared. The main bases of comparison were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of mammography and Breastlight methods. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Results: Compared to mammography, the Breastlight method showed a sensitivity of 78.3%, specificity of 99.5%, PPV of 97%, NPV of 95%, and diagnostic accuracy of 95.6%. Conclusion: Although mammography is more effective than other common methods in diagnosing early-stage breast cancer, Breastlight is a simple and cost-effective device that can be considered a valid tool in breast cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer has been a significant contributor to cancer-related mortality, but advancements in early detection through regular mammography and improvements in treatment modalities have contributed to declining mortality rates in several regions. This study presents a novel approach to cancer diagnosis utilizing Full-Field Digital Mammography images through predictive analysis methods. By using predictive analytic techniques and mammography images, this study offers a novel way to cancer detection. The research involves the application of deep learning techniques to extract valuable insights from cancer images captured by mammography devices. The CBIS-DDSM (Curated Breast Imaging Subset of Digital Database for Screening Mammography) dataset including images from patients with varying types and stages of cancer, is collected and pre-processed to ensure uniformity and quality. Relevant features, including color, texture, and shape characteristics, are extracted, and a rigorous feature selection process is employed to identify discriminative markers. The Residual Network (ResNet) model is selected and trained on the dataset, with a focus on classification accuracy and robust predictive performance. Validation metrics, such as accuracy, IoU (Intersection over Union) score, dice score, and ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve are employed to evaluate the model's efficiency. After analysis, the proposed method had the best degree of mass lesion detection accuracy, at 99.24%. This research contributes to the advancement of non-invasive and efficient diagnostic tools, potentially enhancing early detection and intervention in cancer patients. The proposed method not only demonstrates promising results in terms of diagnostic accuracy but also emphasizes interpretability, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and adherence to ethical standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Given the inevitable trend of domestic imaging center mergers and the current lack of comprehensive imaging evaluation guidelines for non-mass breast lesions, we have developed a novel BI-RADS risk prediction and stratification system for non-mass breast lesions that integrates clinical characteristics with imaging features from ultrasound, mammography, and MRI, with the aim of assisting clinicians in interpreting imaging reports. Methods: This study enrolled 350 patients with non-mass breast lesions (NMLs), randomly assigning them to a training set of 245 cases (70%) and a test set of 105 cases (30%). Radiologists conducted comprehensive evaluations of the lesions using ultrasound, mammography, andMRI. Independent predictors were identified using LASSO logistic regression, and a predictive riskmodel was constructed using a nomogram generated with R software, with subsequent validation in both sets. Results: LASSO logistic regression identified a set of independent predictors, encompassing age, clinical palpation hardness, distribution and morphology of calcifications, peripheral blood supply as depicted by color Doppler imaging, maximum lesion diameter, patterns of internal enhancement, distribution of non-mass lesions, time-intensity curve (TIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The predictive model achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.873 for the training group and 0.877 for the testing group. The model's positive predictive values were as follows: BI-RADS 2 = 0%, BI-RADS 3 = 0%, BI-RADS 4A = 6.25%, BI-RADS 4B = 26.13%, BI-RADS 4C = 80.84%, and BI-RADS 5 = 97.33%. Conclusion: The creation of a risk-predictive BI-RADS stratification, specifically designed for non-mass breast lesions and integrating clinical and imaging data from multiple modalities, significantly enhances the precision of diagnostic categorization for these lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Prostate and breast cancer screening are prevalent among older adults, even among those unlikely to benefit. We aimed to evaluate why older adults stop cancer screening, including the role of physician recommendations.We used nationally representative data from the 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). We included women aged 76 and older without a history of breast cancer and men aged 71 and older without a history of prostate cancer. The primary outcome was reason for discontinuing screening, categorized as follows: (1) physician recommendation against screening; (2) absence of a recommendation to screen; and (3) patient‐driven reason, such as patient preferences or beliefs. We evaluated reasons for screening discontinuation by health status and educational attainment using age‐stratified multinomial logistic regression.The sample included 7350 participants representing a weighted population of 22,498,715. Overall, 53% of women underwent screening mammography in the past year or intended to continue screening. Among those who stopped screening, 5% reported a recommendation to stop screening from their doctor, 48% reported no recommendation, and 32% reported a patient‐driven reason for cessation. Findings did not differ by educational attainment or health status, including among the oldest patients. For men, 61% were screened with PSA in the past year or intended to continue. Among those who stopped, 3% reported a recommendation against screening, 54% reported no recommendation, and 27% reported a patient‐driven reason for cessation. Men with higher educational attainment were more likely to report that their physician recommended against screening (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.01) and that their doctor did not recommend screening (58% vs. 47%, p = 0.01). Reasons for screening cessation did not differ by health status, including among the oldest patients.Cancer screening remains common, even among those with limited potential for benefit, but discussions around screening cessation are rare. Improving communication between patients and physicians may improve screening decision quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Background Purpose Method Results Conclusion Breast cancer is one of the most diagnosed cancers in Arab countries. Lack of knowledge and awareness regarding breast cancer screening has increased the breast cancer‐related morbidity and mortality.This literature review aimed to assess published research papers with a focus on the levels of knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers of women in Arab countries of the Middle East toward breast cancer and its screening.SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched using specific terms for relevant, quantitative, original studies published between 2017 and 2022. All English articles that matched the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Fourteen studies focusing on knowledge, attitudes, and barriers regarding breast cancer were included. Two independent reviewers performed screening and extraction.Among the reviewed studies, a range from 19.6% in Oman to 67% in Saudi Arabia had poor knowledge of breast cancer. Past personal or family history was a well‐recognized risk factor (n = 5), and being worried about the results was the most common barrier to screening. Although most women were aware of screening methods, the majority did not practice screening. Social media and the internet were the most used sources of information used by women to obtain knowledge regarding breast cancer and its screening (n = 6).Most of the Arab female population had low levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding breast cancer and its screening. Programs designed to raise awareness are necessary, and more policy changes must take place on the national level in Arab, Middle Eastern countries to address the low knowledge, the negative attitudes, and the limited access to breast cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dual-energy subtraction (DES) imaging is critical in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), as the recombination of low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images produces contrast enhancement while reducing anatomical noise. The study's purpose was to compare the performance of the DES algorithm among three different CEM systems using a commercial phantom. Methods: A CIRS Model 022 phantom, designed for CEM, was acquired using all available automatic exposure modes (AECs) with three CEM systems from three different manufacturers (CEM1, CEM2, and CEM3). Three studies were acquired for each system/AEC mode to measure both radiation dose and image quality metrics, including estimation of measurement error. The mean glandular dose (MGD) calculated over the three acquisitions was used as the dosimetry index, while contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was obtained from LE and HE images and DES images and used as an image quality metric. Results: On average, the CNR of LE images of CEM1 was 2.3 times higher than that of CEM2 and 2.7 times higher than that of CEM3. For HE images, the CNR of CEM1 was 2.7 and 3.5 times higher than that of CEM2 and CEM3, respectively. The CNR remained predominantly higher for CEM1 even when measured from DES images, followed by CEM2 and then CEM3. CEM1 delivered the lowest MGD (2.34 ± 0.03 mGy), followed by CEM3 (2.53 ± 0.02 mGy) in default AEC mode, and CEM2 (3.50 ± 0.05 mGy). The doses of CEM2 and CEM3 increased by 49.6% and 8.0% compared with CEM1, respectively. Conclusion: One system outperformed others in DES algorithms, providing higher CNR at lower doses. Relevance statement: This phantom study highlighted the variability in performance among the DES algorithms used by different CEM systems, showing that these differences can be translated in terms of variations in contrast enhancement and radiation dose. Key Points: DES images, obtained by recombining LE and HE images, have a major role in CEM. Differences in radiation dose among CEM systems were between 8.0% and 49.6%. One DES algorithm achieved superior technical performance, providing higher CNR values at a lower radiation dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Numerous underlying causes can lead to inflammatory breast disorders. A wide range of non-specific symptoms may be presenting symptoms, which could cause a delay in diagnosis and thus improper therapy. Studies on artificial intelligence (AI) are rapidly developing and offer a wide range of possible uses in breast imaging. Artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) holds promise in the field of mammography. It demonstrated diagnostic performances that are equivalent to or even better than those achieved by stand-alone methods. The current work aimed to identify whether AI can improve the performance of mammography in diagnosing inflammatory breast diseases and excluding the underlying malignancy in cases resistant to treatment that may reduce the need for interventional procedures such as biopsy. Methods: Our study was a retrograde one done on 34 patients with pathologically proven inflammatory breast lesions. Results: Suppurative breast lesions gave high false positive results. This was also the case with granulomatous mastitis; while simple inflammatory lesions gave true negative results on AI interrogation. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence can be of great value in diagnosing simple inflammatory breast lesions thus following up on such lesions can usually be sufficient without asking for unneeded biopsies. On the other hand, our study showed that AI had high false positive results in suppurative lesions and granulomatous mastitis. Consequently, ultrasonography can be more reliable in their diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Determine the prevalence of breast cancer in male patients treated at the Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Center (CDDCM) of the ISSSTE. Method: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study. All men aged between 18 and 90 years with palpable breast and/or axillary nodule, increased breast volume, nipple discharge, mastalgia, and changes in the skin of the breast who underwent mammography and/or ultrasound studies and biopsy at the CDDCM from January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2023, were included. Descriptive statistical methods were used for data analysis. Results: Forty-two patients were studied. The palpable nodule was the most frequent symptom in 95.2% of the patients. Twenty-eight-point six percent of patients required image-guided biopsy for histopathological correlation. The prevalence of breast cancer was 4%. Conclusion: The prevalence of breast cancer in men was higher than that reported by national reference centers. Breast image studies in men are performed in 100% of cases for diagnostic purposes. Spreading awareness of breast pathology in men will facilitate timely cancer detection in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and various patient-related and technical factors in recombined contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images. Material and Methods: We assessed CESM images from 62 female patients who underwent CESM between May 2017 and October 2019, focusing on factors influencing BPE. A total of 235 images, all acquired using the same mammography machine, were analyzed. A region of interest (ROI) with a standard size of 0.75 to 1 cm2 was used to evaluate the minimal, maximal, and average pixel intensity enhancement. Additionally, the images were qualitatively assessed on a scale from 1 (minimal BPE) to 4 (marked BPE). We examined correlations with body mass index (BMI), age, hematocrit, hemoglobin levels, cardiovascular conditions, and the amount of pressure applied during the examination. Results: Our study identified a significant correlation between the amount of pressure applied during the examination and the BPE (Spearman's ρ = 0.546). Additionally, a significant but weak correlation was observed between BPE and BMI (Spearman's ρ = 0.421). No significant associations were found between BPE and menopausal status, cardiovascular preconditions, hematocrit, hemoglobin levels, breast density, or age. Conclusions: Patient-related and procedural factors significantly influence BPE in CESM images. Specifically, increased applied pressure and BMI are associated with higher BPE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Mastalgia or breast pain is a very common symptom in women attending breast clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether imaging for mastalgia leads to cancer detection in an area where routine breast cancer screening services are underutilized. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was performed between 1st March 2021 to 31st January 2023 at a tertiary care academic institution of central India. All patients underwent through clinical examination by a surgeon. Then patients were referred for ultrasound and/or X-ray mammography (MMG) depending on age. Cancer detection rate was calculated. Results: The final cohort consisted of 176 patients with mastalgia and without any abnormality on clinical breast examination. Sixteen patients had mass lesion on radiology and core needle biopsy resulted as infiltrating duct carcinoma in 7 patients and benign phylloides tumor in one patient. Overall case detection rate for cancer was 4%. Conclusion: The breast cancer detection rate in patients presenting with mastalgia was low. However, in the absence of routine mammographic screening in the Indian general population, these would have been missed. Hence, diagnostic assessment for mastalgia is an appropriate strategy in countries where routine screening MMG is lacking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the predictive capabilities of preoperative mammography, dynamic contrast-enhancedmagnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in determining hormone receptor (HRc) status for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 79 patients who underwent preoperative mammography (MG) and MRI between December 2018 and December 2023 and were subsequently diagnosed with pure DCIS after surgery. The correlation between MG, DCE-MRI, and DWI features and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status was examined. Results: Among the lesions, 44 were double HRc-positive (ER and PR-positive), 13 were single HRc-positive (ER-positive and PR-negative or ERnegative and PR-positive) and 22 were double HRc-negative (ER and PR-negative). The presence of symptom (p = 0.029), the presence of comedo necrosis (p = 0.005) and high histological grade (p<0.001) were found to be associated with ER and PR negativity. Amorphous microcalcifications were more commonly observed in the double HRc-negative group, while linear calcifications were more prevalent in both double and single HRc-positive groups (p = 0.020). Non-mass enhancement (NME) with a linear distribution was significantly more common in double HRc-negative lesions (38%), and NME with a segmental distribution in both double (43%) and single (50%) receptor-positive lesions (p = 0.042). Evaluation of DWI findings revealed that a higher lesion-to-normal breast parenchyma apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio statistically increased the probability of HRc positivity (p = 0.033). Conclusion: Certain clinicopathological, mammography, and MRI features, along with the lesion-to-normal breast parenchyma ADC ratio, can serve as predictors for HRc status in DCIS lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women accounting for about 30% of all new cancer cases and the incidence is constantly increasing. Implementation of mammographic screening has contributed to a reduction in breast cancer mortality of at least 20% over the last 30 years. Screening programs usually include all women irrespective of their risk of developing breast cancer and with age being the only determining factor. This approach has some recognized limitations, including underdiagnosis, false positive cases, and overdiagnosis. Indeed, breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths in women undergoing cancer screening. Supplemental imaging modalities, including digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, breast MRI, and, more recently, contrast-enhanced mammography, are available and have already shown potential to further increase the diagnostic performances. Use of breast MRI is recommended in high-risk women and women with extremely dense breasts. Artificial intelligence has also shown promising results to support risk categorization and interval cancer reduction. The implementation of a risk-stratified approach instead of a "one-size-fits-all" approach may help to improve the benefit-to-harm ratio as well as the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Key Points: Regular mammography should still be considered the mainstay of the breast cancer screening. High-risk women and women with extremely dense breast tissue should use MRI for supplemental screening or US if MRI is not available. Women need to participate actively in the decision to undergo personalized screening. Key recommendations: Mammography is an effective imaging tool to diagnose breast cancer in an early stage and to reduce breast cancer mortality (evidence level I). Until more evidence is available to move to a personalized approach, regular mammography should be considered the mainstay of the breast cancer screening. High-risk women should start screening earlier; first with yearly breast MRI which can be supplemented by yearly or biennial mammography starting at 35–40 years old (evidence level I). Breast MRI screening should be also offered to women with extremely dense breasts (evidence level I). If MRI is not available, ultrasound can be performed as an alternative, although the added value of supplemental ultrasound regarding cancer detection remains limited. Individual screening recommendations should be made through a shared decision-making process between women and physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Evaluate microcalcification detectability in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and synthetic 2D mammography (SM) for different acquisition setups using a virtual imaging trial (VIT) approach. Materials and methods: Medio-lateral oblique (MLO) DBT acquisitions on eight patients were performed at twice the automatic exposure controlled (AEC) dose. The noise was added to the projections to simulate a given dose trajectory. Virtual microcalcification models were added to a given projection set using an in-house VIT framework. Three setups were evaluated: (1) standard acquisition with 25 projections at AEC dose, (2) 25 projections with a convex dose distribution, and (3) sparse setup with 13 projections, every second one over the angular range. The total scan dose and angular range remained constant. DBT volume reconstruction and synthetic mammography image generation were performed using a Siemens prototype algorithm. Lesion detectability was assessed through a Jackknife-alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) study with six observers. Results: For DBT, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97 ± 0.01 for the standard, 0.95 ± 0.02 for the convex, and 0.89 ± 0.03 for the sparse setup. There was no significant difference between standard and convex dose distributions (p = 0.309). Sparse projections significantly reduced detectability (p = 0.001). Synthetic images had a higher AUC with the convex setup, though not significantly (p = 0.435). DBT required four times more reading time than synthetic mammography. Discussion: A convex setup did not significantly improve detectability in DBT compared to the standard setup. Synthetic images exhibited a non-significant increase in detectability with the convex setup. Sparse setup significantly reduced detectability in both DBT and synthetic mammography. Clinical relevance statement: This virtual imaging trial study allowed the design and efficient testing of different dose distribution trajectories with real mammography images, using a dose-neutral protocol. Key Points: • In DBT, a convex dose distribution did not increase the detectability of microcalcifications compared to the current standard setup but increased detectability for the SM images. • A sparse setup decreased microcalcification detectability in both DBT and SM images compared to the convex and current clinical setups. • Optimal microcalcification cluster detection in the system studied was achieved using either the standard or convex dose setting, with the default number of projections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC) are at an increased risk of either a local recurrence or a new primary breast cancer. Thus, surveillance is essential for the detection of recurrent disease at the earliest possible stage, allowing for prompt treatment, and potentially improving overall survival. Nowadays, mammography follow-up is the only surveillance imaging technique recommended by international guidelines. Nevertheless, sensitivity of mammography is lower after breast cancer treatment, particularly during the first 5 years, due to increased density or post-treatment changes. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging techniques, such as MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), are very sensitive to detect malignant enhancement, especially in dense breasts. This Special Report will provide arguments in favor of and against breast cancer follow-up with MRI or CEM, in a debate style between experts in Breast Imaging. Finally, the scientific points of pros and cons arguments will be summarized to help objectively decide the best follow-up strategy for women with a personal history of breast cancer. Clinical relevance statement: A personalized approach to follow-up imaging after conservative breast cancer treatment could optimize patient outcomes, using mammography as a baseline for most patients, and MRI or CEM selectively in patients with higher risks for a recurrence. Key Points: • Women with a personal history of breast cancer are at an increased risk of either a local recurrence or a new primary breast cancer. • Breast cancer survivors may benefit from additional imaging with MRI/CEM, in case of increased risk of a second breast cancer, with dense breasts or a cancer diagnosis before age 50 years. • As survival after local recurrence seems to depend on the initial stage at diagnosis, imaging should be more focused on detecting tumors in the earliest stages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to classify breast cancer by mammographic density in an organized screening program. Materials and method: We included information about 99,489 examinations from 74,941 women who participated in BreastScreen Norway, 2013–2019. All examinations were analyzed with an AI system that assigned a malignancy risk score (AI score) from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) for each examination. Mammographic density was classified into Volpara density grade (VDG), VDG1–4; VDG1 indicated fatty and VDG4 extremely dense breasts. Screen-detected and interval cancers with an AI score of 1–10 were stratified by VDG. Results: We found 10,406 (10.5% of the total) examinations to have an AI risk score of 10, of which 6.7% (704/10,406) was breast cancer. The cancers represented 89.7% (617/688) of the screen-detected and 44.6% (87/195) of the interval cancers. 20.3% (20,178/99,489) of the examinations were classified as VDG1 and 6.1% (6047/99,489) as VDG4. For screen-detected cancers, 84.0% (68/81, 95% CI, 74.1–91.2) had an AI score of 10 for VDG1, 88.9% (328/369, 95% CI, 85.2–91.9) for VDG2, 92.5% (185/200, 95% CI, 87.9–95.7) for VDG3, and 94.7% (36/38, 95% CI, 82.3–99.4) for VDG4. For interval cancers, the percentages with an AI score of 10 were 33.3% (3/9, 95% CI, 7.5–70.1) for VDG1 and 48.0% (12/25, 95% CI, 27.8–68.7) for VDG4. Conclusion: The tested AI system performed well according to cancer detection across all density categories, especially for extremely dense breasts. The highest proportion of screen-detected cancers with an AI score of 10 was observed for women classified as VDG4. Clinical relevance statement: Our study demonstrates that AI can correctly classify the majority of screen-detected and about half of the interval breast cancers, regardless of breast density. Key Points: • Mammographic density is important to consider in the evaluation of artificial intelligence in mammographic screening. • Given a threshold representing about 10% of those with the highest malignancy risk score by an AI system, we found an increasing percentage of cancers with increasing mammographic density. • Artificial intelligence risk score and mammographic density combined may help triage examinations to reduce workload for radiologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has an aggressive clinical behaviour, with advanced stages at initial diagnostic evaluation, early recurrences and poor survival, so the purpose was to determine the clinical and radiological manifestations associated with TNBC. Materials and methods: A case-control study in women diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2015 to August 2022 at the 'Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del Norte'. We classified cases (Triple Negative subtype) and controls (Luminal A, Luminal B and HER2) according to immunohistochemistry ical analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The medical reports of 88 cases and 236 controls were reviewed. Cases were more likely to report pain (p = 0.001), nodules on ultrasound (p = 0.01) and mammography (p = 0.003), superior median size (p < 0.05), posterior enhancement (p = 0.001) and moderate density (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified that TNBC was more likely to have a nodular type lesion by ultrasound (OR: 9.73, 95% CI: 1.10--86.16; p = 0.04), ultrasound lesion larger than 36 mm (OR: 4.99, 95% CI: 1.75-14.17; p = 0.003) and moderate density (OR: 3.83, 95% CI: 1.44-10.14; p = 0.007). Conclusion: There are particular clinical and imaging manifestations of TNBC, showing that radiological lesions that presented characteristics in ultrasound as nodular type lesions larger than 36 mm and in mammography moderate grade density, were associated with this subtype of breast tumours in a Peruvian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Correct alignment of the image receptor (IR) in mammography for the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view of the breast is fundamental to enable the maximum inclusion of breast tissue. This study aims to assess Australian radiographers' knowledge and digital era practice in selecting the IR angle for female body habitus in the MLO view of the breast. An online survey was distributed to all members of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) through their electronic newsletter and via direct email to radiographers holding the Certificate of Mammographic Practice (CMP). Descriptive analysis was undertaken, and a Pearson's chi-squared test of independence was used to compare associations between academic qualification and IR selection data. A value of p < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. A total of 107 valid surveys were returned; 67.3 % reported using the posterior lateral margin to select the IR angle. For linear body habitus, 44.9 % reported using 50°; for all other body habitus, participants most commonly used 45° (59.1 %); 85.1 % used a range of angles between 40 and 55°; 16.8 % recognised the link between correct IR angle selection and breast tissue inclusion. The range of angles used in practice has reduced in the digital era; the frequency of the use of 45° across all body habitus may reflect tube angle movement automation. Few radiographers recognised the important link between correct selection of IR angle and breast tissue inclusion on the image. Understanding of the link between IR angle selection and image quality enhances current practice in the digital era to maximise the inclusion of breast tissue and minimise the potential of missed breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extremely dense breasts can be an independent risk factor for breast cancer. A new FDA rule requires that patients be notified of their breast density and the possible benefits of additional imaging to screen for breast cancer. Clinicians should be cognizant of the data about breast cancer risk, breast density, and recommendations to change screening techniques if patients, particularly premenopausal females, have extremely dense breasts but no other known risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI compared with mammography in women with a family history of breast cancer included in the Croatian National Breast Screening Program. Methods: 178 women with a family history of breast cancer aged 50 to 69 underwent abbreviated breast MRI and mammography. Radiological findings for each method were categorized according to the BI-RADS classification. The gold standard for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI and mammography, in terms of suspicious BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 findings, was the histopathological diagnosis. Performance measures, including cancer detection rates, specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values, were calculated for both imaging methods. Results: Twelve new cases of breast cancer were detected, with seven (58.3%) identified only by abbreviated breast MRI, four (33.3%) detected by both mammography and breast MRI, and one (8.3%) diagnosed only by mammography. Diagnostic accuracy parameters for abbreviated breast MRI were 91.67% sensitivity, 94.58% specificity, 55.0% positive predictive value (PPV), and 99.37% negative predictive value (NPV), while for mammography, the corresponding values were 41.67%, 96.39%, 45.46%, and 95.81%, respectively. Conclusions: Abbreviated breast MRI is a useful supplement to screening mammography in women with a family history of breast cancer. Considering the results of the conducted research, it is recommended to assess whether women with a family history of breast cancer have an increased risk and subsequently provide annual abbreviated breast MRI in addition to mammography for early detection of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is the second most prevalent cause of cancer death and the most common malignancy among women, posing a life-threatening risk. Treatment for breast cancer can be highly effective, with a survival chance of 90% or higher, especially when the disease is detected early. This paper introduces a groundbreaking deep U-Net framework for mammography breast cancer images to perform automatic detection of abnormalities. The objective is to provide segmented images that show areas of tumors more accurately than other deep learning techniques. The proposed framework consists of three steps. The first step is image preprocessing using the Li algorithm to minimize the cross-entropy between the foreground and the background, contrast enhancement using contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), normalization, and median filtering. The second step involves data augmentation to mitigate overfitting and underfitting, and the final step is implementing a convolutional encoder-decoder network-based U-Net architecture, characterized by high precision in medical image analysis. The framework has been tested on two comprehensive public datasets, namely INbreast and CBIS-DDSM. Several metrics have been adopted for quantitative performance assessment, including the Dice score, sensitivity, Hausdorff distance, Jaccard coefficient, precision, and F1 score. Quantitative results on the INbreast dataset show an average Dice score of 85.61% and a sensitivity of 81.26%. On the CBIS-DDSM dataset, the average Dice score is 87.98%, and the sensitivity reaches 90.58%. The experimental results ensure earlier and more accurate abnormality detection. Furthermore, the success of the proposed deep learning framework in mammography shows promise for broader applications in medical imaging, potentially revolutionizing various radiological practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Covid-19 infection influenced the screening test rate of breast cancer worldwide due to the quarantine measures, routine procedures reduction, and delay of early diagnosis, causing high mortality risk and severity of the disease. X-ray mammography is the gold standard for diagnosing early signs of breast cancer, and Artificial Intelligence enables the detection of suspicious lesions and classifying them in terms of malignancy. This paper aimed to investigate mass detection and classification in a large-scale OPTIMAM dataset with 6000 cases and extracted 3524 images with masses in the mammograms of the Hologic manufacturer. The methodology of the detection step is to train the RetinaNet architecture of ResNet50, ResNet101, and ResNet152 backbones with three types of initializations by ImageNet and COCO weights and from scratch. The dataset was pre-processed to generate two types of input with entire mammograms and patches, which are stated as the first and the second approaches. The results show that in the first approach, RetinaNet of ResNet50 backbone with ImageNet and COCO weights and ResNet152 with the same weights performed 0.91 True Positive Rate at 0.78 False Positive Per Image, respectively. In contrast, in the second approach, ResNet152 with ImageNet weights reached 0.88 TPR at 0.78 FPPI. In the classification step, the Transfer Learning approach was applied with fine-tuning by adding L2-regularization and class weights to balance class distribution in the datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer mortality reduction progress has halted in recent years. The mortality rate was rising, and breast cancer was the leading cause of death among women. Early diagnosis is critical in treatment since it can prevent complications and heavy pathologic therapy. Many Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems were developed for this purpose. However, to produce more accurate findings, it must continue to be enhanced by adopting new methodologies. To efficiently handle semantic segmentation in a predicted image, we propose a novel Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) called DEES-Breast that presents an End-to-End system for an early breast cancer detection from mammographic scans. The DEES-Breast uses an encoder-decoder architecture to identify relevant features from scans at several scales and upsample them to generate the best segmentation results. The main advantage of the proposed architecture is the skip connection mode within the decoder and encoder layers, which merges high-level features encoded with low-level features decoded from the decoder. The CNN used at the encoder tries to admit relevant studies having similar contrast values using thirteen convolutional layers and three fully connected layers. Various complex preprocessing methods were carefully used to enhance the model's performance. These methods included various procedures, such as image cropping, CLAHE enhancement, artifact removal, etc., and allowed us to create a well-prepared dataset for training and testing. Geometric data augmentations were carefully integrated into the pipeline to improve generalization capabilities and reduce overfitting. CBIS-DDSM images and a private database were used to test our suggested architecture comprehensively. Quantitative criteria for evaluating segmentation outcomes, such as Dice coefficient, precision, and recall, are all above 90%, demonstrating that the proposed architecture system can differentiate functional tissues in breast mammogram images. As a result, our proposed architecture has the potential to offer the classification required to aid in the clinical detection of breast cancer while also improving imaging in other modalities of medical mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Imaging of the postoperative breast is a challenging issue for the interpreting physician with many variable findings that may require additional assessment through targeted ultrasound, more mammography views, or other investigations. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a fast-developing field with various applications in the breast imaging including the detection and classification of lesions, the prediction of therapy response, and the prediction of breast cancer risk. This study aimed to identify whether Artificial Intelligence improves the mammographic detection and diagnosis of breast post-operative changes and hence improves follow-up and diagnostic workflow and reduces the need for additional exposure to extra radiation or contrast material doses as in Contrast Enhanced Mammography, and the need for interventional procedures as biopsy. Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study included 66 female patients following breast-conserving surgeries coming with breast complaints or for follow-up, with mammographically diagnosed changes. Results: Mammography had a sensitivity of 91.7%, a specificity of 94.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.6%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%, and an accuracy of 93.9%, while the AI method indices were sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 92.6%, (PPV) 73.3%, (NPV) 98%, and accuracy 92.4%. The calculated cut-off point for the quantitative AI (probability of malignancy "POM" score) was 51.5%. There was a statistically significantly higher average in the percentage of POM in malignant cases (76.5 ± 27.3%) compared to benign cases (27.1 ± 19.7%). However, the final indices for the combined use of mammography and (AI) were sensitivity 100%, specificity 88.9%, (PPV) 66.7%, (NPV) 100%, and accuracy 90.9%. Conclusion: Applying the AI algorithm on mammograms showed positive impacts on the sensitivity of the post-operative breast assessment, with an excellent reduction of the mammographic missed cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to the survey of World Health Organization (WHO), in 2020 there are 2.3 million women found with breast cancer and 685,000 deaths in world wide. 81% women get affected with cancer over the age of 50 at the time of detection. Breast cancer is the world's number 2 cancer and number 1 cancer in India and 66% survival rate in India is very low if compare to 90% in U.S and 90.2% in Australia. However, treatment for this cancer has possibility of 90% or more. So that, it need to be detect the cancer at very early stage to overcome the death rate. Main objective of this research to design a Breast Cancer diagnose system using image processing and deep learning which can be helpful for radiologist and physician for treating the diagnosis. Basically, Deep learning is a fast-developing fashion inside the health care enterprise and facilitates medical experts to examine records and pick out trends. And image processing plays vital role for enhancing the quality of image by removing noise which is very helpful for better abnormality classification. Now a days Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) are very popular due to its better performance. In this work, we have used transfer learning with pre-trained VGG16 model. At initial testing stage, the model shows the over-fitting and after that performance improved. Hence we achieved better results by using this approach on DDSM and UPMC data-sets for breast cancer classification. Classifier classify the images into four classes as asymmetry, calcification, carcinoma and mass. Initially 2276 images were taken and divided into 80%-20% ratio. The accuracy achieved by this approach varied from 92% to 95%. We have also used transfer learning with VGG19 and ResNet50 for comparison and found VGG16 much powerful among them. We found, transfer learning with VGG16 giving better results on DDSM and UPMC data-sets. However, breast cancer divided into different categories according to its type, grade or stage of abnormalities, severity of cancer, aggressiveness of cancerous cells, presence/absence of gene etc. Hence classification can be done basis on other types of abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The development and optimization of novel diagnostic imaging prototypes heavily rely on experimental work. In radiology, this experimental work involves the use of phantoms. When testing novel techniques to demonstrate their advantages, anthropomorphic phantoms are utilized. The aim of this study was to investigate seven materials for 3D printing to replicate the radiological properties of breast lesions. Methods: To achieve this objective, we utilized three fused filament fabrication materials, namely, polylactic acid (PLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G), along with resins such as White v4 Resin, Flexible 80A v1 Resin, Model v2 Resin, and Wax40 v1 Resin, to 3D print seven irregularly shaped lesions. These lesions were used to prepare a set of seven physical phantoms, each filled with either water or liquid paraffin, and one of the printed lesions. The phantoms were then scanned using a mammography unit at 28 kVp. Additionally, six computational breast phantoms, replicating the shape of the physical phantoms, were generated. These computational models were assigned the attenuating properties of various breast tissues, including glandular tissue, adipose tissue, skin, and lesions. Mammography images were generated under the same experimental conditions as the physical scans. Both the simulated and experimental images were evaluated for their contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and contrast (C). Discussion: The results indicated that the studied resins and filament-based materials are all suitable for replicating breast lesions. Among these, PLA and White v4 Resin exhibited the densest formations and can effectively approximate breast lesions that are slightly less attenuating than glandular tissue, while ABS and Flexible 80A v1 Resin were the least dense and can represent fat-containing breast lesions. The remaining materials provided good approximations for malignant lesions. These materials can be utilized for constructing phantoms for experimental work, rendering the model a valuable tool for optimizing mammography protocols, ensuring quality control of mammography X-ray equipment, and aiding in the diagnosis and assessment of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Taiwan implemented the Cancer Screening Quality Improvement Program (CAQIP) in 2010. The program sought to enhance mass breast cancer screening accessibility. This study aimed to examine socioeconomic disparities in outreach screening utilization pre-CAQIP (2005–2009) and post-CAQIP (2010–2014). Method: We conducted a nationwide population-based observational study in Taiwan, analyzing four population databases to evaluate socioeconomic disparities among women aged 50 to 69 years undergoing their first mammography screening pre-CAQIP. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine changes in utilization of outreach screening pre- and post-CAQIP implementation, and to estimate the Slope Index of Inequity (SII) and Relative Index of Inequity (RII) values. Results: Utilization of outreach screening through mobile mammography units (MMUs) increased from 6.12 to 32.87% between the two periods. Following CAQIP, a higher proportion of screened women were older, less educated, and from suburban or rural areas. The SII and RII for age, income, and urbanization levels decreased post-CAQIP. However, regarding education level, SII was − 0.592 and RII was 0.392 in the pre-CAQIP period, increasing to -0.173 and 0.804 post-CAQIP, respectively. Conclusions: Our study observed that utilization of outreach screening through MMUs increased after CAQIP. The MMUs made outreach screening services more accessible in Taiwan. Expanding outreach screening services and educational programs to promote mammography uptake in local communities could help reduce the potential effect of socioeconomic disparities, and thus may enhance early detection of breast cancer. Further study could focus on the accessibility of outreach screening and breast cancer outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Risk-stratified approaches to breast screening show promise for increasing benefits and reducing harms. But the successful implementation of such an approach will rely on public acceptability. To date, research suggests that while increased screening for women at high risk will be acceptable, any de-intensification of screening for low-risk groups may be met with less enthusiasm. We report findings from a population-based survey of women in England, approaching the age of eligibility for breast screening, to compare the acceptability of current age-based screening with two hypothetical risk-adapted approaches for women at low risk of breast cancer. Methods: An online survey of 1,579 women aged 40–49 with no personal experience of breast cancer or mammography. Participants were recruited via a market research panel, using target quotas for educational attainment and ethnic group, and were randomised to view information about (1) standard NHS age-based screening; (2) a later screening start age for low-risk women; or (3) a longer screening interval for low-risk women. Primary outcomes were cognitive, emotional, and global acceptability. ANOVAs and multiple regression were used to compare acceptability between groups and explore demographic and psychosocial factors associated with acceptability. Results: All three screening approaches were judged to be acceptable on the single-item measure of global acceptability (mean score > 3 on a 5-point scale). Scores for all three measures of acceptability were significantly lower for the risk-adapted scenarios than for age-based screening. There were no differences between the two risk-adapted scenarios. In multivariable analysis, higher breast cancer knowledge was positively associated with cognitive and emotional acceptability of screening approach. Willingness to undergo personal risk assessment was not associated with experimental group. Conclusion: We found no difference in the acceptability of later start age vs. longer screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer in a large sample of women who were screening naïve. Although acceptability of both risk-adapted scenarios was lower than for standard age-based screening, overall acceptability was reasonable. The positive associations between knowledge and both cognitive and emotional acceptability suggests clear and reassuring communication about the rationale for de-intensified screening may enhance acceptability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of three two-dimensional (2D) mammographic acquisition techniques on image quality and radiation dose in the presence of silicone breast implants (BIs). Then, we propose and validate a new International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) phantom to reproduce these techniques. Images were acquired on a single Hologic Selenia Dimensions® unit. The mammography of the left breast of a single clinical case was included. Three methods of image acquisition were identified. They were based on misused, recommended, and reference settings. In the clinical case, image criteria scoring and the signal-to-noise ratio on breast tissue (SNRBT) were determined for two 2D projections and compared between the three techniques. The phantom study first compared the reference and misused settings by varying the AEC sensor position and, second, the recommended settings with a reduced current-time product (mAs) setting that was 13% lower. The signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) and detectability indexes at 0.1 mm (d' 0.1 mm) and 0.25 mm (d' 0.25 mm) were automatically quantified using ATIA software. Average glandular dose (AGD) values were collected for each acquisition. A statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis and corrected Dunn tests (p < 0.05). The SNRBT was 2.6 times lower and the AGD was −18% lower with the reference settings compared to the recommended settings. The SNRBT values increased by +98% with the misused compared to the recommended settings. The AGD increased by +79% with the misused settings versus the recommended settings. The median values of the reference settings were 5.8 (IQR 5.7–5.9), 1.2 (IQR 0.0), 7.0 (IQR 6.8–7.2) and 1.2 (IQR 0.0) mGy and were significantly lower than those of the misused settings (p < 0.03): 7.9 (IQR 6.1–9.7), 1.6 (IQR 1.3–1.9), 9.2 (IQR 7.5–10.9) and 2.2 (IQR 1.4–3.0) mGy for the SDNR, d' 0.1 mm, d' 0.25 mm and the AGD, respectively. A comparison of the recommended and reduced settings showed a reduction of −6.1 ± 0.6% (p = 0.83), −7.7 ± 0.0% (p = 0.18), −6.4 ± 0.6% (p = 0.19) and −13.3 ± 1.1% (p = 0.53) for the SDNR, d' 0.1 mm, d' 0.25 mm and the AGD, respectively. This study showed that the IAEA phantom could be used to reproduce the three techniques for acquiring 2D mammography images in the presence of breast implants for raising awareness and for educational purposes. It could also be used to evaluate and optimize the manufacturer's recommended settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mobile health apps are widely used for breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence algorithms, providing radiologists with second opinions and reducing false diagnoses. This study aims to develop an open-source mobile app named "BraNet" for 2D breast imaging segmentation and classification using deep learning algorithms. During the phase off-line, an SNGAN model was previously trained for synthetic image generation, and subsequently, these images were used to pre-trained SAM and ResNet18 segmentation and classification models. During phase online, the BraNet app was developed using the react native framework, offering a modular deep-learning pipeline for mammography (DM) and ultrasound (US) breast imaging classification. This application operates on a client–server architecture and was implemented in Python for iOS and Android devices. Then, two diagnostic radiologists were given a reading test of 290 total original RoI images to assign the perceived breast tissue type. The reader's agreement was assessed using the kappa coefficient. The BraNet App Mobil exhibited the highest accuracy in benign and malignant US images (94.7%/93.6%) classification compared to DM during training I (80.9%/76.9%) and training II (73.7/72.3%). The information contrasts with radiological experts' accuracy, with DM classification being 29%, concerning US 70% for both readers, because they achieved a higher accuracy in US ROI classification than DM images. The kappa value indicates a fair agreement (0.3) for DM images and moderate agreement (0.4) for US images in both readers. It means that not only the amount of data is essential in training deep learning algorithms. Also, it is vital to consider the variety of abnormalities, especially in the mammography data, where several BI-RADS categories are present (microcalcifications, nodules, mass, asymmetry, and dense breasts) and can affect the API accuracy model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Insight into the aggressiveness of potential breast cancers found in screening may optimize recall decisions. Specific growth rate (SGR), measured on mammograms, may provide valuable prognostic information. This study addresses the association of SGR with prognostic factors and overall survival in patients with invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) from a screened population. Methods: In this historic cohort study, 293 women with NST were identified from all participants in the Nijmegen screening program (2003–2007). Information on clinicopathological factors was retrieved from patient files and follow-up on vital status through municipalities. On consecutive mammograms, tumor volumes were estimated. After comparing five growth functions, SGR was calculated using the best-fitting function. Regression and multivariable survival analyses described associations between SGR and prognostic factors as well as overall survival. Results: Each one standard deviation increase in SGR was associated with an increase in the Nottingham prognostic index by 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21–0.46]. Each one standard deviation increase in SGR increased the odds of a tumor with an unfavorable subtype (based on histologic grade and hormone receptors; odds ratio 2.14 [95% CI: 1.45–3.15]) and increased the odds of diagnosis as an interval cancer (versus screen-detected; odds ratio 1.57 [95% CI: 1.20–2.06]). After a median of 12.4 years of follow-up, 78 deaths occurred. SGR was not associated with overall survival (hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI: 0.87–1.43]). Conclusions: SGR may indicate prognostically relevant differences in tumor aggressiveness if serial mammograms are available. A potential association with cause-specific survival could not be determined and is of interest for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Many population-based breast screening programmes temporarily suspended routine screening following the COVID-19 pandemic onset. This study aimed to describe screening mammography utilisation and the pattern of screen-detected breast cancer diagnoses following COVID-19-related screening disruptions in Ireland. Methods: Using anonymous aggregate data from women invited for routine screening, three time periods were examined: (1) January–December 2019, (2) January–December 2020, and (3) January–December 2021. Descriptive statistics were conducted and comparisons between groups were performed using chi-square tests. Results: In 2020, screening mammography capacity fell by 67.1% compared to 2019; recovering to 75% of mammograms performed in 2019, during 2021. Compared to 2019, for screen-detected invasive breast cancers, a reduction in Grade 1 (14.2% vs. 17.2%) and Grade 2 tumours (53.4% vs. 58.0%) and an increase in Grade 3 tumours (32.4% vs. 24.8%) was observed in 2020 (p = 0.03); whereas an increase in Grade 2 tumours (63.3% vs. 58.0%) and a reduction in Grade 3 tumours (19.6% vs. 24.8%) was found in 2021 (p = 0.02). No changes in oestrogen receptor-positive or nodal-positive diagnoses were observed; however the proportion of oestrogen/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancers significantly increased in 2020 (76.2%; p < 0.01) and 2021 (78.7%; p < 0.001) compared to 2019 (67.8%). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate signs of a grade change for screen-detected invasive breast cancers early in the pandemic, with recovery evident in 2021, and without an increase in nodal positivity. Future studies are needed to determine the COVID-19 impact on long-term breast cancer outcomes including mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the location of AI markings on screening mammograms with cancer location on diagnostic mammograms, and to classify interval cancers with high AI score as false negative, minimal sign, or true negative. Methods: In a retrospective study from 2022, we compared the performance of an AI system with independent double reading according to cancer detection. We found 93% (880/949) of the screen-detected cancers, and 40% (122/305) of the interval cancers to have the highest AI risk score (AI score of 10). In this study, four breast radiologists reviewed mammograms from 126 randomly selected screen-detected cancers and all 120 interval cancers with an AI score of 10. The location of the AI marking was stated as correct/not correct in craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique view. Interval cancers with an AI score of 10 were classified as false negative, minimal sign significant/non-specific, or true negative. Results: All screen-detected cancers and 78% (93/120) of the interval cancers with an AI score of 10 were correctly located by the AI system. The AI markings matched in both views for 79% (100/126) of the screen-detected cancers and 22% (26/120) of the interval cancers. For interval cancers with an AI score of 10, 11% (13/120) were correctly located and classified as false negative, 10% (12/120) as minimal sign significant, 26% (31/120) as minimal sign non-specific, and 31% (37/120) as true negative. Conclusion: AI markings corresponded to cancer location for all screen-detected cancers and 78% of the interval cancers with high AI score, indicating a potential for reducing the number of interval cancers. However, it is uncertain whether interval cancers with subtle findings in only one view are actionable for recall in a true screening setting. Clinical relevance statement: In this study, AI markings corresponded to the location of the cancer in a high percentage of cases, indicating that the AI system accurately identifies the cancer location in mammograms with a high AI score. Key Points: • All screen-detected and 78% of the interval cancers with high AI risk score (AI score of 10) had AI markings in one or two views corresponding to the location of the cancer on diagnostic images. • Among all 120 interval cancers with an AI score of 10, 21% (25/120) were classified as a false negative or minimal sign significant and had AI markings matching the cancer location, suggesting they may be visible on prior screening. • Most of the correctly located interval cancers matched only in one view, and the majority were classified as either true negative or minimal sign non-specific, indicating low potential for being detected earlier in a real screening setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the early-detection capabilities of AI in a screening program over its duration, with a specific focus on the detection of interval cancers, the early detection of cancers with the assistance of AI from prior visits, and its impact on workload for various reading scenarios. Materials and methods: The study included 22,621 mammograms of 8825 women within a 10-year biennial two-reader screening program. The statistical analysis focused on 5136 mammograms from 4282 women due to data retrieval issues, among whom 105 were diagnosed with breast cancer. The AI software assigned scores from 1 to 100. Histopathology results determined the ground truth, and Youden's index was used to establish a threshold. Tumor characteristics were analyzed with ANOVA and chi-squared test, and different workflow scenarios were evaluated using bootstrapping. Results: The AI software achieved an AUC of 89.6% (86.1–93.2%, 95% CI). The optimal threshold was 30.44, yielding 72.38% sensitivity and 92.86% specificity. Initially, AI identified 57 screening-detected cancers (83.82%), 15 interval cancers (51.72%), and 4 missed cancers (50%). AI as a second reader could have led to earlier diagnosis in 24 patients (average 29.92 ± 19.67 months earlier). No significant differences were found in cancer-characteristics groups. A hybrid triage workflow scenario showed a potential 69.5% reduction in workload and a 30.5% increase in accuracy. Conclusion: This AI system exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in screening mammograms, effectively identifying interval and missed cancers and identifying 23% of cancers earlier in prior mammograms. Adopting AI as a triage mechanism has the potential to reduce workload by nearly 70%. Clinical relevance statement: The study proposes a more efficient method for screening programs, both in terms of workload and accuracy. Key Points: • Incorporating AI as a triage tool in screening workflow improves sensitivity (72.38%) and specificity (92.86%), enhancing detection rates for interval and missed cancers. • AI-assisted triaging is effective in differentiating low and high-risk cases, reduces radiologist workload, and potentially enables broader screening coverage. • AI has the potential to facilitate early diagnosis compared to human reading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to develop a multi-modality model to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis by combining clinical predictors with radiomic features from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography (MMG) in breast cancer. This model might potentially eliminate unnecessary axillary surgery in cases without ALN metastasis, thereby minimizing surgery-related complications. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 485 breast cancer patients from two hospitals and extracted radiomics features from tumor and lymph node regions on MRI and MMG images. After feature selection, three random forest models were built using the retained features, respectively. Significant clinical factors were integrated with these radiomics models to construct a multi-modality model. The multi-modality model was compared to radiologists' diagnoses on axillary ultrasound and MRI. It was also used to assist radiologists in making a secondary diagnosis on MRI. Results: The multi-modality model showed superior performance with AUCs of 0.964 in the training cohort, 0.916 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.892 in the external validation cohort. It surpassed single-modality models and radiologists' ALN diagnosis on MRI and axillary ultrasound in all validation cohorts. Additionally, the multi-modality model improved radiologists' MRI-based ALN diagnostic ability, increasing the average accuracy from 70.70 to 78.16% for radiologist A and from 75.42 to 81.38% for radiologist B. Conclusion: The multi-modality model can predict ALN metastasis of breast cancer accurately. Moreover, the artificial intelligence (AI) model also assisted the radiologists to improve their diagnostic ability on MRI. Clinical relevance statement: The multi-modality model based on both MRI and mammography images allows preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. With the assistance of the model, the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists can be further improved. Key Points: • We developed a novel multi-modality model that combines MRI and mammography radiomics with clinical factors to accurately predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis, which has not been previously reported. • Our multi-modality model outperformed both the radiologists' ALN diagnosis based on MRI and axillary ultrasound, as well as single-modality radiomics models based on MRI or mammography. • The multi-modality model can serve as a potential decision support tool to improve the radiologists' ALN diagnosis on MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) addresses food insecurity for low-income households, which is associated with access to care. Many US states expanded SNAP access through policies eliminating the asset test (ie, restrictions based on SNAP applicant assets) and/or broadening income eligibility. The objective of this study was to determine whether state SNAP policies were associated with the use of mammography among women eligible for breast cancer screening. Data for income-eligible women 40 to 79 years of age were obtained from the 2006 to 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Difference-in-differences analyses were conducted to compare changes in the percentage of mammography in the past year from pre- to post-SNAP policy adoption (asset test elimination or income eligibility increase) between states that and did not adopt policies expanding SNAP eligibility. In total, 171,684 and 294,647 income-eligible female respondents were included for the asset test elimination policy and income eligibility increase policy analyses, respectively. Mammography within 1 year was reported by 58.4%. Twenty-eight and 22 states adopted SNAP asset test elimination and income increase policies, respectively. Adoption of asset test elimination policies was associated with a 2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-4.15; P =.043) percentage point increase in mammography received within 1 year, particularly for nonmetropolitan residents (4.14 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.07-7.21 percentage points; P =.008), those with household incomes <$25,000 (2.82 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.68-4.97 percentage points; P =.01), and those residing in states in the South (3.08 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.17-5.99 percentage points; P =.038) or that did not expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (3.35 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.36-6.34; P =.028). There was no significant association between mammography and state-level policies broadening of SNAP income eligibility. State policies eliminating asset test requirements for SNAP eligibility were associated with increased mammography among low-income women eligible for breast cancer screening, particularly for those in the lowest income bracket or residing in nonmetropolitan areas or Medicaid nonexpansion states. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer screening trends of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people remain largely unknown. This is concerning, as data are necessary to inform recommendations made by clinicians to their patients and by national guidelines to clinicians. The aim of this review is to explore the state of existing research literature and provide a summary report of current breast cancer screening rates in TGD adults. All articles were identified using Medical Subject Headings terms. Inclusion criteria were all the following: (1) documents inclusion of at least one participant who identifies as a TGD person; (2) at least one TGD participant with top surgery or currently receiving estrogen-based gender-affirming hormone therapy; (3) results that report rates of breast cancer screening or mammogram referral. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria, six cross-sectional studies and six retrospective chart reviews. Three studies conducted secondary analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System national dataset, and nine articles recruited their own sample with number of TGD participants ranging from 30 to 1,822 and number of cisgender women ranging from 242 to 18,275. Three studies found lower rates of screening in transfeminine persons receiving gender-affirming care compared with cisgender women; two studies found lower rates among TGD people compared with cisgender women; and three studies found no differences between the breast cancer screening rates of TGD and cisgender participants. Limited studies recruit and report trends in breast cancer screening of TGD people. Those that do include TGD participants have mixed results, but overall TGD people had lower rates of breast cancer screening. More research is needed regarding breast cancer screening of TGD people to inform the development of protocols that ensure equitable access to preventative care. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast radiologists encounter unusual lesions, which may not be well described in the literature. Previously based on histologic and molecular classifications, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors has become increasingly multidisciplinary. Familiarity with imaging features and basic pathology of infrequent breast lesions, as well as their current classification according to the WHO, may help the radiologist evaluate biopsy results for concordance and help direct the management of uncommon breast lesions. This review article provides a case-based review of imaging features and WHO histologic classification of rare breast tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dedicated breast CT is an imaging modality that provides true 3D imaging of the breast with many advantages over current conventional breast imaging modalities. The addition of intravascular contrast increases the sensitivity of breast CT substantially. As such, there are immediate potential applications in the clinical workflow. These include using breast CT to replace much of the traditional diagnostic workup when faced with indeterminate breast lesions. Contrast-enhanced breast CT may be appropriate as a supplemental screening tool for women at high risk of breast cancer, similar to breast MRI. In addition, emerging studies are demonstrating the utility of breast CT in neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumor response monitoring as well as planning for surgical treatment options. While short exam times and fully 3D imaging in a noncompressed position are advantages of this modality, limited coverage of chest wall/axilla due to prone positioning and use of ionizing radiation are drawbacks. To date, several studies have reported on the performance characteristics of this promising modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer remains a substantial public health challenge, marked by a rising prevalence. Accurate early detection is paramount for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes in breast cancer. The diversity of breast tumors and the complexity of their microenvironment present significant challenges. Establishing a reliable breast calcification and micro-calcification detection approach is an ongoing issue that researchers must continue to investigate. The goal is to develop an effective methodology that contributes to increased patient survival. Therefore, this paper introduces a novel approach for classifying breast calcifications in mammography, aiming to distinguish between benign and malignant cases. Aiming to address these challenges, we proposed our hybrid approach for breast calcification classification in mammogram images. The proposed approach starts with an image pre-processing phase that includes noise reduction and enhancement filters. Afterward, we proposed our hybrid classification architecture. It includes two branches: First, the vision transformer (ViT++) branch for contextual features. Secondly, a CNN branch based on transfer learning techniques for visual features. Using the CBIS-DDSM dataset, the application of our proposed ViT++ architecture reached the maximum accuracy of 96.12%. Further, the application of the VGG16 as a single feature extractor had a much lower accuracy of 61.96%. Meanwhile, the combination of these techniques in the same architecture improved the accuracy to 99.22%. Three different pre-trained feature extractors were applied in the CNN branch: Xception, VGG16, and RegNetX002. However, the best-obtained outcomes were from the combination of the ViT++ and the VGG16. The experimental findings indicate that the proposed strategy for breast calcification detection has the potential to surpass the performance of currently top-ranked methods, particularly in terms of classification accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mammography (MG) has demonstrated its effectiveness in diminishing mortality and advanced-stage breast cancer incidences in breast screening initiatives. Notably, research has accentuated the superior diagnostic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). However, the scope of evidence validating the cost-effectiveness of DBT remains limited, prompting a requisite for more comprehensive investigation. The present study aimed to rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DBT plus MG (DBT-MG) compared to MG alone within the framework of Taiwan's National Health Insurance program. Methods: All parameters for the Markov decision tree model, encompassing event probabilities, costs, and utilities (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs), were sourced from reputable literature, expert opinions, and official records. With 10,000 iterations, a 2-year cycle length, a 30-year time horizon, and a 2% annual discount rate, the analysis determined the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to compare the cost-effectiveness of the two screening methods. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of findings. Results: The ICER of DBT-MG compared to MG was US$5971.5764/QALYs. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$33,004 (Gross Domestic Product of Taiwan in 2021) per QALY, more than 98% of the probabilistic simulations favored adopting DBT-MG versus MG. The one-way sensitivity analysis also shows that the ICER depended heavily on recall rates, biopsy rates, and positive predictive value (PPV2). Conclusion: DBT-MG shows enhanced diagnostic efficacy, potentially diminishing recall costs. While exhibiting a higher biopsy rate, DBT-MG aids in the detection of early-stage breast cancers, reduces recall rates, and exhibits notably superior cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]