Search

Purpose: Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) is the first-choice treatment in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), when curative options are unavailable. However, reliable biomarkers for patient selection are still lacking., Experimental Design: In this translational study, clinical annotations, tissue and liquid biopsies were acquired to investigate the association between sustained objective responses and transcriptional profiles, immune cell dynamics in tumor tissue and peripheral blood samples, as well as circulating cytokine levels., Results: First, we investigated the baseline characteristics of the immune landscape of cSCC biopsies. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed upregulation of interleukin (IL)2/STAT5 pathways and downregulation of Interferon signatures in non-responder patients compared with responders. Next, we studied the early changes induced by cemiplimab in tissue biopsies. Notably, after only three weeks, cemiplimab treatment induced an increase in B cells and CD8+ T cells in responders, whereas their abundance decreased in non-responder patients. Moreover, analyzing differentially expressed genes modulated early during treatment, compared with baseline biopsies, we found that IL1β and IL8 exhibited early downregulation in responder patients' tumor specimens. We assessed whether changes in the local tumor microenvironment were mirrored in peripheral blood. Similar to tissue findings, no changes were observed in the whole T regulatory (Treg) population, although PD1+ Tregs, which were downregulated in responder patients (vs T0), showed a rebound enrichment in non-responders after three cycles of cemiplimab. Finally, IL8 mirrored the tissue results, unlike IL1β, with early (T1) and then sustained (T3) downregulation of its levels in responder patients, while increased in non-responders., Conclusions: Taken together, these findings shed light on the significance of early transcriptomic and immune cell modulation in predicting responses to cemiplimab therapy. Additionally, our data suggest that IL8 levels in peripheral blood offer promising avenues for personalized treatment selection and response assessment in patients with cSCC receiving cemiplimab, while PD1+Tregs can be followed longitudinally to monitor response to therapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LF declares the following competing interests: Consultant and advisory board for Seagen, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Jansen and Pierre Fabre Pharma. RB declares the following competing interests: Consultant and advisory board for BMS, MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Novartis. AS reports honoraria from Eli Lilly, MSD, and Janssen and travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Kristen rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations play a major role in the carcinogenesis of many types of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among KRAS mutations, p.G12C single-nucleotide variant (KRAS G12C ) is the most frequently reported in NSCLC patients, with a prevalence of about 12-13 %. For many decades, KRAS mutations including KRAS G12C were considered "undruggable" because of the lack of effective and well-tolerated selective therapies. Noteworthy, CodeBreaK100 and KRYSTAL-1 clinical trials have recently demonstrated that sotorasib and adagrasib, two novel selective KRAS G12C inhibitors, have clinical activity with acceptable adverse-event profile for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutation. On the other hand, no selective therapies are approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with non-G12C KRAS mutations. As a result, these patients receive the same treatments as those without KRAS mutations. In this paper, we describe the role of KRAS mutations in NSCLC focusing on the clinical and molecular characteristics which potentially identify specific subtypes of NSCLC patients based on different KRAS mutations. We also provide an overview of the main clinical trials testing novel selective KRAS G12C inhibitors as well as novel potential therapeutic strategies for NSCLC patients with non-G12C KRAS mutations., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All the authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Assessment of Progression-free survival (PFS) events by investigators might be inaccurate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with open-label design. We explored differences in PFS evaluated by blinded independent central review (BICR) or local investigator assessment (IA) in trials testing immunotherapy (IO) in advanced cancers., Methods: We systematically reviewed articles of RCTs investigating IO in advanced tumors, published in PubMed-indexed journals up to December 2023. For each RCT, we collected PFS results by BICR and by local IA. We calculated the discrepancy index (DI) as the ratio of BICR and IA Hazard Ratios (HR BICR /HR IA ) for PFS. An overall DI and relative confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effect model weighted for the inverse of variance., Findings: Only 32/140 (22.9 %) RCTs reported both BICR and local IA PFS data, including 17,054 patients. PFS was the sole primary endpoint in 19/32 (59.4 %) and a co-primary endpoint 9/32 (28.2 %) trials. The study design was open label or double-blind in 17/32 (53.1 %) and 15/32 (46.9 %) RCTs, respectively. The overall DI was 1.07 (95 % CI 1.01-1.13; I 2 =0, p = 0.02), revealing a more optimistic analysis of results in favor of local IA. In the 17 open-label trials, the overall DI was 1.09 (95 % CI 1.02-1.17, I2 =0, p = 0.02), revealing a more favorable interpretation of PFS results by local investigators., Interpretation: We found a statistically significant difference between BICR and local IA of PFS in trials of IO in cancer. These results suggest that the double assessment is recommended in RCTs testing IO, especially in open-label trials., Funding: This work was supported by the MFAG27826-2022 grant (Dr. Alberto Servetto)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Al. Se. reports Honoraria from Eli Lilly, MSD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Gilead, AstraZeneca; Travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Jannsen Pharmaceuticals Daiichi Sankyo; Board advisor: MSD, Novartis. R. F. reports honorarira for advisory board from MSD, Beigene, Astrazeneca, BMS, Sanofi, Johnson and Johnson. G. V. reports travel grants from Sanofi. L. F. reports honoraria for a role as consultant and advisory board from Seagen, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Jansen, and Pierre Fabre Pharma. R. B. reports honoraria for a role as consultant and advisory board for BMS, MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Novartis. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Apalutamide (APA) is a treatment for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). In the ARON-3 study we investigated real-world experiences with APA treatment for mCSPC., Methods: We retrospectively assessed real-world clinical outcomes for patients with mCSPC treated with APA in the ARON-3 study. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from APA initiation to death from any cause. PSA 90 was defined as a prostate-specific antigen decline of ≥90% from baseline, and PSA 0.2 as achievement of a PSA level ≤0.2 ng/ml. Data for adverse events were retrospectively collected from electronic and paper charts and categorized according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0., Key Findings and Limitations: We included 531 patients with mCSPC treated with APA. High-volume disease was reported for 214 patients (40%), and 56 (11%) had visceral metastases. Median OS was not reached. PSA 90 was experienced by 461 patients (87%) and PSA 0.2 by 368 (69%). Median OS was significantly longer for patients with PSA 90 or PSA 0.2 than for subjects without these responses (p < 0.001). The incidence of grade 3-4 fatigue was higher among elderly patients (≥80 yr) than among younger patients (19% vs 5%), but the incidence of other adverse events was comparable between the age groups., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: APA is an effective and tolerable treatment for mCSPC in the real-world setting., Patient Summary: The ARON-3 project collects data for patients with prostate cancer treated in multiple centers worldwide to assess outcomes in the real-world setting. We analyzed data for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving apalutamide. Our results show that apalutamide is a safe and effective drug in the real-world setting as well as in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) has been approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the pivotal clinical trials did not include patients previously treated with avelumab maintenance therapy., Objective: The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to assess the effectiveness of EV following avelumab in patients with mUC enrolled in the ARON-2 EV study., Patients and Methods: The study included 182 patients with mUC treated with EV following avelumab maintenance. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Statistical analysis involved Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models., Results: Median OS and PFS were 12.7 (95% CI 10.2-14.1) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.4-9.9) months, respectively. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 5% and partial response (PR) in 34% of patients, with an ORR of 39%. The DoR in patients who achieved CR/PR was 10.9 months (95% CI 8.1-11.4). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy and skin rash was 9%, followed by 8% of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and 4% of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia., Conclusions: The results of our large international retrospective study confirm the effectiveness of EV and endorse its use in the population of patients with mUC treated with EV following the frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent maintenance treatment with avelumab., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript. Conflicts of Interest Ondřej Fiala received honoraria from Roche, Janssen, GSK, and Pfizer for consultations and lectures unrelated to this project. Francesco Massari has received research support and/or honoraria from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Umberto Basso received honoraria for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Astra Zeneca; research funding from Ipsen; and travel grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Merck/Pfizer, and Bayer, all unrelated to this project. Sebastiano Buti received honoraria as speaker at scientific events and advisory role by BMS, Pfizer, MSD, Ipsen, Roche, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Merck, Gentili, and Astellas, all unrelated to the present paper. Yüksel Ürün has served on advisory board for Abdi-İbrahim, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Deva, Eczacıbaşı, Gen ilaç, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche and received travel grants, honoraria, or consultation fees from Abdi-İbrahim, Astellas, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Deva, Eczacıbaşı, Gen İlaç, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, all unrelated to the present paper. Maria T. Bourlon is a consultant of Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Gilead, Astellas, and Asofarma and a speaker for Janssen Pharmaceuticasl, MSD, Merck, and Astellas, all unrelated to the present paper. Mimma Rizzo has received honoraria as a speaker/consultant by MSD, Merck Serono, Astrazeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, and Gilead, all unrelated to the present paper. Linda Cerbone has received honoraria for advisory boards, speaker engagements, and scientific consultancy for educational purposes from AstraZeneca, EISAI, MSD, Ipsen, BMS, and A.A.A.; and is a past MSD employee in Medical Affairs. Javier Molina-Cerrillo reports research funding from Roche, Ipsen, Pfizer, and Janssen; travel support from Pfizer, Janssen, Ipsen, and BMS; and a consulting or advisory role with Ipsen, Roche, BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas, Eisai, Adium, and MSD, all unrelated to the present paper. Álvaro Pinto is a member of advisory boards of Pfizer, Novartis, Ipsen, BMS, Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Bayer, Clovis, Roche, MSD, Pierre Fabre, and Merck; has received research support from Pfizer and BMS; clinical trial payments from Pfizer, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Clovis, Pharmacyclics, BMS, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Eisai, and Aveo; and travel arrangements from Janssen, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, and Ipsen, all unrelated to the present paper. Andrey Soares reports honoraria from Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Ipsen, and Adium; consulting or advisory role from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Adium, Ipsen, Pfizer, and Novartis; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Astellas (Inst), and AstraZeneca (Inst); travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bayer, Janssen, Ipsen, Adium, MSD, and Merck Serono; and ownership in BIO, Brazilian Information Oncology; all unrelated to this study. Alexandr Poprach has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Ipsen, Roche, Astellas, Merck, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, unrelated to this project. Gian Paolo Spinelli has received payment or honoraria for advidory boards from Novartis, Roche, and Bayer, unrelated to this project. Martin Angel received honoraria from Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Raffo, and Pfizer for consultations and lectures unrelated to this project. Fernando Sabino M. Monteiro reports research support provided by Merck Sharp Dome; honoraria from Janssen, Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp Dome; and ownership in BIO, Brazilian Information Oncology, all unrelated to this study. Camillo Porta acted as a remunerated consultant and/or speaker for Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMC, Eisai, Exilixis, Genenta, Ipsen, Merck Serono, and MSD; as a protocol steering committee member for Eisai and MSD; and as an Independent Review Board member for Genenta. Shilpa Gupta is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, Gilead, Bayer, and Seattle Genetics; is a speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb; and has institutional research funding from Seatte Genetics, Pfizer, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, and Tyra Biosciences. Matteo Santoni has received research support and honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Astellas, and Bayer, all unrelated to the present paper. Patrizia Giannatempo, Enrique Grande, Zin W. Myint, Ugo De Giorgi, Renate Pichler, Francesco Grillone, Fabio Calabrò, Luca Galli, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Giandomenico Roviello, Jakub Kucharz, Se Hoon Park, Emmanuel Seront, Carlo Messina, Daniele Santini, Akihiro Yano, Lorena Incorvaia, Martina Catalano, Luigi Formisano, Gaetano Facchini, Giuseppe Fornarini, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Cecilia Nasso, Marco Stellato, Deniz Tural, Gaetano Aurilio, Ilana Epstein, Francesco Carrozza, Giovanni Benedetti, Tomáš Büchler, Cinzia Ortega, Roubini Zakopoulou, Nicola Battelli, and Joaquin Bellmunt declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Tomáš Büchler and Camillo Porta are Editorial Board members of Targeted Oncology. Tomáš Büchler and Camillo Porta were not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Ethics Approval The study protocol was approved on 28 September 2023, by the Ethical Committee of the coordinating center (Marche Region – Italy – no. 2022 39/7875, Study Protocol “ARON 2 Study” NCT05290038) and by the Institutional Review Boards of participating centers. Consent to Participate Informed consent with subsequent analysis of the follow-up data was obtained from all participants. Consent for Publication Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient data security but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Code Availability Not applicable. Author Contributions Study concept and design: all authors; acquisition of data: all authors; analysis and interpretation of data: all authors; drafting of the manuscript: Fiala, Massari, Gupta, and Santoni; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors; statistical analysis: Santoni; obtaining funding: none; administrative, technical, or material support: none; and supervision: Gupta and Santoni., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Objective: The depth of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline after androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) treatment combined with androgen deprivation therapy for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) may affect prognosis. The primary objective in our study was the correlation between the PSA response at 3 mo and radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) at 24 mo. Three groups were defined according to the PSA decline: complete response (PSA ≤0.02 ng/ml), partial response (PSA >0.02 and ≤0.2 ng/ml), and incomplete response (PSA >0.2 ng/ml). Secondary objectives were correlation between the PSA response at 3 mo and overall survival, and the development of a model predicting complete PSA response., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of patients with mHSPC treated with apalutamide from May 2018 to September 2023 registered in the Real-World Evidence APA registry across 20 centers., Key Findings and Limitations: We included 633 patients with mHSPC. The median age at diagnosis was 68 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 63-75) and median PSA was 16 ng/ml (IQR 7.5-64). Some 63% of the short had low-volume disease, 51% had de novo disease, 48% had recurrent disease. At 3 mo, 27% had a complete response, 42% a partial response, and 31% an incomplete response, with corresponding rRFS rates at 24 mo of 92%, 86%, and 63%. According to the predictive model, a complete PSA response at 3 mo was associated with the use of next-generation imaging and PSA <50 ng/ml at diagnosis. Study limitations include heterogeneity among the groups and variations in data quality and assessment methods., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Patients with a complete PSA response after 3 mo of apalutamide treatment face a very low risk of progression within 2 yr. Conversely, nearly 50% of patients with an incomplete PSA response will experience disease progression., Patient Summary: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer that is still responsive to hormone therapy, a complete response after treatment with a drug called apalutamide is associated with a very low risk of progression within 2 years. However, nearly half of patients with an incomplete response to apalutamide will experience progression of their cancer., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

The advent of immunological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of solid and haematological cancers over the last decade. Licensed therapies which activate the immune system to target cancer cells can be broadly divided into two classes. The first class are antibodies that inhibit immune checkpoint signalling, known as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The second class are cell-based immune therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocyte (CAR-T) cell therapies, natural killer (NK) cell therapies, and tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies. The clinical efficacy of all these treatments generally outweighs the risks, but there is a high rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are often unpredictable in timing with clinical sequalae ranging from mild (e.g. rash) to severe or even fatal (e.g. myocarditis, cytokine release syndrome) and reversible to permanent (e.g. endocrinopathies).The mechanisms underpinning irAE pathology vary across different irAE complications and syndromes, reflecting the broad clinical phenotypes observed and the variability of different individual immune responses, and are poorly understood overall. Immune-related cardiovascular toxicities have emerged, and our understanding has evolved from focussing initially on rare but fatal ICI-related myocarditis with cardiogenic shock to more common complications including less severe ICI-related myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, including conduction system disease and heart block, non-inflammatory heart failure, takotsubo syndrome and coronary artery disease. In this scientific statement on the cardiovascular toxicities of immune therapies for cancer, we summarize the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of ICI, CAR-T, NK, and TIL therapies. We also highlight gaps in the literature and where future research should focus., (© 2024 European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Granular Cell Tumors (GCTs), also known as Abrikossoff tumors, are rare neoplasms that typically originate from Schwann cells. These tumors most commonly occur in the head and neck region, particularly the tongue. While GCTs are generally benign, less than 2% of cases exhibit aggressive biological features such as rapid growth, high recurrence rates, and metastasis. In this report, we present a rare case of a Malignant Granular Cell Tumor (MGCT) of the chest wall, which posed significant challenges in both characterization and management., Case Presentation: A fifty-year-old man underwent an ultrasound examination for a nodular mass on his right chest wall. The ultrasound revealed a firm, hard mass measuring 2 cm x 2 cm with an uncertain diagnosis. A fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) guided by ultrasound was performed, resulting in a diagnosis of Abrikossoff tumor. The patient subsequently underwent radical excision of the mass, which confirmed the initial diagnosis. Nine months after surgery, a new mass with similar characteristics was detected during a physical examination. The patient underwent a second surgery, but this time the histopathological examination was negative for neoplastic cells. However, another mass appeared at the same site as the previous surgical excision. A CT scan and MRI of the right chest wall confirmed the presence of a 2 cm x 2 cm nodular mass. The patient then underwent a deeper excision. Histomorphological and immunohistochemical assessments confirmed the recurrence of MGCT., Conclusion: This case highlights the malignant potential of GCTs. The numerous local recurrences necessitated three surgeries and additional procedures. The aggressive nature of this pathology underscores the complexity of managing these tumors, which are poorly understood and lack proven post-operative strategies for controlling local and distant disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Flauto, Servetto, Bianco and Formisano.)

Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has emerged as a prophylactic and therapeutic immunomodulatory option for managing acute rejection in heart transplants (HTx). The underlying mechanisms through which ECP exerts its immunomodulatory effects remain under investigation. Regulatory T cells (Treg) are a heterogeneous subset of immune lymphocytes that ensure the maintenance of tissue homeostasis, avoiding graft rejection. The transcription factor forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3) is an essential molecular marker of Treg, acting as a "master regulator" of their genesis, stability, and functions. No study has investigated whether ECP impacts FoxP3 expression and its highly suppressive variants containing the exon 2 (FoxP3-E2), particularly in HTx., Methods: In the current study, we recruited 14 HTx participants who had undergone ECP therapy. We explored the effect of in vivo ECP on CD4+FoxP3+ Treg frequency and in vitro suppressive function in 8 HTx participants before (T0) and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) mo of treatment. As a control group, we included 4 HTx individuals who had not undergone ECP therapy., Results: We found that ECP increases the frequency of CD4+FoxP3+ Treg subset with highly suppressive phenotype, including CD4+FoxP3-E2+ Treg. At functional levels, we observed that ECP treatment in HTx individuals effectively improves Treg suppressive ability in controlling the proliferation of autologous conventional CD4+ T lymphocytes., Conclusions: Our findings collectively suggest that ECP exerts its immunomodulatory effects in HTx individuals by positively impacting the frequency and regulatory function of the FoxP3+ Treg compartment., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for poor performance status patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains unknown., Objective: In the present sub-analysis of the ARON-2 study, we investigated the role of pembrolizumab for advanced UC patients with ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (ECOG-PS) 2., Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a cytologically and/or histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced UC progressing or recurring after platinum-based therapy and treated with pembrolizumab between 1 January 2016 to 1 April 2024 were included. In this sub-analysis we focused on patients with ECOG-PS 2., Results: We included 1,040 patients from the ARON-2 dataset; of these, 167 patients (16%) presented an ECOG-PS 2. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-16.1) in the overall study population, 18.2 months (95% CI 15.8-22.2) in patients with ECOG-PS 0-1, and 3.7 months (95% CI 3.2-5.2) in subjects with ECOG-PS 2 (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall study population was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.3-97.1), 6.2 months (95% CI 5.5-97.1) in patients with ECOG-PS 0-1, and 2.8 months (95% CI 2.1-3.4) in patients with ECOG-PS 2. Among the latter, liver metastases and progressive disease during first-line therapy were significant predictors of OS at both univariate and multivariate analyses. For PFS, univariate and multivariate analyses showed a prognostic role for lung metastases, liver metastases, and progressive disease during first-line therapy., Conclusions: This large real-world evidence study suggests the effectiveness of second-line pembrolizumab for mUC patients with poor performance status. The presence of liver metastases and progressive disease during first-line therapy is associated with worse clinical outcomes and, thus, should be taken into account when making treatment decisions in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Apalutamide is a selective androgen receptor signalling inhibitor that is used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Skin rash is one of the most common adverse events with apalutamide. Although the majority of rash events are grade 1 and 2, the appearance of skin rash during treatment can lead to dose reduction, a pause in treatment or even treatment discontinuation, especially if patients present late when the rash has become severe. This in turn can result in a significant delay or even a permanent discontinuation in the patient's treatment of prostate cancer. As apalutamide is a generally well tolerated and an effective treatment for many men with advanced prostate cancer, it is extremely important to make attempts to prevent skin problems or to manage them at the earliest stage possible. We therefore have developed practical guidance for the management of apalutamide-related rash, including an infographic with recommendations for rash management by grade. Central to this approach is patient education and awareness. Encouraging patients to proactively care for their skin from the start of treatment and informing them of the risk of rash with apalutamide therapy are essential. If the patient observes any skin changes, they should be advised to report it straight away to their cancer care team. Adopting this simple, proactive approach of patient education and increased vigilance from the care team is expected to lead to early identification of rash and subsequent intervention to allow for quicker resolution and enable patients to continue their cancer treatment with a drug that can delay disease progression and increase survival in patients with prostate cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Cemiplimab has demonstrated relevant clinical activity in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) but mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy are still unknown. We collected clinical data from locally advanced and/or metastatic cSSC patients treated with cemiplimab in two Italian University centers. In addition, gene expression analysis by using Nanostring Technologies platform to evaluate 770 cancer- and immune-related genes on 20 tumor tissue samples (9 responders and 11 non-responders to cemiplimab) was performed. We enrolled 81 patients with a median age of 82 years. After 16.4 months of median follow-up, 12- and 24-months PFS were 53% and 42%, respectively; while 12- and 24-months OS were 71% and 61%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. Overall response rate (ORR) was 58%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 77.8%. The difference between genes expressed in responder versus non-responder patient samples was substantial, particularly for genes involved in immune system regulation. Cemiplimab-resistant tumors were associated with over-expression of CCL-20 and CXCL-8. Cemiplimab confirmed efficacy and safety data in real-life cSCC patients. Overexpression of CCL-20 and CXCL-8 could represent biomarkers of lack of response to immunotherapy., Competing Interests: S.N. had travel grants from Amgen, Merck outside of the submitted works. D.C. had travel support from Sanofi, BMS, Merck serono outside of the submitted works. F.C. was advisory board for Amgen, Servier, MSD, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Bayer, Pierre Fabre, Eisai outside of the submitted work. T.T. was advisory board for Amgen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Merck outside of the submitted work. All remaining authors have no competing interests., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Background: About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care., Objective: This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy., Methods: The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models., Results: Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In patients with ER + metastatic breast cancer (mBC), the first-line treatment involves the combination of endocrine therapy (ET) and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). However, a significant group of patients experiences disease progression, emphasizing the urgent clinical need to identify novel anti-tumor therapies. We previously generated breast cancer cells resistant to the combination of fulvestrant (ER downregulator) and abemaciclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) from MCF7 and T47D (MCF7-FAR and T47D-FAR). RNA-seq-based Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed hyper-activation of EGFR, HER2, and AKT signaling in both MCF7-FAR and T47D-FAR. Modulating EGFR or ERBB2 expression through loss- and gain-of-function experiments altered tumor sensitivity to fulvestrant and abemaciclib in parental and FAR spheroids, affecting ERK and AKT/S6 pathways. Cetuximab treatment overcame tumor resistance to fulvestrant and abemaciclib in FAR and EGFR-overexpressing breast cancer spheroids and xenografts. Likewise, patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from individuals with ER + mBC, progressing on palbociclib, exhibited up-regulation of EGFR and HER2 pathways. In conclusion, our findings suggest that inhibiting EGFR and HER2 pathways might overcome resistance to ET + CDK4/6i in selected patients with ER + mBC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Servetto A. reports honoraria from Eli Lilly, MSD, and Janssen and travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. Formisano L. declares the following competing interests: consultant and advisory board for Seagen, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Jansen, and Pierre Fabre Pharma. Bianco R. declares the following competing interests: consultant and advisory board for BMS, MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Novartis. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)