Search

Cardiorenal fibrosis is a common feature of chronic cardiovascular disease and recent data suggests that cytokines and chemokines may also drive fibrosis. Here we tested the hypothesis that CXCR7, a highly conserved chemokine receptor, contributes to cardiac and renal fibrosis. We generated an anti-mouse CXCR7-specific monoclonal antibody (CXCR7 mAb) and tested its anti-fibrotic actions in cardiorenal fibrosis induced using the deoxycorticosterone acetate/uni-nephrectomy (DOCA-UNX) model. CXCR7 mAb treatment (10 mg/kg, twice weekly for 6 weeks) significantly attenuated the development of cardiac and renal fibrosis, and reduced fibrotic and inflammatory gene expression levels, in the absence of an effect on blood pressure. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated an increase in the vascular expression of CXCR7 in DOCA-UNX-treated mice. This study demonstrated that a CXCR7 mediated pathway plays a significant role in cardiac and renal fibrosis induced by DOCA-UNX treatment. Accordingly, antagonism of CXCR7 may provide a therapeutic opportunity to mitigate against fibrosis in the setting of mineralocorticoid excess., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing burden on healthcare resources, despite improvements in prevention and management. AF is a common cause of hospitalisation, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) use. However, there is a paucity of data describing the burden of AF on EMS. We aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients presenting with AF to EMS using a large population-based sample., Methods: Consecutive attendances for AF in Victoria, Australia (January 2015-June 2019) were included if patients had a diagnosis of "AF" or "arrhythmia" with AF on electrocardiogram. Data were individually linked to emergency, hospital, and mortality records., Results: Of 2,613,056 EMS attendances, 16,525 were a first attendance for AF and linked to hospital records. Median (IQR) age was 76 (67,84) years (43% female). Seventy-eight percent had high thromboembolic risk (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥ 2), and 72% had a heart rate ≥ 100 bpm. Forty-two percent of patients received no treatment by paramedics and 99.4% were transported to hospital. Fifty-three percent were discharged from ED. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Of 2542 cases reattended for AF, 19% occurred within 30 days, with increased odds for females and those of low socioeconomic status. Overall, 24% died during the study period, 12% within 30 days. Increasing age, heart failure, stroke, COPD, and low socioeconomic status increased the odds of 30-day mortality., Conclusions: EMS utilisation for AF is common and associated with frequent reattendance. Further studies are required to investigate novel pathways of care to reduce AF burden on healthcare systems., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The optimal revascularization strategy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy remains unclear with no contemporary randomized trial data to guide clinical practice. This study aims to assess long-term survival in patients with severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy revascularized by either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: Using the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and Melbourne Interventional Group registries (from January 2005 to 2018), patients with severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%] undergoing PCI or isolated CABG were included in the analysis. Those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were excluded. The primary outcome was long-term National Death Index-linked mortality up to 10 years following revascularization. Risk adjustment was performed to estimate the average treatment effect using propensity score analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)., Results: A total of 2042 patients were included, of whom 1451 patients were treated by CABG and 591 by PCI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted demographics, procedural indication, coronary artery disease extent, and LVEF were well balanced between the two patient groups. After risk adjustment, patients treated by CABG compared with those treated by PCI experienced reduced long-term mortality [adjusted hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.79, P = .001] over a median follow-up period of 4.0 (inter-quartile range 2.2-6.8) years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.42, 95% CI 0.41-4.96, P = .58], but there was an increased risk of peri-procedural stroke (aOR 19.6, 95% CI 4.21-91.6, P < .001) and increased length of hospital stay (exponentiated coefficient 3.58, 95% CI 3.00-4.28, P < .001) in patients treated with CABG., Conclusions: In this multi-centre IPTW analysis, patients with severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing revascularization by CABG rather than PCI showed improved long-term survival. However, future randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effect of any such benefits., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Heart failure (HF) is a debilitating clinical syndrome affecting 64.3 million patients worldwide. More than 50% of HF cases are attributed to HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), an entity growing in prevalence and mortality. Although recent breakthroughs reveal the prognostic benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in HFpEF, there is still a lack of effective pharmacological therapy available. This highlights a major gap in medical knowledge that must be addressed. Current evidence attributes HFpEF pathogenesis to an interplay between cardiometabolic comorbidities, inflammation, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) activation, leading to cardiac remodelling and diastolic dysfunction. However, conventional RAAS blockade has demonstrated limited benefits in HFpEF, which emphasises that alternative therapeutic targets should be explored. Presently, there is limited literature examining the use of anti-inflammatory HFpEF therapies despite growing evidence supporting its importance in disease progression. Hence, this review aims to explore current perspectives on HFpEF pathogenesis, including the importance of inflammation-driven cardiac remodelling and the therapeutic potential of anti-inflammatory therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript being submitted. They warrant that the article is the authors' original work, hasn't received prior publication, and isn't under consideration for publication elsewhere. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest or Competing Interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Whilst metabolic inflexibility and substrate constraint have been observed in heart failure for many years, their exact causal role remains controversial. In parallel, many of our fundamental assumptions about cardiac fuel use are now being challenged like never before. For example, the emergence of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy as one of the four "pillars" of heart failure therapy is causing a revisit of metabolism as a key mechanism and therapeutic target in heart failure. Improvements in the field of cardiac metabolomics will lead to a far more granular understanding of the mechanisms underpinning normal and abnormal human cardiac fuel use, an appreciation of drug action, and novel therapeutic strategies. Technological advances and expanding biorepositories offer exciting opportunities to elucidate the novel aspects of these metabolic mechanisms. Methodologic advances include comprehensive and accurate substrate quantitation such as metabolomics and stable-isotope fluxomics, improved access to arterio-venous blood samples across the heart to determine fuel consumption and energy conversion, high quality cardiac tissue biopsies, biochemical analytics, and informatics. Pairing these technologies with recent discoveries in epigenetic regulation, mitochondrial dynamics, and organ-microbiome metabolic crosstalk will garner critical mechanistic insights in heart failure. In this state-of-the-art review, we focus on new metabolic insights, with an eye on emerging metabolic strategies for heart failure. Our synthesis of the field will be valuable for a diverse audience with an interest in cardiac metabolism., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with an array of central and peripheral haemodynamic and metabolic changes. The exact pathogenesis of exercise limitation in HFpEF remains uncertain. Our aim was to compare lactate accumulation and central haemodynamic responses to exercise in patients with HFpEF, non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD), and healthy volunteers., Methods and Results: Right heart catheterization with mixed venous blood gas and lactate measurements was performed at rest and during symptom-limited supine exercise. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between haemodynamic and biochemical parameters and their association with exercise capacity. Of 362 subjects, 198 (55%) had HFpEF, 103 (28%) had NCD, and 61 (17%) were healthy volunteers. This included 139 (70%) females with HFpEF, 77 (75%) in NCD (P = 0.41 HFpEF vs. NCD), and 31 (51%) in healthy volunteers (P < 0.001 HFpEF vs. volunteers). The median age was 71 (65, 75) years in HFpEF, 66 (57, 72) years in NCD, and 49 (38, 65) years in healthy volunteers (HFpEF vs. NCD or volunteer, both P < 0.001). Peak workload was lower in HFpEF compared with healthy volunteers [52 W (interquartile range 31-73), 150 W (125-175), P < 0.001], but not NCD [53 W (33, 75), P = 0.85]. Exercise lactate indexed to workload was higher in HFpEF at 0.08 mmol/L/W (0.05-0.11), 0.06 mmol/L/W (0.05-0.08; P = 0.016) in NCD, and 0.04 mmol/L/W (0.03-0.05; P < 0.001) in volunteers. Exercise cardiac index was 4.5 L/min/m 2 (3.7-5.5) in HFpEF, 5.2 L/min/m 2 (4.3-6.2; P < 0.001) in NCD, and 9.1 L/min/m 2 (8.0-9.9; P < 0.001) in volunteers. Oxygen delivery in HFpEF was lower at 1553 mL/min (1175-1986) vs. 1758 mL/min (1361-2282; P = 0.024) in NCD and 3117 mL/min (2667-3502; P < 0.001) in the volunteer group during exercise. Predictors of higher exercise lactate levels in HFpEF following adjustment included female sex and chronic kidney disease (both P < 0.001)., Conclusions: HFpEF is associated with reduced exercise capacity secondary to both central and peripheral factors that alter oxygen utilization. This results in hyperlactataemia. In HFpEF, plasma lactate responses to exercise may be a marker of haemodynamic and cardiometabolic derangements and represent an important target for future potential therapies., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Animal models are regularly used to test the role of the gut microbiome in hypertension. Small-scale pre-clinical studies have investigated changes to the gut microbiome in the angiotensin II hypertensive model. However, the gut microbiome is influenced by internal and external experimental factors, which are not regularly considered in the study design. Once these factors are accounted for, it is unclear if microbiome signatures are reproduceable. We aimed to determine the influence of angiotensin II treatment on the gut microbiome using a large and diverse cohort of mice and to quantify the magnitude by which other factors contribute to microbiome variations., Methods and Results: We conducted a retrospective study to establish a diverse mouse cohort resembling large human studies. We sequenced the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from 538 samples across the gastrointestinal tract of 303 male and female C57BL/6J mice randomized into sham or angiotensin II treatment from different genotypes, diets, animal facilities, and age groups. Analysing over 17 million sequencing reads, we observed that angiotensin II treatment influenced α-diversity (P = 0.0137) and β-diversity (i.e. composition of the microbiome, P < 0.001). Bacterial abundance analysis revealed patterns consistent with a reduction in short-chain fatty acid producers, microbial metabolites that lower blood pressure. Furthermore, animal facility, genotype, diet, age, sex, intestinal sampling site, and sequencing batch had significant effects on both α- and β-diversity (all P < 0.001). Sampling site (6.8%) and diet (6%) had the largest impact on the microbiome, while angiotensin II and sex had the smallest effect (each 0.4%)., Conclusion: Our large-scale data confirmed findings from small-scale studies that angiotensin II impacted the gut microbiome. However, this effect was modest relative to most of the other factors studied. Accounting for these factors in future pre-clinical hypertensive studies will increase the likelihood that microbiome findings are replicable and translatable., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Competing Interests: None.

Objectives: To determine the influence of presenting electrocardiographic (ECG) changes on prognosis in acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock (ACS-CS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary angiography (PCI)., Background: The effect of initial ECG changes such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) versus non-STEMI among patients ACS-CS on prognosis remains unclear., Methods: We analysed data from consecutive patients with ACS-CS enrolled in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes registry between 2014 and 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (IPTW) was used to assess the effect of ECG changes on 30-day mortality., Results: Of 1564 patients with ACS-CS who underwent PCI, 161 had non-STEMI and 1403 had STEMI on ECG. The mean age was 66 ± 13 years, and 74 % (1152) were males. Patients with non-STEMI compared to STEMI were older (70 ± 12 vs 65 ± 13 years), had higher rates of diabetes (34 % vs 21 %), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (14 % vs 3.3 %), peripheral arterial disease (10.6 % vs 4.1 %, p < 0.01), and lower baseline eGFR (53.8 [37.1, 75.4] vs 65.3 [46.3, 87.8] ml/min/1.73m 2 ), all p ≤ 0.01. Non-STEMI patients were more likely to have a culprit left circumflex artery (29 % vs 20 %) and more often underwent multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (30 % vs 20 %) but had lower rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (21 % vs 39 %), all p ≤ 0.01. Propensity score analysis with IPTW confirmed that non-STEMI ECG was associated with lower odds for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 0.47 [0.32, 0.69], p < 0.001), and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.48 [0.33, 0.70])., Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI, Non-STEMI as compared to STEMI on index ECG was associated with approximately half the relative risk of both 30-day mortality and 30-day MACCE and could be a useful variable to integrate in ACS-CS risk scores., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. N D’Elia – None; ndelia@utas.edu.au Ms Sara Vogrin – None; sara.vogrin@unimelb.edu.au Ms Angela Brennan – None; angela.brennan@monash.edu Ms Diem Dinh – None; diem.dinh@monash.edu Dr. Jeffrey Lefkovits – None; lefkovits@me.com Professor Christopher Reid – None; christopher.reid@curtin.edu.au A/Prof Dion Stub - Proctor for Medtronic, Edwards and Abbott. Research supported by the National Heart Foundation and NHMRC fellowships; dion.stub@monash.edu Dr. Jason Bloom – None; jason.elliott.bloom@gmail.com Dr. Kawa Haji – None; kaawa22@hotmail.com Dr. Samer Noaman – None; Samerkn@yahoo.com Professor David Kaye – None; david.kaye@alfred.org.au A/Prof Nicholas Cox – None; Nicholas.Cox@wh.org.au A/Prof William Chan – None; william.chan@unimelb.edu.au, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is under-recognized in clinical practice. Although a previously developed risk score, termed H 2 FPEF, can be used to estimate HFpEF probability, this score requires imaging data, which is often unavailable. Here we sought to develop an HFpEF screening model that is based exclusively on clinical variables and that can guide the need for echocardiography and further testing. In a derivation cohort (n = 414, 249 women), a clinical model using age, body mass index and history of atrial fibrillation (termed the HFpEF-ABA score) showed good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.839 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.800-0.877), P < 0.0001). The performance of the model was validated in an international, multicenter cohort (n = 736, 443 women; AUC = 0.813 (95% CI = 0.779-0.847), P < 0.0001) and further validated in two additional cohorts: a cohort including patients with unexplained dyspnea (n = 228, 136 women; AUC = 0.840 (95% CI = 0.782-0.900), P < 0.0001) and a cohort for which HF hospitalization was used instead of hemodynamics to establish an HFpEF diagnosis (n = 456, 272 women; AUC = 0.929 (95% CI = 0.909-0.948), P < 0.0001). Model-based probabilities were also associated with increased risk of HF hospitalization or death among patients from the Mayo Clinic (n = 790) and a US national cohort across the Veteran Affairs health system (n = 3076, 110 women). Using the HFpEF-ABA score, rapid and efficient screening for risk of undiagnosed HFpEF can be performed in patients with dyspnea using only age, body mass index and history of atrial fibrillation., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: The REDUCE LAP-HF II (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II) trial found that, compared with a sham procedure, the Corvia Atrial Shunt did not improve outcomes in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. However, after 12-month follow-up, "responders" (peak-exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU and absence of a cardiac rhythm management device) were identified., Objectives: This study sought to determine: 1) the overall efficacy and safety of the atrial shunt vs sham control after 2 years of follow-up; and 2) whether the benefits of atrial shunting are sustained in responders during longer-term follow-up or are offset by adverse effects of the shunt., Methods: The study analyzed 2-year outcomes in the overall REDUCE LAP-HF II trial, as well as in responder and nonresponder subgroups. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal ischemic/embolic stroke, total heart failure events, and change in health status., Results: In 621 randomized patients, there was no difference between the shunt (n = 309) and sham (n = 312) groups in the primary endpoint (win ratio: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.82-1.24]) or its individual components at 2 years. Shunt patency at 24 months was 98% in shunt-treated patients. Cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal ischemic stroke were not different between the groups; however, major adverse cardiac events were more common in those patients assigned to the shunt compared with sham (6.9% vs 2.7%; P = 0.018). More patients randomized to the shunt had an increase in right ventricular volume of ≥30% compared with the sham control (39% vs 28%, respectively; P < 0.001), but right ventricular dysfunction was uncommon and not different between the treatment groups. In responders (n = 313), the shunt was superior to sham (win ratio: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.02-1.83]; P = 0.037, with 51% fewer HF events [incidence rate ratio: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.25-0.95]; P = 0.034]). In nonresponders (n = 265), atrial shunting was inferior to sham (win ratio: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54-0.98])., Conclusions: At 2 years of follow-up in REDUCE LAP-HF II, there was no difference in efficacy between the atrial shunt and sham groups in the overall trial group. The potential clinical benefit identified in the responder group after 1 and 2 years of follow-up is currently being evaluated in the RESPONDER-HF (Re-Evaluation of the Corvia Atrial Shunt Device in a Precision Medicine Trial to Determine Efficacy in Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trial. (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II [REDUCE LAP-HF II]; NCT03088033)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The REDUCE LAP-HF II trial was funded by Corvia Medical, Inc. Dr Gustafsson has served as an unpaid advisor to Corvia; has received consulting fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Ionis, Alnylam, Pfizer, FineHeart, CorWave, and AdjuCor; and has received speaker fees from Novartis. Dr Petrie has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, SQ Innovations, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Pharmacosmos; and has served as a consultant and on trial committees for Akero, Applied Therapeutics, AnaCardio, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Abbvie, Bayer, Horizon Therapeutics, Takeda, Cardiorentis, Pharmacosmos, Siemens, Lilly, Vifor, New Amsterdam, Moderna, and Teikoku. Dr Komtebedde is an employee of Corvia Medical, Inc. Dr Borlaug has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, and the U.S. Department of Defense; has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Axon, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Mesoblast, Novo Nordisk, Rivus, and Tenax Therapeutics; has served as a consultant for Actelion, Amgen, Aria, Axon Therapies, BD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, NGM, NXT, and VADovations; and is a named inventor (US Patent number 10,307,179) for the tools and approach for a minimally invasive pericardial modification procedure to treat heart failure. Dr Mohan has received research funds paid to his institution from Corvia, Alleviant Medical, and V-Wave; has received consulting fees from Corvia, Alleviant Medical, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Boston Scientific, and has received speaker honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Sverdlov has received support from the National Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship (Award ID 106025); has received research grants from the Department of Health and Aged Care (Australia) Medical Research Future Fund (MRF2017053), New South Wales (NSW) Health (Australia), AstraZeneca, Novartis, Biotronik, RACE Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor; and has received personal fees from Novartis, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Chung has received consulting fees from Abbott, Medtronic, InterShunt, Cardionomic, EBR, CVRx, LivaNova; and has served on the Speakers Bureau for Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Lurz has received institutional fees and research grants from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and ReCor; has received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Medical, Innoventric, ReCor; and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has held stock options with Innoventric. Dr Cikes has received investigator-initiated research grants to her institution from Novartis, Abbott, and Pfizer; has received clinical study contracts for her institution from Novo Nordisk and Corvia; and has served in an advisory role and received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Amicus Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GE Healthcare, Livanova, Krka Pharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pulsify Medical, Roche, Swixx, Takeda, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, and Viatris. Dr Shah has received grant support from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (grants U54 HL160273, R01 HL107577, R01 HL127028, R01 HL140731, and R01 HL149423), AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Pfizer; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Alleviant, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Aria CV, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia, Ionis, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, ReCor, Regeneron, Rivus, Sardocor, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and Ultromics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. The use of aspirin for CAV prophylaxis has recently garnered interest as a possible therapeutic adjunct in this setting., Methods: This 2-center retrospective cohort study included 372 patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 2009 and March 2018 and were stratified according to the commencement of aspirin during their index transplant admission. The primary outcome was the development of moderate or severe CAV (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2) at surveillance coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints included mortality at follow-up., Results: There were no differences in age, sex, and cause of heart failure. In the early aspirin group, the preponderant risk factors included use of ventricular assist devices, pretransplant smoking, and mild or moderate rejection. Multivariable analyses to assess for independent predictors of CAV development and mortality demonstrated that aspirin was associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.47, P < 0.01) and a trend toward a protective effect against the development of moderate or severe CAV (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.19; P = 0.08)., Conclusions: In this retrospective risk-adjusted 2-center cohort study, early aspirin administration was associated with reduced risk of death and a trend toward a protective effect against CAV development. These findings warrant validation in prospective randomized trials., Competing Interests: J.B. is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and National Heart Foundation Post Graduate Scholarships. D.K. is supported by an NHMRC Investigator Grant. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease hospitalisations associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In hospitals, HF patients are typically managed by cardiology or physician teams, with differences in patient demographics and clinical outcomes. This study utilises contemporary HF registry data to compare patient characteristics and outcomes in those with ADHF admitted into General Medicine and Cardiology units., Methods: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry was utilised to identify patients hospitalised with ADHF 30-day period in each of four consecutive years. We compared patient characteristics, pharmacological management and outpatient follow-up of patients admitted to General Medicine and Cardiology units. Primary outcome measures included in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality., Results: Between 2014 and 2017, a total of 1,253 patients with ADHF admissions were registered, with 53% admitted in General Medicine units and 47% in Cardiology units. General Medicine patients were more likely to be older (82 vs 71 years; p<0.001), female (51% vs 34%; p<0.001), and have higher prevalence of comorbidities and preserved left ventricular function (p<0.001). There were no differences in primary outcome measures between General Medicine and Cardiology in terms of: in-hospital mortality (5.0% vs 3.9%; p=0.35), 30-day readmission (23.4% vs 23.6%; p=0.93), and 30-day mortality (10.0% vs 8.0%; p=0.21)., Conclusions: Hospitalised patients with HF continue to have high mortality and rehospitalisation rates. The choice of treatment by General Medicine or Cardiology units, based on the particular medical profile and individual needs of the patients, provides equivalent outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Suboptimal coronary reperfusion (no reflow) is common in acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to develop and externally validate a clinical risk score for angiographic no reflow for use following angiography and before PCI., Methods: We developed and externally validated a logistic regression model for prediction of no reflow among adult patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome using data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI registry (2005-2020; development cohort) and the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society PCI registry (2006-2020; external validation cohort)., Results: A total of 30 561 patients (mean age, 64.1 years; 24% women) were included in the Melbourne Interventional Group development cohort and 440 256 patients (mean age, 64.9 years; 27% women) in the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society external validation cohort. The primary outcome (no reflow) occurred in 4.1% (1249 patients) and 9.4% (41 222 patients) of the development and validation cohorts, respectively. From 33 candidate predictor variables, 6 final variables were selected by an adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model for inclusion (cardiogenic shock, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with symptom onset >195 minutes pre-PCI, estimated stent length ≥20 mm, vessel diameter <2.5 mm, pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow <3, and lesion location). Model discrimination was very good (development C statistic, 0.808; validation C statistic, 0.741) with excellent calibration. Patients with a score of ≥8 points had a 22% and 27% risk of no reflow in the development and validation cohorts, respectively., Conclusions: The no-reflow prediction in acute coronary syndrome risk score is a simple count-based scoring system based on 6 parameters available before PCI to predict the risk of no reflow. This score could be useful in guiding preventative treatment and future trials., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Heart failure (HF) with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is a growing global concern. This study evaluated myocardial oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ) levels in human systolic and diastolic HF and in a murine model of HF with preserved ejection fraction, exploring NAD + repletion as therapy. We quantified myocardial NAD + and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase levels, assessing restoration with nicotinamide riboside (NR). Findings show significant NAD + and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase depletion in human diastolic HF myocardium, but NR successfully restored NAD + levels. In murine HF with preserved ejection fraction, NR as preventive and therapeutic intervention improved metabolic and antioxidant profiles. This study underscores NAD + repletion's potential in diastolic HF management., Competing Interests: This work was supported by the Sydney Medical School Foundation (Dr O’Sullivan); Sydney Cardiovascular Fellowship (Dr O’Sullivan), NSW Health Early-Mid Career Fellowship and Clinician-Scientist Awards (Dr O’Sullivan; DOH1003 and DOH1006), National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (Dr O’Sullivan; NHF104853), National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (Dr Koay; NHF107180), NSW Cardiovascular Collaborative Grant (Dr Koay), and philanthropic support from The University of Sydney donors (Dr Lal). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Aims: Heart failure with preserved ejection (HFpEF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) commonly co-exist. However, it is unclear if DM modifies the haemodynamic and cardiometabolic phenotype in patients with HFpEF. We aimed to interrogate the haemodynamic and cardiometabolic effects of DM in HFpEF., Methods: We compared the haemodynamic and metabolic profiles of non-DM patients and patients with DM-HFpEF at rest and during exercise using right heart catheterisation and mixed venous blood gas analysis., Results: Of 181 patients with HFpEF, 37 (20%) had DM. Patients with DM displayed a more adverse exercise haemodynamic response vs HFpEF alone (mean pulmonary arterial pressure: 47 mmHg [interquartile range {IQR} 42-55] vs 42 [38-47], p<0.001; workload indexed pulmonary capillary wedge pressure indexed: 0.80 mmHg/W [0.44-1.23] vs 0.57 [0.43-1.01], p=0.047). HFpEF-DM patients had a lower mixed venous oxygen saturation at rest (70% [IQR 66-73] vs 72 [69-75], p=0.003) and were unable to enhance O 2 extraction to the same extent (Δ-28% [-33 to -15] vs -29 [-36 to -21], p=0.029), this occurred at a 22% lower median workload. Resting mixed venous lactate levels were higher in those with DM (1.5 mmol/L [IQR 1.1-1.9] vs 1 [0.9-1.3], p<0.001), and during exercise indexed to workload (0.09 mmol/L/W [0.06-0.13] vs 0.08 [0.05-0.11], p=0.018)., Conclusion: Concurrent diabetes and HFpEF was associated with greater metabolic responses at rest, with enhanced wedge driven pulmonary hypertension and relative lactataemia during exercise without appropriate augmentation of oxygen consumption., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cold static storage preservation of donor hearts for periods longer than 4 hours increases the risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The aim of the study was to determine if hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) could safely prolong the preservation time of donor hearts., Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter investigation of the effect of HOPE using the XVIVO Heart Preservation System on donor hearts with a projected preservation time of 6 to 8 hours on 30-day recipient survival and allograft function post-transplant. Each center completed 1 or 2 short preservation time followed by long preservation time cases. PGD was classified as occurring in the first 24 hours after transplantation or secondary graft dysfunction (SGD) occurring at any time with a clearly defined cause. Trial survival was compared with a comparator group based on data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry., Results: We performed heart transplants using 7 short and 29 long preservation time donor hearts placed on the HOPE system. The mean preservation time for the long preservation time cases was 414 minutes, the longest being 8 hours and 47 minutes. There was 100% survival at 30 days. One long preservation time recipient developed PGD, and 1 developed SGD. One short preservation time patient developed SGD. Thirty day survival was superior to the ISHLT comparator group despite substantially longer preservation times in the trial patients., Conclusions: HOPE provides effective preservation out to preservation times of nearly 9 hours allowing retrieval from remote geographic locations., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common but poorly understood form of heart failure, characterized by impaired diastolic function. It is highly heterogeneous with multiple comorbidities, including obesity and diabetes, making human studies difficult., Methods: Metabolomic analyses in a mouse model of HFpEF showed that levels of indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), a metabolite produced by gut bacteria from tryptophan, were reduced in the plasma and heart tissue of HFpEF mice as compared with controls. We then examined the role of IPA in mouse models of HFpEF as well as 2 human HFpEF cohorts., Results: The protective role and therapeutic effects of IPA were confirmed in mouse models of HFpEF using IPA dietary supplementation. IPA attenuated diastolic dysfunction, metabolic remodeling, oxidative stress, inflammation, gut microbiota dysbiosis, and intestinal epithelial barrier damage. In the heart, IPA suppressed the expression of NNMT (nicotinamide N-methyl transferase), restored nicotinamide, NAD + /NADH, and SIRT3 (sirtuin 3) levels. IPA mediates the protective effects on diastolic dysfunction, at least in part, by promoting the expression of SIRT3. SIRT3 regulation was mediated by IPA binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, as Sirt3 knockdown diminished the effects of IPA on diastolic dysfunction in vivo. The role of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide circuit in HFpEF was further confirmed by nicotinamide supplementation, Nnmt knockdown, and Nnmt overexpression in vivo. IPA levels were significantly reduced in patients with HFpEF in 2 independent human cohorts, consistent with a protective function in humans, as well as mice., Conclusions: Our findings reveal that IPA protects against diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF by enhancing the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide salvage pathway, suggesting the possibility of therapeutic management by either altering the gut microbiome composition or supplementing the diet with IPA., Competing Interests: Disclosures Wilson Tang is a consultant for Sequana Medical A.V., Cardiol Therapeutics Inc, Genomics plc, Zehna Therapeutics Inc, Renovacor Inc and has received honorarium from Springer Nature for authorship/editorship and American Board of Internal Medicine for exam writing committee. S.L. Hazen reports being named as co-inventors on pending and issued patents held by the Cleveland Clinic relating to cardiovascular diagnostics and therapeutics. S.L. Hazen reports having received royalty payments for inventions or discoveries related to cardiovascular diagnostics or therapeutics from Cleveland Heart laboratory, a fully owned subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics, and Procter & Gamble. S.L. Hazen is a paid consultant for Zehna Therapeutics and Proctor & Gamble and has received research funds from Zehna Therapeutics, Proctor & Gamble, Pfizer Inc, and Roche Diagnostics.

The authors conducted transcardiac blood sampling in healthy subjects and subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) to compare cardiac metabolite and lipid substrate use. We demonstrate that fatty acids are less used by HFpEF hearts and that lipid extraction is influenced by hemodynamic factors including pulmonary pressures and cardiac index. The release of many products of protein catabolism is apparent in HFpEF compared to healthy myocardium. In subgroup analyses, differences in energy substrate use between female and male hearts were identified., Competing Interests: Samples were collected with support of a National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Project Grant (GNT1159721) to Drs Marques and Kaye. Dr Kaye is the recipient of an NHMRC Investigator Grant (Level 3). Dr O’Sullivan is supported by an National Heart Foundation (NHF) Future Leader Fellowship (Level 2) and an New South Wales early to mid career (NSW EMCR) award. Dr Marques is supported by a Senior Medical Research Fellowship from the Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation, a National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (105663), and NHMRC Emerging Leader Grant (GNT2017382). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Aims: The relationship between lower socioeconomic status (SES) and poor cardiovascular outcomes is well described; however, there exists a paucity of data exploring this association in cardiogenic shock (CS). This study aimed to investigate whether any disparities exist between SES and the incidence, quality of care or outcomes of CS patients attended by emergency medical services (EMS)., Methods and Results: This population-based cohort study included consecutive patients transported by EMS with CS between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2019 in Victoria, Australia. Data were collected from individually linked ambulance, hospital, and mortality datasets. Patients were stratified into SES quintiles using national census data produced by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.A total of 2628 patients were attended by EMS for CS. The age-standardized incidence of CS amongst all patients was 11.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 11.4-12.3] per 100 000 person-years, with a stepwise increase from the highest to lowest SES quintile (lowest quintile 17.0 vs. highest quintile 9.7 per 100 000 person-years, P-trend < 0.001). Patients in lower SES quintiles were less likely to attend metropolitan hospitals and more likely to be received by inner regional and remote centres without revascularization capabilities. A greater proportion of the lower SES groups presented with CS due to non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina pectoris (UAP), and overall were less likely to undergo coronary angiography. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an increased 30-day all-cause mortality rate in the lowest three SES quintiles when compared with the highest quintile., Conclusion: This population-based study demonstrated discrepancies between SES status in the incidence, care metrics, and mortality rates of patients presenting to EMS with CS. These findings outline the challenges in equitable healthcare delivery within this cohort., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) are common among women. However, women tend to present later and are less likely to receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) compared with men., Methods: We analysed prospectively collected data (2005-2018) from a multicentre registry on GDMT 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention in 13,015 patients with LV ejection fraction <50%. Guideline-directed medical therapy was defined as beta blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker±mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Long-term mortality was determined by linkage with the Australian National Death Index., Results: Women represented 20% (2,634) of the total cohort. Mean age was 65±12 years. Women were on average >5 years, with higher body mass index and higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, renal dysfunction, prior stroke, and rheumatoid arthritis. Guideline-directed medical therapy was similar between sexes (73% vs 72%; p=0.58), although women were less likely to be on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (80% vs 82%; p=0.02). Women were less likely to be on statin therapy (p<0.001) or a second antiplatelet agent (p=0.007). Women had higher unadjusted long-term mortality (25% vs 19%; p<0.001); however, there were no differences in long-term mortality between sexes on adjusted analysis (hazard ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.14; p=0.94)., Conclusions: Rates of GDMT for LV dysfunction were high and similar between sexes; however, women were less likely to be on appropriate IHD secondary prevention. The increased unadjusted long-term mortality in women was attenuated in adjusted analysis, which highlights the need for optimisation of baseline risk to improve long-term outcomes of women with IHD and comorbid LV dysfunction., Competing Interests: Competing Interest Statement SJD’s work is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Grant (number 1111170). CMR’s work is supported by a NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (reference no. 1136372)., (Copyright © 2023 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-related cardiogenic shock (CS) with or without concomitant CA may have disparate prognoses. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with CS secondary to ACS with and without cardiac arrest (CA). Between 2014 and 2020, 1,573 patients with ACS-related CS with or without CA who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention enrolled in a multicenter Australian registry were analyzed. Primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization and stroke). Long-term mortality was obtained through linkage to the National Death Index. Compared with the no-CA group (n = 769, 49%), the CA group (n = 804, 51%) was younger (62 vs 69 years, p <0.001) and had fewer comorbidities. Patients with CA more frequently had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (92% vs 86%), occluded left anterior descending artery (43% vs 33%), and severe preprocedural renal impairment (49% vs 42%) (all p <0.001). CA increased risk of 30-day MACCE by 45% (odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.00, p = 0.024) after adjustment. CA group had higher 30-day MACCE (55% vs 42%, p <0.001) and mortality (52% vs 37%, p <0.001). Three-year survival was lower for CA compared with no-CA patients (43% vs 52%, p <0.001). In Cox regression, CS with CA was associated with a trend toward greater long-term mortality hazard (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.41, p = 0.055). In conclusion, concomitant CA among patients with ACS-related CS conferred a particularly heightened short-term risk with a diminishing legacy effect over time for mortality. CS survivors continue to exhibit high sustained long-term mortality hazard regardless of CA status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical features among patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and initial shockable rhythms of ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia are not well-characterized., Methods: We compared clinical characteristics and coronary angiographic findings between patients with refractory OHCA (incessant ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia after ≥3 direct-current shocks) and those without refractory OHCA., Results: Between 2014 and 2018, a total of 204 patients with ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia OHCA (median age 62; males 78%) were divided into groups with (36%, 74/204) and without refractory arrest (64%, 130/204). Refractory OHCA patients had longer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (23 versus 15 minutes), more frequently required ≥450 mg amiodarone (34% versus 3.8%), and had cardiogenic shock (80% versus 55%) necessitating higher adrenaline dose (4.0 versus 1.0 mg) and higher rates of mechanical ventilation (92% versus 74%; all P <0.01). Of 167 patients (82%) selected for coronary angiography, 33% (n=55) had refractory OHCA ( P =0.035). Significant coronary artery disease (≥1 major vessel with >70% stenosis) was present in >70% of patients. Refractory OHCA patients frequently had acute coronary occlusion (64% versus 47%), especially left circumflex (20% versus 6.4%) and graft vessel (7.3% versus 0.9%; all P <0.05) compared with those without refractory OHCA. Refractory OHCA group had higher in-hospital mortality (45% versus 30%, P =0.036) and greater new requirement for dialysis (18% versus 6.3%, P =0.011). After adjustment, refractory OHCA was associated with over 2-fold higher odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.06-4.89]; P =0.034)., Conclusions: Refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia OHCA was associated with more intensive resuscitation, higher rates of acute coronary occlusion, and poorer in-hospital outcomes, underscoring the need for future studies in this extreme-risk subgroup., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Aims: Lifestyle risk factors are a modifiable target in atrial fibrillation (AF) management. The relative contribution of individual lifestyle risk factors to AF development has not been described. Development and validation of an AF lifestyle risk score to identify individuals at risk of AF in the general population are the aims of the study., Methods and Results: The UK Biobank (UKB) and Framingham Heart Study (FHS) are large prospective cohorts with outcomes measured >10 years. Incident AF was based on International Classification of Diseases version 10 coding. Prior AF was excluded. Cox proportional hazards regression identified independent AF predictors, which were evaluated in a multivariable model. A weighted score was developed in the UKB and externally validated in the FHS. Kaplan-Meier estimates ascertained the risk of AF development. Among 314 280 UKB participants, AF incidence was 5.7%, with median time to AF 7.6 years (interquartile range 4.5-10.2). Hypertension, age, body mass index, male sex, sleep apnoea, smoking, and alcohol were predictive variables (all P < 0.001); physical inactivity [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.05, P = 0.80] and diabetes (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09, P = 0·38) were not significant. The HARMS2-AF score had similar predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC) 0.782] to the unweighted model (AUC 0.802) in the UKB. External validation in the FHS (AF incidence 6.0% of 7171 participants) demonstrated an AUC of 0.757 (95% CI 0.735-0.779). A higher HARMS2-AF score (≥5 points) was associated with a heightened AF risk (score 5-9: HR 12.79; score 10-14: HR 38.70). The HARMS2-AF risk model outperformed the Framingham-AF (AUC 0.568) and ARIC (AUC 0.713) risk models (both P < 0.001) and was comparable to the CHARGE-AF risk score (AUC 0.754, P = 0.73)., Conclusion: The HARMS2-AF score is a novel lifestyle risk score which may help identify individuals at risk of AF in the general community and assist population screening., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Purpose: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a complex and high-risk life support modality used in severe cardiorespiratory failure. ECMO survival scores are used clinically for patient prognostication and outcomes risk adjustment. This study aims to create the first artificial intelligence (AI)-driven ECMO survival score to predict in-hospital mortality based on a large international patient cohort., Methods: A deep neural network, ECMO Predictive Algorithm (ECMO PAL) was trained on a retrospective cohort of 18,167 patients from the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (ELSO) registry (2017-2020), and performance was measured using fivefold cross-validation. External validation was performed on all adult registry patients from 2021 (N = 5015) and compared against existing prognostication scores: SAVE, Modified SAVE, and ECMO ACCEPTS for predicting in-hospital mortality., Results: Mean age was 56.8 ± 15.1 years, with 66.7% of patients being male and 50.2% having a pre-ECMO cardiac arrest. Cross-validation demonstrated an inhospital mortality sensitivity and precision of 82.1 ± 0.2% and 77.6 ± 0.2%, respectively. Validation accuracy was only 2.8% lower than training accuracy, reducing from 75.5% to 72.7% [99% confidence interval (CI) 71.1-74.3%]. ECMO PAL accuracy outperformed the ECMO ACCEPTS (54.7%), SAVE (61.1%), and Modified SAVE (62%) scores., Conclusions: ECMO PAL is the first AI-powered ECMO survival score trained and validated on large international patient cohorts. ECMO PAL demonstrated high generalisability across ECMO regions and outperformed existing, widely used scores. Beyond ECMO, this study highlights how large international registry data can be leveraged for AI prognostication for complex critical care therapies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by tissue hypoxia caused by circulatory failure arising from inadequate cardiac output. In addition to treating the pathologic process causing impaired cardiac function, prompt hemodynamic support is essential to reduce the risk of developing multiorgan dysfunction and to preserve cellular metabolism. Pharmacologic therapy with the use of vasopressors and inotropes is a key component of this treatment strategy, improving perfusion by increasing cardiac output, altering systemic vascular resistance, or both, while allowing time and hemodynamic stability to treat the underlying disease process implicated in the development of cardiogenic shock. Despite the use of mechanical circulatory support recently garnering significant interest, pharmacologic hemodynamic support remains a cornerstone of cardiogenic shock management, with over 90% of patients receiving at least 1 vasoactive agent. This review aims to describe the pharmacology and hemodynamic effects of current pharmacotherapies and provide a practical approach to their use, while highlighting important future research directions.

Background: Many patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction have no overt volume overload and normal resting left atrial (LA) pressure., Objectives: This study sought to characterize patients with normal resting LA pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] <15 mm Hg) but exercise-induced left atrial hypertension (EILAH)., Methods: The REDUCE LAP-HF II (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) trial randomized 626 patients with ejection fraction ≥40% and exercise PCWP ≥25 mm Hg to atrial shunt or sham procedure. The primary trial outcome, a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, intensification of diuretics, and change in health status was compared between patients with EILAH and those with heart failure and resting left atrial hypertension (RELAH)., Results: Patients with EILAH (29%) had similar symptom severity, but lower natriuretic peptide levels, higher 6-minute walk distance, less atrial fibrillation, lower left ventricular mass, smaller LA volumes, lower E/e', and better LA strain. PCWP was lower at rest, but had a larger increase with exercise in EILAH. Neither group as a whole had a significant effect from shunt therapy vs sham. Patients with EILAH were more likely to have characteristics associated with atrial shunt responsiveness (peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU) and no pacemaker (63% vs 46%; P < 0.001). The win ratio for the primary outcome was 1.56 (P = 0.08) in patients with EILAH and 1.51 (P = 0.04) in those with RELAH when responder characteristics were present., Conclusions: Patients with EILAH had similar symptom severity but less advanced myocardial and pulmonary vascular disease. This important subgroup may be difficult to diagnose without invasive exercise hemodynamics, but it has characteristics associated with favorable response to atrial shunt therapy. (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure [REDUCE LAP-HF TRIAL II]; NCT03088033)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was sponsored by Corvia Medical Inc. Dr Litwin has received research funding from the department of Veterans Affairs, Corvia, AstraZeneca, V-Wave, Axon Therapeutics, and Eli Lilly all paid to the institution; has received consulting fees from CVRx, Axon Therapeutics, Occlutech, Eli Lilly, and Rivus Pharmaceuticals; and has received travel grants, speaker fees, and advisory board honoraria from NovoNordisk and Roche. Dr Komtebedde is employed by Corvia. Dr Burkhoff has consulted for Corvia. Dr Hasenfuß has consulted for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Servier, Vifor; has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and Vifor; and is a co-principal investigator to Impulse Dynamics. Dr Borlaug has received research grants from Corvia, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Mesoblast, Novartis, and Tenax Therapeutics; and has received consulting fees from Actelion, Amgen, Aria, Axon Therapies, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and VADovations. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Eidos, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, MyoKardia, the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, DiNAQOR, Tremeau, CellProthera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, AnaCardio, and Akros. Dr Mohan has received research support from Corvia and V-Wave paid to the institution. Dr Kahwash has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Impulse Dynamics, and Cardionomic. Dr Sverdlov has received research grants from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (Future Leader Fellowships 101918 and 106025), Department of Health and Aged Care (Australia): Medical Research Future Fund (MRF2017053), New South Wales Health (Australia), Novartis Australia, Biotronik, RACE Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor Pharma; and has received personal fees from Novartis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Fail has received research support paid to the institution from Corvia and Alleviant. Dr Chung has served as a consultant to Intershunt. Dr Kaye has received research support from Corvia. Dr Hummel has received research grant funding from National Institutes of Health, Veterans Affairs, American Heart Association, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Axon Therapies. Dr Zirlik has received personal consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Abbott, Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Amgen, Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiorentis, Corvia, Daichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Neucomed, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Rigel, and Stealth Peptides. Dr Hayward has received research support from Corvia, Medtronic, Abbott, Roche, and Procyrion. Dr Lewis has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL 151841, R01-HL131029, R01-HL159514), American Heart Association (15GPSGC-24800006), Amgen, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and SoniVie; has received honoraria for advisory boards outside of the current study from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, NXT, American Regent, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, and Amgen; and has received royalties from UpToDate for scientific content authorship related to exercise physiology. Dr Gupta has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, Imara, Corvia, and Astellas Pharma. Dr Cikes has received institutional research grants from Abbott, Novartis, and Pfizer; has received travel grants, speaker fees, and advisory board honoraria from Abbott, Abiomed, Amicus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GE Healthcare, Krka Pharma, LivaNova, Medtronic, Novartis, Orion Corporation, Pfizer, Sanofi, Swixx BioPharma, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, all outside of the present study; and has received research support from Corvia. Dr Gustafsson has received honoraria outside the present study as a consultant for Abbott, Pfizer, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Alnylam; has received speaker fees from Novartis and Orion Pharma; and has received research support from Corvia. Dr Silvestry has received research support from Corvia. Dr Rowin has received research support from Corvia; and has served as a consultant for Cardiovascular Clinical Sciences. Dr Cutlip has received research support from Corvia paid to the institution. Dr Kitzman has received honoraria outside the present study as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Rivus, Keyto, and Novartis; has received grant funding outside the present study from Novartis, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca; owns stock in Gilead Sciences; and has received research support from Corvia. Dr Shah has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (U54 HL160273, R01 HL107577, R01 HL127028, R01 HL140731, R01 HL149423), Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, Novartis, and Pfizer; and has received personal fees from Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Aria CV, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiora, Coridea, CVRx, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Eisai, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia Therapeutics, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Rivus, Sanofi, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and United Therapeutics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the microcirculatory resistance (MR) and myocardial metabolic adaptations at rest and in response to increased cardiac workload in patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD)., Methods: Patients with objective ischaemia and/or myocardial injury and non-obstructive coronary artery disease underwent thermodilution-derived microcirculatory assessment and transcardiac blood sampling during graded exercise with adenosine-mediated hyperaemia. We measured MR at rest and following supine cycle ergometry. Patients (n=24) were stratified by the resting index of MR (IMR) into normal-IMR (IMR<22U, n=12) and high-IMR groups (IMR≥22U, n=12)., Results: The mean age was 57 years; 67% were males and 38% had hypertension. The normal-IMR group had increased IMR response to exercise (16±5 vs 23±12U, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group, who had persistently elevated IMR at rest and following exercise (38±19 vs 33±15U, p=0.39) despite similar exercise duration and rate-pressure product between the groups, both p>0.05. The normal-IMR group had augmented oxygen extraction ratio following exercise (53±18 vs 64±11%, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group (65±14 vs 59±11%, p=0.26). The postexercise lactate uptake was greater in the high-IMR (0.04±0.05 vs 0.11±0.07 mmol/L, p=0.004) compared with normal-IMR group (0.08±0.06 vs 0.09±0.09 mmol/L, p=0.67). The high-IMR group demonstrated greater troponin release following exercise compared with the normal-IMR group (0.13±0.12 vs 0.001±0.05 ng/L, p=0.03)., Conclusions: Patients with suspected CMD appear to have distinctive microcirculatory resistive and myocardial metabolic profiles at rest and in response to exercise. These differences in phenotypes may permit individualised therapies targeting microvascular responsiveness (normal-IMR group) and/or myocardial metabolic adaptations (normal-IMR and high-IMR groups)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background Transesophageal echocardiography-guided direct cardioversion is recommended in patients who are inadequately anticoagulated due to perceived risk of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT); however, LAAT risk factors remain poorly defined. Methods and Results We evaluated clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters to predict LAAT risk in consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion between 2002 and 2022. Regression analysis identified predictors of LAAT, combined to create the novel CLOTS-AF risk score (comprising clinical and echocardiographic LAAT predictors), which was developed in the derivation cohort (70%) and validated in the remaining 30%. A total of 1001 patients (mean age, 62±13 years; 25% women; left ventricular ejection fraction, 49.8±14%) underwent transesophageal echocardiography, with LAAT identified in 140 of 1001 patients (14%) and dense spontaneous echo contrast precluding cardioversion in a further 75 patients (7.5%). AF duration, AF rhythm, creatinine, stroke, diabetes, and echocardiographic parameters were univariate LAAT predictors; age, female sex, body mass index, anticoagulant type, and duration were not (all P >0.05). CHADS 2 VASc, though significant on univariate analysis ( P <0.001), was not significant after adjustment ( P =0.12). The novel CLOTS-AF risk model comprised significant multivariable predictors categorized and weighted according to clinically relevant thresholds (Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, Left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, Overload (left atrial volume index >34 mL/m 2 ), Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) <17 mm, Stroke, and AF rhythm). The unweighted risk model had excellent predictive performance with an area under the curve of 0.820 (95% CI, 0.752-0.887). The weighted CLOTS-AF risk score maintained good predictive performance (AUC, 0.780) with an accuracy of 72%. Conclusions The incidence of LAAT or dense spontaneous echo contrast precluding cardioversion in patients with AF who are inadequately anticoagulated is 21%. Clinical and noninvasive echocardiographic parameters may identify patients at increased risk of LAAT better managed with a suitable period of anticoagulation before undertaking cardioversion.