1. The Nature of Optical Afterglows Without Gamma-ray Bursts: Identification of AT2023lcr and Multiwavelength Modeling
- Author
-
Li, Maggie L., Ho, Anna Y. Q., Ryan, Geoffrey, Perley, Daniel A., Lamb, Gavin P., Nayana, A. J., Andreoni, Igor, Anupama, G. C., Bellm, Eric C., Berger, Edo, Bloom, Joshua S., Burns, Eric, Caiazzo, Ilaria, Chandra, Poonam, Coughlin, Michael W., El-Badry, Kareem, Graham, Matthew J., Kasliwal, Mansi, Keating, Garrett K., Kulkarni, S. R., Kumar, Harsh, Masci, Frank J., Perley, Richard A., Purdum, Josiah, Rao, Ramprasad, Rodriguez, Antonio C., Rusholme, Ben, Sarin, Nikhil, Sollerman, Jesper, Srinivasaragavan, Gokul P., Swain, Vishwajeet, and Vanderbosch, Zachary
- Subjects
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena - Abstract
In the past few years, the improved sensitivity and cadence of wide-field optical surveys have enabled the discovery of several afterglows without associated detected gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We present the identification, observations, and multiwavelength modeling of a recent such afterglow (AT2023lcr), and model three literature events (AT2020blt, AT2021any, and AT2021lfa) in a consistent fashion. For each event, we consider the following possibilities as to why a GRB was not observed: 1) the jet was off-axis; 2) the jet had a low initial Lorentz factor; and 3) the afterglow was the result of an on-axis classical GRB (on-axis jet with physical parameters typical of the GRB population), but the emission was undetected by gamma-ray satellites. We estimate all physical parameters using afterglowpy and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods from emcee. We find that AT2023lcr, AT2020blt, and AT2021any are consistent with on-axis classical GRBs, and AT2021lfa is consistent with both on-axis low Lorentz factor ($\Gamma_0 \approx 5 - 13$) and off-axis ($\theta_\text{obs}=2\theta_\text{jet}$) high Lorentz factor ($\Gamma_0 \approx 100$) jets., Comment: 40 pages, 18 figures, 20 tables
- Published
- 2024