Search

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed at investigating the effects of tele-yoga on physical function, disease activity, spinal mobility, flexibility, muscular endurance, exercise capacity, balance, sleep quality, stress, depression, anxiety, quality of life (QoL), and mindfulness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: Sixty patients with AS were randomly assigned to the tele-yoga group (TYG) or wait-list control group (CG). In addition to their medical treatments, TYG participants attended online yoga classes three times per week for 8 weeks. The CG continued their standard medical treatment. Data were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was physical function as assessed by the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI). Secondary outcome measures included the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Patient Global Score (BAS-G), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI), Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI), sit-and-reach test, sit-up test, push-up test, incremental shuttle walk test, Balance Master test, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Results: Compared with the CG (n = 27), participants in the TYG (n = 28) demonstrated significant improvements in BASFI (p = 0.001). The TYG also showed significant improvements in disease activity, spinal mobility, flexibility, muscular endurance, balance, sleep quality, stress, depression, and QoL compared with the CG (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Tele-yoga practice appears to be a safe and promising intervention for patients with AS and should be considered as a part of holistic disease management because of its potential physical and psychological benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04803383. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the effect of four different techniques used in the treatment of ureteral stones on patients' daily physical functioning (PF) and quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS)—with or without Double-J stenting (DJS)—and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) were divided into four groups: Group I: SWL (n = 29), Group II: URS (n = 43), Group III: URS +4.8F DJS (n = 39), Group IV: URS +6F DJS (n = 42), and Group V: Control (n = 30). Short Form-36 (SF-36) was administered to each participant both preoperatively and 14 days after operation. Based on the SF-36 results, the changes in patients' PF and QoL were evaluated. Results: Ureteral stone treatment was performed in 202 patients. Of these, 153 patients who underwent an effective SWL or URS procedure in the first attempt were included in the study. Success rates in the first session were 53.7% (29/54) and 83.8% (124/148) for SWL and URS, respectively (p < 0.001). All the four groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, stone size, preoperative PF, and QoL. However, although postoperative PF, role limitations due to physical health, and energy/fatigue scores were similar in Group I, III, and IV, they were significantly higher in Group II. No major complication associated with SWL or URS occurred in any patient. However, in Group 2, DJS was inserted in three (7.7%) patients in the early postoperative period (within the first 48 hours) due to renal colic attacks secondary to ureterovesical junction mucosal edema. Conclusion: URS without DJS seems to be the most advantageous technique in the treatment of ureteral stones in terms of daily PF and QoL. However, it should be noted that patients undergoing URS may require postoperative emergency stenting, although rarely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]