Comparison of the Effects of Four Treatment Techniques Commonly Used in Ureteral Stone Treatment on Patients' Daily Physical Functioning: An Observational Randomized-Controlled Study.

Objective: To investigate the effect of four different techniques used in the treatment of ureteral stones on patients' daily physical functioning (PF) and quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS)—with or without Double-J stenting (DJS)—and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) were divided into four groups: Group I: SWL (n = 29), Group II: URS (n = 43), Group III: URS +4.8F DJS (n = 39), Group IV: URS +6F DJS (n = 42), and Group V: Control (n = 30). Short Form-36 (SF-36) was administered to each participant both preoperatively and 14 days after operation. Based on the SF-36 results, the changes in patients' PF and QoL were evaluated. Results: Ureteral stone treatment was performed in 202 patients. Of these, 153 patients who underwent an effective SWL or URS procedure in the first attempt were included in the study. Success rates in the first session were 53.7% (29/54) and 83.8% (124/148) for SWL and URS, respectively (p < 0.001). All the four groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, stone size, preoperative PF, and QoL. However, although postoperative PF, role limitations due to physical health, and energy/fatigue scores were similar in Group I, III, and IV, they were significantly higher in Group II. No major complication associated with SWL or URS occurred in any patient. However, in Group 2, DJS was inserted in three (7.7%) patients in the early postoperative period (within the first 48 hours) due to renal colic attacks secondary to ureterovesical junction mucosal edema. Conclusion: URS without DJS seems to be the most advantageous technique in the treatment of ureteral stones in terms of daily PF and QoL. However, it should be noted that patients undergoing URS may require postoperative emergency stenting, although rarely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]