Search

Pioneering longitudinal studies of boys with hyperactivity by Satterfield et al. 1 indicated that one of the most deleterious outcomes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is later antisocial behaviors. This risk grows when ADHD is accompanied by severe behavior problems.2 Though most children with ADHD will not go on to engage in criminal behavior, dimensional measures of externalizing behavior problems as well as categorical diagnoses of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder have strong associations with ADHD. Moreover, cross-sectional studies of incarcerated adults indicate that 20% to 30% meet diagnostic criteria for ADHD.3 These associations between childhood ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder and later criminal behavior beg the question of whether treatment of ADHD can reduce the severity of, or in some cases prevent, criminal behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poor school readiness and high rates of expulsion from preschool or day care are common in very young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), while in cases of severe impulsivity and inadequate monitoring there is real danger of injury to the child and others. Compared to older children, preschool-age children with ADHD have more frequent and often severe ADHD symptoms and high rates of psychiatric and developmental comorbidity.1 As pediatricians are now routinely screening for ADHD in children as young as 4 years of age,2 identification will likely increase. However, once identified, far less is known about treating ADHD.3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a robust literature of predominantly cross-sectional studies demonstrating an association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and sleep quality in childhood and adolescence, measured by subjective as well as objective measures, dimensional and categorical variables, and controlling for a wide range of confounders such as other disorders.1 Moreover, ADHD symptoms and sleep problems are independently associated with adverse functional outcome and quality of life.2 As a result, these are viewed as common and mutually exacerbating conditions, likely mediated by common neuropathways.3-5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Children with complex medical problems who require anesthesia are known to be at risk for acute adverse physiologic events related to anesthesia. The risks of anesthesia include short- and long-term psychological and neurobehavioral issues. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the standard of care for diagnosis and follow-up of many conditions, and more children are being subjected to anesthesia to ensure acceptable motion-free image quality of the MRI scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an anesthesia-free patient- and family-centered intervention through an analysis of MRI quality, health-care costs, and operational efficiency as compared with other approaches. This study retrospectively reviewed patient data extracted from electronic medical records of children aged 3-17 years, who underwent outpatient MRI at an urban academic medical center from 2015 to 2016. A total matched sample size of 500 children, 125 per group, was used to investigate the outcome variables including the quality of magnetic resonance image, health-care cost, and procedural time. The groups included are as follows: (1) intervention group, patient- and family-centered preparation of the child, and no anesthesia given (PFC/NA); (2) comparison group, no structured preparation, and no anesthesia given (SC/NA); (3) comparison group, certified child life specialist preparation, and anesthesia given (CCLS/A); (4) comparison group, no structured preparation, anesthesia given (SC/A). The PFC/NA intervention group was found to have significantly lower costs (p <.0001) and shorter procedure times (p <.0001), and 96.8% of the MRI images were of acceptable or better quality than those of the SC/A and CCLS/A groups. The PFC approach provides a way for children to undergo outpatient diagnostic MRI without the need for anesthesia, thus reducing risk, costs, and procedure time. Highlights • The Intervention dispels the notion children need anesthesia to remain still for MRI. • The Intervention allows children to undergo MRI without the need for anesthesia. • The Intervention group had lower costs than the anesthesia groups (p < 0.001). • The Intervention group had shorter procedure time than anesthesia groups (p < 0.001). • In the Intervention group, 96.8% of MRIs were of acceptable quality or better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We tested the interactive effect of feedback and reward on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD. Seventeen boys with ADHD and 17 Normal Control (NC) boys underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing four visuospatial 2-back tasks that required monitoring the spatial location of letters presented on a display. Tasks varied in reward size (large; small) and feedback availability (no-feedback; feedback). While the performance of NC boys was high in all conditions, boys with ADHD exhibited higher performance (similar to those of NC boys) only when they received feedback associated with large-reward. Performance pattern in both groups was mirrored by neural activity in an executive function neural network comprised of few distinct frontal brain regions. Specifically, neural activity in the left and right middle frontal gyri of boys with ADHD became normal-like only when feedback was available, mainly when feedback was associated with large-reward. When feedback was associated with small-reward, or when large-reward was expected but feedback was not available, boys with ADHD exhibited altered neural activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula. This suggests that contextual support normalizes activity in executive brain regions in children with ADHD, which results in improved working memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persistent and early-onset externalizing behavior problems are associated with a wide range of impairments.1 Parent management training (PMT) is frequently recommended as either a prevention strategy in at-risk children, or as first -line treatment. Although several group-based and individually based models of PMT have demonstrated efficacy in reducing preschool behavior problems, there is a paucity of comparative effectiveness studies to help guide treatment selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify patient- and treatment-level factors that predict intervention engagement and outcome for adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), guiding efforts to enhance care.Method: Integrative data analysis was used to pool data from 4 randomized controlled trials of adolescent ADHD treatment with participants (N = 854) receiving various evidence-based behavioral therapy packages in 5 treatment arms (standard [STANDARD], comprehensive [COMP], engagement-focused [ENGAGE]), community-based usual care (UC), or no treatment (NOTX). Participants also displayed varying medication use patterns (negligible, inconsistent, consistent) during the trial. Regression and latent growth curve analyses examined treatment- and patient-level predictors of engagement and outcome.Results: Compared with COMP, ENGAGE was associated with higher parent engagement in behavioral therapy (d = 1.35-1.73) when delivered in university, but not community, clinics. Under some conditions, ENGAGE also predicted youth engagement in behavioral therapy (d = 1.21) and lower likelihood of negligible medication use (odds ratio = 0.49 compared with NOTX). UC was associated with poorer parent engagement compared with COMP (d = -0.59) and negligible medication use (odds ratio = 2.29) compared with NOTX. Compared with COMP, ENGAGE (in university settings) was consistently associated with larger ADHD symptom improvements (d = 0.41-0.83) at 6-month follow-up and sometimes associated with larger grade point average (d = 0.68) and parent-teen conflict (d = 0.41) improvements. Consistent medication use during behavioral therapy was associated with larger improvements in ADHD symptoms (d = 0.28) and parent-teen conflict (d = 0.25-0.36). An ADHD+internalizing clinical profile predicted larger improvements in grade point average (d = 0.45). Family adversity predicted poorer parent and youth engagement (rate ratio = 0.90-0.95), negligible medication use (odds ratio = 1.22), and smaller improvements in grade point average (d = -0.23). African American race predicted smaller improvements in parent-teen conflict (d = -0.49).Conclusion: Engagement-focused behavioral therapy and consistent medication use most frequently predicted stronger clinical engagement and outcomes for adolescents with ADHD. Youths who are African American or who experience family adversity may demonstrate treatment-related disparities for certain outcomes; youths with ADHD+internalizing symptoms may demonstrate excellent academic outcomes following behavioral therapy.Data Sharing: The full ADHD TIDAL dataset is publicly available through the National Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov), including a data dictionary. The study protocol is also publicly available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02734-6. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ADHD is common in parents of children with ADHD, and little is known about how to select, sequence, or combine treatments in multiplex families in which both a child and a parent have ADHD. Over a 3-year period, 35 dyads consisting of a child aged 3-8 years with ADHD symptoms not yet treated with stimulant medications and a mother with ADHD were first randomized to receive 8 weeks of behavioral parent training (BPT) or individually titrated maternal stimulant medication (MSM). [Extracted from the article]

The goal of this session is to increase the understanding of the effects of ADHD medications on sleep in youth with ADHD by reviewing previous studies and a recent comparative effectiveness study [Methylphenidate-Atomoxetine Crossover (MACRO) Study]. The most common sleep problems reported at baseline were as follows: 1) takes >30 minutes to fall asleep (23.9%); 2) grinds teeth (19.3%); 3) snores (16.4%); 4) too much energy to sleep (13.4%); 5) talks in sleep (11.7%); and 6) excessive movements in sleep (10.5%). [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To conduct a phase II trial of the combination of carboplatin, prednisone, and everolimus in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as mTOR inhibition can overcome resistance to chemotherapy in prostate cancer.Methods: Patients with progressive mCRPC pretreated with docetaxel-based regimen were eligible. Performance status of 0-1 and adequate bone marrow, renal, and liver function were required. Primary end point was time to progression. Treatment consisted of carboplatin (starting dose equal to area under the curve (AUC of 5) intravenously every 21 days along with oral everolimus 5 mg once daily and prednisone 5 mg twice daily.Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled with median age of 69 years with 8 patients of African American origin. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia in 4 of 6 initial patients required dose adjustment of carboplatin to AUC of 4 for subsequent patients. There were no pharmacokinetic interactions between carboplatin and everolimus. The median time to progression was 2.5 months (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-4.3 months), and median overall survival was 12.5 months (90% CI, 7.7-18.7 months). Of 10 patients, 8 that demonstrated positive nuclear phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) staining on immunohistochemistry progressed within 9 weeks, whereas 2 patients with negative staining continued without progression for prolonged durations of 30 and 48 weeks. TSC1 gene mutations did not correlate with clinical outcome.Conclusion: The addition of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to carboplatin demonstrated minimal clinical efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. pAKT testing warrants further evaluation as a predictive marker of response to everolimus therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• ADHD occurs in 5.9 % of youth and 2.5 % of adults. • Most cases of ADHD are caused by the combined effects of many genetic and environmental risks. • There are small differences in the brain between people with and without ADHD. • Untreated ADHD can lead to many adverse outcomes. • ADHD costs society hundreds of billions of dollars each year, worldwide. Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base. We reviewed studies with more than 2000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder. We generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 80 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 366 people who have read this document and agree with its contents. Many findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The rapid expansion of telemedicine has presented a challenge for the care of patients with genitourinary malignancies. We sought to assess patient and physician perspectives on the use of telemedicine for genitourinary cancer care.Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients who had telemedicine visits with urology, medical oncology, or radiation oncology for management of genitourinary malignancies from July-August 2020. Patients and physicians each received a questionnaire regarding the telemedicine experience. Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The primary outcomes of the study were patient and physician satisfaction.Results: Of the 115 patients who enrolled, we received 96 patient responses and 46 physician responses. Overall, 77% of patients and 70% of physicians reported being "extremely satisfied" with the telemedicine encounter. Satisfaction was high among all components of the encounter including patient-physician communication, counseling, shared decision making, time spent, timeliness and efficiency, and convenience. Additionally, 78% of patients and 85% of physicians "strongly agreed" that they were able to discuss sensitive topics about cancer care as well as they could at an in-person visit. Nine telemedicine visits (9%) encountered technological barriers. Technological barriers were associated with lower overall satisfaction scores among both patients and physicians (p ≤ 0.01).Conclusion: We observed high levels of patient and physician satisfaction for telemedicine visits for management of genitourinary malignancies. Technological barriers were encountered by 9% of patients and were associated with decreased satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is generally incurable and has scarce treatment options, especially for cisplatin-ineligible patients previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate directed at Nectin-4, a protein highly expressed in urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in the post-immunotherapy setting in cisplatin-ineligible patients.Methods: EV-201 is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study of enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Cohort 2 included adults (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less who were considered ineligible for cisplatin at enrolment and who had not received platinum-containing chemotherapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting. Enfortumab vedotin was given intravenously at a dose of 1·25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of enfortumab vedotin. EV-201 is an ongoing study and the primary analysis is complete. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03219333.Findings: Between Oct 8, 2017, and Feb 11, 2020, 91 patients were enrolled at 40 sites globally, of whom 89 received treatment. Median follow-up was 13·4 months (IQR 11·3-18·9). At data cutoff (Sept 8, 2020), the confirmed objective response rate was 52% (46 of 89 patients; 95% CI 41-62), with 18 (20%) of 89 patients achieving a complete response and 28 (31%) achieving a partial response. 49 (55%) of 89 patients had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (eight [9%] patients), maculopapular rash (seven [8%] patients), and fatigue (six [7%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 15 (17%) patients. Three (3%) patients died due to acute kidney injury, metabolic acidosis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (one [1%] each) within 30 days of first dose and these deaths were considered by the investigator to be related to treatment; a fourth death from pneumonitis occurred more than 30 days after the last dose and was also considered to be related to treatment.Interpretation: Treatment with enfortumab vedotin was tolerable and confirmed responses were seen in 52% of cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. These patients have few treatment options, and enfortumab vedotin could be a promising new therapy for a patient population with a high unmet need.Funding: Astellas Pharma Global Development and Seagen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When compared to other malignancies, the tumor microenvironment (TME) of primary and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is relatively devoid of immune infiltrates. While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) induces a complex immune infiltrate in localized prostate cancer, the composition of the TME in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), and the effects of ADT and other treatments in this context are poorly understood. Here, we perform a comprehensive single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiling of metastatic sites from patients participating in a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03951831) that evaluated standard-of-care chemo-hormonal therapy combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. We perform a longitudinal, protein activity-based analysis of TME subpopulations, revealing immune subpopulations conserved across multiple metastatic sites. We also observe dynamic changes in these immune subpopulations in response to treatment and a correlation with clinical outcomes. Our study uncovers a therapy-resistant, transcriptionally distinct tumor subpopulation that expands in cell number in treatment-refractory patients. [Display omitted] • Protein-inferred activity clustering shows complex immune cells in CSPC metastases • ADT and aPD-1 treatment induces robust infiltrates of CD8+, CD4+ T cells, and Tregs • T cell infiltration determined by scRNA-seq correlated with T cells shown by qmIF • Baseline tumor and immune clusters associated with clinical outcomes TME composition of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) remains elusive. Hawley et al. perform scRNA-seq analysis of metastatic sites from mCSPC patients with ADT and anti-PD-1 treatment, identify tumor and immune subpopulations conserved across multiple metastatic sites, and reveal treatment-induced dynamic changes in these subpopulations and their correlation with clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) originating from the renal medulla. Clinical outcomes are poor, and there are no consensus guidelines to guide therapy. Objective To determine genomic alterations (GAs) in a series of patients with locally advanced or metastatic CDC for whom genomic profiling was performed during the course of clinical care. Design, setting, and participants Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks or slides were obtained for 17 patients with CDC. DNA was extracted and comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a laboratory certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Bayesian algorithms and local alignment algorithms were used to detect substitutions and insertions/deletions, respectively. A comparison to normal control samples was used to detect copy number alterations. Clinically relevant GAs (CRGAs) were defined as those linked to approved or investigational targeted therapies. Results and limitations The median age in the cohort was 53 yr (range 26–73), and 14 primary tumors and three metastatic sites assessed. A total of 36 GAs were detected in this series of patients, with an average of 2.1 GAs per case. The most common GAs were in NF2 (5/17, 29%), SETD2 (4/17, 24%), SMARCB1 (3/17, 18%), and CDKN2A (2/17, 12%). Of nine cases assessed for FH GAs, two patients had FH homozygous loss. A limitation is that targeted interrogation of genes known to be implicated in other cancers was performed, so mutations outside of these cannot be excluded. Conclusions Recurrent CRGAs were detected in this series of CDC cases and suggest a possible benefit from targeted therapy. In particular, mTOR inhibitors may be of interest in patients with NF2 alterations. Alterations in FH and SMARCB1 also occurred in a mutually exclusive manner to NF2 alterations. Patient summary This report provides important genomic insights into collecting duct carcinoma, a rare type of renal cell carcinoma with a very aggressive course. These insights could further rationalize the use of targeted therapies for rare tumors according to the individual genomic alterations harbored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background E9802 was a phase 2 multi-institution study conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of vaccinia and fowlpox prostate-specific antigen (PSA) vaccine (step 1) followed by combination with androgen ablation therapy (step 2) in patients with PSA progression without visible metastasis. Objective To test the hypothesis that vaccine therapy in this early disease setting will be safe and have a biochemical effect that would support future studies of immunotherapy in patients with minimal disease burden. Design, setting, and participants Patients who had PSA progression following local therapy were treated with PROSTVAC-V (vaccinia)/TRICOM on cycle 1 followed by PROSTVAC-F (fowlpox)/TRICOM for subsequent cycles in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (step 1). Androgen ablation was added on progression (step 2). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Step 1 primary end points included progression at 6 mo and characterization of change in PSA velocity pretreatment to post-treatment. Step 2 end points included PSA response with combined vaccine and androgen ablation. Results and limitations In step 1, 25 of 40 eligible patients (63%) were progression free at 6 mo after registration (90% confidence interval [CI], 48–75). The median pretreatment PSA velocity was 0.13 log(PSA)/mo, in contrast to median postregistration velocity of 0.09 log(PSA)/mo ( p = 0.02), which is an increase in median PSA doubling time from 5.3 mo to 7.7 mo. No grade ≥4 treatment-related toxicity was observed. In the 27 patients eligible and treated for step 2, 20 patients achieved a complete response (CR) at 7 mo (CR rate: 74%; 90% CI, 57–87). Although supportive of larger studies in the cooperative group setting, this study is limited by the small number of patients and the absence of a control group as in a phase 3 study. Conclusions A viral PSA vaccine can be administered safely in the multi-institutional cooperative group setting to patients with minimal disease volume alone and combined with androgen ablation, supporting the feasibility of future phase 3 studies in this population. Patient summary These data support consideration of vaccine therapy earlier in the course of prostate cancer progression with minimal disease burden in future studies of vaccine approaches in earlier stages of disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Methylphenidate has prominent effects in the dopamine-rich striatum that are absent for the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor atomoxetine. This study tested whether baseline striatal activation would predict differential response to the two medications in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Method: A total of 36 youth with ADHD performed a Go/No-Go test during functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and were treated with methylphenidate and atomoxetine using a randomized cross-over design. Whole-brain task-related activation was regressed on clinical response.Results: Task-related activation in right caudate nucleus was predicted by an interaction of clinical responses to methylphenidate and atomoxetine (F1,30 = 17.00; p < .001). Elevated caudate activation was associated with robust improvement for methylphenidate and little improvement for atomoxetine. The rate of robust response was higher for methylphenidate than for atomoxetine in youth with high (94.4% vs. 38.8%; p = .003; number needed to treat = 2, 95% CI = 1.31-3.73) but not low (33.3% vs. 50.0%; p = .375) caudate activation. Furthermore, response to atomoxetine predicted motor cortex activation (F1,30 = 14.99; p < .001).Conclusion: Enhanced caudate activation for response inhibition may be a candidate biomarker of superior response to methylphenidate over atomoxetine in youth with ADHD, purportedly reflecting the dopaminergic effects of methylphenidate but not atomoxetine in the striatum, whereas motor cortex activation may predict response to atomoxetine. These data do not yet translate directly to the clinical setting, but the approach is potentially important for informing future research and illustrates that it may be possible to predict differential treatment response using a biomarker-driven approach.Clinical Trial Registration Information: Stimulant Versus Nonstimulant Medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00183391. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of the article "Examination of the Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Construct in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder" by Beth Krone and colleagues is presented.