Search

The article presents the discussion on challenges and strategies involved in collaboratively writing a textbook, focusing on maintaining structure and consistency. Topics include creating effective headings to organize content, the importance of uniformity across chapters; and how structured headings can simplify the writing process and enhance readability.

The article emphasizes the importance of continued support for late elementary school students in developing advanced word reading and decoding skills. It highlights the complexity of word reading and decoding, especially when dealing with complex words in English. It also discusses the significance of morphological analysis, syllable decomposition, and flexibility training as instructional strategies to help students improve their word-reading abilities in the late elementary grades.

The article focuses on the redesign of Aperture magazine, highlighting the changes made to enhance readability and accessibility while maintaining the publication's commitment to presenting diverse ideas and photography. It also explores the intersection of photography and design, emphasizing the essential role design plays in framing and enhancing the visual experience of photography.

A recent study conducted at Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital in Maharashtra, India, examined the readability of informed consent documents (ICDs) in clinical research and its impact on consent refusal rates. The researchers analyzed 300 ICDs from various types of studies over a 6-year period. They used the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES) and estimated reading time to assess readability, and correlated this data with consent refusal rates. The study found that the readability of ICDs has improved over time, and that pharma studies performed better in terms of compliance with Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines. The researchers concluded that improving the readability of ICDs can potentially reduce consent refusal rates. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted at the Jr. Hospital of Cook County in Chicago, Illinois, evaluated the readability of online patient education materials (PEMs) related to liver transplantation in the United States. The researchers found that the readability of these materials exceeded the recommended level, hindering their accessibility to a broader population. The study highlights the importance of optimizing the readability of PEMs to improve equitable healthcare services and outcomes. The research provides valuable insights for healthcare providers and institutions in developing patient education materials that are comprehensible to diverse populations. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of California examined the readability and quality of online patient education materials related to endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS). The study found that these materials often lacked readability and quality, despite recommendations to publish them at or below a sixth-grade literacy level. The researchers utilized an artificial intelligence system called ChatGPT to modify and generate new articles, and found that it improved the readability and quality of the materials. However, most of the articles still remained above the recommended literacy level for patient education materials. The study suggests that ChatGPT has the potential to generate more reliable and higher quality patient education materials, but further improvements are needed to match the readability of average online articles. [Extracted from the article]

A recent report from the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs discusses the use of large language models (LLMs) in providing education on prostate cancer (PCa). The study evaluated the performance of three LLMs, including ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bard, in terms of accuracy, comprehensiveness, and readability. While all three models generated accurate and comprehensive information, ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated superiority in general knowledge of PCa, and Bard had the highest readability scores. The researchers concluded that while these AI models cannot replace healthcare professionals, they can assist in patient education and guidance. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by the Urology Department evaluated the quality and readability of information provided by ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence-based language model, in response to frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation (PE). The study found that the texts produced by ChatGPT exhibited significant concerns regarding quality, readability, and understanding. The average scores for quality and comprehensibility were relatively low, indicating a need for improvement. The study concluded that ChatGPT cannot replace the need for comprehensive medical consultations. However, it is important to note that the investigation only included the first 25 popular keywords in English. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania evaluated the quality and readability of online health information resources for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The study found that most patient-oriented websites on SHPT from ESKD were written at a reading level higher than recommended and had low-quality information. The researchers emphasized the need to improve the accessibility and quality of information for all patients. The study was published in the Journal of Surgical Research. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted at Stanford University examined the accuracy, reliability, and readability of large language models in answering questions about the diagnosis and management of liver cancer. The study asked twenty questions to three different language models: ChatGPT-3.5, Gemini, and Bing. The responses were evaluated by six physicians, and the accuracy, reliability, and readability of the answers were analyzed. The study found that large language models often provided complex responses that were not accurate, reliable, or readable. The researchers concluded that these models are not effective in providing accurate information about liver cancer. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by researchers at the University of Southern California (USC) evaluated the quality of responses provided by an artificial intelligent chatbot called ChatGPT to hypothetical tracheostomy care questions. The responses were graded by otolaryngologists for appropriateness, accuracy, and overall score. The study found that while the responses exhibited moderately high appropriateness, high accuracy, and moderately high overall scores, there were instances of incomplete or misleading information. The study concluded that AI-generated information should not be solely relied upon as a direct patient care resource. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai analyzed the readability levels of 50 web articles on dyslexia. The study aimed to determine if these articles were written at an appropriate level for individuals with reading challenges. The researchers used six readability formulas to assess the articles and found that most of them were too complex, with readability scores ranging from a 12th-grade level to college-level. The study suggests that tools such as readability metrics and AI sentence restructuring could help make dyslexia-related information more accessible and understandable. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University evaluated the readability of responses generated by ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence language model, in the context of lung cancer. The study found that the responses provided by ChatGPT were at a moderate level of readability, making them difficult to understand for many individuals. The researchers suggest that future improvements could be made to program ChatGPT to produce responses that are more appropriate for people of different educational and age groups. This study highlights the importance of ensuring that medical information obtained from AI tools is accessible and understandable for a wide range of users. [Extracted from the article]

A new report discusses research on patient education materials for acute appendicitis, cholecystitis, and hydrocele. The study compares the effectiveness of two artificial intelligence tools, ChatGPT and Google Gemini, in creating patient education brochures. The analysis found no significant differences in readability, word count, sentence length, or reliability between the materials produced by the two tools. The study concludes that both ChatGPT and Google Gemini are equally effective in producing patient education materials for these conditions, suggesting their potential utility in healthcare settings. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Southern California (USC) evaluated the accuracy, completeness, clarity, and readability of a generative pretrained model (GPT) chatbot called ChatGPT in providing information about prostate cancer. The study found that the GPT-generated responses were deemed correct by a majority of urologists and urology residents, and the simplified layperson summaries created from these responses were rated as accurate and sufficient for patient decision-making. However, the readability of the layperson summaries was higher than the original GPT outputs, indicating a need for improvement in delivering patient information. The researchers concluded that prompting the model to respond with accuracy, completeness, clarity, and readability could enhance its utility in medical chatbots. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by the University of Health Sciences evaluated the effectiveness of ChatGPT in addressing patient questions about thyroid surgery. The study found that the majority of ChatGPT responses were rated fair or above in terms of accuracy, readability, and relevance. However, the readability scores indicated that the information may not be easily understood by the general public. The researchers concluded that while ChatGPT shows potential, further refinements are needed to optimize its application in the medical domain. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by researchers at Jiangnan University in Jiangsu, China, examined the impact of text typography direction and font size on the readability of word clouds. The study found that word clouds with horizontal typography had higher reading search accuracy, readability scores, and fatigue scores compared to word clouds with vertical and diagonal typography. Additionally, an increase in text typography directions resulted in a decrease in readability. Font size also played a significant role in the legibility of text in word clouds. The study concluded that these findings have applications in graphic design, human-computer interaction, and information visualization. [Extracted from the article]

A recent research report from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) compared the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot called ChatGPT with traditional patient information leaflets (PILs) for educating patients about chronic pain medications. The study found that while traditional PILs generally had higher readability, the AI-generated texts had more positive emotional tones. Accuracy, completeness, actionability, and understandability were comparable between the two methods. The researchers concluded that while AI chatbots offer efficient information delivery, it is important to balance innovation with evidence-based practice and prioritize patient-centeredness. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at Yale University School of Medicine evaluated the quality and readability of online literature related to facial feminization surgery (FFS). The study found that the majority of websites providing information on FFS had a very poor or poor rating in terms of quality. Additionally, the reading grade level of the literature was above the recommended sixth grade level for health literature. The researchers recommended that FFS patient resources should be written at a more inclusive reading level and include visual aids to improve patient comprehension. They also suggested that websites should provide more information about procedural risks and limitations to ensure a broader understanding. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of California analyzed the quality and readability of online information related to shoulder instability. The study found that many patient educational materials (PEMs) did not meet current recommendations, with an average quality rating of "poor" and a reading level equivalent to the ninth grade. Additionally, the study revealed that only a small percentage of the materials mentioned the risks associated with surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the limited information available on the risks and outcomes of operative treatment for shoulder instability in these online resources. [Extracted from the article]

Researchers from the University of Engineering and Technology in Lahore, Pakistan have developed a handwriting tutoring system to teach Urdu transcription. The system uses machine learning to evaluate the quality of handwriting based on legibility and writing process, providing feedback to the writer. The system achieved an average accuracy of 97% in identifying and correcting mistakes, making it effective for individuals seeking to improve their handwriting skills. This research contributes to the development of a standard for evaluating the quality of Urdu handwriting and provides an architecture that relies on machine learning-based models to provide detailed and intelligent feedback. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at Roger Williams Medical Center examined the readability and other health literacy metrics of online patient education materials (OPEMs) related to breast cancer. The study found that the average readability of these materials was significantly higher than the recommended 6th grade level set by the American Medical Association. Additionally, the study revealed inconsistencies in the reporting of health literacy-associated metrics in the literature. The researchers suggest that standardization of future readability studies and a holistic evaluation of patient materials could improve shared decision-making, increase screening rates, and raise awareness about breast cancer. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine evaluated the quality and understandability of patient education materials (PEMs) related to scar management. The study found that while online PEMs included a wide range of scar management interventions, they lacked emphasis on non-invasive methods such as scar massage or sun protection. The readability of the materials was moderate, and the actionability was lacking. The researchers suggest that improving language simplicity, including visual aids, and providing specific steps for patients to take action could enhance the effectiveness of PEMs for scar management. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine explored the use of large language models (LLMs) in radiation oncology patient care. The study found that LLMs, specifically ChatGPT version 3.5, were able to generate accurate, comprehensive, and concise responses to patient questions with minimal risk of harm. The LLMs performed as well as or better than expert answers in terms of factual correctness, completeness, and conciseness. However, the LLMs did have a higher reading level compared to expert answers. The findings suggest that with some retraining, LLMs could be a valuable resource for patient queries in radiation oncology and other medical fields. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted at the University of Health Sciences aimed to assess the readability of online patient education materials related to brainstem implants. The study found that all websites examined had a high level of readability, surpassing the recommended 6th-grade reading level suggested by the American Medical Association. This may hinder patients and their families from fully understanding the materials. The researchers suggest that health professionals and institutions should strive to strike a balance between scientific accuracy and readability to make these materials more accessible to a broader audience. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by researchers at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) found that online patient educational materials (OPEMs) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in both English and Spanish do not meet recommended readability standards. The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends that OPEMs be written at or below a sixth-grade reading level, but the majority of OPEMs in both languages were considered difficult to read. The study suggests that health content creators, particularly hospitals and professional societies, should prioritize developing materials that are written at a level appropriate for the public in order to prevent health disparities related to literacy. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted at Amsterdam University Medical Center has found that an Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Model (AI-LLM) can improve the readability of knee radiology reports. The researchers inserted a prompt command into the AI-LLM to generate reports that explain the radiology findings in layman's terms. The AI-LLM-generated reports showed statistically significant improvements in readability scores compared to the original reports. However, the AI-LLM did produce some inaccurate text, so it is important for physicians to engage in collaborative discussions with patients to ensure accurate understanding. This study suggests that AI-LLMs have the potential to enhance patients' understanding of their imaging reports and reduce the burden on physicians. [Extracted from the article]

The article presents the discussion on the use of ebooks and electronic readers prefering print books, audio books, or ebooks when reading for pleasure.

Aim of Study: To assess patients' comprehension of discharge instructions and to explore associated factors. Methods: Following a cross-sectional design, 300 patients aged above 14 years, who were admitted to Aseer Central Hospital, and were discharged to home, were included. A questionnaire was designed by researchers for data collection. It consisted of personal data and statements related to assessment of the patients' comprehension of discharge instructions. Results: Most participants were males (68.3%). Age of 26% was <30 years or 30-39 years (27%), while age of less than one-quarter of them (22.3%) was 40-49 years or >50 years (24.7%). Educational level of more than one-third was either secondary school (36.7%) or university education (37.7%), while 6.3% were illiterate. Most participants (85.7%) lived with their families, while 14.3% were living alone. More than half of patients (57%) did not know the side effects of their drugs, 13% of participants did not know about times of their medication intake, duration of treatment (16.7%), when to return to hospital (39.1%), or precautions after discharge (30.1%). About one-third of patients (33.7%) had poor comprehension regarding their discharge instructions, while 37.7% had moderate comprehension and 28.7% had good comprehension. More than three-quarters of patients felt satisfied about their understanding regarding discharge instructions, while 5.7% were not satisfied. About half of patients (47.7%) preferred verbal methods for having discharge instructions, 11.3% preferred written instructions, while 41% preferred both verbal and written methods. Knowledge levels were significantly lower among those aged >50 years (p=0.031). Illiterate patients had signifi- cantly lower comprehension about discharge instructions (p=0.021). Those who live with their families had significantly better knowledge than those who don't live alone (p=0.024). Their comprehension differed signifi- cantly according to their department (p=0.009), with best comprehension among those discharged from the Surgery Department, while the worst comprehension was observed among patients discharged from the Urology and Orthopedics Departments (63.6% and 48.1%, respectively). Conclusions: About one-third of patients have poor comprehension regarding their discharge instructions. Verbal methods for discharge instructions are preferred by about half of patients, while 41% prefer both verbal and written methods. Patients' poor comprehension is significantly associated with patients' illiteracy, older age (>50 years) and social isolation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A recent report discusses the readability of online educational material about cerebrovascular diseases from major healthcare organizations. The study found that none of the organizations met the federal government guidelines for grade-level readability, with most materials being far above the recommended reading level. The researchers provide suggestions for improving the informational material to enhance patient understanding. This research has been peer-reviewed and offers valuable insights for patients seeking medical information online. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted at the University of Pennsylvania explored the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the readability of patient education materials (PEMs) on aortic stenosis (AS). The researchers used two AI dialogue platforms, ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard, to rewrite online PEMs to meet recommended reading skill levels. The results showed that both platforms successfully improved the readability of the materials, although they did not fully meet the recommended reading levels. This study suggests that AI dialogue platforms have the potential to enhance health literacy in cardiac patients in the future. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted at the University of Health Sciences in Izmir, Turkey, examined the readability, reliability, quality, and content of patient education materials (PEMs) about Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) available on the internet. The study found that the readability of these materials was quite high, surpassing the recommended sixth-grade level. However, the reliability and quality of the PEMs were determined to be moderate to poor. The researchers suggest that PEMs for public health issues should be prepared with attention to readability recommendations. [Extracted from the article]

This study implemented an integrated system of Note Summarization (NoteSum) that merged with multi-users' notes and searched for relevant information on the Internet and, slides, and textbooks to create a summary for students to learn effectively. The integrated system's framework consists of four different modules: Topic Identification Module, Supporting Material Finding Module, Content Mapping Module and Learning Material Integrating Module. Five experiments were conducted; these resulted in the following findings. First, translating notes with the assistance of topic terms could enhance translation quality. Second, when mapping contents, NoteSum performed better in a discussion-based course rather than in a technical course. Third, the Jensen-Shannon (JS) Divergence was used to assess the generated summary that performed better for the discussion-based course. Fourth, the three attributes—presence of topic terms, number of non-topic words, and ratio of the words with important parts of speech—had different effects on different subjects. Finally, we compared NoteSum with other existing summarization systems. The results indicated that the NoteSum-generated summary was closer to students' original notes and thus resulted in better performance in readability, informativeness, and completeness. All the results confirm that our proposed NoteSum is an effective note summarization system for student learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A recent study conducted by researchers at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences examined the readability and trustworthiness of websites providing information on kidney transplantation. The study found that the assessed websites were suitable for students or high school graduates, indicating that the readability level was higher than recommended. The researchers suggest that health organizations should consider readability when designing their websites. The study also found a significant association between the credibility of websites and their position on search engine results pages. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers from Stanford University School of Medicine examined the readability and reliability of online patient education materials (OPEMs) about statins, which are commonly used for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The study found that the average reading grade level of these materials was 10.9, exceeding the recommended 6th grade level. Additionally, there was an inverse association between readability and reliability, with industry and commercial sources being the most readable but least reliable, while lay press sources were the most reliable. The researchers suggest that the lack of accessible, high-quality online health information may contribute to statin nonadherence. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers from Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons examined the accessibility and readability of online patient education on cutaneous lymphomas. The study found that patients often turn to the internet for information on cutaneous lymphoma, but it can be challenging to find patient-accessible education. The researchers analyzed over 1,000 webpages and found that the readability of the information exceeded the recommended grade level. They concluded that there is a need for more patient-accessible education and improved readability of existing online resources. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted at the University of Utah compared the readability of patient education materials (PEMs) in ophthalmology generated by AI chatbots to those produced by the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The study found that the PEMs generated by ChatGPT 4.0 had the highest readability scores, indicating that they may be more difficult to read. However, when prompted to produce content at a 6th-grade reading level, both ChatGPT 4.0 and Google Bard were able to significantly improve their readability scores. The study suggests that AI tools, when guided by appropriate prompts, can generate accessible and comprehensible PEMs in the field of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgeries. [Extracted from the article]

Naomi Alderman's novel, "The Future," explores a near future where climate-related disasters have become commonplace. In this world, three tech billionaires position themselves as saviors while secretly planning to escape to a private bunker. The story follows three other major characters, including a doomsday cult leader's daughter and a YouTube influencer, who are determined to prevent the apocalypse. While the novel is praised for its readability and breathtaking scenes, some critics argue that it prioritizes ideas over human interaction and presents a simplistic view that money and technology can solve our problems. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by Umm Al-Qura University in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, examined the content of Arabic diabetes websites targeting speakers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The study found that the majority of these websites performed poorly in terms of quality, readability, engagement, popularity, and availability. Only two websites were HONcode certified, and none of the websites achieved a high score in the DISCERN analysis. The study concludes that there is a need for improving the content of diabetes information websites available to Arabic speakers, and collaboration between multiple stakeholders is necessary to develop websites with high-quality, easily understandable information. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, aimed to assess the readability and quality of online materials related to Zenker's diverticulum. The researchers reviewed the first 50 websites that appeared in a Google search for "Zenker's diverticulum." The study found that the readability scores for both patient-oriented and physician-oriented websites were more advanced than recommended for medical education materials. However, patient-oriented sites had better readability than physician-oriented sites. The understandability and actionability scores did not differ between the two categories of websites. This research provides valuable insights into the quality of online education materials for Zenker's diverticulum. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at Florida State University evaluated the readability and quality of online patient education materials for pediatric ACL tears. The study found that the average grade level of these resources exceeded the recommended reading level, indicating that they may be too difficult for the average adult reader. However, the materials were deemed to be of good quality. The researchers emphasized the importance of considering the readability of these resources in order to improve health literacy and outcomes, particularly for patients and families of lower socioeconomic status. Physicians treating young patients with ACL tears should be aware of these online resources as they are increasingly utilized. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted at Stanford University examined the readability and quality of online health information related to pediatric nocturnal enuresis (bedwetting). The researchers analyzed 36 websites and found that the majority of articles were written at a higher reading level than recommended. Additionally, the quality of the information varied, with some articles considered to be of "good" quality and others of "poor" quality. The study highlights the need for institutions to provide high-quality and easily understandable content for families seeking information on bedwetting. [Extracted from the article]

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota examined the availability and readability of online patient education materials related to cleft lip and palate. The study analyzed both English and Spanish language materials collected from American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams. The findings revealed that while there were more English materials available, both sets of materials had readability levels above the recommended grade level. The researchers suggest that improving the readability of these materials could lead to lower healthcare costs and increased patient satisfaction. [Extracted from the article]

A study compared the performance of three large language models (LLMs) in answering questions related to immuno-oncology. The LLMs evaluated were ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard. The study found that ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 answered all questions, while Google Bard only answered 53.3% of the questions. ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 also had higher rates of reproducible answers, accuracy, relevance, and readability compared to Google Bard. However, the study emphasized the importance of expert verification of the LLM outputs due to the risk of inaccuracy or incompleteness. [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: Houston; State:Texas; United States; North and Central America; Education; Health and Medicine; Surgery; Urethroplasty EN Houston State:Texas United States North and Central America Education Health and Medicine Surgery Urethroplasty 1458 1458 1 11/06/23 20231110 NES 231110 2023 NOV 12 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Medical Devices & Surgical Technology Week -- Fresh data on Education are presented in a new report. According to news originating from Houston, Texas, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, "Online patient education materials (PEMs) often exceed the recommended 6th grade reading level. [Extracted from the article]

Los Angeles, State:California, United States, North and Central America, Health and Medicine, Surgery, Vasectomy Keywords: Los Angeles; State:California; United States; North and Central America; Health and Medicine; Surgery; Vasectomy EN Los Angeles State:California United States North and Central America Health and Medicine Surgery Vasectomy 823 823 1 10/24/23 20231026 NES 231026 2023 OCT 29 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Medical Devices & Surgical Technology Week -- Investigators publish new report on Surgery - Vasectomy. [Extracted from the article]