Search

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common side effects, classified according to timing and severity. Conventional agents such as dexamethasone are effective but have various side effects. For moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapies have been developed to minimize these side effects. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy for highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC)., Methods: We performed a thorough literature search for studies related to dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy with neurokinin-1 antagonists (NK 1 RA) for HEC using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases. A qualitative analysis of the combined data was performed and risk differences with confidence intervals were calculated., Results: Two reviewers independently assessed the 425 records and 12 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility. Two studies were included in the qualitative and meta-analyses. These studies included anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) regimens and cisplatin-based regimens, with palonosetron as the serotonin receptor antagonist. In the two studies, no difference was found in the prevention of vomiting (delayed complete response). However, non-inferiority was not demonstrated in the subgroup that received cisplatin-containing regimens. Delayed complete control showed different results for nausea prevention; however, there was no significant difference in the meta-analysis. Only one report has shown non-inferiority for delayed total control. Although the strength of evidence for individual outcomes varied, there was no difference in the duration of dexamethasone administration., Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy with NK 1 RA and palonosetron can be used to prevent CINV in HEC, limited to AC combination therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Claudin-18 splice variant 2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein, is a highly cell type-specific antigen that is expressed by differentiated gastric mucosa cells. The expression of CLDN18.2 in gastric mucosa cells may be retained upon malignant transformation and is displayed on the surface of several tumors, including gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab is a genetically engineered, highly purified chimeric (mouse/human IgG1) antibody directed against CLDN18.2. Nausea and vomiting were observed as adverse events of zolbetuximab. To investigate the mechanism of nausea and vomiting in humans, we evaluated emesis (retching and vomiting) and conducted histopathologic assessment in ferrets after the administration of zolbetuximab. Emesis was frequently observed in all ferrets treated with zolbetuximab in the first hour after administration. Histopathologic assessment revealed the surface of the gastric mucosa was the primary site of emesis-associated tissue damage. The effect of antiemetics (dexamethasone, ondansetron, fosaprepitant, and olanzapine) on emesis induced by zolbetuximab was investigated. Fosaprepitant showed suppressive effects on emesis, and use of dexamethasone or concomitant use of fosaprepitant with other antiemetics tended to alleviate gastric tissue damage. The onset of emesis in humans receiving zolbetuximab may be associated with damage in the gastric mucosa, and antiemetics may mitigate gastrointestinal adverse events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors are employees of Astellas Pharma, Inc. or its affiliates., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) commonly affects patient quality of life and the overall effectiveness of chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) to 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5-HT 3 RAs) and corticosteroids provides clinically meaningful benefits in preventing CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web to identify clinical studies evaluating NK1RAs combined with 5-HT 3 RAs and dexamethasone for managing CINV in MEC. The endpoints were complete response (CR), complete control (CC), total control (TC), adverse events, and costs. The data were analyzed using a random effects model., Results: From 142 articles identified, 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 4,405 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Approximately 60% of the patients received carboplatin (CBDCA)-based chemotherapy. The meta-analysis showed that triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with NK1RA was significantly more effective for achieving CR than doublet prophylaxis in each phase. Regarding CC, the triplet antiemetic prophylaxis was significantly more effective than the doublet in the overall (risk difference [RD]: 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.17) and delayed (RD: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02-0.13) phases. For TC, no significant differences were observed in any phase. Adding NK1RA did not cause adverse events., Conclusions: Adding NK1RA to CBDCA-based chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits. However, the clinical benefits of NK1RA-containing regimens for overall MEC have not yet been established and require RCTs that exclusively evaluate MEC regimens other than CBDCA-based chemotherapy., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Hypernatremia is an increase in serum sodium concentration above 145 mmol/L. There are many causes of elevated sodium levels in the blood serum. One is incorrect actions performed by medical staff. The symptoms of excessively high serum sodium levels depend on the severity of hypernatremia, the rate of its increase and the accompanying volume disorders. Severe symptoms include altered consciousness, increased muscle tone and reflexes, convulsions, psychomotor hyperactivity or drowsiness (up to coma), respiratory failure, and even death. We present the case of a 45-year-old man who took seven tablets of a blood pressure-lowering drug, and paramedics subsequently administered a concentrated solution of table salt to induce vomiting. However, vomiting did not occur, leading to hypernatremia. Ultimately, the man survived but developed persistent cognitive dysfunction, including disordered short-term memory and encoding and retrieval of information from long-term memory, weakening of attention function and fatigue, and disorders in abstract thinking. The patient's family went to the prosecutor's office to investigate the possibility of medical malpractice. Experts found that the paramedics' actions were incorrect. Although it has been known for many years that table salt solutions should not be used to induce vomiting, unfortunately, both laypeople and medical professionals are still using this technique. Iatrogenic salt poisoning may end not only in serious health complications but also in legal consequences., (© 2024 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.)

Background: This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients receiving clinical practice guideline (CPG)-inconsistent care related to chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) prophylaxis, and to describe the association between CPG-inconsistent care and site size. The association between delivery of CPG-inconsistent care and patient outcomes (CIV control, admission prolongation, and unplanned healthcare visits) was also described., Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at Children's Oncology Group (COG) National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) sites. Eligible patients received highly (HEC) or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) as inpatients from January 2014 through December 2015, and were previously enrolled in a COG study. The COG generated a patient list from which patients were randomly selected for chart review by participating sites. A central panel adjudicated CIV prophylaxis received as CPG-consistent or -inconsistent., Results: Twenty-four sites participated. Over half of patients received CPG-inconsistent CIV prophylaxis (HEC: 59/112, 52.6%; MEC: 119/215, 55.3%). The most common reasons for CPG-inconsistency were shortened duration of antiemetic administration or omission of dexamethasone. Site size was not found to be associated with CPG-inconsistent care delivery (HEC: adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.23; MEC: adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.92-1.24). Additionally, there was no statistically significant association between receipt of CPG-inconsistent care and patient outcomes., Conclusions: Patients receiving MEC or HEC often received CPG-inconsistent CIV prophylaxis. Site size was not associated with receipt of CPG-inconsistent care. Future studies should evaluate strategies to improve CIV control among pediatric oncology patients including those aimed at improving CPG adherence., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Study Objective: The primary objective of this study was to examine the common usage patterns of droperidol in the relatively unrestricted environment of an urban, academic medical center. We focused specifically on the most common use of droperidol in our department: patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting., Methods: For this retrospective, observational, single-center study, we extracted records of all administrations of droperidol from August 2019 to August 2020. Patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting, or any combination thereof, were included in data analysis., Results: Between April 2019 to August 2020, 830 discrete patient visits involving droperidol administration were identified, comprising 706 patients. The average age was 39 years old with a range of 15 to 80. Seven patients (0.08%) were younger than 18, and 35 (4%) were older than 65. Five hundred sixty-five patients (68%) were female. Droperidol doses ranged from 0.625 mg to 5 mg intravenous (IV), with a median dose of 0.625 mg (interquartile range 0.625-1.25 mg), with 590 patients (71%) receiving a dose of 0.625 mg. Only 19 patients (2.3%) had a documented adverse event. Seven had akathisia or restlessness, 7 had anxiety or agitation, 3 had dystonia or stiffness, 1 had fatigue, and 1 had dizziness. For the entire cohort, there were no cardiac dysrhythmias, syncope, seizures, other major adverse events, or fatalities recorded., Conclusion: At one institution, droperidol is being used commonly for the chief complaints of abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting. The preferred dosing is nearly universally below the 2.5 mg IV dose for which the FDA warning applies. Similar to previous studies, identification of adverse events was rare, and no major adverse outcomes such as dysrhythmia or death were identified., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Olanzapine has been shown to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC); however, there is limited work on the impact of CINV on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the comparative cost-effectiveness of CINV prophylaxis in the Malaysian context. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the HRQoL using EQ-5D-5L and the cost-effectiveness of olanzapine compared with aprepitant for CINV prophylaxis in Malaysia using data from a local study., Methods: Fifty-nine chemo-naive patients receiving either olanzapine or aprepitant were randomly recruited and completed the EQ-5D-5L before and day 5 after HEC. HRQoL utility scores were analyzed according to the Malaysian valuation set. The economic evaluation was conducted from a healthcare payer perspective with a 5-day time horizon. Quality-adjusted life days (QALD) and the rate of successfully treated patients were used to measure health effects. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is assessed as the mean difference between groups' costs per mean difference in health effects. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess variations that might affect outcomes., Results: Aprepitant and olanzapine arms' patients had comparable baseline mean HRQoL utility scores of 0.920 (SD = 0.097) and 0.930 (SD = 0.117), respectively; however, on day 5, a significant difference (P value = .006) was observed with mean score of 0.778 (SD = 0.168) for aprepitant and 0.889 (SD = 0.133) for olanzapine. The cost per successfully treated patient in the aprepitant arm was 60 times greater than in the olanzapine arm (Malaysian Ringgit [MYR] 927 vs MYR 14.83). Likewise, the cost per QALD gain in the aprepitant arm was 36 times higher than in the olanzapine arm (MYR 57.05 vs MYR 1.57). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of MYR -937.00 (USD -200.98) per successfully treated patient and MYR -391.84 (USD -85.43) per QALD gained for olanzapine compared with the aprepitant-based regimen., Conclusions: An olanzapine-based regimen is a cost-effective therapeutic substitution in patients receiving HEC in Malaysia., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Olanzapine is prescribed as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at a dose of 2.5 or 5 mg in Asian countries. We compared the effectiveness of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer., Methods: Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified patients who received olanzapine doses of 2.5 or 5 mg during high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer between January 2016 and March 2021. We conducted a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for various factors, including those affecting olanzapine metabolism. The outcomes were additional antiemetic drug administration (within 2-5 days after chemotherapy initiation), length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs., Results: Olanzapine 2.5 and 5.0 mg were used in 2905 and 4287 patients, respectively. The propensity score-matched analysis showed that olanzapine 2.5 mg administration was significantly associated with a higher proportion of additional antiemetic drug administration (36% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) than olanzapine 5 mg. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days in both groups. Total hospitalization cost did not differ significantly between the two doses of olanzapine (5061 vs. 5160 USD, p = 0.07). The instrumental variable analysis demonstrated compatible results., Conclusion: Prophylactic use of olanzapine 2.5 mg during chemotherapy for lung cancer was associated with a higher rate of additional antiemetic drugs than olanzapine 5 mg., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Children continue to experience chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), despite effective antiemetic medications. Recommendations in clinical practice guidelines are underpinned by narrative syntheses and meta-analyses that compare only two treatments. This means not all antiemetics have been compared to one another, and estimates remain imprecise. We apply network meta-analysis (NMA) to overcome these limitations by comparing multiple treatments simultaneously., Methods: A systematic review identified and critically appraised RCTs comparing antiemetics recommended and licensed for the prevention of CINV in children. Bayesian NMA compared and ranked antiemetic effectiveness for the outcomes complete (CR) and partial response (PR) in the acute, delayed, and overall phases, nausea, and decreased food intake. Antiemetics given with and without dexamethasone were compared in separate networks as their underlying populations differed., Results: Sixteen RCTs (3115 patients receiving moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC)) were included. When given with dexamethasone, NK1 antagonists with ondansetron ranked highest for CR and PR in the acute and overall phases, PR in the delayed phase, and decreased food intake. Post hoc analysis shows further a benefit of adding olanzapine to regimens of aprepitant and ondansetron. Ondansetron ranked lower than palonosetron, for CR in the delayed and overall phases, and ondansetron was less effective than palonosetron for nausea prevention. Rankings for other regimens, including those given without dexamethasone, were uncertain or inconsistent across outcomes., Conclusions: Our findings serve to support the current recommendations of olanzapine (when given with aprepitant and ondansetron) and NK1 antagonists' regimens receiving HEC, but note that evidence of a significant difference in relative benefit, between patients receiving MEC and HEC, does not yet exist. Recommendations for palonosetron as the preferred 5HT3 antagonists may be extended, particularly, to those who are at high risk of nausea., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Over the past decade, several randomized controlled trials have compared single-day dexamethasone (dexamethasone-sparing) regimens to the current standard multi-day dexamethasone antiemetic regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing regimens to standard multi-day dexamethasone, used for the prophylaxis of CINV., Methods: Ovid Medline and Embase were searched from database inception to March 2024. Studies were included if they reported on randomized controlled trials of adult cancer patients receiving different scheduling of dexamethasone, for the endpoints of complete response, complete control, no nausea, no vomiting, and no use of rescue medication. Safety was also assessed. Meta-analysis, leave-one-out meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis were conducted to generate summary effect estimates and assess the influence of single trials on the summary effect estimate., Results: Ten trials reporting on 2234 patients were included. Dexamethasone-sparing regimens were found to be no different to control arm in the acute (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08), delayed (RR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05) and overall phases (RR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06) for complete response. There was likewise no difference for complete control, no nausea, no vomiting, and no use of rescue medication. Safety profile was similar. There was no concern for bias in the published literature. No difference was found between studies reporting on anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)., Conclusion: In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, dexamethasone-sparing regimens were found to be no different to current multi-day regimens with respect to efficacy and safety for MEC and anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based regimens. Clinicians and future guidelines should strongly consider greater adoption and endorsement of dexamethasone-sparing regimens., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

BACKGROUND Cognitive errors are common in medical practice and can have serious consequences for patients related to misdiagnosis and delays in diagnosis and treatment. We report a case in which cognitive error substantially influenced a patient's diagnosis and treatment. CASE REPORT This report recounts the case of an adolescent girl with symptoms similar to those of her previous episodes of tetrahydrocannabinol-induced hyperemesis, despite a 21-kg weight loss over 6 months. She sought care at multiple facilities until finally being diagnosed with superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Treatment was conservative with intravenous hydration, nasogastric feeding, and gastric decompression until duodenal compression was relieved. The patient's condition had improved at 7-month follow-up, and she declined surgical consultation. CONCLUSIONS This case report seeks to raise awareness of the effects of cognitive errors in clinical practice. This tendency to prematurely attribute symptoms to a known diagnosis and thereby overlook alternative and potentially more accurate explanations can lead to delays in diagnoses and treatments. Awareness of cognitive error is especially important in the context of the increasing prevalence of legalization of tetrahydrocannabinol/marijuana in several states. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome, although rare, is linked to high morbidity and mortality when the diagnosis is delayed; thus, it is crucial to consider it in the differential diagnosis for a patient with weight loss and abdominal pain. By sharing this case, we hope clinicians and patients can become more aware of this rare consequence of tetrahydrocannabinol use to facilitate more comprehensive patient-centered investigations.

Background: Older adults are at high risk for toxicity due to cancer treatment and increased risk for adverse events related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Unfortunately, older adults report multiple treatment-related symptoms but use few strategies to self-manage these symptoms due to erroneous beliefs related to the effectiveness of commonly taught self-management strategies. We developed a novel serious game, Managing at Home (MAH), to help older adults learn how to effectively self-manage CINV at home., Objective: This study has 2 aims. Aim 1 is to examine changes in CINV severity, self-management behaviors, functioning, quality of life, cognitive representation, and health care use within the intervention group from baseline (T 1 ) to completion of the study (T 6 ). Aim 2 is to determine the efficacy of the MAH intervention by comparing differences in primary outcomes (CINV severity and health care use) and secondary outcomes (self-management behaviors, functioning, and quality of life) between the intervention and control groups at each follow-up visit (T 2 -T 6 ) and completion of the study (T 6 )., Methods: This is a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. We will collect data from 500 older adults receiving cancer-related chemotherapy at baseline (T1) and at each treatment cycle until cycle 6 (T6). Participants will be enrolled if they are 60 years or older of age, are newly diagnosed with cancer, being treated with any chemotherapy agent with moderate or high emetic potential, are on a 2-, 3-, or 4-week treatment cycle, are proficient in English, and have a telephone. Previous diagnosis or treatment for cancer, end-stage disease with less than 6 months to live, and uncorrected visual or hearing impairment are exclusion criteria., Results: This study was funded in September 2022 and received institutional review board approval in October 2022. As of July 2023, the enrollment of participants is ongoing and currently has 130 enrolled participants. Data collection and analysis will be complete in 2027., Conclusions: This study addresses self-management of CINV in older adults using an innovative serious game. The MAH intervention uses simulation and gaming technology to engage older adults in active learning in order to reframe erroneous perceptions about symptom self-management. If shown to be effective, it can easily be adapted to include other cancer-related symptoms or other chronic illnesses., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05838638; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05838638., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/64673., (©Victoria Loerzel, Arsham Alamian, John Clochesy, Patricia I Geddie. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 02.10.2024.)

Background: Nausea and vomiting are one of the common and distressing side effects of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients often impacting their quality of life and treatment adherence. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether acupressure is effective in treating breast cancer patients' acute nausea and vomiting brought on by chemotherapy as well as delayed nausea and vomiting., Methods: We systematically searched for Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Clinical Key, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus. Based on the inclusion criteria two reviewers independently identified the articles using key thesaurus and free text terms. The review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement., Results: According to the pooled findings, acupressure combined with antiemetics greatly lessens the severity of acute nausea [SMD, (95% CI)] [-0.35(-0.62,-0.08), P=0.01, I2=0%], delayed nausea [SMD, (95% CI)] [-0.52(-0.78,-0.26), P<0.001, I2=16%], and delayed vomiting [SMD, (95% CI)] [-0.46(- 0.83,-0.08), P=0.02, I2=43%] brought on by chemotherapy., Conclusion: For chemotherapy-treated breast cancer patients, acupressure is a helpful complementary therapy for easing nausea and vomiting.

Background: As access to cannabis has increased, there has been a rise in a condition called cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). This study estimates annual prevalence of suspected CHS at emergency department visits (ED) over an 11-year period in Northern California., Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study used electronic health records from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Two CHS case definitions were used to construct two cohorts of adults (18+) with ≥1 CHS visits from 2009 to 2019. The primary definition used a narrow definition based on past studies (CHS group 1) and an exploratory definition allowed for a broader range of codes (CHS group 2); both definitions required a primary diagnosis of vomiting. Annual prevalence of CHS and annual rates of counts of CHS visits estimated using a log-link Poisson model are reported per group., Findings: There were 57,227 patients with ≥1 CHS visits included in CHS group 1 and 65,645 patients included in CHS group 2. Over eleven years, CHS increased across groups with the fastest rise in CHS group 1 (prevalence ratio = 2.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.65-2.85, p<.0001 from 2009 to 2019 vs. prevalence ratio = 2.34, 95 % CI 2.27-2.43). CHS group 1 also exhibited the largest increase in ED visits (rate ratio = 2.35, 95 % CI 2.27-2.43, p<.0001)., Conclusion: In a large California population, suspected CHS increased over time across definitions. Annual prevalence increased by 134-175 %, depending on CHS definition. CHS group 2's definition may have been too broad and changes in ICD-10-CM coding may have impacted estimates., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No conflict declared, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study investigated whether ghrelin mimetics, namely anamorelin and ipamorelin, can alleviate weight loss and inhibition of feeding observed during acute and delayed phases of cisplatin-induced emesis in ferrets. The potential of anamorelin to inhibit electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contractions of isolated ferret ileum was compared with ipamorelin. In other experiments, ferrets were administered anamorelin (1-3 mg/kg), ipamorelin (1-3 mg/kg), or vehicle intraperitoneally (i.p.) 30 s before cisplatin (5 mg/kg, i.p.) and then every 24 h, and their behaviour was recorded for up to 72 h. Food and water consumption was measured every 24 h. The effect of anamorelin (10 µg) was also assessed following intracerebroventricular administration. Anamorelin and ipamorelin inhibited EFS-induced contractions of isolated ileum by 94.4 % (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ]=14.0 µM) and 54.4 % (IC 50 =11.7 µM), respectively. Neither of compounds administered i.p. had any effect on cisplatin-induced acute or delayed emesis, but both inhibited associated cisplatin-induced weight loss on the last day of delayed phase (48-72 h) by approximately 24 %. Anamorelin (10 µg) administered intracerebroventricularly reduced cisplatin-induced acute emesis by 60 % but did not affect delayed emesis. It also improved food and water consumption by approximately 20 %-40 % during acute phase, but not delayed phase, and reduced associated cisplatin-induced weight loss during delayed phase by ∼23 %. In conclusion, anamorelin and ipamorelin administered i.p. had beneficial effects in alleviating cisplatin-induced weight loss during delayed phase, and these effects were seen when centrally administered anamorelin. Anamorelin inhibited cisplatin-induced acute emesis following intracerebroventricular but not intraperitoneal administration, suggesting that brain penetration is important for its anti-emetic mechanism of action., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Olanzapine use for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in hematological malignancies, for multi-day chemotherapy, and with a steroid-sparing antiemetic strategy is poorly understood. This study investigated if olanzapine is associated with improved prevention of CINV when added to a steroid-sparing antiemetic regimen in patients with acute leukemia receiving intensive, moderately emetogenic, multi-day chemotherapy., Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study in patients with acute leukemia. Patients who received olanzapine for CINV prevention were compared to those who did not. All patients received a 5-HT3 antagonist. Adult patients receiving moderately emetogenic, multi-day, intensive chemotherapy for acute leukemia were included. Patients were excluded if they received steroids greater than physiological doses during the study period. The primary endpoint was the complete response of CINV (no emesis or rescue antiemetic usage)., Results: This study included 58 patients, 12 patients received olanzapine and 46 patients were in the control group. Baseline demographics were similar. In the study population, 89.7% had acute myeloid leukemia, median age was 54 (interquartile range 42-63) years, 34.5% were female, 27.6% had prior CINV. Complete response of CINV was similar between groups, 4 (33.3%) and 15 (32.6%) patients in the olanzapine and control groups, respectively. Safety events were similar between groups., Conclusion: Patients with acute leukemia receiving multi-day intensive chemotherapy are at high risk for CINV. The limited data in this study suggests that olanzapine use within a steroid-sparing antiemetic regimen was well tolerated and associated with similar incidence and severity of CINV compared to the control group., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a debilitating side effect related to activation of substance P (SP). SP activation can result from dysregulation of the gut-brain axis, and also from activation of protein kinase A signaling (PKA) signaling. In this study, we connected these factors in an attempt to unveil the mechanisms underlying CINV and develop new therapeutic strategies. Female rats were injected with cisplatin (Cis) to induce pica. Fecal samples were collected before/after injection, and subjected to lipid metabolomics analysis. In another portion of pica rats, the PKA inhibitor KT5720 was applied to investigate the involvement of PKA signaling in CINV, while fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was implemented to verify the therapeutic effect of the lipid metabolite 14(15)-EpETE. Pica symptoms were recorded, followed by ileal histological examination. The targeting relationship between 14(15)-EpETE and glucagon was determined by bioinformatics. SP and glucagon/PKA signaling in rat ileum, serum, and/or brain substantia nigra were detected by immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and/or western blot. The results showed a significantly lower level of 14(15)-EpETE in rat feces after Cis injection. KT5720 treatment alleviated Cis-induced pica symptoms, ileal injury, SP content increase in the ileum, serum, and brain substantia nigra, and ileal PKA activation in rats. The ileal level of glucagon was elevated by Cis in rats. FMT exerted an effect similar to that of KT5720 treatment, relieving the Cis-induced changes, including ileal glucagon/PKA activation in rats. Our findings demonstrate that FMT restores 14(15)-EpETE production, which inhibits SP release by targeting GCG/PKA signaling, ultimately mitigating CINV.

A 20-year-old man was brought to the emergency room with chief complaints of dysarthria and vomiting after placing several drops of an inhalation liquid containing hexahydrocannabiphorol (HHCP) under his tongue. During ambulance transport, the patient had a post-vomiting convulsion that lasted approximately 1 minute. Upon arrival at the hospital, he was agitated, had dysarthria to the extent that he was in danger of falling from the stretcher, and was having visual hallucinations. Blood tests showed acidosis and a high lactic acid concentration. The patient was urgently admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute poisoning and was started on supplemental intravenous fluids. The patient was able to communicate from the second day, started eating on the third day, finished receiving supplemental fluids on the fourth day, and was discharged from the hospital on the fifth day. HHCP was not illegal in Japan at the time and was distributed mainly through mail order. Clinical information on HHCP is lacking, but this case shows that the drug causes health problems. Although HHCP has been regulated by law in Japan since January 2024, clinicians and the general public should be aware that similar cases may occur in the future.

Introduction: The goal of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of e-health interventions for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)., Methods: A literature search was conducted across the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from database establishment to 3 March 2024. We included randomized controlled trials in English where the intervention group was via e-health. Two reviewers independently carried out the screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal of the studies. Using Stata 17.0, meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize the effects of outcomes of interest., Results: A total of 6663 studies were retrieved, with only 8 RCTs meeting criteria, involving 620 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that e-health interventions significantly reduce CINV severity (MD =  - 7.687; 95% CI - 11.903, - 3.326; p < 0.001). However, results regarding CINV incidence reduction and quality of life improvement are inconclusive due to variations in intervention content, modality, and frequency among studies., Conclusions: e-health interventions may reduce the severity and incidence of CINV, while enhancing quality of life. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously. Higher quality studies are needed in the future to further validate the effectiveness of e-health interventions for CINV., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms experienced by cancer patients undergoing treatment, impacting their physical well-being and quality of life. Serotonin, a neurotransmitter known for its role in regulating mood and gastrointestinal function, has been implicated in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This study aimed to investigate serotonin level differences between CINV and non-CINV groups among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy., Methods: An analytical observational investigation utilizing a cross-sectional design was conducted at Dr. Kariadi General Hospital from 2021-2022. Non-random consecutive sampling was employed to select participants meeting inclusion criteria, including age between 18 and 65 years, undergoing chemotherapy, non-smoking, and no recent antibiotic use. Platelet-poor plasma samples were analyzed for serotonin levels using a radioimmunoassay kit (Microplate reader ELx800)., Results: This study included 61 subjects compared serotonin levels in two groups to investigate their potential association with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The non-CINV group (n=31) had a median serotonin level of 70 (IQR: 20) ng/mL, while the CINV group (n=30) had a significantly higher median of 170 ng/mL (IQR: 50) ng/mL. Age was associated with a 1.2 ng/mL increase in serotonin per year (95% CI: 0.5-1.9, p = 0.002), adjusted for sex. Being male correlated with a 40 ng/mL increase (95% CI: 10-70, p = 0.010), adjusted for age., Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of understanding serotonin's role in CINV and highlights the need for tailored treatment approaches based on chemotherapy emetogenicity.

Purpose: This study aims to synthesize and analyze the impact of technology-based interventions on chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, and quality of life in pediatric patients., Design and Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The JBI checklist assessed the studies' methodological quality. This study was performed based on the PRISMA checklist., Results: This review incorporated five published studies, exploratory randomized controlled trials, and non-randomized pre and post-test control group studies involving 232 pediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. The meta-analysis revealed a significant impact of technology-based interventions on alleviating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (Hedge's g = -0.707, Q = 9.61, I 2  = 47.97%, p < 0.001). It was found that a significant effect of technology-based interventions on the patient's quality of life was observed (Hedge's g = -0.745, Q = 5.431, I 2  = 63.74%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: These findings indicated that technology-based interventions have significant potential in managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and quality of life., Practice Implications: Future research endeavors should explore this aspect further, employing a broader range of outcome measures and longer-term follow-up assessments better to understand their impact on pediatric oncology patients' well-being., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Over the years, advancements in antiemetic drugs have improved chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control. However, despite the antiemetics therapies, in a relevant number of adult patients (∼30 %), CINV is still persistent, leading to several complications, such as electrolyte imbalances, anorexia, and treatment discontinuation. Supportive care interventions have gained credibility in cancer care, helping to improve patients' psycho-physical condition, quality of life, and managing symptoms, including CINV. Physical exercise and tailored nutritional counseling have demonstrated benefits in reducing the severity of nausea and vomiting. Psychological intervention has been postulated as a key approach in controlling anticipatory nausea/vomiting, as well as acupuncture/acupressure has been shown to decrease nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy treatments. In the current review, we aim to provide a clinical update on current prophylactic and delayed antiemetic guidelines for CINV and an overview of the non-pharmacological interventions tested for alleviating CINV in patients with cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest LB received speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche, outside the submitted manuscript; travel fees from Takeda. SP received honoraria or speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, and Roche, outside the submitted manuscript. E.B. has received grants or contracts from Astra-Zeneca, Roche and honoraria for lectures from Merck-Sharp & Dome, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda and Roche; E.B. has been member of Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Merck-Sharp & Dome, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra-Zeneca, and Roche. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the adverse events that most affects oncologic patients' quality of life. Carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 belongs to agents with high emetic risk (moderate risk in ASCO guidelines). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of netupitant/palonosetron and dexamethasone triple combination (TC) therapy versus ondansetron and dexamethasone double combination (DC) therapy as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. As a secondary endpoint, in TC group we evaluated the effectiveness of changing NEPA administration timing from 1 h to 15 min before chemotherapy., Methods: Open-label prospective study conducted in a tertiary-care hospital in patients receiving carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. CINV was evaluated using MASCC antiemetic tool, in acute (<24 h) and delayed phase (24-120 h). Results were analyzed using χ 2 test., Results: Two-hundred four completed questionnaires (CQ) were analyzed (76 in DC and 128 in TC). The proportion of patients who remained emesis-free was superior for TC-treated group compared to DC, either in acute (99.2% vs 92.1%, p  = 0.0115) and delayed phase (97.6% vs 90.7%, p  = 0.043). Likewise, a higher proportion of TC-treated patients compared to DC remained nausea-free for the first 24 h after treatment (90.6% vs 71%, p  = 0.0004) and between 24 and 120 h (82.3% vs 62.7%, p  = 0.0025). The change of NEPA administration time showed similar effectiveness in terms of CINV control (81.6% vs 74.5%, p  = 0.70)., Conclusions: TC showed superiority in early and delayed CINV control in carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 regimens, with no significant differences among cancer types. Change in NEPA administration timing has beneficial implications; it allows NEPA to be administered at hospitals before chemotherapy session., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for delayed chemotherapy-induced vomiting (DCIV) in pediatric oncology patients. We collected data on pediatric patients from a tertiary care pediatric hospital in an Asian urban center. We analyzed the risk factors for DCIV in patients by univariate analysis and logistic regression. Patients were grouped according to age by the Youden index, and differences in clinical features between the high-risk and low-risk groups were calculated. In the univariate analysis, the number of chemotherapy days, pH, and blood glucose levels were significantly associated with DCIV. In the logistic regression analysis, patient age was an independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 1.013, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-1.021, P = .002). Children in the high-risk group had a higher grade of vomiting ( P < .05). Age is an important risk factor for DCIV in pediatric patients, with older children tending to experience more frequent and more severe vomiting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Ayahuasca, an entheogen from the Amazon rainforest, has garnered growing interest for treating substance dependence. To date, there is little research concerning the act of ayahuasca-related purging (mainly vomiting), which is considered to be central to healing during ayahuasca rituals. This study explored practitioner perspectives on purging during ayahuasca rituals at the Takiwasi Center in Peru., Method: We conducted in-depth interviews with curanderos (healers), plant preparers, and psychotherapists ( N = 11) at the Takiwasi Center between August and October 2021. Interviews were conducted and transcribed in Spanish. Interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach., Results: Participants described purging as a fluid concept that went beyond the act of vomiting. Participant narratives around purging were organized into three central themes or accounts: spiritual-oriented, which highlighted the relationship between purging and spiritual development; Amazonian-oriented, which emphasized purging as a cathartic expulsion of embodied cargas (loads) that are perceived to lead to sickness; and clinical-oriented, which stressed that purging generates a range of empirically observable therapeutic benefits. All of these explanatory models emphasized the pivotal interconnection between purging and healing during ayahuasca-assisted treatment for substance dependence at Takiwasi., Conclusions: This study highlights practitioner perspectives on purging at the Takiwasi Center, who offer three main explanatory models for this aspect of healing during ayahuasca-assisted therapy for substance dependence. This research contributes to the limited literature on the role of purging in ayahuasca-related healing, which may inform further investigation into differential understandings of the role of purging for therapeutic benefits.

Background: The expanding roles and popularity of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists has created access barriers to medication use. We sought to describe an adverse drug event which occurred after reinitiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist following a prolonged lapse in therapy due to poor medication access. Case Summary : Once-weekly injectable semaglutide was prescribed to an outpatient 33-year-old male for chronic weight management. After a delayed initiation due to global shortage, semaglutide was initiated and titrated over five months before a seven week lapse in therapy due to prior authorization interruption. Despite the extended treatment gap, the patient was directed to reinitiate semaglutide at the target dose rather than starting dose, which was followed by recurrent, symptomatic nausea and vomiting requiring medical intervention. Practice Implications: A prolonged lapse in GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy, typically defined as missing three or more doses of a once-weekly injectable, warrants consideration of reinitiation at a reduced dose, personalized to the patient's prior gastrointestinal tolerability, efficacy goals, and therapy lapse duration. Therapy lapses with GLP-1 receptor agonists may be prevented by utilizing a multi-modal approach including extended dosing intervals, intermediate doses, agent interchange, efficient prior authorization communication, and cautious initiation of GLP-1 recent agonists while supply cannot meet demand., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Ricin intoxication is a serious condition with symptoms ranging from mild gastroenteritis to fatal outcomes due to shock and multi-organ failure. Intoxication from the ingestion of castor seeds is uncommon. However, its diagnosis is crucial, particularly with a clear history of exposure to castor seeds, regardless of the route of exposure (enteral or parenteral). Prompt diagnosis is essential to monitor and manage the patient effectively and to prevent potentially fatal outcomes. We report a case where ingestion of castor seeds resulted in gastroenteritis severe enough to necessitate emergency medical care., Case Report: We present the case of a 47-year-old Belgian woman of Moroccan descent, previously healthy who was admitted to the emergency department with symptoms of colicky abdominal pain, diarrhea, and vomiting following the ingestion of six castor beans. The patient was diagnosed with ricin intoxication, admitted for observation, and received symptomatic treatment. She was discharged home after a complete recovery three days later., Conclusion: Our report underscores the clinical manifestations, hemodynamic changes, laboratory findings, and treatment of intoxication due to castor seed ingestion. It contributes to the limited literature on castor seed poisoning in humans, with a specific focus on cases in Belgium. This report aims to raise awareness among clinicians about this condition and emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive history-taking to prevent misdiagnosis and malpractice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT 3 ) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT 3 RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety., Results: In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group v 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% v 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both P < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity., Conclusion: The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.

Background: Children with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency require treatment with glucocorticoids, usually at supraphysiologic doses, to address cortisol insufficiency and reduce excess adrenal androgens. However, such treatment confers a predisposition to glucocorticoid-related complications. In 2-week phase 2 trials, patients with CAH who received crinecerfont, a new oral corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, had decreases in androstenedione levels., Methods: In this phase 3, multinational, randomized trial, we assigned pediatric participants with CAH, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive crinecerfont or placebo for 28 weeks. A stable glucocorticoid dose was maintained for 4 weeks, and the dose was then adjusted to a target of 8.0 to 10.0 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day (hydrocortisone dose equivalents), provided that the androstenedione level was controlled (≤120% of the baseline level or within the reference range). The primary efficacy end point was the change in the androstenedione level from baseline to week 4. A key secondary end point was the percent change in the glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 28 while androstenedione control was maintained., Results: A total of 103 participants underwent randomization, of whom 69 were assigned to crinecerfont and 34 to placebo; 100 (97%) remained in the trial at 28 weeks. At baseline, the mean glucocorticoid dose was 16.4 mg per square meter per day, and the mean androstenedione level was 431 ng per deciliter (15.0 nmol/liter). At week 4, androstenedione was substantially reduced in the crinecerfont group (-197 ng per deciliter [-6.9 nmol/liter]) but increased in the placebo group (71 ng per deciliter [2.5 nmol/liter]) (least-squares mean difference [LSMD], -268 ng per deciliter [-9.3 nmol/liter]; P<0.001); the observed mean androstenedione value, obtained before the morning glucocorticoid dose, was 208 ng per deciliter (7.3 nmol/liter) in the crinecerfont group, as compared with 545 ng per deciliter (19.0 nmol/liter) in the placebo group. At week 28, the mean glucocorticoid dose had decreased (while androstenedione control was maintained) by 18.0% with crinecerfont but increased by 5.6% with placebo (LSMD, -23.5 percentage points; P<0.001). Headache, pyrexia, and vomiting were the most common adverse events., Conclusions: In this phase 3 trial, crinecerfont was superior to placebo in reducing elevated androstenedione levels in pediatric participants with CAH and was also associated with a decrease in the glucocorticoid dose from supraphysiologic to physiologic levels while androstenedione control was maintained. (Funded by Neurocrine Biosciences; CAHtalyst Pediatric ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04806451.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Importance: The role of olanzapine has not been adequately evaluated in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens with or without neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists., Objective: To evaluate whether addition of olanzapine to an MEC regimen reduces nausea, vomiting, and use of nausea rescue medications among patients with solid malignant tumors., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial included patients aged 18 years or older with solid malignant tumors who were receiving oxaliplatin-, carboplatin-, or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The trial was conducted at 3 institutes in India from March 26, 2019, to August 26, 2023; the final cutoff date for analysis was September 10, 2023., Exposure: Patients were randomized 1:1 to dexamethasone, aprepitant, and palonosetron with olanzapine (experimental group) or without olanzapine (observation group). The experimental group received 10 mg of olanzapine orally once at night on days 1 through 3 of the chemotherapy regimen., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was complete response (CR), defined as the proportion of patients with no vomiting, no significant nausea (scored as <5 on a visual analog scale of 1 to 100), and no use of rescue medications for nausea. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients experiencing nausea and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), receiving rescue medications, and experiencing adverse events., Results: A total of 560 patients (259 [64%] male; median age, 51 years [range, 19-80 years]) were randomized. The analysis included 544 patients with evaluable data (274 assigned to olanzapine and 270 to observation). Baseline characteristics were evenly matched between the 2 groups. The proportion of patients with CR was significantly greater in the group with (248 [91%]) than without (222 [82%]) olanzapine in the overall 120-hour treatment period (P = .005). Likewise, there were significant differences between the olanzapine and observation groups for nausea control (264 [96%] vs 234 [87%]; P < .001) and CINV (262 [96%] vs 245 [91%]; P = .02) during the overall assessment period, and the proportion of patients receiving rescue medications significantly increased in the observation group (30 [11%]) compared with the olanzapine group (11 [4%]) (P = .001). Grade 1 somnolence was reported by 27 patients (10%) following administration of chemotherapy and olanzapine and by no patients in the observation group., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of olanzapine significantly improved CR rates as well as nausea and vomiting prevention rates in chemotherapy-naive patients who were receiving MEC regimens containing oxaliplatin, carboplatin, or irinotecan. These findings suggest that use of olanzapine should be considered as one of the standards of care in these chemotherapy regimens., Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) Identifier: CTRI/2018/12/016643.

Background: Ondansetron is an antiemetic drug (AED) used to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting. The summary of product characteristics reports a rare risk of transient blindness primarily during IV injections, notably with the concomitant use of chemotherapeutic agents. We aimed to refine the characterization of ondansetron-induced blindness., Research Design and Methods: We performed a descriptive and a case/non-case analysis using VigiBase®. Cases were defined as reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to blindness: amaurosis, amaurosis fugax, blindness. Non-cases were all other recorded reactions. Reporting risk of blindness-related ADRs was assessed using a disproportionality analysis and expressed as Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR)., Results: 138,315 ADRs were reported with AEDs, including 136 blindness-related ADRs, among them 44 (32.4%) with ondansetron. For ondansetron users, blindness-related ADRs occurred mainly on the first day. Out of the 25 patients with known outcomes, 18 (72.0%) were recovering or had recovered, 7 (28.0%) patients had not recovered There were no statistical differences in the number of cases for IV or oral users and for users or not of chemotherapeutic agents. Compared with other AEDs, ondansetron was associated with an increase in the reporting risk of blindness-related ADRs (ROR = 4.00 [2.79-5.72], p  < 0.001)., Conclusions: Rarely blindness can occur following intravenous or oral administration of ondansetron.

Objective: To identify clinical characteristics that distinguish cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) from cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), 2 conditions marked by episodes of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain., Study Design: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a large children's health care system from 2015 through 2022. Patients with CHS and CVS were identified by the electronic medical record using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes., Results: Of 201 patients screened, 125 were included. Patients with CHS were older than those with CVS (mean [SD] 18.06 [1.41] vs 14.50 [2.91] years, P < .001). There were no significant differences in sex, race, ethnicity, or hospital length of stay between groups. Patients with CHS were more likely to have a positive urine drug screen (86% vs 2.9%, P < .001), lower mean (SD) serum potassium (3.62 [0.77] vs 3.88 [0.49], P < .001), and greater mean (SD) serum creatinine (0.83 (0.41) vs 0.63 (0.17), P < .001). The average (SD) systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in patients with CHS (systolic blood pressure 124.46 [10.66] vs 118.55 [10.99], P = .032) compared with children of comparable age range with CVS. Imaging was obtained in 36% of all patients, and only 2.4% had abnormalities., Conclusions: Clinical features including older age, greater systolic blood pressure, positive urine drug screen, and select electrolyte findings might distinguish CHS from CVS. Abdominal imaging in both conditions is of low yield. These findings may allow for early recognition and appropriate therapy in CHS patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Due to an evidence gap, the emetogenicity of intravenous (IV) pegaspargase was unable to be included in the clinical practice guideline classifying chemotherapy emetogenicity in pediatric patients. This single-center, retrospective chart review describes the proportion of pediatric patients who did not vomit during the acute phase (complete response; CR) after receiving IV pegaspargase and provides an emetogenicity classification using a preexisting framework. Of 44 patients who received IV pegaspargase between 2011 and 2020, 13 received a serotonin receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone or palonosetron alone and all experienced a CR. We, therefore, recommend classifying IV pegaspargase as moderately emetogenic.

Purpose: The current candidate gene association study aims to investigate tag SNPs from the TACR1 gene as pharmacogenetic predictors of response to the antiemetic guidelines-recommended, NK-1 receptor antagonist-based, triple antiemetic regimens., Methods: A set of eighteen tag SNPs of TACR1 were genotyped in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (with/without docetaxel) applying real-time PCR-HRMA. Data analysis for 121 ultimately enrolled patients was initiated by defining haplotype blocks using PHASE v.2.1. The association of each tag SNP and haplotype alleles with failure to achieve the defined antiemetic regimen efficacy endpoints was tested using PLINK (v.1.9 and v.1.07, respectively) based on the logistic regression, adjusting for the previously known chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prognostic factors. All reported p-values were corrected using the permutation test (n = 100,000)., Results: Four variants of rs881, rs17010730, rs727156, and rs3755462, as well as haplotypes containing the mentioned variants, were significantly associated with failure to achieve at least one of the defined efficacy endpoints. Variant annotation via in-silico studies revealed that the non-seed sequence variant, rs881, is located in the miRNA (hsa-miR-613) binding site. The other three variants or a variant in complete linkage disequilibrium with them overlap a region of high H3K9ac-promoter-like signature or regions of high enhancer-like signature in the brain or gastrointestinal tissue., Conclusion: Playing an essential role in regulating TACR1 expression, gene polymorphisms of TACR1 serve as the potential pharmacogenetic predictors of response to the NK-1 receptor antagonist-based, triple antiemetic regimens. If clinically approved, modifying the NK-1 receptor antagonist dose leads to better management of CINV in risk-allele carriers., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Nausea and vomiting complicating chemotherapy (CINV) remain side effects despite preventive and curative treatments. We hypothesize that acupuncture (ACU), auriculotherapy (AUR), and their combination (ACU-AUR), could decrease, compared to usual treatment (UT), the intensity of acute nausea in patients already treated according to the antiemetic guidelines and presenting nausea with or without vomiting in the earlier cycle., Methods: In this multicenter study, patients were treated just before chemotherapy according to randomization. ACU consisted of implanting bilaterally on each forearm, one semi-permanent needle at point P6. AUR consisted of implanting bilaterally on each pavilion of the ear, one semi-permanent needle at point O. All patients received systematic preventive drug treatment according to antiemetic guidelines. Main outcome was intensity of nausea at 24 h after chemotherapy using a numeric scale ranging from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (maximum symptoms)., Results: One hundred and fifteen patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups at inclusion. Intensity of nausea at 24 h after chemotherapy, was statistically different between the groups (covariance intergroup analysis, p = 0.005) and was significantly lower for the all-treatment groups vs UT group (p = 0.007 for AUR, p = 0.008 for ACU, and p = 0.0009 for AUR-ACU). AUR-ACU also decreased intensity of delayed nausea when compared to UT (p = 0.023). AUR, ACU and AUR-ACU had no effect on acute and delayed vomiting episodes. No serious adverse event due to the studied treatments was reported in our study., Conclusion: AUR or ACU reduce intensity of acute and delayed nausea in patients treated by optimal antiemetic treatment., Clinicaltrials: gov identifier NCT02767791, registered on May 10, 2016., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) combined with Dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin (CapeOX) therapy., Design: Open-label, prospective, multi-center phase II trial., Setting: Three institutions., Participants: Fifty-four patients scheduled to receive CapeOX chemotherapy., Interventions: Participants received GTDS (3.1 mg applied to the upper arm 48 h before chemotherapy, replaced on day 5, and discarded on day 12) and Dexamethasone., Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was the complete control rate of CINV. Secondary endpoints included the duration of delayed complete control, complete control rate in the acute phase, safety, and quality of life., Results: The complete control rate for delayed CINV over the entire period (25-480 h) was 72.7% (95% CI 0.57-0.88). The duration of delayed complete control was 17.2 ± 4.5 days, with 51.5% of patients experiencing no nausea during the delayed phase. The complete control rate in the acute phase was 81.8% (95% CI 0.69-0.95). No serious adverse events related to the antiemetic regimen were reported., Conclusion: Prolonged administration of GTDS is safe and effective for preventing CINV in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with CapeOX., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT05325190); registered on October 10, 2021., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: We assessed the differences in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) severity in patients with breast cancer, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC)., Methods: CINV severity in patients on anthracycline-based NAC (n = 203) and AC (n = 79) was assessed at baseline (C0) and after the first and fourth chemotherapy using a 10-point Likert scale. Group-by-time interaction term was used to evaluate the effect of the group on changes in CIN (cCIN) and CIV (cCIV) from C0 to the follow-up periods (C1, C4). If insignificant, group effects were analyzed without the interaction term. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age 50. In statistical analyses, sociodemographic and clinical variables that differed between groups were adjusted for., Results: The effect of group by follow-up period was not significant in cCIN and cCIV. The AC group showed a significantly higher change in the severity of cCIN compared to the NAC group (estimated mean = 1.133, 95% CI = 0.104-2.161, p = 0.031), but there was no difference in cCIV. In those ≤ 50 years, significant differences in cCIN severity (estimated mean = 1.294, 95% CI = 0.103-2.484, p = 0.033) were observed, but not in cCIV. In those > 50 years, neither cCIN nor cCIV differed significantly between groups., Conclusions: NAC in breast cancer patients showed less severe CIN than adjuvant chemotherapy AC, but not in those over 50. Clinicians should recognize that the severity of CIN may vary across different chemotherapy settings and adjust their management accordingly., Trial Registration: The clinical trial registration ( www., Clinicaltrials: gov ) numbers were NCT01887925 (the registration date is from June 20, 2013, to November 27, 2015) and NCT02011815 (the registration date is from December 10, 2013, to September 22, 2019)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Anticipatory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a conditioned response influenced by the severity and duration of previous emetic responses to chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-pharmacologic interventions for anticipatory CINV among patients with cancer., Methods: We conducted a systematic search in databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web, from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2020. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized designs, observational studies, or case-control studies that utilized non-pharmacological therapies were included. The primary outcomes were anticipatory CINV, with an additional investigation into adverse events and the costs of therapies. The risk-of-bias for each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software., Results: Of the 107 studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. Three types of non-pharmacological treatments were identified: systematic desensitization (n = 2), hypnotherapy (n = 2), and yoga therapy (n = 2). Among them, systematic desensitization significantly improved anticipatory CINV as compared to that in the control group (nausea: risk ratio [RR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-0.72, p < 0.00001; vomiting: RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.32-0.91, p = 0.02). However, heterogeneity in outcome measures precluded meta-analysis for hypnotherapy and yoga. Additionally, most selected studies had a high or unclear risk of bias, and adverse events were not consistently reported., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that systematic desensitization may effectively reduce anticipatory CINV. However, further research is warranted before implementation in clinical settings., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Chemotherapy is the foremost treatment for children with leukemia, while causing different serious side-effects. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are the most common deliberating side effects and critical concerns of pediatric oncology nurses among those children., Aim: To investigate the effect of peppermint inhalation versus Swedish massage on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children with leukemia., Design: A multi-arm randomised trial design with three parallel groups., Setting: This study was conducted at outpatient and inpatient Hematology/leukemia Units at Alexandria University Children's Hospital at Smouha., Methods: Seventy-five children with leukemia received the first chemotherapy session. They were randomly allocated into three equal groups, 25 children in each group (control, peppermint inhalation, and Swedish massage groups). Every child is assessed for nausea and vomiting before chemotherapy administration and after for three days for consecutive three sessions of treatment., Results: Study findings revealed that children in peppermint inhalation and Swedish massage groups showed significant reduction in mean total score of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among peppermint inhalation and Swedish groups (15.120 ± 4.585 and 14.680 ± 3.158, respectively) was observed on third chemotherapy session than in control group (45.680 ± 5.793) (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: It can be concluded that Swedish massage and peppermint inhalation therapies may have significant antiemetic effects as alleviating the chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting for children with leukemia., Practice Implications: This study directs the pediatric oncology nurses to incorporate peppermint inhalation and Swedish massage therapies besides antiemetic drugs in pediatric oncology unit protocols for management of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pheochromocytoma is a neuroendocrine tumor that secretes catecholamines; excessive catecholamine secretion can lead to pheochromocytoma crisis (PCC), a rare and life-threatening condition. Sibutramine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, was previously used for obesity treatment but is now banned due to its cardiovascular side effects. Although fatalities related to PCC and adverse events associated with sibutramine have been frequently reported individually, there is no documented literature addressing PCC-induced by sibutramine. Here we report a rare case of fatal sibutramine-induced PCC in a previously asymptomatic young female with undiagnosed pheochromocytoma. The 25-year-old patient took a weight-loss pill containing sibutramine for the first time and subsequently experienced nausea, vomiting, chest tightness, and other symptoms. She went to hospital about 6 hours after taking the pill but died approximately 4 hours later despite the resuscitation efforts. An autopsy revealed a pheochromocytoma in the right adrenal gland. The cause of death was attributed to sibutramine-induced PCC. To our knowledge, this is the first report to document the occurrence of sibutramine-induced PCC., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Extended-release formulations of buprenorphine offer less frequent dosing, provide consistent medication delivery, and improve adherence for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Although buprenorphine is a partial agonist with seemingly less precipitated withdrawal and easier initiation than full opioid agonists used for OUD, its use is not benign and understanding of the different extended-release formulations is necessary. We report a case of a patient that received a long-acting buprenorphine formulation (Sublocade®) administered subcutaneously that presented to the emergency department with tachycardia, hyperglycemia, elevated anion gap, and sustained nausea and vomiting refractory to pharmacotherapy requiring surgical removal of the buprenorphine depot for resolution of nausea and vomiting symptoms., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study describes chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control rates in pediatric and adult patients who did or did not receive guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis., Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of studies published in 2000 or later that evaluated CINV control in patients receiving guideline-consistent vs. guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis and reported at least one CINV-related patient outcome. Studies were excluded if the guideline evaluated was not publicly available or not developed by a professional organization. Over-prophylaxis was defined as antiemetic use recommended for a higher level of chemotherapy emetogenicity than a patient was receiving., Results: We identified 7060 citations and retrieved 141 publications for full-text evaluation. Of these, 21 publications (14 prospective and seven retrospective studies) evaluating guidelines developed by six organizations were included. The terms used to describe CINV endpoints and definition of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis varied among studies. Included studies either did not address over-prophylaxis in their definition of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (48%; 10/21) or defined it as guideline-inconsistent (38%; 8/21) or guideline-consistent (3/21; 14%). Eleven included studies (52%; 11/21) reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one CINV endpoint in patients receiving guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis. Ten reported a statistically significant improvement., Conclusions: This evidence supports the use of guideline-consistent prophylaxis to optimize CINV control. Institutions caring for patients with cancer should systematically adapt CINV CPGs for local implementation and routinely evaluate CINV outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Epidemiologic data show that the incidence and mortality of cancer in China has been increasing, but the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) decreased. The descend trend in ASMR indicated that China has achieved remarkable results in the comprehensive prevention and control of cancer in recent decades through the risk factor control, cancer screening, early diagnosis and treatment, and standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic protocols. In recent years, new anti-tumor therapies and drugs have been developed, but nausea and vomiting are still common adverse event associated with many anti-tumor therapies and can negatively impact patients' quality of life and potentially limit the effectiveness of anti-tumor therapies. The experts from China Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, China Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Tumor Clinical Chemotherapy, China Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Neoplastic Supportive-care and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Committee of Supportive and Rehabilitative Care have integrated recent advances in the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by anti-tumor therapy. Following the existing evidence in evidence-based medicine, referring to both domestic and international guidelines, and considering the clinical practice in China, the "Guidelines for China prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by antitumor therapies (2023 edition)," has been formulated, aiming to provide professional guidance for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in anti-tumor therapy in China.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) refers to the nausea and vomiting experienced by patients after the application of chemotherapy drugs, significantly affecting their quality of life and physical recovery, as well as increasing the pain of the patients. Basic medicine primarily focuses on acid suppression, gastric protection, and vomiting suppression, but there are still many patients with nausea and vomiting symptoms that cannot be alleviated. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can effectively alleviate nausea and vomiting through acupoint stimulation and pressure, while also offering advantages such as simplicity, affordability, and fewer side effects. The aim of this article is to introduce the method of using acupoint application combined with acupressure as an adjunctive therapy for CINV, using the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) tablet scale as a questionnaire. The article details aspects such as acupoint selection, production, and the use of acupoint application, massage techniques, and operating procedures, all with the goal of ensuring the safety and efficacy of acupoint application combined with acupressure as an adjuvant therapy, thereby improving patients' clinical symptoms and quality of life.

Purpose: We assumed that in Palliative Care, even in common clinical situations, the choice of drugs differs substantially between physicians. Therefore, we assessed the practice of pharmaceutical treatment choices of physicians for cancer pain and opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) and the rationale for their choices., Methods: An online survey was conducted with physicians covering the following domains: i) Cancer pain therapy: non-opioids in addition to opioids: choice of drug ii) prevention of OINV: choice of drug and mode of application. Current guidelines concerning cancer pain therapy and prevention of OINV were compared., Results: Two-hundred-forty European physicians responded to our survey. i) Use of non-opioids in addition to opioids for the treatment of cancer pain: Only 1.3% (n = 3) of respondents never used an additional non-opioid. Others mostly used: dipyrone/metamizole (49.2%, n = 118), paracetamol/acetaminophen (34.2%, n = 82), ibuprofen / other NSAIDs (11.3%, n = 27), specific Cox2-inhibitors (2.1%, n = 5), Aspirin (0.4%, n = 1), no answer (2.9%, n = 7). ii) Antiemetics to prevent OINV: The drugs of choice were metoclopramide (58.3%, n = 140), haloperidol (26.3%, n = 63), 5-HT3 antagonists (9.6%, n = 23), antihistamines (1.3%, n = 3) and other (2.9%, n = 7); no answer (1.7%, n = 4). Most respondents prescribed the substances on-demand (59.6%, n = 143) while others (36.3%, n = 87) provided them as around the clock medication. Over both domains, most physicians answered that their choices were not based on solid evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Guidelines were inconsistent regarding if and what non-opioid to use for cancer pain and recommend anti-dopaminergic drugs for prevention or treatment of OINV., Conclusions: Physician's practice in palliative care for the treatment of cancer pain and OINV differed substantially. Respondents expressed the lack of high-quality evidence- based information from RCTs. We call for evidence from methodologically high-quality RCTs to be available to inform physicians about the benefits and harms of pharmacological treatments for common symptoms in palliative care., (© 2024. The Author(s).)