Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of the change of antiemetic prophylaxis from double to triple combination in patients with high dose carboplatin chemotherapy.
- Source :
-
Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners [J Oncol Pharm Pract] 2024 Sep; Vol. 30 (6), pp. 999-1009. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 10. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the adverse events that most affects oncologic patients' quality of life. Carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 belongs to agents with high emetic risk (moderate risk in ASCO guidelines). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of netupitant/palonosetron and dexamethasone triple combination (TC) therapy versus ondansetron and dexamethasone double combination (DC) therapy as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. As a secondary endpoint, in TC group we evaluated the effectiveness of changing NEPA administration timing from 1 h to 15 min before chemotherapy.<br />Methods: Open-label prospective study conducted in a tertiary-care hospital in patients receiving carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. CINV was evaluated using MASCC antiemetic tool, in acute (<24 h) and delayed phase (24-120 h). Results were analyzed using χ <superscript>2</superscript> test.<br />Results: Two-hundred four completed questionnaires (CQ) were analyzed (76 in DC and 128 in TC). The proportion of patients who remained emesis-free was superior for TC-treated group compared to DC, either in acute (99.2% vs 92.1%, p = 0.0115) and delayed phase (97.6% vs 90.7%, p = 0.043). Likewise, a higher proportion of TC-treated patients compared to DC remained nausea-free for the first 24 h after treatment (90.6% vs 71%, p = 0.0004) and between 24 and 120 h (82.3% vs 62.7%, p = 0.0025). The change of NEPA administration time showed similar effectiveness in terms of CINV control (81.6% vs 74.5%, p = 0.70).<br />Conclusions: TC showed superiority in early and delayed CINV control in carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 regimens, with no significant differences among cancer types. Change in NEPA administration timing has beneficial implications; it allows NEPA to be administered at hospitals before chemotherapy session.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Prospective Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Female
Aged
Palonosetron administration & dosage
Palonosetron therapeutic use
Adult
Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage
Drug Therapy, Combination
Neoplasms drug therapy
Quality of Life
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage
Drug Combinations
Carboplatin administration & dosage
Carboplatin adverse effects
Antiemetics administration & dosage
Antiemetics therapeutic use
Nausea prevention & control
Nausea chemically induced
Dexamethasone administration & dosage
Dexamethasone therapeutic use
Vomiting prevention & control
Vomiting chemically induced
Ondansetron administration & dosage
Ondansetron therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1477-092X
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 37563932
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231194077