Search

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal is the property of Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article explains the disparity of criteria generated within the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Justice concerning to the use of the theories of the dynamic burden of proof in the Colombian criminal accusatory tendency process, enactment by Act 906 of 2004. This study was conducted through a normative, doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis with a basic legal qualitative approach. Results determined the absence of unifying criteria in the High Courts allowing the application of the distribution of the burden of proof arbitrarily, contrary to the prohibition in clause 3 article 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explains the disparity of criteria generated within the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Justice concerning to the use of the theories of the dynamic burden of proof in the Colombian criminal accusatory tendency process, enactment by Act 906 of 2004. This study was conducted through a normative, doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis with a basic legal qualitative approach. Results determined the absence of unifying criteria in the High Courts allowing the application of the distribution of the burden of proof arbitrarily, contrary to the prohibition in clause 3 article 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fundamental rights of the crime victim have been strengthened through the establishment of the accusatorial criminal procedure in the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States. The problem is that important rules of the National Code of Criminal Procedures are still restrictive in terms of their constitutional rights. The current paper aims at analyzing the right of the crime victim to become an active part of the criminal procedure and as a result, this right could turn into a guarantee to provide effective access to every single stage of the criminal procedure for the adequate and timely defense of their interests according to due process of law. It is concluded that this right is the nucleus of a jurisprudence doctrine issued by the Federal Tribunals to progressively broaden the scope of the adjectival rights of the victim in conditions of procedural equity with the defendant's rights. This is a documentary research developed within the framework of the theory of guarantee procedural law through the analytical and hermeneutic methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social is the property of Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal is the property of Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal is the property of Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal is the property of Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC is the property of Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas is the property of Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas is the property of Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

O presente estudo traz, inicialmente, elementos informativos acerca do surgimento e evolução histórica do direito ao silêncio, enfrentando questões conceituais e de natureza jurídica do respectivo instituto, situando-o como garantia fundamental reconhecida desde o advento da Constituição Federal de 1988. Objetivando buscar uma adequada compreensão, não apenas das decorrências no plano normativo da constitucionalização da enfocada garantia, mas, principalmente, das consequências do exercício do direito ao silencio, necessárias foram algumas considerações sobre ônus da prova e direito de não produzir provas contra si, após breve apanhado acerca do processo penal acusatório e da teoria do garantismo penal. A amplitude do direito ao silêncio, tanto objetiva como subjetivamente, assim como as implicações decorrentes de sua violação, foram também abordadas neste trabalho, merecendo especial atenção a questão da ilegalidade de prisões fundadas no seu mero exercício. Por fim, passado a limpo as modificações sucedidas desde a promulgação da atual Carta da República sobre o tema, procurou-se demonstrar a necessidade, de parte dos operadores do direito, de constante e redobrada atenção para se evitar prejuízos aos acusados, pois, não raramente, na prática forense, observam-se sutis tentativas de violações às regras processuais, inclusive no tocante ao direito ao silêncio, ainda que, na doutrina, cada vez mais crescente o entendimento de que o processo penal deve ser compreendido em consonância com os ditames constitucionais.

Copyright of Revista Jurídica Cesumar: Mestrado is the property of Revista Juridica Cesumar - Mestrado and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Brazilian Journal of Law & International Relations / Relações Internacionais no Mundo is the property of Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC is the property of Meritum: Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

O presente artigo visa mostrar comoo modelo de processo penal acusatório é o quemais se coaduna com os princípios e garantiasconstitucionais, sendo, portanto, dever do MinistérioPúblico, enquanto órgão defensor doregime democrático e dos preceitos constitucionais,implementar uma nova práxis processualna qual esse modelo seja privilegiado, apesardos limites da nossa legislação processualpenal, que ainda reproduz muito do modeloinquisitorial e autoritário.Abstract: The present article aims atdemonstrating how the accusatory penalprocess is the one which better embodiesconstitutional principles and guarantees,being, therefore, duty of the Public Ministry,whose objective is to defend the democraticregime and the rule of law, to implement anew practice in penal process law in whichthis model may be privileged, in spite oflimitations imposed by Brazilian penal processlaw, which still reproduces much of theinquisitional and authoritarian model.

Copyright of Revista Jurídica Cesumar: Mestrado is the property of Revista Juridica Cesumar - Mestrado and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)