1. Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus
- Author
-
Ingen-Housz-Oro, S, Schmidt, V, Ameri, MM, Abe, R, Brassard, A, Mostaghimi, A, Paller, AS, Romano, A, Didona, B, Kaffenberger, BH, Ben Said, B, Thong, BYH, Ramsay, B, Brezinova, E, Milpied, B, Mortz, CG, Chu, CY, Sotozono, C, Gueudry, J, Fortune, DG, Dridi, SM, Tartar, D, Do-Pham, G, Gabison, E, Phillips, EJ, Lewis, F, Salavastru, C, Horvath, B, Dart, J, Setterfield, J, Newman, J, Schulz, JT, Delcampe, A, Brockow, K, Seminario-Vidal, L, Jörg, L, Watson, MP, Gonçalo, M, Lucas, M, Torres, M, Noe, MH, Hama, N, Shear, NH, O’Reilly, P, Wolkenstein, P, Romanelli, P, Dodiuk-Gad, RP, Micheletti, RG, Tiplica, GS, Sheridan, R, Rauz, S, Ahmad, S, Chua, SL, Flynn, TH, Pichler, W, Le, ST, Maverakis, E, Walsh, S, French, LE, and Brüggen, MC
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease ,Humans ,Stevens-Johnson Syndrome ,Consensus ,Skin ,Disease Progression ,Epidermal necrolysis ,Stevens-Johnson syndrome ,Toxic epidermal necrolysis ,Sequelae ,Quality of life ,Delphi ,Other Medical and Health Sciences ,Genetics & Heredity ,Genetics ,Clinical sciences - Abstract
BackgroundLong-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking.ObjectivesWe conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae.MethodsParticipants were sent a survey via the online tool "Survey Monkey" consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.ResultsFifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index
- Published
- 2023