Search

OBJECTIVE: In addition to the recent success of neprilysin inhibition in treatment of heart failure, elevated soluble neprilysin (sNEP) in circulation has been suggested to be a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the diagnostic performance of sNEP is nebulous and its levels in HFrEF have not been compared with controls. For the purpose of this study, we determined the role of sNEP levels as a biomarker in routine ambulatory care of HFrEF patients, when compared to the control subjects. METHODS: Ambulant patients with chronic HFrEF (n = 18) were included. Apparently healthy volunteers -- hospital physicians (n = 9) were included as the controls. Besides standard diagnostic tools (echocardiographic examination and laboratory biochemical diagnostic tests including NT-proBNP assessment), we analysed serum levels of neprilysin with a commercially available human soluble neprilysin ultrasensitive ELISA kit (Aviscera Bioscience, USA). RESULTS: Concentrations of sNEP were significantly reduced in HFrEF patients (average ± S.E.M.=1038 ± 464 pg/ml) when compared to the controls (1947 ± 613 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Two of eighteen HFrEF samples were below, while two of ten control samples were above the detection limit of the immunoassay. We documented a lack of significant correlation between sNEP and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other echocardiographic features as well as NT-proBNP. However, sNEP significantly negatively correlated to serum natrium levels (Spearman r = -0.6112, p < 0.05) and to systolic blood pressure (Spearman r = -0.4746, p < 0.05) in HFrEF. CONCLUSION: Levels of sNEP were significantly reduced in HFrEF, when compared to the controls, with absent correlations to relevant HF-related features (e.g. LVEF). These findings might contribute to clarification of the diagnostic value of sNEP in HF (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 30). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cardiology Letters is the property of Slovak Society of Cardiology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cardiology Letters is the property of Slovak Society of Cardiology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

An abstract of the study "ApoE Polymorphism in Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Advanced Heart Failure," by M. Luknar and colleagues is presented.

Importance: Sex is associated with the clinical presentation, outcomes, and response to treatment in patients with heart failure (HF). However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of treatment with finerenone according to sex., Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared with placebo in both women and men., Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified analyses were conducted in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients with Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF). The trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023., Intervention: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and total (first and recurrent) HF events (unplanned HF hospitalizations or urgent HF visits)., Results: A total of 6001 patients were randomized in FINEARTS-HF, of whom 2732 were women (45.5%), with a mean (SD) age of 73.6 (9.1) years. Women had higher rates of any obesity, higher LVEF (54.6 [7.6%] vs 50.9 [7.6] for men), lower mean (SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate than men (59.7 [19.1] vs 64.1 [20.0] for men; P<.001) , worse New York Heart Association functional class, and lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Scores (KCCQ-TSS) (mean [SD] 62.3 [24.0] vs 71.0 [23.1]). The incident rate of the primary outcome was slightly lower in women (15.7; 95% CI, 14.3-17.3) than in men (16.8; 95% CI, 15.4-18.3) per 100 person-years. Compared with placebo, finerenone reduced the risk of the primary end point similarly in women and men: rate ratio 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95) in women and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.04) in men (P = .41 for interaction). Consistent effects were observed for the components of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality. The mean increase (improvement) in KCCQ-TSS from baseline to 12 months was greater with finerenone, regardless of sex (P = .73 for interaction). Finerenone had similar tolerability in women and men., Conclusions and Relevance: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone reduced the risk of the primary end point similarly in women and men with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Finerenone had similar tolerability in women and men., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Background: Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce morbidity and mortality among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy in those with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction has not been established. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction are needed., Methods: In this international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive finerenone (at a maximum dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily) or matching placebo, in addition to usual therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of total worsening heart failure events (with an event defined as a first or recurrent unplanned hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) and death from cardiovascular causes. The components of the primary outcome and safety were also assessed., Results: Over a median follow-up of 32 months, 1083 primary-outcome events occurred in 624 of 3003 patients in the finerenone group, and 1283 primary-outcome events occurred in 719 of 2998 patients in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95; P = 0.007). The total number of worsening heart failure events was 842 in the finerenone group and 1024 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P = 0.006). The percentage of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was 8.1% and 8.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11). Finerenone was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and a reduced risk of hypokalemia., Conclusions: In patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone resulted in a significantly lower rate of a composite of total worsening heart failure events and death from cardiovascular causes than placebo. (Funded by Bayer; FINEARTS-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04435626.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background:  Mechanical assist device indications have changed in recent years. Reduced incidence of complications, better survival, and the third generation of mechanical support devices contributed to this change. In this single-center study, we focused on two time periods that are characterized by the use of different types of mechanical support devices, different patient characteristics, and change in the indications., Methods:  The data were processed from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS). We retrospectively defined two time intervals to reflect changes in ventricular assist device technology (period 1: 2007-2015; period 2: 2016-20222). A total of 181 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation. Device utilization was the following: HeartMate II = 52 (76.4%) and HeartWare = 16 (23.6%) in period 1 and HeartMate II = 2 (1.8%), HeartMate 3 = 70 (61:9%), HeartWare = 29 (25.7%), SynCardia TAH = 10 (8.8%), and BerlinHeart EXCOR = 2 (1.8%) in period 2. The outcomes of the time intervals were analyzed and evaluated., Results:  Survival was significantly higher during the second time period. Multivariate analysis revealed that age and bypass pump time are independent predictors of mortality. Idiopathic cardiomyopathy, bypass time, and the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) score are independent predictors of adverse events. Furthermore, the first period was noted to be at an increased risk of the following adverse events: pump thrombosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and bleeding events., Conclusion:  Despite the higher risk profile of the patients and persistent challenges, during the second period, there was a significant decrease in mortality and morbidity. The use of the HeartMate 3 device may have contributed to this result., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Although left ventricular assist device implantation represents the majority of durable mechanical circulatory support implants for patients with advanced heart failure, as many as 20 to 30% will subsequently have right heart failure requiring extended inotropic support or short-term mechanical circulatory support, and the total artificial heart is an established tool in the bridge to transplant armamentarium. The aim of this short report is to present our center's experience with the use of SynCardia total artificial heart. Between November 2017 and April 2021, 10 SynCardia total artificial heart devices were implanted. Of the 10 patients who underwent total artificial heart implantation, 6 (60%) were successfully bridged to transplant with a median time of 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 6-8) months, and 4 patients died on device support during the index hospitalization. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survival rates after heart transplantation were the same at 66.7% (4/6). Despite the uncertain future of total artificial hearts, it remains a viable option for patients who require biventricular bridge to transplant or for a select subset of patients with advance heart failure who may not otherwise survive., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receive less guideline-recommended therapy and experience worse quality of life than men., Objectives: The authors sought to assess differences in baseline characteristics, outcomes, efficacy, and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil between men and women enrolled in the GALACTIC-HF (Registrational Study With Omecamtiv Mecarbil [AMG 423] to Treat Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) study., Methods: In GALACTIC-HF, patients with symptomatic heart failure with EF of 35% or less, recent heart failure event, and elevated natriuretic peptides were randomized to omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo. The current analysis investigated differences in baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil between men and women., Results: Of 8,232 patients analyzed, 21.2% were women. Women more likely self-identified as being Black, had worse symptoms (lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score [KCCQ-TSS]), and were less likely to be treated with angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor and devices at baseline. Compared with men, women had lower rates of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Sex did not significantly modify omecamtiv mecarbil's treatment effect (P interaction = 0.68). Women also had 20% less risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure event, and all-cause death. Women participants had lower rates of serious adverse events., Conclusions: Women participants of the GALACTIC-HF trial had worse quality of life and were less likely to be treated with guideline-based therapies at baseline. Despite KCCQ-TSS being predictive of poor outcomes in this population, women had a 20% lower risk of an HF event or cardiovascular death compared with men. The beneficial effect of omecamtiv mecarbil did not significantly differ by sex. (Registrational Study With Omecamtiv Mecarbil [AMG 423] to Treat Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [GALACTIC-HF]; NCT02929329)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Pabon is supported by the First.In.Women Fellowship Program in Sex- and Gender-Differences in Cardiovascular Diseases Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology and the John S. LaDue Memorial Fellowship at Harvard Medical School. Dr Cunnigham has consulted for Roche Diagnostics, Occlutech, and KCK. Dr Clagget has consulted for Alnylam, CVRX, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Intellia, Novartis, and Rocket. Dr Felker has received research grants from NHLBI, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, Myokardia; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, and Sequana; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharm. Dr McMurray has received payments through Glasgow University from work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GSK, KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; personal consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharma, Bayer, BMS, George Clinical PTY Ltd, Ionis Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharma, and River 2 Renal Corporation; and received personal lecture fees Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, AstraZeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharma Ltd, Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of CME, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica Health, Intas Pharma, J.B. Chemicals & Pharma Ltd, Lupin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharma, The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy; and he is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. Dr Metra has received personal fees in the last 3 years from Vifor Pharma and LivaNova (Executive Committee member); and participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Abbott Structural, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Diaz has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics Inc, and Servier Laboratories. Dr Wang is supported by a T32 postdoctoral training grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL094301) and by the Scott Schoen and Nancy Adams First.In.Women Cardiovascular Fellowship, Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr Crespo Leiro has received personal fees from Amgen; personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Vifor, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Medtronic; and grants from CIBERCV, outside the submitted work. Dr Fonseca has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; and grants and personal fees from Vifor Pharma, outside of the submitted work. Dr Goncalvesova has received personal fees from Amgen, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Servier; and grants and personal fees from Novartis, outside of the submitted work. Dr Lund has received grant funding and personal fees from Amgen; has received honoraria from Novartis; and has served as the New Zealand Chairperson for Cardiac Society Australia and New Zealand. Dr O’Meara has received research funds (paid to her institution) for clinical trials from American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Pfizer; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, and Janssen; and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Malik is an employee of and owns stock in Cytokinetics, Inc. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Cytokinetics, Eidos, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/NHLBI, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Valo. Dr Teerlink has received personal fees as Chairperson of the GALACTIC-HF Executive Committee from Amgen and Cytokinetics; personal fees for research contracts and/or consulting fees from 3ive Labs, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardurion, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Verily, ViCardia, and Windtree Therapeutics; has served as Secretary and Treasurer of the Heart Failure Society of America; and is currently President of the Heart Failure Society of America. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Right heart failure is a huge challenge in left ventricular assist device therapy and its occurrence is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Other options include the use od temporary right ventricular assist device, use of two continous flow biventricular assist devices, use of total artificial heart and the use of paracorporeal biventricular assist devices.In this report we described the successful use of the paracorporeal pulsatile Berlin Heart EXCOR system as a bridge to transplant in a 62 years old patient with end-stage biventricular heart failure (Tab. 1, Fig. 3, Ref. 22). Keywords: biventricular heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, biventricular assist device, Berlin Heart EXCOR system, heart transplantation.

Aim: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have high mortality, hospitalizations, and poorly tolerate evidence-based medical treatment. Omecamtiv mecarbil may be particularly helpful in such patients. This study examined its efficacy and tolerability in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF)., Methods and Results: The GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with baseline SBP ≥85 mmHg with a primary outcome of time to cardiovascular death or first heart failure event. In this analysis, patients were divided according to their baseline SBP (≤100 vs. >100 mmHg). Among the 8232 analysed patients, 1473 (17.9%) had baseline SBP ≤100 mmHg and 6759 (82.1%) had SBP >100 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 715 (48.5%) and 2415 (35.7%) patients with SBP ≤100 and >100 mmHg, respectively. Patients with lower SBP were at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Omecamtiv mecarbil, compared with placebo, appeared to be more effective in reducing the primary composite endpoint in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.94] compared with those with SBP >100 mmHg (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.03; P-value for interaction = 0.051). In both groups, omecamtiv mecarbil did not change SBP values over time and did not increase the risk of adverse events, when compared with placebo., Conclusion: In GALACTIC-HF, risk reduction of heart failure outcomes with omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo was large and significant in patients with low SBP. Omecamtiv mecarbil did not affect SBP and was well tolerated independent of SBP values., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.M. has received funding to his institution from Amgen and Cytokinetics as participant to the Executive Committee during the trial and for patients’ enrolment; has received consulting fees for participation to advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received personal fees as member of Executive or Data Monitoring Committees of sponsored clinical trials from LivaNova and Vifor Pharma; has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Therapeutics for speeches at sponsored meetings; and has participated on Data Safety Monitoring boards for Actelion. B.L.C. has received consulting fees from Amgen, Cardurion, Corvia, Myokardia, and Novartis. R.D. has received research grants and other payment or honoraria from Amgen. G.M.F. has received grant funding to his institution from American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL-Behring, Cytokinetics, Merck, Myokardia, and National Institutes of Health; has received consulting fees from Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardionomic, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Myovant, Novartis, Reprieve, Sequana, Windtree Therapeutics, and WhiteSwell; and has participated on Data Safety Monitoring boards or advisory boards for EBR Systems, LivaNova, Medtronic, Siemens, Rocket Pharma, and V-Wave. J.J.V.M. has received funding to his institution from Amgen and Cytokinetics for his participation in the Steering Committee for the ATOMIC-HF, COSMIC-HF, and GALACTIC-HF trials and meetings and other activities related to these trials; has received personal fees from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, Eris Lifesciences, Hikma, Lupin, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Servier, Sun Pharmaceuticals, and The Corpus; and has received funding paid to his institution for activities related to trials or other activities from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardurion, DalCor, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, KBP Biosciences, Novartis, and Theracos. S.D.S. has received grant funding to his institution from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bellerophon, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Neurotronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, US2.AI; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, American Regent, Amgen, Anacardio, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardior, Cardurion, CellProthera, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Dinaqor, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lexicon, Lilly, Merck, Moderna, Myokardia, Novartis, Puretech Health, Quantum Genomics, Roche, Sanofi Pasteur, Sarepta, Tenaya, Theracos, and Tremeau. D.B. has received research grants from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, SOBI, and Zoll; has received consulting fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, SOBI, and Zoll; has received speaker fees or honoraria and support for attending meetings and/or travels from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, SOBI, and Zoll; and is in the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function. J.C.F. has served on the Board of Directors for the Heart Failure Society of America. C.F. has received personal fees for consulting from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; has received honoraria for lectures and educational events from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bayer, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; has participated on advisory boards for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Vifor Pharma; and has received grants for medical writing from Merck Serono and Roche. E.G. has received consulting fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Servier; has received personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; and is the President of the Slovak Society of Cardiology. J.G.H. has received grants and consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; and is Co-Chair of the Heart Failure Pathway Group of the Province of Alberta, Heart Failure lead at University of Calgary, and in the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines and Development Committees. J.L. has received research agreements from Amgen during the conduct of the study through the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. E.O. has received support to her institution (Montreal Heart Institute) for being local Principal Investigator and member of the Steering Committee of the GALACTIC-HF trial from Amgen and Cytokinetics; has received grant funding to her institution (Montreal Heart Institute) for clinical trials from AstraZeneca, American Regent, Cardurion, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Janssen; has received speaker fees or other honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has participated on Data Safety Monitoring boards or advisory boards for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the independent COLpEF trial. S.A.A. is an employee and shareholder of Amgen. S.B.H., S.K., and F.I.M. are employees and shareholders of Cytokinetics. J.R.T. has received personal fees as Chairperson of the GALACTIC-HF Executive Committee from Amgen and Cytokinetics; has received personal fees for research contracts and/or consulting fees from 3ive Labs, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardurion, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Verily, ViCardia, and Windtree Therapeutics; has served as Secretary and Treasurer of Heart Failure Society of America; and is currently President-Elect of the Heart Failure Society of America. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the association between prehospital intravenous therapy and clinical outcomes in the patients with acute heart failure., Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study of consecutive AHF patients. Univariate and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine association between prehospital furosemide or nitrates administration and hospital outcome (death, length of stay)., Results: Data on a total of 1239 patients were processed. The mean age in the whole cohort was 71 ± 11.8 years with a gender distribution (M/F) of 634/605 patients. By prehospital treatment whole cohort was divided into 4 groups: F+ group with prehospital IV furosemide administration of 602 patients (48.6 %), F- group without prehospital IV furosemide administration of 637 patients (51.4 %), N+ group with prehospital IV nitrates administration of 110 patients (8.9 %) and N- group without IV nitrates administration of 1129 patients (91.1 %). Group of combined F+/N+ was not created. Ninety-four patients (7.6 %) died during the index hospitalization. Hospital mortality (p = 0.138) and length of stay (p = 0.101) did not differ in F+ vs F-. The patients with prehospital nitrates administration did not differ in mortality, but a shorter length of stay in univariate analysis (p = 0.03) was recorded. After adjusting for age, systolic BP and mode of referral to hospitalization, early IV furosemide usage nor nitrates showed no impact on hospital mortality and length of stay., Conclusions: Prehospital treatment with IV furosemide or nitrates in AHF patients seemed to have no major impact on hospital mortality or length of hospitalization after adjustment for several cofounders (Tab. 2, Ref. 16).

Importance: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a progressive clinical syndrome, and many patients' condition worsen over time despite treatment. Patients with more severe disease are often intolerant of available medical therapies., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil for the treatment of patients with severe heart failure (HF) enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) randomized clinical trial., Design, Setting, and Participants: The GALACTIC-HF study was a global double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial that was conducted at multiple centers between January 2017 and August 2020. A total of 8232 patients with symptomatic HF (defined as New York Heart Association symptom class II-IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less were randomized to receive omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo and followed up for a median of 21.8 months (range, 15.4-28.6 months). The current post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil therapy among patients classified as having severe HF compared with patients without severe HF. Severe HF was defined as the presence of all of the following criteria: New York Heart Association symptom class III to IV, left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less, and hospitalization for HF within the previous 6 months., Interventions: Participants were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was time to first HF event or cardiovascular (CV) death. Secondary end points included time to CV death and safety and tolerability., Results: Among 8232 patients enrolled in the GALACTIC-HF clinical trial, 2258 patients (27.4%; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.6] years; 1781 men [78.9%]) met the specified criteria for severe HF. Of those, 1106 patients were randomized to the omecamtiv mecarbil group and 1152 to the placebo group. Patients with severe HF who received omecamtiv mecarbil experienced a significant treatment benefit for the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90), whereas patients without severe HF had no significant treatment benefit (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.08; P = .005 for interaction). For CV death, the results were similar (HR for patients with vs without severe HF: 0.88 [95% CI, 0.75-1.03] vs 1.10 [95% CI, 0.97-1.25]; P = .03 for interaction). Omecamtiv mecarbil therapy was well tolerated in patients with severe HF, with no significant changes in blood pressure, kidney function, or potassium level compared with placebo., Conclusions and Relevance: In this post hoc analysis of data from the GALACTIC-HF clinical trial, omecamtiv mecarbil therapy may have provided a clinically meaningful reduction in the composite end point of time to first HF event or CV death among patients with severe HF. These data support a potential role of omecamtiv mecarbil therapy among patients for whom current treatment options are limited., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02929329.

The accepted use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology as a good alternative for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure together with the improved survival of the LVAD-supported patients on the device and the scarcity of donor hearts has significantly increased the population of LVAD-supported patients. The expected and non-expected device-related and patient-device interaction complications impose a significant burden on the medical system exceeding the capacity of the LVAD implanting centres. The ageing of the LVAD-supported patients, mainly those supported with the 'destination therapy' indication, increases the risk for those patients to experience comorbidities common in the older population. The probability of an LVAD-supported patient presenting with medical emergency to a local emergency department, internal, or surgical ward of a non-LVAD implanting centre is increasing. The purpose of this trilogy is to supply the immediate tools needed by the non-LVAD specialized physician: ambulance clinicians, emergency ward physicians, general cardiologists, internists, anaesthesiologists, and surgeons, to comply with the medical needs of this fast-growing population of LVAD-supported patients. The different issues discussed will follow the patient's pathway from the ambulance to the emergency department and from the emergency department to the internal or surgical wards and eventually to the discharge home from the hospital back to the general practitioner. In this first part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider, after the introduction on the assist devices technology in general, definitions and structured approach to the assessment of the LVAD-supported patient in the ambulance and emergency department is presented including cardiopulmonary resuscitation for LVAD-supported patients., (© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

The growing population of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-supported patients increases the probability of an LVAD- supported patient hospitalized in the internal or surgical wards with certain expected device related, and patient-device interaction complication as well as with any other comorbidities requiring hospitalization. In this third part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the hospitalized LVAD-supported patient are presented including blood pressure assessment, medical therapy of the LVAD supported patient, and challenges related to anaesthesia and non-cardiac surgical interventions. Finally, important aspects to consider when discharging an LVAD patient home and palliative and end-of-life approaches are described., (© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

The improvement in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology and scarcity of donor hearts have increased dramatically the population of the LVAD-supported patients and the probability of those patients to present to the emergency department with expected and non-expected device-related and patient-device interaction complications. The ageing of the LVAD-supported patients, mainly those supported with the 'destination therapy' indication, increases the risk for those patients to suffer from other co-morbidities common in the older population. In this second part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the LVAD-supported patient presenting to the emergency department with bleeding, neurological event, pump thrombosis, chest pain, syncope, and other events are presented. The very challenging issue of declaring death in an LVAD-supported patient, as the circulation is artificially preserved by the device despite no other signs of life, is also discussed in detail., (© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Alternative branches of the classical renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) represent an important cascade in which angiotensin 2 (AngII) undergoes cleavage via the action of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with subsequent production of Ang(1-7) and other related metabolites eliciting its effects via Mas receptor activation. Generally, this branch of the RAS system is described as its non-canonical alternative arm with counterbalancing actions to the classical RAS, conveying vasodilation, anti-inflammatory, anti-remodeling and anti-proliferative effects. The implication of this branch was proposed for many different diseases, ranging from acute cardiovascular conditions, through chronic respiratory diseases to cancer, nonetheless, hypoxia is one of the most prominent common factors discussed in conjugation with the changes in the activity of alternative RAS branches. The aim of this review is to bring complex insights into the mechanisms behind the various forms of hypoxic insults on the activity of alternative RAS branches based on the different duration of stimuli and causes (acute vs. intermittent vs. chronic), localization and tissue (heart vs. vessels vs. lungs) and clinical relevance of studied phenomenon (experimental vs. clinical condition). Moreover, we provide novel insights into the future strategies utilizing the alternative RAS as a diagnostic tool as well as a promising pharmacological target in serious hypoxia-associated cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary diseases.

The accepted use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology as a good alternative for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure together with the improved survival of patients on the device and the scarcity of donor hearts has significantly increased the population of LVAD supported patients. Device-related, and patient-device interaction complications impose a significant burden on the medical system exceeding the capacity of LVAD implanting centres. The probability of an LVAD supported patient presenting with medical emergency to a local ambulance team, emergency department medical team and internal or surgical wards in a non-LVAD implanting centre is increasing. The purpose of this paper is to supply the immediate tools needed by the non-LVAD specialized physician - ambulance clinicians, emergency ward physicians, general cardiologists, and internists - to comply with the medical needs of this fast-growing population of LVAD supported patients. The different issues discussed will follow the patient's pathway from the ambulance to the emergency department, and from the emergency department to the internal or surgical wards and eventually back to the general practitioner., (© 2021 European Society of Cardiology.)

Aim: Circulating microRNA-21 (miR-21) has been utilized as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of heart failure (HF). Blood constitution may be altered when HF occurs and miR-21 may affect hematopoiesis. Sample hemolysis may influence the determination of circulating miRNAs, challenging the diagnostic use of miRNAs. Methods: We examined the relationship between blood measurements and miR-21 levels in ambulant chronic HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; n  = 19). Healthy volunteers ( n  = 11) served as controls. Serum miR-21 levels were measured through quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and we calculated the hemolysis score (H-score). Study was approved by an Institutional Review Board (EK FaF UK 02/2018). Results: MiR-21 serum levels were reduced in HFrEF patients compared with the controls ( p  < 0.05), without relationship to New York Heart Association class, left ventricular ejection fraction or N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels. MiR-21 levels decreased markedly in anemic patients, compared with those with normal hematocrits ( p  < 0.05). We found a significant relationship between miR-21 to hematocrit ( p  < 0.05) and hemoglobin concentration ( p  < 0.05). Importantly, we found a correlation between hematocrit and sample H-score ( p  < 0.05) in the cohort of HFrEF patients; however, there was no correlation between hemolysis and miR-21. Conclusion: Circulating miR-21 levels were decreased in HFrEF patients and hematocrit was identified as a factor associated with this abnormality. This suggests that miR-21 mirrors other characteristics of HFrEF patients rather than the standard identifiers of HF severity and progression.

Background: The selective cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown., Methods: We randomly assigned 8256 patients (inpatients and outpatients) with symptomatic chronic heart failure and an ejection fraction of 35% or less to receive omecamtiv mecarbil (using pharmacokinetic-guided doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo, in addition to standard heart-failure therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of a first heart-failure event (hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) or death from cardiovascular causes., Results: During a median of 21.8 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 1523 of 4120 patients (37.0%) in the omecamtiv mecarbil group and in 1607 of 4112 patients (39.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 0.99; P = 0.03). A total of 808 patients (19.6%) and 798 patients (19.4%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.11). There was no significant difference between groups in the change from baseline on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. At week 24, the change from baseline for the median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level was 10% lower in the omecamtiv mecarbil group than in the placebo group; the median cardiac troponin I level was 4 ng per liter higher. The frequency of cardiac ischemic and ventricular arrhythmia events was similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection, those who received omecamtiv mecarbil had a lower incidence of a composite of a heart-failure event or death from cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo. (Funded by Amgen and others; GALACTIC-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02929329; EudraCT number, 2016-002299-28.)., (Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Objective: In addition to the recent success of neprilysin inhibition in treatment of heart failure, elevated soluble neprilysin (sNEP) in circulation has been suggested to be a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the diagnostic performance of sNEP is nebulous and its levels in HFrEF have not been compared with controls. For the purpose of this study, we determined the role of sNEP levels as a biomarker in routine ambulatory care of HFrEF patients, when compared to the control subjects., Methods: Ambulant patients with chronic HFrEF (n = 18) were included. Apparently healthy volunteers - hospital physicians (n = 9) were included as the controls. Besides standard diagnostic tools (echocardiographic examination and laboratory biochemical diagnostic tests including NT-proBNP assessment), we analysed serum levels of neprilysin with a commercially available human soluble neprilysin ultrasensitive ELISA kit (Aviscera Bioscience, USA)., Results: Concentrations of sNEP were significantly reduced in HFrEF patients (average ± S.E.M.=1038 ± 464 pg/ml) when compared to the controls (1947 ± 613 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Two of eighteen HFrEF samples were below, while two of ten control samples were above the detection limit of the immunoassay. We documented a lack of significant correlation between sNEP and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other echocardiographic features as well as NT-proBNP. However, sNEP significantly negatively correlated to serum natrium levels (Spearman r = ‒0.6112, p < 0.05) and to systolic blood pressure (Spearman r = ‒0.4746, p < 0.05) in HFrEF., Conclusion: Levels of sNEP were significantly reduced in HFrEF, when compared to the controls, with absent correlations to relevant HF-related features (e.g. LVEF). These findings might contribute to clarification of the diagnostic value of sNEP in HF (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 30) Keywords: soluble neprilysin, heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, pharmacotherapy.

Objectives: Mechanical circulatory support is an established therapy in end-stage heart failure. The EUROMACS registry was created to promote research in these patients. The aim of this report was to present our 12 year experience with the durable mechanical circulatory support devices and compare it with the EUROMACS registry., Methods: Data from the entire EUROMACS registry from January 2011 to April 2019 were included (4704 implantations in 4410 patients). During the 12 years of our experience, until April 2019,125 mechanical support devices were implanted, in 122 patients. We compare patients´ characteristics, operative data and results with the EUROMACS registry and we report the major complications during the observational period., Results: Primary end-point (death) occurred in 40 (32.8 %) patients in our cohort during the follow-up period, representing the survival rate 75 %, 68 %, and 58 % for 6, 12, 24 months respectively, which compares favourably with the data, reported by the EUROMACS registry, the survival 66 % and 53 % after 1 and 2 years respectively. Cerebrovascular accident occurred in 7 %, a bleeding event in 32 %, significant infection (driveline) in 78 % and a device malfunction in 13 % of the patients. Forty- three patients underwent a heart transplant with hospital and long-term mortality of 11.6 % and 14 % respectively., Conclusion: Mechanical circulatory support is a valuable therapeutic option with excellent survival rates, nevertheless it is associated with clinically significant complications rates. The direct comparison between our cohort and the EUROMACS registry showed that early implantation strategy and mini invasive approach may improve survival rates and decrease postoperative complications (Tab. 3, Fig. 3, Ref. 16).

Aims: The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is being tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC-HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials., Methods and Results: Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥II, ejection fraction ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for heart failure or history of hospitalization/emergency department visit for heart failure within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic-guided dosing: 25, 37.5, or 50 mg bid). A total of 8256 patients [male (79%), non-white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean ejection fraction 27%, ischaemic aetiology in 54%, NYHA class II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide 1971 pg/mL. Heart failure therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary heart failure trials. GALACTIC-HF randomized patients representative of recent heart failure registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitril/valsartan at baseline (n = 1594)., Conclusions: GALACTIC-HF enrolled a well-treated, high-risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation., (© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there is no approved treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the predominant phenotype in women. Therefore, there is a greater heart failure therapeutic deficit in women compared with men., Methods: In a prespecified subgroup analysis, we examined outcomes according to sex in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), which compared sacubitril-valsartan and valsartan in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The primary outcome was a composite of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. We also report secondary efficacy and safety outcomes., Results: Overall, 2479 women (51.7%) and 2317 men (48.3%) were randomized. Women were older and had more obesity, less coronary disease, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels than men. For the primary outcome, the rate ratio for sacubitril-valsartan versus valsartan was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) in women and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.84-1.25) in men ( P interaction = 0.017). The benefit from sacubitril-valsartan was attributable to reduction in heart failure hospitalization. The improvement in New York Heart Association class and renal function with sacubitril-valsartan was similar in women and men, whereas the improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score was less in women than in men. The difference in adverse events between sacubitril-valsartan and valsartan was similar in women and men., Conclusions: As compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan seemed to reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization more in women than in men. Whereas the possible sex-related modification of the effect of treatment has several potential explanations, the present study does not provide a definite mechanistic basis for this finding., Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01920711.

Bjectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent event in patients with an acute heart failure (AHF) and is associated with a poor short and long-term outcome. The aim of this study was to describe diagnostic yield of selected novel biomarkers in prediction of AKI in patients admitted for AHF., Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 72 consecutive patients (46/26 M/F) aged 69±10,3 years admitted for AHF. Renal damage was defined according to KDIGO guidelines. Patients were divided into the two groups: AKI- (without renal injury, n=52) and AKI+ (with renal injury, n=20). Urine samples for AKI biomarkers measurements (NGAL, TIMP2, IGFBP7) were collected at the admission. The ROC and linear logistic regression of new biomarkers and selected clinical variables was performed for the evaluation of the AKI prediction., Results: The patients with AKI+ were older (median age: 75 vs 64 years, p=0.01), had lower BMI (median: 28 vs 29.5 kg/m2, p=0.04), were with a higher proportion of patients with HF with a reduced ejection fraction (55 % vs 23.1 %, p=0.01) and a higher level of serum NTproBNP. Urinary NGAL at admission was significantly higher in the AKI+ compared to the AKI - group (152 vs 19.5 ng/mL, p<0.0001); also median of u-TIMP-2 and u-IGFBP-7 in the AKI+ patients was significantly higher: 194.1 versus 42.5 ng/mL (p<0.0001) and 379 versus 92.4 pg/mL (p<0.0001) resp. Age, u-NGAL, u-TIMP2, u-IGFBP7, s-haemoglobin, NTproBNP and LVEF were associated with the development of AKI. Urine concentration of IGFBP-7 was measured, which is the best marker for the prediction of AKI (AUC 0.94)., Conclusion: Urine concentrations of NGAL, TIMP2, IGFBP7 at the time of admission for AHF predicted a development of AKI. Age, NTproBNP, LVEF and s-haemoglobin were also associated with AKI in AHF patients (Tab. 3, Fig. 3, Ref. 22). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: biomarkers, cardiorenal syndrome, acute heart failure.

Aims: Patients admitted for acute heart failure (HF) are at high risk of readmission and death, especially in the 90 days following discharge. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of early optimization of oral HF therapy with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) on 90-day clinical outcomes in patients admitted for acute HF., Methods: In a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, a total of 900 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 'usual care' or 'high-intensity care'. Patients enrolled in the usual care arm will be discharged and managed according to usual clinical practice at the site. In the high-intensity care arm, doses of oral HF medications - including a BB, ACEi or ARB, and MRA - will be up-titrated to 50% of recommended doses before discharge and to 100% of recommended doses within 2 weeks of discharge. Up-titration will be delayed if the patients develop worsening symptoms and signs of congestion, hyperkalaemia, hypotension, bradycardia, worsening of renal function or significant increase in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide between visits. The primary endpoint is 90-day all-cause mortality or HF readmission., Conclusions: STRONG-HF is the first study to assess whether rapid up-titration of evidence-based guideline-recommended therapies with close follow-up in a large cohort of patients discharged from an acute HF admission is safe and can affect adverse outcomes during the first 90 days after discharge., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03412201., (© 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2019 European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril-valsartan led to a reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effect of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is unclear., Methods: We randomly assigned 4822 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, ejection fraction of 45% or higher, elevated level of natriuretic peptides, and structural heart disease to receive sacubitril-valsartan (target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or valsartan (target dose, 160 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. Primary outcome components, secondary outcomes (including NYHA class change, worsening renal function, and change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ] clinical summary score [scale, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations]), and safety were also assessed., Results: There were 894 primary events in 526 patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 1009 primary events in 557 patients in the valsartan group (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.01; P = 0.06). The incidence of death from cardiovascular causes was 8.5% in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 8.9% in the valsartan group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.16); there were 690 and 797 total hospitalizations for heart failure, respectively (rate ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00). NYHA class improved in 15.0% of the patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 12.6% of those in the valsartan group (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.86); renal function worsened in 1.4% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.77). The mean change in the KCCQ clinical summary score at 8 months was 1.0 point (95% CI, 0.0 to 2.1) higher in the sacubitril-valsartan group. Patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group had a higher incidence of hypotension and angioedema and a lower incidence of hyperkalemia. Among 12 prespecified subgroups, there was suggestion of heterogeneity with possible benefit with sacubitril-valsartan in patients with lower ejection fraction and in women., Conclusions: Sacubitril-valsartan did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction of 45% or higher. (Funded by Novartis; PARAGON-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920711.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Aims: To assess tolerability and optimal time point for initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients stabilised after acute heart failure (AHF)., Methods and Results: TRANSITION was a randomised, multicentre, open-label study comparing two treatment initiation modalities of sacubitril/valsartan. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, hospitalised for AHF were stratified according to pre-admission use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and randomised (n = 1002) after stabilisation to initiate sacubitril/valsartan either ≥ 12-h pre-discharge or between Days 1-14 post-discharge. Starting dose (as per label) was 24/26 mg or 49/51 mg bid with up- or down-titration based on tolerability. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients attaining 97/103 mg bid target dose after 10 weeks. Median time of first dose of sacubitril/valsartan from the day of discharge was Day -1 and Day +1 in the pre-discharge group and the post-discharge group, respectively. Comparable proportions of patients in the pre- and post-discharge initiation groups met the primary endpoint [45.4% vs. 50.7%; risk ratio (RR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.02]. The proportion of patients who achieved and maintained for ≥ 2 weeks leading to Week 10, either 49/51 or 97/103 mg bid was 62.1% vs. 68.5% (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.99); or any dose was 86.0% vs. 89.6% (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-1.01). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 7.3% vs. 4.9% of patients (RR 1.49; 95% CI 0.90-2.46)., Conclusions: Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in a wide range of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients stabilised after an AHF event, either in hospital or shortly after discharge, is feasible with about half of the patients achieving target dose within 10 weeks., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02661217., (© 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Objectives: For the first time we used targeted next-generation sequencing to detect candidate pathogenic variants in Slovak cardiomyopathy patients., Background: Targeted next-generation sequencing is considered to be the best practice in genetic diagnostics of cardiomyopathies. However, in Slovakia, with high cardiomyopathies prevalence of 1/440, the current diagnostic tests are still based on Sanger sequencing of a few genes. Consequently, little is known about the exact contribution of pathogenic variants in known cardiomyopathy genes in Slovak patients., Methods: We used a panel of 46 known cardiomyopathy-associated genes to detect genetic variants in 16 Slovak cardiomyopathy patients (6 dilated, 8 hypertrophic, 2 non-compaction subtypes)., Results: We identified candidate pathogenic variants in 11 of 16 patients (69 %). Genes with higher count of candidate pathogenic variants were MYBPC3, MYH and TTN, each with 3 different variants. Seven variants ACTC1 (c.329C>T), ANKRD1 (c.683G>T), MYH7 (c.1025C>T), PKP2 (c.2003delA), TTN (c.51655C>T, c.84841G>T, c.101874&#95;101881delAGAATTTG) have been detected for the first time and might represent Slovak-specific genetic cause., Conclusions: We have performed genetic testing of previously untested Slovak cardiomyopathy patients using next-generation sequencing cardiomyopathy gene panel. Given the high percentage of candidate pathogenic variants it should be recommended to implement this method into routine genetic diagnostic practice in Slovakia (Tab. 4, Ref. 39).

Introduction: Implantation of a total artificial heart is an alternative to durable biventricular assist device support in selected patients. We present our initial experience with the implantation of the SynCardia total artificial heart (TAH) in three patients. The first patient, was the first SynCardia (TAH) implantation in the Visegrad Four (V4) countries METHOD: Three patients with severe refractory end stage biventricular heart failure listed for heart transplant were indicated for SynCardia TAH implantationRESULTS: We present in details the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of these patients. The first and the third patient, after 195 and 126 days of TAH support respectively, had a successful heart transplants, the second patient died on 11th postoperative day. The cause of death was brain bleeding due to ruptured undiagnosed brain aneurysm., Conclusion:   SynCardia TAH is an alternative therapy in patients with end-stage biventricular heart failure waiting for heart transplantation. The SynCardia TAH with pulsatility resembles the physiologic circulation, improves the condition of the patients and increases survival compared to the biventricular assist devices. It is an intermediate step until the development of genetically modified animal hearts, engineered bioartificial hearts or hearts from induced pluripotent stem cells that would replace the failing heart in the patients with end-stage heart disease (Tab. 2, Fig. 1, Ref. 27).

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most significant prognostic factor in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, a significant number of individuals may develop CVD that does not present with the classic angina-related or heart failure symptoms. In these cases, CVD may seem to be 'silent' or 'asymptomatic', but may be more accurately characterised as unrecognised diabetic cardiac impairment. An initial step to raise awareness of unrecognised CVD in individuals with T2D would be to reach a consensus regarding the terminology used to describe this phenomenon. By standardising the terminologies, and agreeing on the implementation of an efficient screening program, it is anticipated that patients will receive an earlier diagnosis and appropriate and timely treatment. Given the availability of anti-diabetic medications that have been shown to concomitantly reduce CV risk and mortality, it is imperative to improve early identification and initiate treatment as soon as possible in order to enable as many patients with T2D as possible to benefit.

Background: To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HFpEF) comparing sacubitril/valsartan to valsartan in reducing morbidity and mortality., Methods and Results: We report key demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings, and baseline therapies, of 4822 patients randomized in PARAGON-HF, grouped by factors that influence criteria for study inclusion. We further compared baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in PARAGON-HF with those patients enrolled in other recent trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Among patients enrolled from various regions (16% Asia-Pacific, 37% Central Europe, 7% Latin America, 12% North America, 28% Western Europe), the mean age of patients enrolled in PARAGON-HF was 72.7±8.4 years, 52% of patients were female, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.5%, similar to other trials of HFpEF. Most patients were in New York Heart Association class II, and 38% had ≥1 hospitalizations for heart failure within the previous 9 months. Diabetes mellitus (43%) and chronic kidney disease (47%) were more prevalent than in previous trials of HFpEF. Many patients were prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (85%), β-blockers (80%), calcium channel blockers (36%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (24%). As specified in the protocol, virtually all patients were on diuretics, had elevated plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (median, 911 pg/mL; interquartile range, 464-1610), and structural heart disease., Conclusions: PARAGON-HF represents a contemporary group of patients with HFpEF with similar age and sex distribution compared with prior HFpEF trials but higher prevalence of comorbidities. These findings provide insights into the impact of inclusion criteria on, and regional variation in, HFpEF patient characteristics., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01920711., (© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Liver dysfunction in heart failure is common and usually clinically significant, especially in patients with advanced or severe acute heart failure. Lesions are caused by an impaired hepatic circulation due to congestion and hypoperfusion. Congestive lesions are more common and typically manifested by painful hepatomegaly and increased direct bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase. The inferior vena cava and hepatic veins are usually dilated. Congestive lesions are characterized by dilatation of the central vein with fibrotic changes in the surrounding areas on histological examination. Isolated ischaemic lesions are rare and occur due to severe and prolonged ineffective perfusion, often accompanied by hypoxemia. Ineffective perfusion is reflected by an increase in total bilirubin and significantly increased transaminase levels. The prognosis of ischaemic lesions without an adequate treatment of the cause of hypoperfusion is poor. Increased levels of bilirubin and liver function tests, as well as signs of impaired liver proteosynthetic function, are associated with a poor prognosis. Knowledge of the phenotypes of hepatic lesions in heart failure is important to select the appropriate treatment for an acute decompensation. Changes in biochemical markers, hepatic perfusion or stiffness of the liver can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of diuretic treatment and achieve euvolemic status in the patients with heart failure (Tab. 1, Fig. 3, Ref. 28).

Background: In human failing hearts (HF) of different origin (coronary artery disease-CAD, dilated-DCM, restrictive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-OTHER), we investigated the active forms of Ca 2+ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIδ (p-Thr 287 -CaMKIIδ, oxMet 281/282 -CaMKIIδ) and their role in phenotypes of the disease., Methods and Results: Although basic diagnostic and clinical markers indicating the attenuated cardiac contractility and remodeling were comparable in HF groups, CaMKIIδ-mediated axis was different. P-Thr 287 -CaMKIIδ was unaltered in CAD group, whereas it was upregulated in non-ischemic cardiomyopathic groups. No correlation between the upregulated p-Thr 287 -CaMKIIδ and QT interval prolongation was detected. Unlike in DCM, oxMet 281/282 -CaMKIIδ did not differ among HF groups. Independently of CaMKIIδ phosphorylation/oxidation, activation of its downstreams-phospholamban and cardiac myosin binding protein-C was significantly downregulated supporting both diminished cardiac lusitropy and inotropy in all hearts. Content of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase 2a in all HF was unchanged. Protein phosphatase1β was upregulated in CAD and DCM only, while 2A did not differ among groups., Conclusion: This is the first demonstration that the posttranslational activation of CaMKIIδ differs in HF depending on etiology. Lower levels of downstream molecular targets of CaMKIIδ do not correlate with either activation of CaMKIIδ or the expression of major protein phosphatases in the HF. Thus, it is unlikely that these mechanisms exclusively underlie failing of the heart., Competing Interests: None.