1. The influence of exposure approaches to in vitro lung epithelial barrier models to assess engineered nanomaterial hazard
- Author
-
Meldrum, Kirsty, Evans, Stephen J., Vogel, Ulla, Tran, Lang, Doak, Shareen H., and Clift, Martin J. D.
- Subjects
In vitro ,Biomedical Engineering ,Nanoparticles ,Epithelial cells ,Co-culture ,Toxicology ,Lung - Abstract
Exposure to engineered nanomaterials (ENM) poses a potential health risk to humans throughlong-term, repetitive low-dose exposures. Currently, this is not commonplace within in vitro lungcell cultures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to consider the optimal exposureapproach toward determining the stability, sensitivity and validity of using in vitro lung cellmono- and co-cultures to determine ENM hazard. A range of exposure scenarios wereconducted with DQ12 (previously established as a positive particle control) (historic and reactivated),TiO2 (JRC NM–105) and BaSO4 (JRC NM–220) on both monocultures of A549 cells aswell as co-cultures of A549 cells anddifferentiated THP-1 cells. Cell cultures were exposed toeither a single, or a repeated exposure over 24, 48- or 72-hours at in vivo extrapolated concentrationsof 0–5.2 mg/cm2, 0-6mg/cm2 and 0-1mg/cm2. The focus of this study was the pro-inflammatory,cytotoxic and genotoxic response elicited by these ENMs. Exposure to DQ12 caused proinflammatoryresponses after 48 hours repeat exposures, as well as increases in micronucleus frequency.Neither TiO2 nor BaSO4 elicited a pro-inflammatory response at this time point.However, there was induction of IL-6 after 24 hours TiO2 exposure. In conclusion, it is importantto consider the appropriateness of the positive control implemented, the cell culture model, thetime of exposure as well as the type of exposure (bolus or fractionated) before establishing if anin vitro model is appropriate to determine the level of response to the specific ENM of interest.
- Published
- 2022