Search

In 2011 the three major Italian gastroenterological scientific societies (AIGO, the Italian Society of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists; SIED, the Italian Society of Endoscopy; SIGE, the Italian Society of Gastroenterology) prepared their official document aimed at analysing medical care for digestive diseases in Italy, on the basis of national and regional data (Health Ministry and Lombardia, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna databases) and to make proposals for planning of care. Digestive diseases were the first or second cause of hospitalizations in Italy in 1999–2009, with more than 1,500,000 admissions/year; however only 5–9% of these admissions was in specialized Gastroenterology units. Reported data show a better outcome in Gastroenterology Units than in non-specialized units: shorter average length of stay, in particular for admissions with ICD-9-CM codes proxying for emergency conditions (6.7 days versus 8.4 days); better case mix (higher average diagnosis-related groups weight in Gastroenterology Units: 1 vs 0.97 in Internal Medicine units and 0.76 in Surgery units); lower inappropriateness of admissions (16–25% versus 29–87%); lower in-hospital mortality in urgent admissions (2.2% versus 5.1%); for patients with urgent admissions due to gastrointestinnal haemorrhage, in-hospital mortality was 2.3% in Gastroenterology units versus 4.0% in others. The present document summarizes the scientific societies’ official report, which constitutes the “White paper of Italian Gastroenterology”

The association beta-blockers plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (I5M) has been proposed for the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with insufficient response to beta-blockers alone, according to hemodynamic criteria. The mechanism of action in these patients is not clearly defined. Fifteen patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices were evaluated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and duplex-Doppler ultrasonography before and after 1 month of treatment with nadolol. Nine patients who did not exhibit a decrease in HVPG to 12 mm Hg or a percent decrease greater than 20% were classified as poor responders, and were studied again with the same methodology after 3 months of chronic administration of nadolol + I5M 20 mg twice per day. In poor responders, mean HVPG decrease after nadolol was 8.9% +/- 2.8%, and after the combination, it was 25.7% +/- 1.7% (P = .004). All patients except one became good responders to the association. Portal blood flow (PBF) decreased significantly after nadolol (P = .004), and remained unchanged after the addition of nitrates. Resistance to portal blood flow (RPBF) increased after nadolol (P = .02) and returned to baseline values during combined treatment (P = .03). In good responders, an adequate decrease in HVPG was associated with a decrease in PBF (P = .06) but no change in RPBF. A wide spectrum of combined changes in PBF and in RPBF after nadolol was observed in poor responders, ranging from no change in either parameter to a marked decrease in PBF counterbalanced by a marked increase in RPBF. The addition of I5M was followed in most cases by larger effects on resistance than on flow. Doppler parameters were not significantly correlated with the HVPG response to nadolol alone or associated with I5M. It is concluded that good hemodynamic responders to nadolol differ from poor responders in the lack of increase in RPBF after the drug. The addition of nitrates to nadolol is effective in decreasing portal pressure in most poor responders to nadolol alone. A decrease in outflow resistance is the main mechanism involved.

Summary Background The risk of having a first cirrhosis-associated variceal bleed is lowered by about 50% by β-blockers. Use of β-blockers is currently recommended for patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices that are at risk of bleeding. We aimed to test the effectiveness of isosorbide mononitrate as an adjunct to the β-blocker nadolol in the prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in these patients. Methods We did a randomised multicentre study to compare the non-selective β -blocker, nadolol, with nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate in 146 relatively well (Child-Pugh score ≤11) patients who had oesophageal varices at risk of bleeding. Patients on nadolol alone received a single oral 40 mg daily dose. Every second day the dose was titrated to achieve 20–25% decrease in resting heart rate (maximum dose 160 mg daily). Patients receiving both drugs received nadolol as above then isosorbide mononitrate was added starting with 10 mg orally twice daily, which was increased to 20 mg unless hypotension or severe headache occurred. The main endpoint was the occurrence of variceal bleeding of any severity. Patients were followed up for up to 40 months. Findings During the study period 11 of 74 patients from the nadolol alone group and four of 72 from the nadalol plus isosorbide mononitrate group had variceal bleeding (logrank test p=0·03). Cumulative risk of variceal bleeding was 18% in the nadolol group and 7·5% in the combined treatment group (95% CI for difference 1–25%). Two patients in each group had a non-variceal bleed related to portal hypertension. 14 patients from the nadolol only group and eight from the combined treatment group died during the study period (log-rank test p=0·09). Four and eight patients, respectively, had to discontinue one of the drugs because of side-effects. Interpretation Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate is signifcantly more effective than nadolol alone in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in relatively well patients with cirrhosis, and has few side-effects.

The association beta-blockers plus nitrates has been reported to impair renal function and renal sodium handling, leading to increased risk of development of ascites, or worsening of a preexisting ascites, or increase in the requirements of diuretic agents. In 81 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices, participating in a multicenter controlled clinical trial of prophylaxis of variceal bleeding comparing nadolol (NAD) plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (I5M) with NAD alone, renal function, presence of ascites, and diuretic requirements were assessed at inclusion and after 6 months of follow-up. No significant variation in s-urea or s-creatinine was observed in either group, Three patients in the nadolol group and two in the NAD plus I5M developed ascites at 6 months (P = .70), and a need to increase diuretic regimen was observed in four and three patients, respectively (P = .76). Decrease in heart rate and in mean arterial pressure was similar in the two groups. There was a significant correlation between increases in s-creatinine and decrease in mean arterial pressure in the whole series (P = .015). Only in patients treated with the association was there a significant larger proportion of patients ascitic who became anascitic, than of patients anascitic who became ascitic (P = .03). In patients treated with the association, there was a significantly larger decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient (P = .05). It is concluded that patients treated with the association NAD plus I5M are not at increased risk of developing renal dysfunction or worsening of ascites compared with patients treated with NAD alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To establish the incidence and risk factors for progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-IEN) or Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BAc) in a prospective cohort of patients with esophageal intestinal metaplasia [(BE)].BE is associated with an increased risk of BAc unless cases are detected early by surveillance. No consistent data are available on the prevalence of BE-related cancer, the ideal surveillance schedule, or the risk factors for cancer.In 2003, a regional registry of BE patients was created in north-east Italy, establishing the related diagnostic criteria (endoscopic landmarks, biopsy protocol, histological classification) and timing of follow-up (tailored to histology) and recording patient outcomes. Thirteen centers were involved and audited yearly. The probability of progression to HG-IEN/BAc was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the Cox regression model was used to calculate the risk of progression.HG-IEN (10 cases) and EAc (7 cases) detected at the index endoscopy or in the first year of follow-up were considered to be cases of preexisting disease and excluded; 841 patients with at least 2 endoscopies {median, 3 [interquartile range (IQR): 2-4); median follow-up = 44.6 [IQR: 24.7-60.5] months; total 3083 patient-years} formed the study group [male/female = 646/195; median age, 60 (IQR: 51-68) years]. Twenty-two patients progressed to HG-IEN or BAc (incidence: 0.72 per 100 patient-years) after a median of 40.2 (26.9-50.4) months. At multivariate analysis, endoscopic abnormalities, that is, ulceration or nodularity (P = 0.0002; relative risk [RR] = 7.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.63-21.9), LG-IEN (P = 0.02, RR = 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-11.43), and BE length (P = 0.01; RR = 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.30) were associated with BE progression. Among the LG-IEN patients, the incidence of HG-IEN/EAc was 3.17 patient-years, that is, 6 times higher than in BE patients without LG-IEN.These results suggest that in the absence of intraepithelial neoplastic changes, BE carries a low risk of progression to HG-IEN/BAc, and strict surveillance (or ablative therapy) is advisable in cases with endoscopic abnormalities, LG-IEN or long BE segments.

Objective To assess the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes on the clinical outcome of liver disease, we analysed 2307 patients. Results The most frequently represented genotypes were 1 b (40%) and 2 (28.1%). Patients with these genotypes had a median age higher than patients with other genotypes (P < 0.01). The overall survival of subjects with genotype 1 b was poorer than the survival of patients with other genotypes (P< 0.01). Liver cirrhosis was found in 280 patients (12.1%), and type 1 b was the most represented isolate among them (P < 0.01). Sixty-two patients (22%) developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during a follow-up of 1481.8 cumulative years (estimated crude incidence rate, 4.1 cases per 100 person-years for all cirrhotics; 5.9 cases for genotype 1 a; 4.5 cases for genotype 1 b; and 2.8 cases for genotypes non-1). Considering the whole population of 2307 patients, only genotype 1 b was associated significantly with both cirrhosis and the development of HCC. One hundred and nineteen cirrhotic patients underwent treatment with interferon in uncontrolled studies. Interferon therapy was associated with both better survival (P

It is clearly established that beta-blockers decrease the risk of a first variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. We have recently shown that the addition of isosorbide mononitrate to nadolol decreases the rate of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and varices, compared with nadolol alone, after a median follow-up of 30 months. It is not established if the long-term treatment with the combination continues to be beneficial. Therefore, we assessed the long-term effect of this combination on first variceal bleeding, complications, and death. One hundred forty-six cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices included in a previously published multicenter, randomized study comparing nadolol (40-160 mg/d) with the combination nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate (10-20 mg 3 times per day) were followed up for up to 7 years (median follow-up, 55 months). The primary end-point was variceal bleeding of any severity. Twenty-four patients (16 in the nadolol group, and 8 in the combination group) experienced variceal bleeding (log rank test, P =.02). Cumulative risk of bleeding was 29% and 12%, respectively (95% CI for the difference, 1%-23%). Two and 4 patients, respectively, had bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy (log rank test, P =.20). Thirty and 25 patients, respectively, died during follow-up (log rank test, P =.13). Twelve and 10 patients, respectively, had de novo occurrence of ascites during follow-up (log rank test, P =.29). In conclusion, nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate is significantly more effective than nadolol alone in the long-term use. Side effects are few, and no deleterious effects on ascites occurrence or on survival occur after long-term use of this combination.