Search

PURPOSE The combination of venetoclax and 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improves remission rates and survival compared with 5-AZA alone. We hypothesized that the addition of venetoclax to cladribine (CLAD)/low-dose araC (low-dose cytarabine [LDAC]) alternating with 5-AZA backbone may further improve outcomes for older patients with newly diagnosed AML. METHODS This is a phase II study investigating the combination of venetoclax and CLAD/LDAC alternating with venetoclax and 5-AZA in older (≥ 60 years) or unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML. The primary objective was composite complete response (CR) rate (CR plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery); secondary end points were overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), overall response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were treated; median age was 68 years (range, 57-84 years). By European LeukemiaNet, 23%, 33%, and 43% were favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively. Fifty-six of 60 evaluable patients responded (composite CR: 93%) and 84% were negative for measurable residual disease. There was one death (2%) within 4 weeks. With a median follow-up of 22.1 months, the median overall survival and DFS have not yet been reached. The most frequent grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n = 33) and pneumonia (n = 14). One patient developed grade 4 tumor lysis syndrome. CONCLUSION Venetoclax and CLAD/LDAC alternating with venetoclax and 5-AZA is an effective regimen among older or unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML. The rates of overall survival and DFS are encouraging. Further study of this non–anthracycline-containing backbone in younger patients, unfit for intensive chemotherapy, as well as comparisons to standard frontline therapies is warranted.

What is this summary about? This is a summary of an article originally published in the journal Advances in Therapy. Cladribine tablets are approved for treating people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (shortened to MS). People with MS take cladribine tablets for 2 periods of 4 to 5 days per year. This analysis looks at the results from 2 studies called the CLARITY and CLARITY Extension studies. These studies looked at what effect a 2-year course of treatment with cladribine tablets had on disability over 5 years in people with MS. How was the analysis carried out? In this analysis, researchers measured disability worsening at regular intervals during the 2-year treatment period in the CLARITY study and thereafter in the 2-year CLARITY Extension study. As many patients had a bridging interval between CLARITY and CLARITY extension, the researchers were able to assess disability over a 5-year timeframe. What were the results? When measurements were taken at Year 5 of the study, disability remained stable in more than half of participants. Over the 5-year period, 70% of participants did not experience persistent disease worsening that lasted more than 6 months. What do the results mean? Researchers concluded that a 2-year course of cladribine tablets may provide long-term benefits on disability for up to 5 years. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00213135 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00641537 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Measures of atrophy in the whole brain can be used to reliably assess treatment effect in clinical trials of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Trials assessing the effect of treatment on grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) atrophy are very informative, but hindered by technical limitations. This study aimed to measure GM and WM volume changes, using a robust longitudinal method, in patients with relapsing MS randomized to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg or placebo in the CLARITY study.We analysed T1-weighted magnetic resonance sequences using SIENA-XL, from 0 to 6 months (cladribine, n = 267; placebo, n = 265) and 6 to 24 months (cladribine, n = 184; placebo, n = 186). Mean percentage GM and WM volume changes (PGMVC and PWMVC) were compared using a mixed-effect model.More GM and WM volume loss was found in patients taking cladribine versus those taking placebo in the first 6 months of treatment (PGMVC: cladribine: -0.53 vs. placebo: -0.25 [p = 0.045]; PWMVC: cladribine: -0.49 vs. placebo: -0.34 [p = 0.137]), probably due to pseudoatrophy. However, over the period 6 to 24 months, GM volume loss was significantly lower in patients on cladribine than in those on placebo (PGMVC: cladribine: -0.90 vs. placebo: -1.27 [p = 0.026]). In this period, volume changes in WM were similar in the two treatment arms (p = 0.52).After a short period of pseudoatrophy, treatment with cladribine 3.5 mg/kg significantly reduced GM atrophy in comparison with placebo. This supports the relevance of GM damage in MS and may have important implications for physical and cognitive disability progression.

In recent years, several disease-modifying therapies have been developed for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Cladribine transiently depletes B and T lymphocytes, with subsequent gradual cell recovery. No cases are reported in literature describing Cladribine drug-induced liver injury (DILI). We describe the case of a 19-year-old woman who developed acute idiosyncratic liver injury 12 days after treatment with Cladribine. Post-marketing adverse event reporting is of paramount importance to allow an early recognition and treatment. Moreover, evaluation of the physiopathological mechanism underlying drug-induced hepatic toxicity can provide clinicians with valuable instruments for prevention and treatment.

Key Points Cladribine is regarded as the first treatment of choice for symptomatic hairy cell leukemia. This large international study reports a complete response in 72% of cases and a continuous complete response in 20% of patients.

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an uncommon subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Combination of rituximab and cladribine (R-2CdA) is a potential option for indolent NHL (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients. The goal of this multicenter retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of R-2CdA in MZL to support consensus-reaching in first-line therapy in advanced-stage patients. We searched electronic medical records databases of eight centers in China. Between November 2014 and December 2019, 183 symptomatic advanced MZL patients (42 treated with R-2CdA and 141 with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CHOP]) were identified. After propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) to adjust for clinical characteristics, 39 patients from each treatment arm were selected. The overall response rate (ORR) (84.6% vs. 94.9%, P = 0.263) and complete response rate (59.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.487) were comparable between two protocols. Neither progression-free survival (PFS), including the 5-year PFS (67.7% vs. 56.1%, P = 0.352), nor overall survival was improved by R-2CdA versus R-CHOP. However, R-2CdA was more tolerable than R-CHOP in MZL patients regarding grade 3/4 hematological adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 0.565, 95% confidence interval [CI] neutropenic fever (OR 0.795, 95% CI 0.678-0.932), and infections (OR 0.800, 95% CI 0.640-1.000). Overall, our study demonstrated that R-2CdA is potentially as effective as but safer than R-CHOP in advanced MZL.

Objective. The prognosis of children with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor. Complete remission (CR) is not always achieved with current salvage chemotherapy regimens before transplantation, and some patients have no chance of transplantation. Here, we aimed to describe a new regimen of conventional chemotherapy drugs (homoharringtonine, cladribine , and aclarubicin (HCA)) for refractory AML and its mechanism in vitro. Methods. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 5 children with primary refractory AML using HCA as reinduction chemotherapy, and CR rates, adverse reactions, and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. The effects of homoharringtonine, cladribine, and aclarubicin alone or in combination on the proliferation of HL60 and THP1 cells were analyzed by CCK-8 assay. Furthermore, CCK-8 was used to determine the effects of HCA, alone or in combination with apoptosis inhibitors, necroptosis inhibitors, ferroptosis inhibitors, or autophagy inhibitors, on the proliferation of HL60 and THP1 cells and to screen for possible HCA-mediated death pathways in AML cells. The pathway of HCA-mediated AML cell death was further verified by Hoechst/PI staining, flow cytometry, and Western blotting. Results. After 2 cycles of conventional chemotherapy, none of the 5 children with AML achieved CR and were then treated with the HCA regimen for two cycles, 4 of 5 achieved CR, and another child achieved CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi). After CR, 3 children underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and only 2 of them received consolidation therapy. As of the last follow-up, all 5 patients had been in DFS for a range of 23 to 28 months. The inhibition rate of homoharringtonine, cladribine, and aclarubicin in combination on HL60 and THP1 cells was significantly greater than that of a single drug or a combination of two drugs. We found that inhibitors of apoptosis and necroptosis were able to inhibit HCA-mediated cell death but not ferroptosis or autophagy inhibitors. Compared with the control group, the number of apoptotic cells in the HCA group was significantly increased and could be reduced by an apoptosis inhibitor. Western blot results showed that PARP, caspase-3, and caspase-8 proteins were activated and cleaved in the HCA group, the expression of Bax was upregulated and that of Bcl-2 was downregulated. The expression of apoptosis-related proteins could be reversed by apoptosis inhibition. Compared with the control group, the expression levels of the necroptosis-related proteins RIP1, RIP3, and MLKL were downregulated in the HCA group but were not phosphorylated. The necroptosis inhibitor increased the expression of RIP1 but caused no significant changes in RIP3 and MLKL, and none were phosphorylated. Conclusions. HCA, as a new regimen of conventional drugs, was a safe and efficacious reinduction salvage strategy in children with refractory AML before HSCT. HCA exhibits the synergistic growth inhibition of AML cells and induces cell death mainly through apoptosis.

This article aims to bring an update on the recent discoveries in hairy cell leukemia (HCL), especially findings in pathophysiology and therapeutic advances.Major discoveries have been made in genetics and epigenetics of HCL. Moreover, the importance of several signaling pathways and tumor microenvironment has been recently highlighted. These findings led to the development of new targeted therapies which have shown interesting results in recent clinical trials. HCL is a chronic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. Most patients respond to purine nucleoside analogs (PNA) like cladribine or pentostatin. However, relapses are frequent and the disease often becomes less sensitive to chemotherapy. Recent discoveries in pathophysiology, like the presence of the V600E mutation of the B-raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) gene and the importance of the B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway, led to the development of new drugs for relapsed/refractory (R/R) HCL patients. The variant-type of HCL (HCL-V) is usually less sensitive to PNA. Chemo-immunotherapy using PNA and rituximab (R), BRAF, MEK, or Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors may be used. Good results were recently published and achieved with moxetumomab pasudotox (Moxe), an anti-CD22 immunoconjugate. In this review, we will present an update on HCL and HCL-V, focusing on pathophysiology and recent therapeutic advances.

The aim was to show the application of the prevalence estimator of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) improvement over time in patients treated with cladribine tablets in the phase III CLARITY/CLARITY extension trials.Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients who entered the CLARITY extension study were evaluated. Patients originally randomized in CLARITY to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and placebo in CLARITY extension (early cladribine [EC]) were compared to patients originally randomized to placebo and then assigned to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (delayed cladribine [DC]). The EC group was compared to the DC group on the prevalence of EDSS improvement over time and on the cumulative incidence of EDSS improvement. Prevalence of improvement was assessed by a new approach based on the difference of Kaplan-Meier estimators, whilst the incidence of improvement was assessed by standard Kaplan-Meier curves.A total of 98 patients in the EC group and 244 patients in the DC group were compared. Patients in the EC group showed a significantly higher (p = 0.011) prevalence of improvement at year 2 (EC 21.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.6-29.3; DC 8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12.8) and at year 5 (EC 15.7%, 95% CI 8.2-23.7; DC 8.3%, 95% CI 4.5-12.4). The cumulative incidence of improvement was also significantly different (hazard ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.13-2.94, p = 0.013).Assessment of the prevalence of EDSS improvement is an alternative outcome to assess if a treatment induces and maintains an improvement over the long term. This estimator was found to be more powerful than the cumulative incidence of improvement to detect a treatment effect of cladribine versus placebo over 5 years.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by pancytopenia, splenomegaly and increased susceptibility to infections. In 2011, BRAF gene mutation was identified in almost all the patients with the classical type of HCL. The purine analogs cladribine and pentostatin induce long-term remission in the majority of patients, and they remain the standard treatment for this type of leukemia. However, more than half of patients in complete response relapse over the long term, with a quarter of them relapsing within the first five years. Recently, new drugs have been developed and have demonstrated efficacy in refractory or relapsed HCL. The immunotoxin Moxetumomab pasudotox was registered for HCL in 2018. The BRAF kinase inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib, as well as the Bruton kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, are also proven highly effective in clinical trials.

Background Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often receive disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that can expose them to reactivation of potential occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (pOBI). We aimed to evaluate the MS Centers behavior regarding HBV screening and prophylaxis in a large cohort of MS patients receiving anti-CD20 or cladribine. Methods Retrospective, multicentric study recruiting Italian MS patients treated with rituximab, ocrelizumab and cladribine. Results We included 931 MS patients from 15 centers. All but 38 patients performed a complete HBV screening. Patients’ age > 50 years was significantly associated with no history of vaccination and HBsAb titres p p = 0.5), pre-or post-therapy vaccination (p = 0.2) and number of previous DMTs (p = 0.2). Among pOBI patients (n = 53), 21 received antiviral prophylaxis, while only 13 had HBV DNA monitoring and 19 patients neither monitored HBV DNA nor received prophylaxis. Conclusions Baseline HBV screening in patients receiving anti-CD20 and cladribine is a consolidated practice. Nonetheless, HBV vaccination coverage is still lacking in such population and age is a significant factor associated with low HBV protection. Rituximab, ocrelizumab and cladribine did not impair HBV vaccine response. Almost 35% of pOBI patients fail to receive HBVr prevention. Management of HBV prophylaxis could be improved in MS patients and further prospective studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic strategies in such patients.

Cladribine is a nucleoside analog that is phosphorylated in its target cells (B and T-lymphocytes) to its active triphosphate form (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine triphosphate). Cladribine tablets 10 mg (Mavenclad

Background and ObjectivesTo evaluate the immune-specific response after full severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with different disease-modifying drugs by the detection of both serologic and T-cell responses.MethodsHealthcare workers (HCWs) and patients with MS, having completed the 2-dose schedule of an mRNA-based vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in the past 2–4 weeks, were enrolled from 2 parallel prospective studies conducted in Rome, Italy, at the National Institute for Infectious diseases Spallanzani–IRCSS and San Camillo Forlanini Hospital. Serologic response was evaluated by quantifying the region-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies. Cell-mediated response was analyzed by a whole-blood test quantifying interferon (IFN)–γ response to spike peptides. Cells responding to spike stimulation were identified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.ResultsWe prospectively enrolled 186 vaccinated individuals: 78 HCWs and 108 patients with MS. Twenty-eight patients with MS were treated with IFN-β, 35 with fingolimod, 20 with cladribine, and 25 with ocrelizumab. A lower anti-RBD antibody response rate was found in patients treated with ocrelizumab (40%, p < 0.0001) and fingolimod (85.7%, p = 0.0023) compared to HCWs and patients treated with cladribine or IFN-β. Anti-RBD antibody median titer was lower in patients treated with ocrelizumab (p < 0.0001), fingolimod (p < 0.0001), and cladribine (p = 0.010) compared to HCWs and IFN-β–treated patients. Serum neutralizing activity was present in all the HCWs tested and in only a minority of the fingolimod-treated patients (16.6%). T-cell–specific response was detected in the majority of patients with MS (62%), albeit with significantly lower IFN-γ levels compared to HCWs. The lowest frequency of T-cell response was found in fingolimod-treated patients (14.3%). T-cell–specific response correlated with lymphocyte count and anti-RBD antibody titer (ρ = 0.554, p < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.255, p = 0.0078 respectively). IFN-γ T-cell response was mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.DiscussionmRNA vaccines induce both humoral and cell-mediated specific immune responses against spike peptides in all HCWs and in the majority of patients with MS. These results carry relevant implications for managing vaccinations, suggesting promoting vaccination in all treated patients with MS.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class III data that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces both humoral and cell-mediated specific immune responses against viral spike proteins in a majority of patients with MS.

Der Prävention von Infektionskrankheiten kommt bei der Multiplen Sklerose (MS) eine besondere Bedeutung zu, da diese den Krankheitsverlauf ungünstig beeinflussen können. Dies wird uns im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie verdeutlicht, wo die SARS-CoV-2-Infektion als Auslöser von besonders schweren und prolongierten Schüben und klinischer Verschlechterung identifiziert werden konnte. Umso wichtiger ist es daher, den Einfluss der für die MS zugelassenen Immuntherapien auf eine etwaige Suszeptibilität für eine SARS-CoV-2-Infektion, den COVID-19-Krankheitsverlauf und das Impfansprechen zu verstehen. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden diese Punkte unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Cladribin-Tabletten, einer für den hochaktiven MS-Verlauf zugelassenen Immunrekonstitutionstherapie, beleuchtet.

Cladribine tablets have been approved in many countries for the treatment of patients with various forms of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Cladribine has a unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile with a short elimination half‐life (~ 1 day) relative to a prolonged PD effect on specific immune cells (most notably a reversible reduction in B and T lymphocyte counts). This results in a short dosing schedule (up to 20 days over 2 years of treatment) to sustain efficacy for at least another 2 years. Global clinical studies were conducted primarily in White patients, in part due to the distinctly higher prevalence of MS in White patients. Given the very low prevalence in Asian countries, MS is considered as a rare disease there. In spite of the limited participation of Asian patients, to demonstrate favorable benefit/risk profile in the treatment of MS demanded application of a Totality of Evidence approach to assess ethnic sensitivity for informing regulatory filings in Asian countries and supporting clinical use of cladribine in Asian patients. Population PD modeling and simulation of treatment‐related reduction in absolute lymphocyte count, as a mechanism‐related biomarker of drug effect, confirmed consistent PDs in Asian and non‐Asian patients with MS, supporting absence of ethnic sensitivity and a common dosage across populations. Through this example, we demonstrate the value of holistic integration of all available data using a model‐informed drug development (MIDD) framework and a Totality of Evidence mindset to evaluate ethnic sensitivity in support of Asia‐inclusive development and use of the drug across populations.

Background: No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) is a patient-centric outcome increasingly used as the goal of multiple sclerosis treatment. Objective: Determine treatment durability of cladribine tablets beyond 2 years considering the variable bridging interval of 0.1–116.0 weeks between CLARITY and CLARITY Extension. Methods: Between CLARITY and CLARITY Extension, patients transitioned from cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg to placebo (CP3.5 group, n = 98) or continued further treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CC7.0 group, n = 186). Treatment assignment was randomized and blinded in both CLARITY and CLARITY Extension. Results: The 2-year NEDA-3 in CLARITY Extension (encompassing both years of CLARITY Extension) was 29.6% in the CP3.5 group and 32.8% in the CC7.0 group. There was no evidence that treatment effect differed with varying bridging intervals. For patients in the CP3.5 group with a bridging interval of ⩽48 weeks, 1 year NEDA-3 (the first year of CLARITY Extension) was 44.4% (28/63) compared with 31.4% (11/35) in patients with a bridging interval of >48 weeks. Conclusion: Treatment with cladribine tablets in CLARITY, followed by either placebo or cladribine tablets in CLARITY Extension, produced sustained benefits for NEDA-3 and its constituent elements for a follow up period up to 6 years from CLARITY baseline.

Here we present a comprehensive mass cytometry analysis of peripheral innate lymphoid cell (ILC) subsets in relapsing/remitting MS (RRMS) patients prior to and after onset of cladribine tablets (CladT). ILC analysis was conducted on CyTOF data from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of MS patients before, 2 and 6 months after onset of CladT, and non-MS controls. Dimensionality reduction was used for immunophenotyping ILC subsets. CladT reduced all ILC subsets, except for CD56bright NK cells and ILC2. Furthermore, CD38+ NK cell and CCR6+ ILC3 were excluded from CladT-induced immune cell reductions. Post-CladT replenishment by immature ILC was noted by increased CD5+ ILC1 proportions at 2 months, and boosted CD38−CD56bright NK cell numbers at 6 months. CladT induce immune cell depletion among ILC but exclude CD56bright NK cells and ILC2 subsets, as well as CD38+ NK cell and CCR6+ ILC3 immunophenotypes. Post-CladT ILC expansions indicate ILC reconstitution towards a more tolerant immune system phenotype.

Polymerase ε exonuclease (POLE) is an enzyme involved in DNA replication and may be an attractive therapeutic target in various cancers. Here we sought to model the impact of specific POLE mutations on protein function. Due to the lack of a crystal structure, the tertiary structures of the wild type and four common mutants were modeled using I-Tasser server.Molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies were performed, and the structure and function of the mutants analyzed through residue conservation analysis and protein folding energy changes.All mutants of POLE gene had favorable binding affinities compared with their wild type of counterpart. The P286R variant, but not the other variants, disrupted cladribine binding to the protein. Similarly, dynamics studies revealed instability of the P286R mutant, while V411L, L424V, and L424F appeared to favor cladribine binding.Since P286R is a hotspot mutation in endometrioid carcinomas, patients with this variant may not respond to cladribine. Population-based pharmacogenomics studies will be required to validate our results.

Enzyme-mediated processes have proven to be a valuable and sustainable alternative to traditional chemical methods. In this regard, the use of multi-enzymatic systems enables the realization of complex synthetic schemes, while also introducing a number of additional advantages, including the conversion of reversible reactions into irreversible processes, the partial or complete elimination of product inhibition problems, and the minimization of undesirable by-products. In addition, the immobilization of biocatalysts on magnetic supports allows for easy reusability and streamlines the downstream process. Herein we have developed a cascade system for cladribine synthesis based on the sequential action of two magnetic biocatalysts. For that purpose, purine 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Leishmania mexicana (LmPDT) and Escherichia coli hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (EcHPRT) were immobilized onto Ni2+-prechelated magnetic microspheres (MagReSyn®NTA). Among the resulting derivatives, MLmPDT3 (activity: 11,935 IU/gsupport, 63% retained activity, operational conditions: 40 °C and pH 5–7) and MEcHPRT3 (12,840 IU/gsupport, 45% retained activity, operational conditions: pH 5–8 and 40–60 °C) emerge as optimal catalysts for further synthetic application. Moreover, the MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 system was biochemically characterized and successfully applied to the one-pot synthesis of cladribine under various conditions. This methodology not only displayed a 1.67-fold improvement in cladribine synthesis (compared to MLmPDT3), but it also implied a practically complete transformation of the undesired by-product into a high-added-value product (90% conversion of Hyp into IMP). Finally, MLmPDT3/MEcHPRT3 was reused for 16 cycles, which displayed a 75% retained activity.

Introduction In the Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) study, cladribine tablets significantly reduced relapse rates and improved findings on magnetic resonance imaging versus placebo in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. In the CLARITY Extension study, treatment with cladribine tablets for 2 years followed by placebo for 2 years produced similar clinical benefits to 4 years of cladribine tablets. The objective of this exploratory post hoc analysis was to evaluate long-term disease stability (assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score) after treatment with cladribine tablets. Methods Patients enrolled into CLARITY Extension who were previously randomized to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in the CLARITY study were included in this post hoc analysis. Two treatment groups were investigated—patients randomized to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in CLARITY and thereafter randomized to placebo in CLARITY Extension (the CP3.5 group) or to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in CLARITY Extension (the CC7 group). In each treatment group, EDSS scores at 6-month intervals, EDSS score improvement/worsening each year, and time to 3- and 6-month confirmed EDSS progression were assessed from CLARITY baseline over 5 years of follow-up (including a variable bridging interval between studies). All analyses are descriptive, and no statistical comparisons were performed for between-treatment group differences. Results The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) EDSS score for patients in the CP3.5 group at 5 years was 2.5 (2.0–3.5) compared with 3.0 (2.5–3.5) at baseline. In the CC7 group, median EDSS score (95% CI) at 5 years was 2.0 (2.0–3.0) compared with 2.5 (2.5–3.0) at baseline. During year 5 for the CP3.5 group, and based on changes in minimum score each year, EDSS score stability was observed in 53.9% of patients, improvement in 21.3%, and worsening in 24.7%. In the CC7 group, EDSS score remained stable in 66.1%, improved in 18.1%, and worsened in 15.8% of patients. Over 70% of patients in both treatment groups did not show 3- or 6-month confirmed EDSS progression at 5 years from CLARITY baseline. Conclusions These findings confirm long-term beneficial effects on disability afforded by either the recommended dose of cladribine tablets over 4 years (cumulative dose, 3.5 mg/kg) or a higher cumulative dose. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00213135 (CLARITY); NCT00641537 (CLARITY Extension).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a difficult condition to treat. Cladribine selectively and transiently depletes B and T lymphocytes, leading to long-lasting immune reconstitution. This report describes observations from 24 months of follow-up after cladribine in NMOSD patients. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a case series including 12 seropositive patients with NMOSD. Patients were given cladribine by subcutaneous injections in a series of several 2-day cycles of 20 mg administered at intervals of 4-6 weeks. Thus, the full treatment course delivered a cumulative bioavailable dose similar to that approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score) and safety in the 24 months preceding and the 24 months following the initiation of cladribine treatment were assessed. RESULTS The mean ARR in the 24 months preceding cladribine treatment was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.62). The mean ARR in the 24 months following initiation of cladribine treatment was 0.21 (95% CI 0.08-0.56). The ratio in the rate of events post versus prior cladribine initiation was 0.20 (95% CI 0.07-0.59) and highly significant (p = 0.0073). The EDSS score did not change over the follow-up period (2.5 ± 1.7; mean ± SD) compared to baseline (2.5 ± 1.5; mean ± SD). No serious adverse events considered to be linked to cladribine were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Cladribine was safe in NMOSD patients over a 2-year observation period. Cladribine treatment was associated with clinical stabilization, as evidenced by significantly decreased ARR and no progression of EDSS score.

Hairy cell leukemia is a rare form of leukemia: three hundred new cases are diagnosed each year in France. The diagnosis is based on: (1) morphological examination of the blood and bone marrow smear, (2) analysis by flow cytometry of hairy cells, which express three or the four following markers: CD11c, CD25, CD103 and CD123, (3) identification of the BRAFV600E mutation, a true molecular marker of the disease. The management of treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. As of today, the purine analogues remain the standard treatment in the first line. Relapses are however observed in about 40% of cases. In the event of a first relapse, the preferred option is treatment with immunochemotherapy i.e. a combination of cladribine plus rituximab. Subsequent relapses are treated with moxetumomab pasudotox or BRAF inhibitors which provide indisputable benefits if third-line treatment is required. We will discuss in patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia the needs for personalized medicine and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment modality. The good prognosis for LT requires treatments that are not immunosuppressive, non-myelotoxic, and do not increase the risk of secondary cancers.

BACKGROUND A meta-analysis was performed to examine the clinical efficacy of drugs in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). METHODS combinations of terms of "acute myeloid leukemia", "fludara", "cytarabine", "cladribine", "aclacinomycin", "granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)", and "hyaluronic acid" were searched in Chinese databases. "acute myelogenous leukemia", "fludara", "cytarabine", "cladribine", "aclacinomycin", "granulocyte colony-stimulating factor", and "hyaluronic acid" were searched in English databases. Review Manager 5.3 was employed for the meta-analysis. RESULTS Ultimately, 12 articles were included. Most of the articles had a low-risk bias, and were of medium or high quality. The complete remission rates were tested for heterogeneity [chi-square test (Chi2) =4.10, degrees of freedom (df)=10, I2=0%; P=0.94]. The fixed effect model analysis showed that the difference between experimental participants and controls was considerable [Z=13.15, odds ratio (OR) =12.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): (8.77, 18.76); P

What is this summary about? This is a summary of an article originally published in the Multiple Sclerosis Journal. The article presents the results from the CLARITY and CLARITY Extension studies, which looked at how well cladribine tablets work in treating people with multiple sclerosis (shortened to MS). Cladribine tablets are a medication approved for treating relapsing forms of MS. This study looked at how treatment with cladribine tablets affects the frequency and severity of relapses in people with MS. A relapse is when new symptoms develop or old symptoms return or get worse after a period of stability or improvement. What happened in the studies? In the CLARITY study, 870 people received either cladribine tablets (3.5 mg/kg, the approved dose) or placebo (a dummy pill). After the CLARITY study ended, some participants who received cladribine tablets chose to take part in a second study called the CLARITY Extension study. Of these participants, 98 were given placebo for 2 more years following an interval period of up to 10 months between participating in each study. What were the results? People with MS who were treated with cladribine tablets for 2 years in the CLARITY study had lower risks of any relapse compared with those given placebo. Participants taking placebo (after cladribine tablets) in the CLARITY Extension study experienced these same benefits, which continued for up to 3 more years after having received cladribine tablets in the CLARITY study. What do the results mean? Researchers concluded the recommended 2-year dosing of cladribine tablets may reduce the number and severity of relapses in people with MS for up to 5 years. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00213135 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00641537 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Introduction: Oral cladribine is a highly effective pulsed selective immune reconstitution therapy licensed for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) since 2017. A full treatment course comprises two treatment cycles given 1 year apart, followed by two treatment-free years. The management of cladribine-treated patients beyond year 4 needs to be addressed as patients have now passed the initial 4 years since European Medical Agency approval. Areas covered: A panel of neurologists and a neuroradiologist experienced in MS treatment/monitoring evaluated clinical trial data and real-world evidence and proposed recommendations for the management of cladribine-treated patients beyond year 4. Expert opinion: Continuous monitoring of disease activity during the treatment-free period is important. Subsequent management depends on the presence or absence of inflammatory disease activity, determined in the absence of consistent guidelines via practice-driven neurological decision criteria. Persisting or newly occurring inflammatory disease activity is an indication for further treatment, i.e. either re-initiation of cladribine or switching to another highly effective disease-modifying therapy. The decision to retreat or switch should be based on clinical and radiological evaluation considering disease course, treatment history, and safety aspects. In the absence of disease activity, either retreatment can be offered, or the treatment-free period can be extended under structured monitoring.

探讨播散性黄色瘤的临床特征、辅助检查表现、克拉屈滨治疗效果及中远期预后情况。2016年12月至2020年12月，共纳入5例患者，均为男性，平均年龄27岁，其中1例单纯累及皮肤，3例同时累及呼吸道黏膜，另有1例同时累及巩膜和垂体。自发病至确诊的平均时间为5.4年，诊断方法为临床表现结合病理组织学检查。治疗方法均为克拉屈滨单药化疗。5例患者治疗后均有缓解，2例随访1年后进展，1例予克拉屈滨巩固治疗后缓解，1例拟返院继续治疗。播散性黄色瘤为一类罕见非朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症，以皮肤黏膜受累为常见表现，亦可累及其他器官，特征性免疫标志为CD68（+），CD1a（-）及S-100（-）。目前缺乏标准治疗，克拉屈滨治疗可取得相对满意疗效，但长期疗效仍有待于进一步观察。.

Immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) are a type of short course procedure or pharmaceutical agent within the MS pharmacopeia. They emanate from oncology and induce transient incomplete lympho-ablation with or without myelo-ablation, resulting in potential prolonged immunomodulation. Thus, they provide significant prophylaxis from disease activity without retreatment. Modern IRT for autoimmunity encompasses a heterogeneous group of pulsed lympho- and non-myelo-ablative treatments designed to re-boot the adaptive immune system in a quasi-permanent manner - a re-induction of ontogeny. IRT is the extensive debulking of an auto-aggressive immune system to attempt to reach the Holy Grail of immune tolerance. This incomplete yet significant lympho-ablation induces lymphoproliferation, reduces pathogenic clonal cells, causes thymopoiesis and results in the induction of immune tolerance. Lympho-ablation with immune reconstitution can result in minimal residual autoimmunity. There is a resetting of the immune thermostat - i.e., the immunostat. IRTs have the potential to provide prolonged periods of disease inactivity without retreatment in part through the immunological results of their pulsatile lymphocyte depletion. It is vital to increase our understanding of how IRTs alter a patient's immune response to the antigenic target of the disease so that we can devise newer, more durable and safer forms of such agents. What common features do extant IRTs (i.e., stem cell transplant, alemtuzumab and oral cladribine) have to produce the durable therapeutic response without long term treatment in neuroimmunological diseases such as MS (multiple sclerosis) and NMOSD (neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders)? Can we learn from these critical features to predict what other maneuvers or agents might effect similar clinical results with equal or greater efficacy and safety?

This study analyzes data from the open clinical trial GLIMPSE comparing the efficacy of cladribine in tablets (Приведены результаты анализа данных открытого клинического исследования GLIMPSE, в ходе которого проводилось сравнение эффективности кладрибина в таблетках (

Cladribine is a purine analog used in first-line treatment of hairy cell leukemia and in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic anemia. Although cladribine is typically associated with mild, self-limited skin reactions, there is increasing evidence that cladribine may increase the risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) when combined with drugs classically associated with SCAR (e.g. allopurinol) beyond what would be expected for either drug alone, possibly due to cladribine-induced lymphopenia. We analyzed all SCAR cases reported for cladribine in Janssen's Global Safety Database and found that 26/35 (74.3%) reported concomitant drugs known to be associated with SCAR, most commonly sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) and allopurinol. In addition, a review of the WHO VigiBase showed that several drugs, including penicillins, SMX/TMP, and allopurinol had a statistically significant contribution to cladribine-associated SCAR. These results lend further support that cladribine may increase the propensity of these drugs to cause SCARs.

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is one of the most common leukemias experienced in adults and conveys significant morbidity and mortality. While the traditional anthracycline based treatments of AML involves cytarabine, developments in alternatives (liposomal cytarabine, fludarabine, cladribine, azacitidine, decitabine), and targeted agents (midostaurin, gilteritinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and venetoclax) exist. Multiple cardiovascular adverse events, notably pericardial toxicity, have been observed in small studies; however, to date little is known about the comparative pericardial toxicity among these newer regimens. Due to the paucity of data, we sought to investigate the reported pericardial events and mortality associated with treatments for AML. Utilizing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), we identified all adverse events associated with FDA approved treatments for AML (2002-2022). Pericardial events were defined as pericarditis, pericardial effusion and tamponade. We excluded any individuals with age18 years old. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with pericardial events. Out of 94,262 reported adverse events, 675 pericardial toxicities were included (243 pericarditis, 479 tamponade). Pericardial events occurred less often in Cladribine (0.3%, P0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P0.001), Venetoclax (0.3%, P0.001), enasidenib (0.3%, P value0.001), and ivosidenib (0.3%, P0.001) compared to Cytarabine (0.9%). Tamponade events occurred significantly less often in cladribine (0.1%, P0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P = 0.001), enasidenib (0.1%, P = 0.006), ivosidenib (0.1%, P = 0.01), and venetoclax (0.1%, P0.001) compared to cytarabine 0.7%. After adjusting for age and sex, Cladribine (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.18-0.68], P = 0.008) and Fludarabine (ROR 0.65 [0.45-0.92], P = 0.03), venetoclax (ROR 0.57 [0.41-0.79], P0.001) remained significantly associated with lower incidence of reported pericardial events. While cytarabine has been the routinely used and/or drug of choice for induction chemotherapy for AML, alternatives like cladribine may have a greater safety profile regarding pericardial toxicities. Future studies should be directed at further investigating cardiovascular safety profiles of AML induction therapy.

BACKGROUND: Authorizations of fingolimod, teriflunomide and cladribine were accompanied by risk minimization measures concerning their teratogenic potential. Real-world data on their use are scarce. We aimed to assess trends in the use of fingolimod, teriflunomide and cladribine among women of childbearing age, estimate the number of pregnancies occurring under treatment and explore the occurrence of malformations in newborns exposed during early pregnancy in Germany. METHODS: Using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD, claims data from ∼20% of the German population), we determined annual age-standardized prevalences of fingolimod, teriflunomide and cladribine use from their authorization until 2019 among women aged 13–49 years (cross-sectional analyses). In longitudinal analyses, we estimated the number of exposed pregnancies by assessing whether there was an overlap between the exposure windows assigned to dispensations and the onset of pregnancy or a dispensation in the first eight weeks of pregnancy. For live births, a mother-baby linkage was performed. All available data of children with in-utero exposure and malformation codes in the first year of life were reviewed to verify the occurrence of congenital malformations. RESULTS: For fingolimod, the age-standardized prevalence of use per 1,000 females increased from 0.14 in 2011 to 0.46 in 2019; for teriflunomide, from 0.06 in 2013 to 0.28 in 2019; for cladribine, from 0.01 in 2017 to 0.07 in 2019. The proportion of users aged ≤40 years was 60% for fingolimod, 45% for teriflunomide and 65% for cladribine. We identified 136 pregnancies exposed to fingolimod, 50 to teriflunomide and one to cladribine. For fingolimod and teriflunomide, respectively, 72% and 62% of exposed pregnancies ended in a live birth. Mother-newborn linkage was successful in 64 (fingolimod) and 20 (teriflunomide) live-born children. Among these, there were six with relevant malformations (mainly heart defects) for fingolimod and two for teriflunomide. CONCLUSION: Use of fingolimod, teriflunomide and cladribine among women of childbearing age has substantially increased in Germany. A high proportion of users was in age groups in which pregnancies typically occur. Despite risk minimization measures, early pregnancy exposure to these drugs was observed.

Background: Oral cladribine is an approved disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. In controlled clinical trials as well as in post marketing safety assessments, autoimmune conditions have not yet been reported as a specific side effect of cladribine. Objective and Results: Here, we report a case of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody-mediated glomerulonephritis that occurred shortly after the fourth cladribine treatment cycle. Conclusion: Neurologists should be attentive to the development of secondary autoimmunity in cladribine-treated patients.

Background The treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using intensive chemotherapy is associated with treatment intolerance and poor survival. We evaluated two new lower-intensity regimens with clofarabine (n=119) or cladribine (n=129) combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with decitabine. Methods We reviewed response rates by subgroup and long term outcomes of 248 patients with newly diagnosed non core-binding-factor AML treated on two clinical trials investigating double nucleoside-analogue therapy (DNT) alternating with HMA from October 2008 to April 2018. Results Of 248 patients with a median age of 69 years (range, 49-85 years), 102 patients (41%) were ≥ 70 years, and 108 (44 %) had adverse karyotype. Overall, 164 patients (66%) responded:147 (59%) complete remission (CR) and 17 (7%) CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). With a median follow up of 60 months, median relapse-free and overall survival (OS) were 10.8 months and 12.5 months, respectively. The two-year OS was 29%. Among patients with normal karyotype, the CR/CRi rate was 79 % and the median OS 19.9 months. High response rates and OS were observed in patients with mutations in NPM1, FLT3, IDH2, and RUNX1. The 4- and 8-week mortality rates were 2% and 11%, respectively. Conclusion The backbone of clofarabine or cladribine and LDAC alternating with decitabine was effective and safe for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed AML. Incorporating targeted therapies could extend the efficacy of this approach and provide more curative therapeutic options in this AML population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background: In the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets treating multiple sclerosis orallY) study of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CladT) significantly reduced the annualised relapse rate (ARR) versus placebo; this effect was sustained in CLARITY Extension, without further treatment. Objective: To assess the frequency and severity of relapses in patients treated with CladT versus placebo in CLARITY over 2 years and evaluate the durability of effect in patients who received no further treatment for 2 years in CLARITY Extension. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, ARRs were calculated for qualifying and all relapses, and qualifying and all severe relapses (i.e. requiring steroid treatment or leading to hospitalisation) in patients treated with CladT ( n = 433) and placebo ( n = 437) in CLARITY, and those from the CladT group who received placebo in CLARITY Extension ( n = 98). Results: At Month 6, Year 1 and Year 2, patients receiving CladT had a significantly lower risk of qualifying or all relapses (all p Conclusion: The results show durable efficacy of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg for reducing frequency and severity of relapses in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CLARITY: NCT00213135; CLARITY Extension: NCT00641537

Standard treatment options in classic HCL (cHCL) result in high response rates and near normal life expectancy. However, the disease itself and the recommended standard treatment are associated with profound and prolonged immunosuppression, increasing susceptibility to infections and the risk for a severe course of COVID-19. The Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation (HCLF) has recently convened experts and discussed different clinical strategies for the management of these patients. The new recommendations adapt the 2017 consensus for the diagnosis and management with cHCL to the current COVID-19 pandemic. They underline the option of active surveillance in patients with low but stable blood counts, consider the use of targeted and non-immunosuppressive agents as first-line treatment for cHCL, and give recommendations on preventive measures against COVID-19.

The use of immune reconstitution therapies (IRT) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with a prolonged period of freedom from relapses in the absence of continuously applied therapy. Cladribine tablets is a disease-modifying treatment (DMT) indicated for highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) as defined by clinical or imaging features. Treatment with cladribine tablets is effective and well tolerated in patients with active MS disease and have a low burden of monitoring during and following treatment. In this article, an expert group of specialist neurologists involved in the care of patients with MS in the United Arab Emirates provides their consensus recommendations for the practical use of cladribine tablets according to the presenting phenotype of patients with RRMS. The IRT approach may be especially useful for patients with highly active MS insufficiently responsive to treatment with a first-line DMT, those who are likely to adhere poorly to a continuous therapeutic regimen, treatment-naïve patients with high disease activity at first presentation, or patients planning a family who are prepared to wait until at least 6 months after the end of treatment. Information available to date does not suggest an adverse interaction between cladribine tablets and COVID-19 infection. Data are unavailable at this time regarding the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in patients treated with cladribine tablets. Robust immunological responses to COVID-19 infection or to other vaccines have been observed in patients receiving this treatment, and treatment with cladribine tablets per se should not represent a barrier to this vaccination.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the results of the use of cladribine in the treatment according to the AML-MM-2006 protocol as post-remission therapy in children. This study is supported by the Independent Ethics Committee and approved by the Academic Council of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology. The article presents the experience of treating children with AML at the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, and later at the Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center within the framework of the AML-MM-2006 protocol. For the period from 2006 to 2018, 25 children were included in the study. As a comparison, to assess the effectiveness of therapy, the remaining cohort of patients from the intermediate risk group, which consisted of 83 children, was selected. Ultimately, the addition of cladribine in consolidation therapy did not show a significant therapeutic effect (event-free survival 0.47 ± 0.1 for the cladribine group, 0.52 ± 0.06 for the control group), including the development of relapse (56% patients in the cladribine group had a relapse, in the control group – in 34.5%). Thus, the study proved that further inclusion of cladribine in consolidation therapy for primary AML is inappropriate.

Background: The Association of British Neurologists (ABN) 2015 guidelines suggested classifying multiple sclerosis therapies according to their average relapse reduction. We sought to classify newer therapies (cladribine, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ozanimod) based on these guidelines. Materials & methods: Therapies were classified by using direct comparative trial results as per ABN guidelines and generating classification probabilities for each therapy based on comparisons versus placebo in a network meta-analysis for annualized relapse rate. Results: For both approaches, cladribine and ofatumumab were classified as high efficacy. Ocrelizumab and ozanimod (1.0 mg) were classified as moderate or high efficacy depending on the approach used. Conclusion: Cladribine and ofatumumab have an efficacy comparable with therapies classified in the ABN guidelines as high efficacy.

Cladribine tablets 10 mg (3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years) are approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting MS and active secondary progressive MS. However, real-world data on cladribine tablets are limited. CLICK-MS and MASTER-2 are single arm, observational, 30-month, Phase IV studies in the US evaluating the effectiveness and safety of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in patients with relapsing-remitting MS or active secondary progressive MS who had suboptimal response to prior injectable (CLICK-MS), or infusion/oral (MASTER-2) disease-modifying therapy. The primary end point is 24-month annualized relapse rate. Key secondary end points include patient-reported outcomes on quality of life measures, treatment adherence and adverse events. Studies began in 2019 and are expected to be completed in 2023. Trial registration number • CLICK-MS: NCT03933215 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Full title; CLadribine tablets: observational evaluation of effectIveness and patient-reported outcomes in suboptimally Controlled patients previously taKing injectable disease-modifying drugs for relapsing forms of Multiple Sclerosis • MASTER-2: NCT03933202 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Full title; Cladribine tablets: observational evaluation of effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes in suboptiMAlly controlled patientS previously Taking oral or infusion disEase-modifying dRugs for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis

To observe the efficacy and prognosis of cladribine (2-CdA) combined with cytarabine (Ara-C) regimen in the treatment of relapsed refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) in children.Nine patients with relapsed refractory LCH treated with the 2-CdA combined with Ara-C regimen in the Department of Hematology and Oncology of Wuhan Children's Hospital from July 2014 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the efficacy and disease status were evaluated according to the Histiocyte Society Evaluation and Treatment Guidelines (2009) and the Disease Activity Score (DAS), the drug toxicity were evaluated according to the World Health Organization（WHO） grading criteria for chemotherapy. All patients were followed up for survival status and disease-related sequelae.Before the treatment combining 2-CdA and Ara-C, 7 of 9 patients were evaluated as active disease worse (ADW), and 2 as active disease stable (ADS) with a median disease activity score of 8 (4-15). Of 9 patients, 6 cases achieved non active disease (NAD) and 3 achieved active disease better (ADB) with a median disease activity score of 0 (0 to 5) after 2-6 courses of therapy. All 9 patients experienced WHO grade IV hematologic toxicity and 3 patients had hepatobiliary adverse effects (WHO grade I～II) after treatment. The median follow-up time was 31(1 to 50) months with all 9 patients survived, 3 of the 9 patients experienced sequelae to the disease with 2 combined liver cirrhosis as well as cholestatic hepatitis and 1 with oral desmopressin acetate tablets for diabetes insipidus.2-CdA combined with Ara-C is an effective regimen for the treatment of recurrent refractory LCH in children, and the main adverse effect is hematologic toxicity, which is mostly tolerated in children. Early treatment with this regimen may be considered for patients with multisystem LCH with risky organ involvement who have failed first-line therapy and for patients with relapse.克拉屈滨联合阿糖胞苷治疗儿童复发难治性朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症.观察克拉屈滨（Cladribine，2-CdA）联合阿糖胞苷（Ara-C）方案治疗儿童复发难治性朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症（LCH）的疗效及预后.回顾性分析2014年7月至2020年2月于武汉儿童医院血液肿瘤科接受2-CdA联合Ara-C方案治疗的复发难治性LCH患儿9例，根据国际组织细胞协会LCH评估指南以及疾病活动度评分（DAS）对疗效以及疾病状态进行评估，根据世界卫生组织（WHO）化疗药物不良反应分级标准进行药物不良反应评估，随访患者生存状态以及疾病相关后遗症.在接受2-CdA联合Ara-C方案治疗前，9例患者中有7例评估为活动性疾病进展（ADW），2例评估为活动性疾病稳定（ADS），中位DAS为8分（4-15分）。经过（2-6）个该疗程治疗后，有6例患者达到无活动性疾病（NAD），3例达到活动性疾病好转（ADB），中位DAS为0分（0-5分）。9例患者在治疗后均出现血液系统不良反应（WHO IV级），3例患者出现肝胆系统不良反应（WHO I-II级）。中位随访时间31（1-50）个月，9例患者均存活，3例出现疾病相关后遗症，2例合并肝硬化以及胆汁淤积性肝炎、1例因中枢性尿崩症口服醋酸去氨加压素片.2-CdA联合Ara-C是治疗儿童复发难治性LCH的有效方案，主要药物不良反应为血液学毒性，儿童多可耐受。对于一线治疗失败的多系统LCH伴危险器官受累患者以及复发患者可考虑尽早使用2-CdA联合Ara-C方案治疗.

Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2CdA) is one of the most effective disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS). Cladribine is a synthetic purine nucleoside analog that induces cell death of lymphocytes and oral cladribine treatment leads to a long-lasting disease stabilization, potentially attributable to immune reconstitution. In addition to its effects on lymphocytes, cladribine has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects on innate immune cells, including dendritic cells and monocytes, which could also contribute to its therapeutic efficacy. However, whether cladribine can modulate human macrophage/microglial activation or monocyte differentiation is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the immunomodulatory effects of cladribine upon monocytes, monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and microglia. We analyzed the phenotype and differentiation of monocytes from MS patients receiving their first course of oral cladribine both before and three weeks after the start of treatment. Flow cytometric analysis of monocytes from MS patients undergoing cladribine treatment revealed that the number and composition of CD14/CD16 monocyte subsets remained unchanged after treatment. Furthermore, after differentiation with M-CSF, such MDMs from treated MS patients showed no difference in gene expression of the inflammatory markers compared to baseline. We further investigated the direct effects of cladribine in vitro using human adult primary MDMs and microglia. GM-CSF-derived MDMs were more sensitive to cell death than M-CSF-derived MDMs. In addition, MDMs treated with cladribine showed increased expression of costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD40, as well as expression of anti-inflammatory, pro-trophic genes IL10 and MERTK, depending on the differentiation condition. Cladribine treatment in vitro did not modulate the expression of activation markers in human microglia. Our study shows that cladribine treatment in vitro affects the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages by modulating the expression of activation markers, which might occur similarly in tissue after their infiltration in the CNS during MS.

Classical MCL (cMCL) constitutes 6-8% of all B cell NHL. Despite recent advances, MCL is incurable except with allogeneic stem cell transplant. Blastic mantle cell lymphoma (bMCL) is a rarer subtype of cMCL associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor treatment response, frequent relapse and poor outcomes. We treated 13 bMCL patients with combined epigenetic and immunotherapy treatment consisting of vorinostat, cladribine and rituximab (SCR). We report an increased OS greater than 40 months with several patients maintaining durable remissions without relapse for longer than 5 years. This is remarkably better then current treatment regimens which in bMCL range from 14.5-24 months with conventional chemotherapy regimens. We demonstrate that the G/A870

The lack of targeted therapies for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) contributes to their high mortality rates and high risk of relapse compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. Most TNBCs (75%) have downregulated the expression of CREB3L1 (cAMP-responsive element binding protein 3 like 1), a transcription factor and metastasis suppressor that represses genes that promote cancer progression and metastasis. In this report, we screened an FDA-approved drug library and identified four drugs that were highly cytotoxic towards HCC1806 CREB3L1-deficient TNBC cells. These four drugs were: (1) palbociclib isethionate, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, (2) lanatocide C (also named isolanid), a Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitor, (3) cladribine, a nucleoside analog, and (4) homoharringtonine (also named omacetaxine mepesuccinate), a protein translation inhibitor. Homoharringtonine consistently showed the most cytotoxicity towards an additional six TNBC cell lines (BT549, HCC1395, HCC38, Hs578T, MDA-MB-157, MDA-MB-436), and several luminal A breast cancer cell lines (HCC1428, MCF7, T47D, ZR-75-1). All four drugs were then separately evaluated for possible synergy with the chemotherapy agents, doxorubicin (an anthracycline) and paclitaxel (a microtubule stabilizing agent). A strong synergy was observed using the combination of homoharringtonine and paclitaxel, with high cytotoxicity towards TNBC cells at lower concentrations than when each was used separately.

Venetoclax (VEN), a highly selective BCL-2 inhibitor, is successfully used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The purine analogue - cladribine (2-CdA) - is also administered to CLL patients, especially as a part of chemoimmunotherapy.To compare the effects of the VEN+2-CdA regimen with that of the 2 drugs used alone on the apoptosis of CLL lymphocytes in vitro.Mononuclear cells were collected from 103 previously untreated CLL patients. They were incubated with VEN (40 nM) or/and 2-CdA (16 μM) for 48 h. Cytotoxicity, overall apoptosis, mitochondrial transmembrane potential changes (ΔΨm), and expression of selected apoptosis-involved proteins were measured.The cytotoxicity, overall apoptosis, caspase-3 or caspase-9 expression, and ΔΨm were significantly higher after VEN+2-CdA addition compared to both drugs used alone, with a very strong synergistic effect observed. The percentage of BCL-2-positive cells decreased after VEN and VEN+2-CdA addition compared to controls. The TP53-expressing cells increased under the influence of all tested regimens. The VEN+2-CdA increased the expression of BIM, BAX and NOXA compared to either controls or VEN or 2-CdA alone. Similar increases in PUMA expression were observed after VEN, 2-CdA and VEN+2-CdA addition. The FAS-associated death-domain protein (FADD) expression was significantly higher after 2-CdA and 2-CdA+VEN addition as compared to control.Our results confirm the involvement of both VEN and 2-CdA in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. They also demonstrate that these agents have a synergistic effect on CLL cells in vitro. Further studies are needed to assess the influence of VEN+2-CdA on the expression of apoptosis-involved genes.

To describe the design of the CLARION post-approval safety study (EU PAS Register number, EUPAS24484) and provide a status update, including characteristics of patients included up to 1 May 2021.CLARION aims to further evaluate adverse events of special interest in patients who are newly initiating treatment with cladribine tablets for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). The study population consists of two cohorts: patients newly initiating cladribine tablets (cladribine cohort) and patients newly initiating oral fingolimod tablets (comparator fingolimod cohort), with an aim to include 8000 patients (4000 patients per cohort). The study relies on secondary use of data from pre-existing MS registries/data sources (except in Germany, where primary data collection is performed). The study is projected to last 15 years, with an anticipated 5-year inclusion period. Study outcomes are: malignancies; severe infections; tuberculosis; progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; other opportunistic infections; herpes zoster; severe lymphopenia (Grade ≥ 3); and treatment discontinuation.As of 1 May 2021, 2393 patients were included in CLARION from seven participating MS registries/data sources (cladribine cohort,By providing further information on adverse events of special interest during long-term follow-up, CLARION will assist neurologists and patients regarding treatment decision-making for management of relapsing MS.

The unraveling of the pathophysiology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has resulted in rapid translation of the information into clinical practice. After more than 40 years of slow progress in AML research, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved nine agents for different AML treatment indications since 2017. In this review, we detail the progress that has been made in the research and treatment of AML, citing key publications related to AML research and therapy in the English literature since 2000. The notable subsets of AML include acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), core-binding factor AML (CBF-AML), AML in younger patients fit for intensive chemotherapy, and AML in older/unfit patients (usually at the age cutoff of 60-70 years). We also consider within each subset whether the AML is primary or secondary (therapy-related, evolving from untreated or treated myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasm). In APL, therapy with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide results in estimated 10-year survival rates of ≥80%. Treatment of CBF-AML with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) results in estimated 10-year survival rates of ≥75%. In younger/fit patients, the "3+7" regimen (3 days of daunorubicin + 7 days of cytarabine) produces less favorable results (estimated 5-year survival rates of 35%; worse in real-world experience); regimens that incorporate high-dose cytarabine, adenosine nucleoside analogs, and GO are producing better results. Adding venetoclax, FLT3, and IDH inhibitors into these regimens has resulted in encouraging preliminary data. In older/unfit patients, low-intensity therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax is now the new standard of care. Better low-intensity regimens incorporating cladribine, low-dose cytarabine, and other targeted therapies (FLT3 and IDH inhibitors) are emerging. Maintenance therapy now has a definite role in the treatment of AML, and oral HMAs with potential treatment benefits are also available. In conclusion, AML therapy is evolving rapidly and treatment results are improving in all AML subsets as novel agents and strategies are incorporated into traditional AML chemotherapy. LAY SUMMARY: Ongoing research in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is progressing rapidly. Since 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved 10 drugs for different AML indications. This review updates the research and treatment pathways for AML.

Overview Systemic mastocytosis (SM) results from a clonal proliferation of abnormal mast cells (MC) in extra-cutaneous organs. Diagnosis The major criterion is presence of multifocal clusters of spindled MC in the bone marrow. Minor diagnostic criteria include elevated serum tryptase level, abnormal MC CD25 expression, and presence of KITD816V mutation. Risk stratification Establishing SM subtype as per the World Health Organization classification system is an important first step. Broadly, patients either have indolent/smoldering SM (ISM/SSM) or advanced SM, the latter includes aggressive SM (ASM), SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). Identification of poor-risk mutations (ie, ASXL1, RUNX1, SRSF2, NRAS) further refines the risk stratification. Recently, clinical and hybrid clinical-molecular risk models have been developed to more accurately assign prognosis in SM patients. Management Treatment goals for ISM patients are primarily directed towards anaphylaxis prevention/symptom control/osteoporosis treatment. Patients with advanced SM frequently need MC cytoreductive therapy to ameliorate disease-related organ dysfunction. High response rates have been seen with small-molecule inhibitors that target mutant-KIT, including midostaurin (Food and Drug Administration approved) or avapritinib (investigational). Other options for MC cytoreduction include cladribine or interferon-α, although head-to-head comparisons are lacking. Treatment of SM-AHN primarily targets the AHN component, particularly if an aggressive disease such as acute myeloid leukemia is present. Allogeneic stem cell transplant can be considered in such patients, or in those with relapsed/refractory advanced SM. Imatinib has a limited therapeutic role in SM; effective cytoreduction is limited to those with imatinib-sensitive KIT mutations.

Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with high disease activity (HDA) experience more severe disease than those without HDA. This analysis describes the efficacy of cladribine tab...

Background The preferred salvage treatment for children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R‐AML) remains unclear. The combination of cladribine/Ara‐C/granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor and mitoxantrone (CLAG‐M) shown promising results in adult R/R‐AML. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of CLAG‐M versus mitoxantrone/etoposide/cytarabine (MEC) or idarubicin/etoposide/cytarabine (IEC) in R/R‐AML children. Methods Fifty‐five R/R‐AML children were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) at 3‐year were documented. Karyotype or mutations status were summarized as different risk groups. Results The ORR was achieved in 80% (16/20) and 51% (18/35) of patients after one‐cycle of CLAG‐M and MEC/IEC treatment (p, CLAG‐M regimen is a more valid option with similar adverse events as a salvage treatment for R/R‐AML in children when compared with conventional chemotherapy no matter in which risk group.