1. Use of non-invasive scales for detecting esophageal varices in paediatric patients with portal vein thrombosis.
- Author
-
Diéguez Hernández-Vaquero I, Domènech Tàrrega A, Costa-Roig A, Couselo Jerez M, and Vila Carbó JJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Male, Female, Child, Child, Preschool, Adolescent, Hypertension, Portal complications, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Platelet Count, Infant, Ligation, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage etiology, Esophageal and Gastric Varices etiology, Esophageal and Gastric Varices diagnosis, Venous Thrombosis diagnostic imaging, Venous Thrombosis complications, Portal Vein diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Introduction: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most frequent cause of portal hypertension in paediatric population. Baveno VI Consensus considers endoscopic variceal ligation as the second therapeutic option after meso-Rex bypass (surgical shunt)., Aim: Analyse the diagnostic profitability of non-invasive scales in order to predict the risk of oesophageal varices (OV) in children with PVT., Material and Methods: Descriptive retrospective study where every upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) carried on patients <15 years old with non-cirrhotic PVT were included. There were divided according to the presence of OV and sex, cause, age, previous gastrointestinal bleeding or treatments, results of UGE and scales (Clinical Prediction Rule - CPR), Varices Prediction Rule - VPR), King's Variceal Prediction Score - K-VaPS) and Platelet count/Spleen diameter Ratio - PSR). Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute frequency and percentage, and quantitative variables as median and interquartile range. U Mann-Whitney and Hanley-McNeil tests were used for comparisons., Results: Forty-five UGE were analysed. 80% (n=36) presented OV: median of 3 (2-3) and 33.3% (n=12) required endoscopic variceal ligation. Statistical differences were demonstrated between both groups: CPR (142.39 [132.22-166.53] vs. 122.75 [115.24-133.15]; p=0.003), VPR (9.91 [9.36-11.75] vs. 5.6 [3.34-8.39]; p=0.001), K-VaPS (117.86 [99.66-126.58] vs. 99.64 [94.88-10.18]; p=0.019), PSR (2384.62 [1902.22-3201.63] vs. 1252.5 [579.6-2144.42]; p=0.05), with and area under the curve AUROC>75%, without statistical differences between scales., Conclusions: In paediatric patients with non-cirrotic PVT non-invasive scales can be used as a tool to predict the presence of OV and raise the indication of UGE., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF