Search

Introduction: Depending upon the type of communication between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus, two types of carotid-cavernous fistulae can be distinguished: direct carotid-cavernous fistula (DCCF), for which diagnosis is usually easy because of the obvious signs of orbital congestion, and indirect carotid-cavernous fistula (ICCF) or dural fistula, with few symptoms, associated with a delay in diagnosis which can alter prognosis for function and even life., Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine characteristic signs of both types of CCF and to study their correlation with the anatomical type of vessels involved on the angiogram. The prognosis for both types of fistula was also studied., Method: Retrospective single-center study, including patients with angiographically confirmed DCCF or ICCF. Demographic, clinical, and prognostic characteristics of these patients were analyzed and compared with the angiogram findings., Results: Six patients (4 DCCF and 2 ICCF) were included in this study. Mean age at diagnosis was 62.7 years in the DCCF group and 62 years in the ICCF group. Mean time until diagnosis was 7 weeks in the DCCF group and 24 weeks in the ICCF group. Signs of orbital congestion were present in 100% of patients with DCCF and absent in all patients in the ICCF group. Mean proptosis was 3.5mm in the DCCF group and 0.5 in the ICCF group. All patients had an audible bruit on auscultation. The location of the bruit was orbital in all patients with DCCF, and pretragal or jugal in 50% of patients with ICCF., Conclusions: ICCF can impact mortality and are often underdiagnosed. The diagnostic delay observed in our study reflects the difficulties which persist in recognizing the clinical signs of this condition. ICCF must be suspected in the case of a history suggestive of CCF, even if the clinical examination appears normal. The presence of a bruit must be carefully sought, not only in the classical orbital location, but also in other facial locations as shown in our study. Our results demonstrate that there is indeed a good correlation between the site of the CCF, the location of the bruit, and the vessels involved., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Exophthalmia can be associated with several disorders. Although unusual, a carotid-cavernous fistula should be ruled out systematically as it may be associated with severe complications., Case Reports: We report three cases associated with both types of carotid-cavernous fistula that highlight the clinical presentation and diagnostic process., Conclusion: A carotid-cavernous fistula should be systematically ruled out in patients with a uni- or bilateral exophthalmia. Careful examination with auscultation of the ocular globe contributes greatly to the diagnosis that may be confirmed by MRI or arteriography., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

Carotid-cavernous fistulas are abnormal communications between the carotid system and the cavernous sinus. Depending on their direct or indirect nature, they have different clinical manifestations and management. Are discussed in this paper: first the anatomy of the cavernous sinus, then clinical signs, diagnosis, management and differential diagnosis of carotid-cavernous fistulas., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal communication between the cavernous sinus and the carotid arterial system. The authors reported the clinical presentation and therapeutic procedure of two cases. The physician has to be aware of this diagnosis when a patient is referred for a posttraumatic exophthalmia. The medical behaviour is multidisciplinary (ENT, ophthalmologist, radiologist and neurosurgeon). The imaging of choice is the angiography but angio-MRI and angio-CT can help to confirm the diagnosis. The endovascular embolization is the treatment of choice. It presents an acceptable risk of complication and a low risk of failure. In this paper the authors report 2 posttraumatic CCF cases treated with success by endovascular embolization.

The diagnosis of carotid-cavernous sinus fistula is based on clinical findings and must be confirmed and detailed by CT scan and arteriography. If the treatment, based on embolization, is not undertaken in the emergency room, visual complications or even death may result. We give an example of a direct post-traumatic carotid-cavernous sinus fistula, stressing its clinical characteristics (ophthalmoplegia) and treatment: the advantages of arteriography and of embolization methods (most often by detachable balloon or coils, through arteries or veins).

Introduction: Proptosis is the most common feature of Graves' ophthalmopathy. We report an exceptional case of proptosis in relation with an isolated enlargement of the superior oblique muscle in Graves' ophthalmopathy., Observation: After ocular contusion a 37 years old man presented a progressive right exophthalmos. On examination there was an unilateral proptosis with dilated conjunctival vessels, without any clinical signs of inflammation and no decreased vision. Ocular movements were full. On general examination signs of hyperthyroidism were present. CT-scan showed a superior oblique muscle enlargement with enlarged superior ophthalmic vein. Cerebral angiography excluded the diagnosis of a carotid-cavernous fistula. Dosage of thyroid hormone revealed hyperthyroidism., Discussion: This case has a double interest: --Diagnostic: a CT-scan picture mimicking a carotido-cavernous fistula in this particular clinical context (history of ocular trauma, enlarged conjunctival vessels). --Isolated enlargement of superior oblique muscle in Graves' disease, which is exceptional in the literature.

The authors report a case of intracranial traumatic aneurysm at young a 21 years old patient. He presented with recurrent epistaxis 3 months after craniofacial trauma. An aneurysm of the left carotid artery was diagnosed at cerebral angiography. Endovascular treatment was performed with favorable outcome. In spite of their rarity, posttraumatic intracranial aneurysms should be suspected in patients with recent or remote history of trauma, even minor, presenting with secondary clinical deterioration, in order to carry out emergent angiographic exploration, before contemplating definitive surgical or endovascular treatment.