Search

COVID-19 is associated with neurological complications including stroke, delirium and encephalitis. Furthermore, a post-viral syndrome dominated by neuropsychiatric symptoms is common, and is seemingly unrelated to COVID-19 severity. The true frequency and underlying mechanisms of neurological injury are unknown, but exaggerated host inflammatory responses appear to be a key driver of COVID-19 severity. We investigated the dynamics of, and relationship between, serum markers of brain injury [neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and total tau] and markers of dysregulated host response (autoantibody production and cytokine profiles) in 175 patients admitted with COVID-19 and 45 patients with influenza. During hospitalization, sera from patients with COVID-19 demonstrated elevations of NfL and GFAP in a severity-dependent manner, with evidence of ongoing active brain injury at follow-up 4 months later. These biomarkers were associated with elevations of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the presence of autoantibodies to a large number of different antigens. Autoantibodies were commonly seen against lung surfactant proteins but also brain proteins such as myelin associated glycoprotein. Commensurate findings were seen in the influenza cohort. A distinct process characterized by elevation of serum total tau was seen in patients at follow-up, which appeared to be independent of initial disease severity and was not associated with dysregulated immune responses unlike NfL and GFAP. These results demonstrate that brain injury is a common consequence of both COVID-19 and influenza, and is therefore likely to be a feature of severe viral infection more broadly. The brain injury occurs in the context of dysregulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses, with no single pathogenic mechanism clearly responsible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a particular need in protein analysis and purification for specific, functional, and generic methods of protein immobilization on solid supports. Here we describe a double-hexahistidine ([His.sub.6]) tag sequence, comprising two hexahistidines separated by an 11-amino acid spacer, which shows at least 1 order of magnitude stronger binding to Ni-NTA-modified surfaces than a conventional single-[His.sub.6] tag or two single-[His.sub.6] tags at N- and C-termini. Using, as a model, tagged versions of green fluorescent protein (GFP), stable and tight binding of the double-[His.sub.6] tag/Ni-NTA interaction was demonstrated by competitive elution from Ni-NTA agarose beads, surface plasmon resonance on a Ni-NTA chip, and ELISA in Ni-NTA microwell plates. Protein purification by Ni-NTA chromatography was improved by a 6-8-fold increase in imidazole concentration required for elution, while the dissociation rate of double-[His.sub.6] GFP from Ni NTA chips in SPR (BIAcore) was 10 times slower than for single-[His.sub.6]-tagged proteins. ELISA assays and protein microarrays constructed with double-[His.sub.6] GFP demonstrated greater detection sensitivity with anti-His antibodies and Ni-NTA conjugates. Moreover, the double-[His.sub.6] tag could serve simultaneously both for protein immobilization and for detection on surfaces. The double-[His.sub.6] peptide has the potential to be a universal tag for protein immobilization and detection on arrays and single-step purification of proteins from crude mixtures.

Validation of antibodies and other protein binders is a subject of pressing concern for the research community and one which is uppermost in the minds of all who use antibodies as research and diagnostic reagents. Assessing an antibody’s fitness for purpose includes accurate ascertainment of its target specificity and suitability for the envisaged task. Moreover, standardised procedures are essential to guarantee sample quality in testing procedures. The problem of defining precise standards for antibody validation has engendered much debate in recent publications and meetings, but gradually a consensus is emerging. At the 8th Alpbach Affinity Proteomics workshop (March 2017), a panel of leaders in the antibody field discussed suggestions which could bring this complex but essential issue a step nearer to a resolution. ‘Alpbach recommendations’ for best practice include tailoring binder validation processes according to the intended applications and promoting greater transparency in publications and in the information available from commercial antibody developers/providers. A single approach will not fit all applications and end users must ensure that the reported validation holds for their specific requirements, highlighting the need for adequate training in the fundamentals of antibody characterisation and validation across the user community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In affinity proteomics, specific protein-binding molecules (a.k.a. binders), principally antibodies, are applied as reagents in proteome analysis. In recent years, advances in binder technologies have created the potential for an unprecedented view on protein expression and distribution patterns in plasma, cells and tissues and increasingly on protein function. Particular strengths of affinity proteomics methods include detecting proteins in their natural environments of cell or tissue, high sensitivity and selectivity for detection of low abundance proteins and exploiting binding actions such as functional interference in living cells. To maximise the use and impact of affinity reagents, it will be essential to create comprehensive, standardised binder collections. With this in mind, the EU FP7 programme AFFINOMICS (http://www.affinomics.org), together with the preceding EU programmes ProteomeBinders and AffinityProteome, aims to extend affinity proteomics research by generating a large-scale resource of validated protein-binding molecules for characterisation of the human proteome. Activity is directed at producing binders to about 1000 protein targets, primarily in signal transduction and cancer, by establishing a high throughput, coordinated production pipeline. An important aspect of AFFINOMICS is the development of highly efficient recombinant selection methods, based on phage, cell and ribosome display, capable of producing high quality binders at greater throughput and lower cost than hitherto. The programme also involves development of innovative and sensitive technologies for specific detection of target proteins and their interactions, and deployment of binders in proteomics studies of clinical relevance. The need for such binder generation programmes is now recognised internationally, with parallel initiatives in the USA for cancer (NCI) and transcription factors (NIH) and within the Human Proteome Organisation (HUPO). The papers in this volume of New Biotechnology are all contributed by participants at the 5th ESF Workshop on Affinity Proteomics organised by the AFFINOMICS consortium and held in Alpbach, Austria, in March 2011. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Ribosome display is a cell-free technology for the in vitro selection and evolution of proteins encoded by DNA libraries, in which individual nascent proteins (phenotypes) are linked physically to their corresponding mRNA (genotypes) in stable protein-ribosome-mRNA (PRM) complexes (Fig. 1). Formation of the complexes can be achieved through deletion of the stop codon of the mRNA, stalling the ribosome at the end of translation; the nascent protein is extended by a spacer such as the immunoglobulin Cκ domain or others to allow exit through the ribosome tunnel. Through affinity for a ligand, the protein-mRNA coupling permits simultaneous isolation of a functional nascent protein and its translated mRNA; the latter is then converted into cDNA by reverse transcription and amplified for further manipulation, repeated cycles or soluble protein expression. Through the use of PCR-generated libraries, avoiding the need for cloning, ribosome display can be used to both screen very large populations and continuously search for new diversity during subsequent rounds of selection. Additionally, the use of cell-free systems allows the selection of proteins that are toxic or unstable in cells, and proteins with chemical modifications. Ribosome display systems using both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell extracts have been developed. Examples of the application of eukaryotic systems include the selection and evolution of antibody fragments, DNA binding domains, enzymes, interacting proteins and peptides among others. Here we describe the step-by-step procedure to perform our previously described eukaryotic ribosome display method, which has the distinctive feature of an in situ reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) procedure for DNA recovery from ribosome-bound mRNA. We also introduce a recent, previously unpublished improvement to the procedure in which in situ reverse transcription is combined with sensitive single-primer PCR technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on proteomebinders. It is a new European consortium aiming to establish a comprehensive resource of well characterized affinity reagents for the analysis of the human proteome. It is given the huge diversity of the proteome, the scale of the project is potentially immense but nevertheless feasible in the context of a pan-European. It is essential to develop a comprehensive, characterized and standardized collection of specific binding molecules.

The crystal structures of the Fab′ fragment of the anti-progesterone monoclonal antibody DB3 and its complexes with steroid haptens have shown that the D-JH junctional residue TrpH100 is a key contributor to binding site interactions with ligands. The indole group of TrpH100 also undergoes a significant conformational change between the bound and unliganded states, effectively opening and closing the combining site pocket. In order to explore the effect of substitutions at this position on steroid recognition, we have carried out mutagenesis on a construct encoding a three-domain single-chain fragment (VH/K) of DB3 expressed in Escherichia coli. TrpH100 was replaced by 13 different amino acids or deleted, and the functional and antigenic properties of the mutated fragments were analyzed. Most substitutions, including small, hydrophobic, hydrophilic, neutral, and negatively charged side chains, were reduced or abolished binding to free progesterone, although binding to progesterone-BSA was partially retained. The reduction in antigen binding was paralleled by alteration of the idiotype associated with the DB3 combining site. In contrast, the replacement of TrpH100 by Arg produced a mutant that retained wild-type antibody affinity and idiotype, but with altered specificity. Significant changes in this mutant included increased relative affinities of 104-fold for progesterone-3-carboxymethyloxime and 10-fold for aetiocholanolone. Our results demonstrate an essential role for the junctional residue H100 in determining steroid-binding specificity and combining site idiotype and show that these properties can be changed by a single amino acid substitution at this position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ribosome display is a cell-free system for the in vitro selection of proteins and peptides from large libraries. It uses the principle of coupling individual nascent proteins (phenotypes) to their corresponding mRNA (genotypes), through the formation of stable protein-ribosome-mRNA (PRM) complexes. This permits the simultaneous isolation of a functional nascent protein, through affinity for a ligand, together with the encoding mRNA, which is then converted and amplified as DNA for further manipulation, including repeated cycles or protein expression. Ribosome display has a number of advantages over cell-based systems such as phage display; in particular, it can display very large libraries without the restriction of bacterial transformation. It is also suitable for generating toxic, proteolytically sensitive and unstable proteins, and allows the incorporation of modified amino acids at defined positions. In combination with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, mutations can be introduced efficiently into the selected DNA pool in subsequent cycles, leading to continuous DNA diversification and protein selection (in vitro protein evolution). Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosome display systems have been developed and each has its own distinctive features. In this paper, ribosome display systems and their application in selection and evolution of proteins are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Presents a comparative analysis of the X-ray structures of five conformationally different steroids in complex with the Fab' fragment of an anti-progesterone antibody DB3 at 2.7 angstrom. Antigen specificity; Binding orientations of the steroid skeleton; Generation of anti-progesterone monoclonal antibodies.