1. Open-lung ventilation versus no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass in an innovative animal model of heart transplantation
- Author
-
Varun Karnik, Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Leah Rickards, Silver Heinsar, Louise E. See Hoe, Karin Wildi, Margaret R. Passmore, Mahe Bouquet, Kei Sato, Carmen Ainola, Nicole Bartnikowski, Emily S. Wilson, Kieran Hyslop, Kris Skeggs, Nchafatso G. Obonyo, Charles McDonald, Samantha Livingstone, Gabriella Abbate, Andrew Haymet, Jae-Seung Jung, Noriko Sato, Lynnette James, Benjamin Lloyd, Nicole White, Chiara Palmieri, Mark Buckland, Jacky Y. Suen, David C. McGiffin, John F. Fraser, and Gianluigi Li Bassi
- Subjects
Ventilation ,Cardiopulmonary bypass ,Heart transplant ,Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,RC86-88.9 - Abstract
Abstract Open-lung ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) is a potential strategy to mitigate postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We utilized an ovine HTx model to investigate whether open-lung ventilation during CPB reduces postoperative lung damage and complications. Eighteen sheep from an ovine HTx model were included, with ventilatory interventions randomly assigned during CPB: the OPENVENT group received low tidal volume (VT) of 3 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 8 cm H20, while no ventilation was provided in the NOVENT group as per standard of care. The recipient sheep were monitored for 6 h post-surgery. The primary outcome was histological lung damage, scored at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary shunt, driving pressure, hemodynamics and inflammatory lung infiltration. All animals completed the study. The OPENVENT group showed significantly lower histological lung damage versus the NOVENT group (0.22 vs 0.27, p = 0.042) and lower pulmonary shunt (19.2 vs 32.1%, p = 0.001). In addition, the OPENVENT group exhibited a reduced driving pressure (9.6 cm H2O vs. 12.8 cm H2O, p = 0.039), lower neutrophil (5.25% vs 7.97%, p ≤ 0.001) and macrophage infiltrations (11.1% vs 19.6%, p
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF