Back to Search Start Over

Open-lung ventilation versus no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass in an innovative animal model of heart transplantation

Authors :
Varun Karnik
Sebastiano Maria Colombo
Leah Rickards
Silver Heinsar
Louise E. See Hoe
Karin Wildi
Margaret R. Passmore
Mahe Bouquet
Kei Sato
Carmen Ainola
Nicole Bartnikowski
Emily S. Wilson
Kieran Hyslop
Kris Skeggs
Nchafatso G. Obonyo
Charles McDonald
Samantha Livingstone
Gabriella Abbate
Andrew Haymet
Jae-Seung Jung
Noriko Sato
Lynnette James
Benjamin Lloyd
Nicole White
Chiara Palmieri
Mark Buckland
Jacky Y. Suen
David C. McGiffin
John F. Fraser
Gianluigi Li Bassi
Source :
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
SpringerOpen, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Open-lung ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) is a potential strategy to mitigate postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We utilized an ovine HTx model to investigate whether open-lung ventilation during CPB reduces postoperative lung damage and complications. Eighteen sheep from an ovine HTx model were included, with ventilatory interventions randomly assigned during CPB: the OPENVENT group received low tidal volume (VT) of 3 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 8 cm H20, while no ventilation was provided in the NOVENT group as per standard of care. The recipient sheep were monitored for 6 h post-surgery. The primary outcome was histological lung damage, scored at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary shunt, driving pressure, hemodynamics and inflammatory lung infiltration. All animals completed the study. The OPENVENT group showed significantly lower histological lung damage versus the NOVENT group (0.22 vs 0.27, p = 0.042) and lower pulmonary shunt (19.2 vs 32.1%, p = 0.001). In addition, the OPENVENT group exhibited a reduced driving pressure (9.6 cm H2O vs. 12.8 cm H2O, p = 0.039), lower neutrophil (5.25% vs 7.97%, p ≤ 0.001) and macrophage infiltrations (11.1% vs 19.6%, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2197425X
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5ec2089cb8ca435584c95f51876bc537
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00669-w