86 results on '"Dowty, JG"'
Search Results
2. The CRISP colorectal cancer risk prediction tool: an exploratory study using simulated consultations in Australian primary care
- Author
-
Walker, JG, Bickerstaffe, A, Hewabandu, N, Maddumarachchi, S, Dowty, JG, CRECRC, Jenkins, M, Pirotta, M, Walter, Fiona, Emery, JD, Walter, Fiona [0000-0002-7191-6476], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
Cancer screening ,General practitioners ,education ,Primary care ,Colorectal cancer ,Colorectal cancer risk prediction ,Bowel cancer screening ,Colorectal cancer risk assessment - Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Australia, screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with colonoscopy is meant to be reserved for people at increased risk, however, currently there is a mismatch between individuals' risk of CRC and the type of CRC screening they receive. This paper describes the development and optimisation of a Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction tool ('CRISP') for use in primary care. The aim of the CRISP tool is to increase risk-appropriate CRC screening. METHODS: CRISP development was informed by previous experience with developing risk tools for use in primary care and a systematic review of the evidence. A CRISP prototype was used in simulated consultations by general practitioners (GPs) with actors as patients. GPs were interviewed to explore their experience of using CRISP, and practice nurses (PNs) and practice managers (PMs) were interviewed after a demonstration of CRISP. Transcribed interviews and video footage of the 'consultations' were qualitatively analyzed. Themes arising from the data were mapped onto Normalization Process Theory (NPT). RESULTS: Fourteen GPs, nine PNs and six PMs were recruited from 12 clinics. Results were described using the four constructs of NPT: 1) Coherence: Clinicians understood the rationale behind CRISP, particularly since they were familiar with using risk tools for other conditions; 2) Cognitive participation: GPs welcomed the opportunity CRISP provided to discuss healthy and unhealthy behaviors with their patients, but many GPs challenged the screening recommendation generated by CRISP; 3) Collective Action: CRISP disrupted clinician-patient flow if the GP was less comfortable with computers. GP consultation time was a major implementation barrier and overall consensus was that PNs have more capacity and time to use CRISP effectively; 4) Reflexive monitoring: Limited systematic monitoring of new interventions is a potential barrier to the sustainable embedding of CRISP. CONCLUSIONS: CRISP has the potential to improve risk-appropriate CRC screening in primary care but was considered more likely to be successfully implemented as a nurse-led intervention., This study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence grant (APP1042021). M Pirotta is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship. JD Emery is supported by an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship. FM Walter is supported by a NIHR Clinician Scientist award.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: Data from COGS
- Author
-
Southey, MC, Goldgar, DE, Winqvist, R, Pylkäs, K, Couch, F, Tischkowitz, M, Foulkes, WD, Dennis, J, Michailidou, K, van Rensburg, EJ, Heikkinen, T, Nevanlinna, H, Hopper, JL, Dörk, T, Claes, KBM, Reis-Filho, J, Teo, ZL, Radice, P, Catucci, I, Peterlongo, P, Tsimiklis, H, Odefrey, FA, Dowty, JG, Schmidt, MK, Broeks, A, Hogervorst, FB, Verhoef, S, Carpenter, J, Clarke, C, Scott, RJ, Fasching, PA, Haeberle, L, Ekici, AB, Beckmann, MW, Peto, J, dos-Santos-Silva, I, Fletcher, O, Johnson, N, Bolla, MK, Sawyer, EJ, Tomlinson, I, Kerin, MJ, Miller, N, Marme, F, Burwinkel, B, Yang, R, Guénel, P, Truong, T, Menegaux, F, Sanchez, M, Bojesen, S, Nielsen, SF, Flyger, H, Benitez, J, Zamora, MP, Perez, JIA, Menéndez, P, Anton-Culver, H, Neuhausen, S, Ziogas, A, Clarke, CA, Brenner, H, Arndt, V, Stegmaier, C, Brauch, H, Brüning, T, Ko, YD, Muranen, TA, Aittomäki, K, Blomqvist, C, Bogdanova, NV, Antonenkova, NN, Lindblom, A, Margolin, S, Mannermaa, A, Kataja, V, Kosma, VM, and Hartikainen, JM
- Subjects
skin and connective tissue diseases - Abstract
Background The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study. Methods We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T > G and c.3113G > A, CHEK2 c.349A > G, c.538C > T, c.715G > A, c.1036C > T, c.1312G > T, and c.1343T > G and ATM c.7271T > G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant. Results For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10-5), PALB2 c.3113G > A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10-8) and ATM c.7271T > G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A > G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C > T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C > T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T > G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G > T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants. Conclusions This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.
- Published
- 2016
4. The CRISP colorectal cancer risk prediction tool: an exploratory study using simulated consultations in Australian primary care
- Author
-
Walker, JG, Bickerstaffe, A, Hewabandu, N, Maddumarachchi, S, Dowty, JG, CRECRC, Jenkins, M, Pirotta, M, Walter, FM, and Emery, JD
- Subjects
Cancer screening ,General practitioners ,Primary care ,Colorectal cancer ,Colorectal cancer risk prediction ,3. Good health ,Bowel cancer screening ,Colorectal cancer risk assessment - Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Australia, screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with colonoscopy is meant to be reserved for people at increased risk, however, currently there is a mismatch between individuals' risk of CRC and the type of CRC screening they receive. This paper describes the development and optimisation of a Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction tool ('CRISP') for use in primary care. The aim of the CRISP tool is to increase risk-appropriate CRC screening. METHODS: CRISP development was informed by previous experience with developing risk tools for use in primary care and a systematic review of the evidence. A CRISP prototype was used in simulated consultations by general practitioners (GPs) with actors as patients. GPs were interviewed to explore their experience of using CRISP, and practice nurses (PNs) and practice managers (PMs) were interviewed after a demonstration of CRISP. Transcribed interviews and video footage of the 'consultations' were qualitatively analyzed. Themes arising from the data were mapped onto Normalization Process Theory (NPT). RESULTS: Fourteen GPs, nine PNs and six PMs were recruited from 12 clinics. Results were described using the four constructs of NPT: 1) Coherence: Clinicians understood the rationale behind CRISP, particularly since they were familiar with using risk tools for other conditions; 2) Cognitive participation: GPs welcomed the opportunity CRISP provided to discuss healthy and unhealthy behaviors with their patients, but many GPs challenged the screening recommendation generated by CRISP; 3) Collective Action: CRISP disrupted clinician-patient flow if the GP was less comfortable with computers. GP consultation time was a major implementation barrier and overall consensus was that PNs have more capacity and time to use CRISP effectively; 4) Reflexive monitoring: Limited systematic monitoring of new interventions is a potential barrier to the sustainable embedding of CRISP. CONCLUSIONS: CRISP has the potential to improve risk-appropriate CRC screening in primary care but was considered more likely to be successfully implemented as a nurse-led intervention.
5. Germline CDH1 Variants and Lifetime Cancer Risk.
- Author
-
Ryan CE, Fasaye GA, Gallanis AF, Gamble LA, McClelland PH, Duemler A, Samaranayake SG, Blakely AM, Drogan CM, Kingham K, Patel D, Rodgers-Fouche L, Siegel A, Kupfer SS, Ford JM, Chung DC, Dowty JG, Sampson J, and Davis JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Loss of Function Mutation, Heterozygote, Penetrance, Prospective Studies, Antigens, CD genetics, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Cadherins genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Germ-Line Mutation, Stomach Neoplasms genetics, Stomach Neoplasms epidemiology
- Abstract
Importance: Approximately 1% to 3% of gastric cancers and 5% of lobular breast cancers are hereditary. Loss of function CDH1 gene variants are the most common gene variants associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. Previously, the lifetime risk of gastric cancer was estimated to be approximately 25% to 83% and for breast cancer it was estimated to be approximately 39% to 55% in individuals with loss of function CDH1 gene variants., Objective: To describe gastric and breast cancer risk estimates for individuals with CDH1 variants., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, retrospective cohort and modeling study of 213 families from North America with a CDH1 pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in 1 or more family members conducted between January 2021 and August 2022., Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs), defined as risk in variant carriers relative to noncarriers, were estimated for each cancer type and used to calculate cumulative risks and risks per decade of life up to age 80 years., Results: A total of 7323 individuals from 213 families were studied, including 883 with a CDH1 P/LP variant (median proband age, 53 years [IQR, 42-62]; 4% Asian; 4% Hispanic; 85% non-Hispanic White; 50% female). In individuals with a CDH1 P/LP variant, the prevalence of gastric cancer was 13.9% (123/883) and the prevalence of breast cancer among female carriers was 26.3% (144/547). The estimated HR for advanced gastric cancer was 33.5 (95% CI, 9.8-112) at age 30 years and 3.5 (95% CI, 0.4-30.3) at age 70 years. The lifetime cumulative risk of advanced gastric cancer in male and female carriers was 10.3% (95% CI, 6%-23.6%) and 6.5% (95% CI, 3.8%-15.1%), respectively. Gastric cancer risk estimates based on family history indicated that a carrier with 3 affected first-degree relatives had a penetrance of approximately 38% (95% CI, 25%-64%). The HR for breast cancer among female carriers was 5.7 (95% CI, 2.5-13.2) at age 30 years and 3.9 (95% CI, 1.1-13.7) at age 70 years. The lifetime cumulative risk of breast cancer among female carriers was 36.8% (95% CI, 25.7%-62.9%)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among families from North America with germline CDH1 P/LP variants, the cumulative risk of gastric cancer was 7% to 10%, which was lower than previously described, and the cumulative risk of breast cancer among female carriers was 37%, which was similar to prior estimates. These findings inform current management of individuals with germline CDH1 variants.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Detection of differentially methylated CpGs between tumour and adjacent benign cells in diagnostic prostate cancer samples.
- Author
-
FitzGerald LM, Jung CH, Wong EM, Joo JE, Bassett JK, Dowty JG, Wang X, Dai JY, Stanford JL, O'Callaghan N, Nottle T, Pedersen J, Giles GG, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Middle Aged, Prostatectomy, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Australia, Prognosis, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnosis, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism, DNA Methylation, CpG Islands genetics
- Abstract
Differentially methylated CpG sites (dmCpGs) that distinguish prostate tumour from adjacent benign tissue could aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Previously, the identification of such dmCpGs has only been undertaken in radical prostatectomy (RP) samples and not primary diagnostic tumour samples (needle biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate). We interrogated an Australian dataset comprising 125 tumour and 43 adjacent histologically benign diagnostic tissue samples, including 41 paired samples, using the Infinium Human Methylation450 BeadChip. Regression analyses of paired tumour and adjacent benign samples identified 2,386 significant dmCpGs (Bonferroni p < 0.01; delta-β ≥ 40%), with LASSO regression selecting 16 dmCpGs that distinguished tumour samples in the full Australian diagnostic dataset (AUC = 0.99). Results were validated in independent North American (n
paired = 19; AUC = 0.87) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; npaired = 50; AUC = 0.94) RP datasets. Two of the 16 dmCpGs were in genes that were significantly down-regulated in Australian tumour samples (Bonferroni p < 0.01; GSTM2 and PRKCB). Ten additional dmCpGs distinguished low (n = 34) and high Gleason (n = 88) score tumours in the diagnostic Australian dataset (AUC = 0.95), but these performed poorly when applied to the RP datasets (North American: AUC = 0.66; TCGA: AUC = 0.62). The DNA methylation marks identified here could augment and improve current diagnostic tests and/or form the basis of future prognostic tests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Breast and bowel cancers diagnosed in people 'too young to have cancer': A blueprint for research using family and twin studies.
- Author
-
Hopper JL, Li S, MacInnis RJ, Dowty JG, Nguyen TL, Bui M, Dite GS, Esser VFC, Ye Z, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Goudey B, Alpen K, Kapuscinski M, Win AK, Dugué PA, Milne RL, Jayasekara H, Brooks JD, Malta S, Calais-Ferreira L, Campbell AC, Young JT, Nguyen-Dumont T, Sung J, Giles GG, Buchanan D, Winship I, Terry MB, Southey MC, and Jenkins MA
- Abstract
Young breast and bowel cancers (e.g., those diagnosed before age 40 or 50 years) have far greater morbidity and mortality in terms of years of life lost, and are increasing in incidence, but have been less studied. For breast and bowel cancers, the familial relative risks, and therefore the familial variances in age-specific log(incidence), are much greater at younger ages, but little of these familial variances has been explained. Studies of families and twins can address questions not easily answered by studies of unrelated individuals alone. We describe existing and emerging family and twin data that can provide special opportunities for discovery. We present designs and statistical analyses, including novel ideas such as the VALID (Variance in Age-specific Log Incidence Decomposition) model for causes of variation in risk, the DEPTH (DEPendency of association on the number of Top Hits) and other approaches to analyse genome-wide association study data, and the within-pair, ICE FALCON (Inference about Causation from Examining FAmiliaL CONfounding) and ICE CRISTAL (Inference about Causation from Examining Changes in Regression coefficients and Innovative STatistical AnaLysis) approaches to causation and familial confounding. Example applications to breast and colorectal cancer are presented. Motivated by the availability of the resources of the Breast and Colon Cancer Family Registries, we also present some ideas for future studies that could be applied to, and compared with, cancers diagnosed at older ages and address the challenges posed by young breast and bowel cancers., (© 2024 The Authors. Genetic Epidemiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Causation and familial confounding as explanations for the associations of polygenic risk scores with breast cancer: Evidence from innovative ICE FALCON and ICE CRISTAL analyses.
- Author
-
Li S, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bui M, Nguyen TL, Esser VFC, Ye Z, Dowty JG, Makalic E, Sung J, Giles GG, Southey MC, and Hopper JL
- Abstract
A polygenic risk score (PRS) combines the associations of multiple genetic variants that could be due to direct causal effects, indirect genetic effects, or other sources of familial confounding. We have developed new approaches to assess evidence for and against causation by using family data for pairs of relatives (Inference about Causation from Examination of FAmiliaL CONfounding [ICE FALCON]) or measures of family history (Inference about Causation from Examining Changes in Regression coefficients and Innovative STatistical AnaLyses [ICE CRISTAL]). Inference is made from the changes in regression coefficients of relatives' PRSs or PRS and family history before and after adjusting for each other. We applied these approaches to two breast cancer PRSs and multiple studies and found that (a) for breast cancer diagnosed at a young age, for example, <50 years, there was no evidence that the PRSs were causal, while (b) for breast cancer diagnosed at later ages, there was consistent evidence for causation explaining increasing amounts of the PRS-disease association. The genetic variants in the PRS might be in linkage disequilibrium with truly causal variants and not causal themselves. These PRSs cause minimal heritability of breast cancer at younger ages. There is also evidence for nongenetic factors shared by first-degree relatives that explain breast cancer familial aggregation. Familial associations are not necessarily due to genes, and genetic associations are not necessarily causal., (© 2024 The Authors. Genetic Epidemiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Genetic and Environmental Causes of Variation in an Automated Breast Cancer Risk Factor Based on Mammographic Textures.
- Author
-
Ye Z, Dite GS, Nguyen TL, MacInnis RJ, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Al-Qershi OM, Nguyen-Dumont T, Goudey B, Stone J, Dowty JG, Giles GG, Southey MC, Hopper JL, and Li S
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Breast, Mammography, Risk Factors, Twins, Dizygotic genetics, Twins, Monozygotic genetics, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: Cirrus is an automated risk predictor for breast cancer that comprises texture-based mammographic features and is mostly independent of mammographic density. We investigated genetic and environmental variance of variation in Cirrus., Methods: We measured Cirrus for 3,195 breast cancer-free participants, including 527 pairs of monozygotic (MZ) twins, 271 pairs of dizygotic (DZ) twins, and 1,599 siblings of twins. Multivariate normal models were used to estimate the variance and familial correlations of age-adjusted Cirrus as a function of age. The classic twin model was expanded to allow the shared environment effects to differ by zygosity. The SNP-based heritability was estimated for a subset of 2,356 participants., Results: There was no evidence that the variance or familial correlations depended on age. The familial correlations were 0.52 (SE, 0.03) for MZ pairs and 0.16(SE, 0.03) for DZ and non-twin sister pairs combined. Shared environmental factors specific to MZ pairs accounted for 20% of the variance. Additive genetic factors accounted for 32% (SE = 5%) of the variance, consistent with the SNP-based heritability of 36% (SE = 16%)., Conclusion: Cirrus is substantially familial due to genetic factors and an influence of shared environmental factors that was evident for MZ twin pairs only. The latter could be due to nongenetic factors operating in utero or in early life that are shared by MZ twins., Impact: Early-life factors, shared more by MZ pairs than DZ/non-twin sister pairs, could play a role in the variation in Cirrus, consistent with early life being recognized as a critical window of vulnerability to breast carcinogens., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Causal relationships between breast cancer risk factors based on mammographic features.
- Author
-
Ye Z, Nguyen TL, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Al-Qershi OM, Bui M, Esser VFC, Dowty JG, Trinh HN, Evans CF, Tan M, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Southey MC, Hopper JL, and Li S
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Australia epidemiology, Breast diagnostic imaging, Breast Density, Mammography methods, Risk Factors, Adult, Middle Aged, Aged, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms etiology
- Abstract
Background: Mammogram risk scores based on texture and density defined by different brightness thresholds are associated with breast cancer risk differently and could reveal distinct information about breast cancer risk. We aimed to investigate causal relationships between these intercorrelated mammogram risk scores to determine their relevance to breast cancer aetiology., Methods: We used digitised mammograms for 371 monozygotic twin pairs, aged 40-70 years without a prior diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of mammography, from the Australian Mammographic Density Twins and Sisters Study. We generated normalised, age-adjusted, and standardised risk scores based on textures using the Cirrus algorithm and on three spatially independent dense areas defined by increasing brightness threshold: light areas, bright areas, and brightest areas. Causal inference was made using the Inference about Causation from Examination of FAmilial CONfounding (ICE FALCON) method., Results: The mammogram risk scores were correlated within twin pairs and with each other (r = 0.22-0.81; all P < 0.005). We estimated that 28-92% of the associations between the risk scores could be attributed to causal relationships between the scores, with the rest attributed to familial confounders shared by the scores. There was consistent evidence for positive causal effects: of Cirrus, light areas, and bright areas on the brightest areas (accounting for 34%, 55%, and 85% of the associations, respectively); and of light areas and bright areas on Cirrus (accounting for 37% and 28%, respectively)., Conclusions: In a mammogram, the lighter (less dense) areas have a causal effect on the brightest (highly dense) areas, including through a causal pathway via textural features. These causal relationships help us gain insight into the relative aetiological importance of different mammographic features in breast cancer. For example our findings are consistent with the brightest areas being more aetiologically important than lighter areas for screen-detected breast cancer; conversely, light areas being more aetiologically important for interval breast cancer. Additionally, specific textural features capture aetiologically independent breast cancer risk information from dense areas. These findings highlight the utility of ICE FALCON and family data in decomposing the associations between intercorrelated disease biomarkers into distinct biological pathways., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Variance of age-specific log incidence decomposition (VALID): a unifying model of measured and unmeasured genetic and non-genetic risks.
- Author
-
Hopper JL, Dowty JG, Nguyen TL, Li S, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Bui M, Stone J, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Southey MC, and Mathews JD
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Age Factors, Incidence, Risk Factors, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Abstract
Background: The extent to which known and unknown factors explain how much people of the same age differ in disease risk is fundamental to epidemiology. Risk factors can be correlated in relatives, so familial aspects of risk (genetic and non-genetic) must be considered., Development: We present a unifying model (VALID) for variance in risk, with risk defined as log(incidence) or logit(cumulative incidence). Consider a normally distributed risk score with incidence increasing exponentially as the risk increases. VALID's building block is variance in risk, Δ2, where Δ = log(OPERA) is the difference in mean between cases and controls and OPERA is the odds ratio per standard deviation. A risk score correlated r between a pair of relatives generates a familial odds ratio of exp(rΔ2). Familial risk ratios, therefore, can be converted into variance components of risk, extending Fisher's classic decomposition of familial variation to binary traits. Under VALID, there is a natural upper limit to variance in risk caused by genetic factors, determined by the familial odds ratio for genetically identical twin pairs, but not to variation caused by non-genetic factors., Application: For female breast cancer, VALID quantified how much variance in risk is explained-at different ages-by known and unknown major genes and polygenes, non-genomic risk factors correlated in relatives, and known individual-specific factors., Conclusion: VALID has shown that, while substantial genetic risk factors have been discovered, much is unknown about genetic and familial aspects of breast cancer risk especially for young women, and little is known about individual-specific variance in risk., (© The Author(s) 2023; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) trial: a randomised controlled trial of a decision support tool for risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening.
- Author
-
Emery JD, Jenkins MA, Saya S, Chondros P, Oberoi J, Milton S, Novy K, Habgood E, Karnchanachari N, Pirotta M, Trevena L, Bickerstaffe A, De Abreu Lourenço R, Crothers A, Ouakrim DA, Flander L, Dowty JG, Walter FM, Clark M, Doncovio S, Etemadmoghadam D, Fishman G, Macrae F, Winship I, and McIntosh JG
- Subjects
- Humans, Early Detection of Cancer, Australia, Risk Assessment, Mass Screening, Occult Blood, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms prevention & control, General Practice
- Abstract
Background: A risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening could result in a more acceptable balance of benefits and harms, and be more cost-effective., Aim: To determine the effect of a consultation in general practice using a computerised risk assessment and decision support tool (Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction, CRISP) on risk-appropriate CRC screening., Design and Setting: Randomised controlled trial in 10 general practices in Melbourne, Australia, from May 2017 to May 2018., Method: Participants were recruited from a consecutive sample of patients aged 50-74 years attending their GP. Intervention consultations included CRC risk assessment using the CRISP tool and discussion of CRC screening recommendations. Control group consultations focused on lifestyle CRC risk factors. The primary outcome was risk-appropriate CRC screening at 12 months., Results: A total of 734 participants (65.1% of eligible patients) were randomised (369 intervention, 365 control); the primary outcome was determined for 722 (362 intervention, 360 control). There was a 6.5% absolute increase (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.28 to 13.2) in risk-appropriate screening in the intervention compared with the control group (71.5% versus 65.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.86, P = 0.057). In those due CRC screening during follow-up, there was a 20.3% (95% CI = 10.3 to 30.4) increase (intervention 59.8% versus control 38.9%; OR 2.31, 95% CI = 1.51 to 3.53, P <0.001) principally by increasing faecal occult blood testing in those at average risk., Conclusion: A risk assessment and decision support tool increases risk-appropriate CRC screening in those due screening. The CRISP intervention could commence in people in their fifth decade to ensure people start CRC screening at the optimal age with the most cost-effective test., (© The Authors.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Heritable methylation marks associated with prostate cancer risk.
- Author
-
Dowty JG, Yu C, Hosseinpour M, Joo JE, Wong EM, Nguyen-Dumont T, Rosenbluh J, Giles GG, Milne RL, MacInnis RJ, Dugué PA, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Prospective Studies, Inheritance Patterns, Epigenesis, Genetic, DNA Methylation, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
DNA methylation marks that are inherited from parents to offspring are known to play a role in cancer risk and could explain part of the familial risk for cancer. We therefore conducted a genome-wide search for heritable methylation marks associated with prostate cancer risk. Peripheral blood DNA methylation was measured for 133 of the 469 members of 25 multiple-case prostate cancer families, using the EPIC array. We used these families to systematically search the genome for methylation marks with Mendelian patterns of inheritance, then we tested the 1,000 most heritable marks for association with prostate cancer risk. After correcting for multiple testing, 41 heritable methylation marks were associated with prostate cancer risk. Separate analyses, based on 869 incident cases and 869 controls from a prospective cohort study, showed that 9 of these marks near the metastable epiallele VTRNA2-1 were also nominally associated with aggressive prostate cancer risk in the population., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Update of penetrance estimates in Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome.
- Author
-
Bruinsma FJ, Dowty JG, Win AK, Goddard LC, Agrawal P, Attina' D, Bissada N, De Luise M, Eisen DB, Furuya M, Gasparre G, Genuardi M, Gerdes AM, Hansen TVO, Houweling AC, Johannesma PC, Lencastre A, Lim D, Lindor NM, Luzzi V, Lynch M, Maffé A, Menko FH, Michels G, Pulido JS, Ryu JH, Sattler EC, Steinlein OK, Tomassetti S, Tucker K, Turchetti D, van de Beek I, van Riel L, van Steensel M, Zenone T, Zompatori M, Walsh J, Bondavalli D, Maher ER, and Winship IM
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Penetrance, Proto-Oncogene Proteins genetics, Tumor Suppressor Proteins genetics, Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome genetics, Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome pathology, Colonic Polyps, Kidney Neoplasms epidemiology, Kidney Neoplasms genetics, Carcinoma, Renal Cell epidemiology, Carcinoma, Renal Cell genetics
- Abstract
Background: Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is a rare genetic syndrome caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in the FLCN gene. Patients with BHD syndrome have an increased risk of fibrofolliculomas, pulmonary cysts, pneumothorax and renal cell carcinoma. There is debate regarding whether colonic polyps should be added to the criteria. Previous risk estimates have mostly been based on small clinical case series., Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted to identify studies that had recruited families carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in FLCN . Pedigree data were requested from these studies and pooled. Segregation analysis was used to estimate the cumulative risk of each manifestation for carriers of FLCN pathogenic variants., Results: Our final dataset contained 204 families that were informative for at least one manifestation of BHD (67 families informative for skin manifestations, 63 for lung, 88 for renal carcinoma and 29 for polyps). By age 70 years, male carriers of the FLCN variant have an estimated 19% (95% CI 12% to 31%) risk of renal tumours, 87% (95% CI 80% to 92%) of lung involvement and 87% (95% CI 78% to 93%) of skin lesions, while female carriers had an estimated 21% (95% CI 13% to 32%) risk of renal tumours, 82% (95% CI 73% to 88%) of lung involvement and 78% (95% CI 67% to 85%) of skin lesions. The cumulative risk of colonic polyps by age 70 years old was 21% (95% CI 8% to 45%) for male carriers and 32% (95% CI 16% to 53%) for female carriers., Conclusions: These updated penetrance estimates, based on a large number of families, are important for the genetic counselling and clinical management of BHD syndrome., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Colorectal cancer incidences in Lynch syndrome: a comparison of results from the prospective lynch syndrome database and the international mismatch repair consortium.
- Author
-
Møller P, Seppälä T, Dowty JG, Haupt S, Dominguez-Valentin M, Sunde L, Bernstein I, Engel C, Aretz S, Nielsen M, Capella G, Evans DG, Burn J, Holinski-Feder E, Bertario L, Bonanni B, Lindblom A, Levi Z, Macrae F, Winship I, Plazzer JP, Sijmons R, Laghi L, Valle AD, Heinimann K, Half E, Lopez-Koestner F, Alvarez-Valenzuela K, Scott RJ, Katz L, Laish I, Vainer E, Vaccaro CA, Carraro DM, Gluck N, Abu-Freha N, Stakelum A, Kennelly R, Winter D, Rossi BM, Greenblatt M, Bohorquez M, Sheth H, Tibiletti MG, Lino-Silva LS, Horisberger K, Portenkirchner C, Nascimento I, Rossi NT, da Silva LA, Thomas H, Zaránd A, Mecklin JP, Pylvänäinen K, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Lepisto A, Peltomäki P, Therkildsen C, Lindberg LJ, Thorlacius-Ussing O, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Loeffler M, Rahner N, Steinke-Lange V, Schmiegel W, Vangala D, Perne C, Hüneburg R, de Vargas AF, Latchford A, Gerdes AM, Backman AS, Guillén-Ponce C, Snyder C, Lautrup CK, Amor D, Palmero E, Stoffel E, Duijkers F, Hall MJ, Hampel H, Williams H, Okkels H, Lubiński J, Reece J, Ngeow J, Guillem JG, Arnold J, Wadt K, Monahan K, Senter L, Rasmussen LJ, van Hest LP, Ricciardiello L, Kohonen-Corish MRJ, Ligtenberg MJL, Southey M, Aronson M, Zahary MN, Samadder NJ, Poplawski N, Hoogerbrugge N, Morrison PJ, James P, Lee G, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Ankathil R, Pai R, Ward R, Parry S, Dębniak T, John T, van Overeem Hansen T, Caldés T, Yamaguchi T, Barca-Tierno V, Garre P, Cavestro GM, Weitz J, Redler S, Büttner R, Heuveline V, Hopper JL, Win AK, Lindor N, Gallinger S, Le Marchand L, Newcomb PA, Figueiredo J, Buchanan DD, Thibodeau SN, Ten Broeke SW, Hovig E, Nakken S, Pineda M, Dueñas N, Brunet J, Green K, Lalloo F, Newton K, Crosbie EJ, Mints M, Tjandra D, Neffa F, Esperon P, Kariv R, Rosner G, Pavicic WH, Kalfayan P, Torrezan GT, Bassaneze T, Martin C, Moslein G, Ahadova A, Kloor M, Sampson JR, and Jenkins MA
- Abstract
Objective: To compare colorectal cancer (CRC) incidences in carriers of pathogenic variants of the MMR genes in the PLSD and IMRC cohorts, of which only the former included mandatory colonoscopy surveillance for all participants., Methods: CRC incidences were calculated in an intervention group comprising a cohort of confirmed carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (path_MMR) followed prospectively by the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD). All had colonoscopy surveillance, with polypectomy when polyps were identified. Comparison was made with a retrospective cohort reported by the International Mismatch Repair Consortium (IMRC). This comprised confirmed and inferred path_MMR carriers who were first- or second-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands., Results: In the PLSD, 8,153 subjects had follow-up colonoscopy surveillance for a total of 67,604 years and 578 carriers had CRC diagnosed. Average cumulative incidences of CRC in path_MLH1 carriers at 70 years of age were 52% in males and 41% in females; for path_MSH2 50% and 39%; for path_MSH6 13% and 17% and for path_PMS2 11% and 8%. In contrast, in the IMRC cohort, corresponding cumulative incidences were 40% and 27%; 34% and 23%; 16% and 8% and 7% and 6%. Comparing just the European carriers in the two series gave similar findings. Numbers in the PLSD series did not allow comparisons of carriers from other continents separately. Cumulative incidences at 25 years were < 1% in all retrospective groups., Conclusions: Prospectively observed CRC incidences (PLSD) in path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers undergoing colonoscopy surveillance and polypectomy were higher than in the retrospective (IMRC) series, and were not reduced in path_MSH6 carriers. These findings were the opposite to those expected. CRC point incidence before 50 years of age was reduced in path_PMS2 carriers subjected to colonoscopy, but not significantly so., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Genetic Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
- Author
-
Li S, Nguyen TL, Nguyen-Dumont T, Dowty JG, Dite GS, Ye Z, Trinh HN, Evans CF, Tan M, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Hopper JL, and Southey MC
- Abstract
Cumulus, Altocumulus, and Cirrocumulus are measures of mammographic density defined at increasing pixel brightness thresholds, which, when converted to mammogram risk scores (MRSs), predict breast cancer risk. Twin and family studies suggest substantial variance in the MRSs could be explained by genetic factors. For 2559 women aged 30 to 80 years (mean 54 years), we measured the MRSs from digitized film mammograms and estimated the associations of the MRSs with a 313-SNP breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) and 202 individual SNPs associated with breast cancer risk. The PRS was weakly positively correlated (correlation coefficients ranged 0.05−0.08; all p < 0.04) with all the MRSs except the Cumulus-white MRS based on the “white but not bright area” (correlation coefficient = 0.04; p = 0.06). After adjusting for its association with the Altocumulus MRS, the PRS was not associated with the Cumulus MRS. There were MRS associations (Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.04) with one SNP in the ATXN1 gene and nominally with some ESR1 SNPs. Less than 1% of the variance of the MRSs is explained by the genetic markers currently known to be associated with breast cancer risk. Discovering the genetic determinants of the bright, not white, regions of the mammogram could reveal substantial new genetic causes of breast cancer.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Population-based estimates of age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for pathogenic variants in ATM.
- Author
-
Renault AL, Dowty JG, Steen JA, Li S, Winship IM, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC, and Nguyen-Dumont T
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Aged, 80 and over, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins genetics, Australia epidemiology, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Tumor Suppressor Proteins genetics, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Breast Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: Multigene panel tests for breast cancer predisposition routinely include ATM as it is now a well-established breast cancer predisposition gene., Methods: We included ATM in a multigene panel test applied to the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry (ABCFR), a population-based case-control-family study of breast cancer, with the purpose of estimating the prevalence and penetrance of heterozygous ATM pathogenic variants from the family data, using segregation analysis., Results: The estimated breast cancer hazard ratio for carriers of pathogenic ATM variants in the ABCFR was 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.45-3.87; P = 0.6). The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 80 years for heterozygous ATM pathogenic variant carriers was estimated to be 13% (95% CI 4.6-30)., Conclusions: Although ATM has been definitively identified as a breast cancer predisposition gene, further evidence, such as variant-specific penetrance estimates, are needed to inform risk management strategies for carriers of pathogenic variants to increase the clinical utility of population testing of this gene., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Association between maternal adversity, DNA methylation, and cardiovascular health of offspring: a longitudinal analysis of the ALSPAC cohort study.
- Author
-
Hyde NK, Dowty JG, Scovelle A, Armstrong G, Sutherland G, Olive L, Lycett K, and O'Neil A
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Blood Pressure, Child, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pregnancy, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, DNA Methylation
- Abstract
Objectives: Maternal adversity during pregnancy has been shown to be associated with some health outcomes in the offspring. This study investigated the association of maternal adversity during pregnancy and DNA methylation with offspring cardiovascular (CV) health., Design: Longitudinal observational cohort study SETTING: All pregnant residents in county Avon (∼0.9 million), UK, were eligible to participate if their estimated delivery date was between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992., Participants: Mother-offspring pairs enrolled in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort at seven (n=7431) and 17 years of age (n=3143)., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Offspring CV health primary measures were heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and secondary measures were pulse-wave velocity and carotid intima-media thickness., Results: Overall, there was no association between maternal adversity scores (number or perceived impact) and primary CV measures (Perceived impact; HR: 0.999-fold change 95% CI 0.998 to 1.001; systolic BP (SBP): 1.000-fold change 95% CI 0.999 to 1.001; diastolic BP: 1.000-fold change 95% CI 0.999 to 1.002). Some small offspring sex effects were observed and there was also a small association between methylation of some CpG sites and offspring BP measures., Conclusions: We found little evidence to support the overall association of maternal adversity during pregnancy and DNA methylation with offspring CV measures. Offspring sex-specific and age-specific associations require further investigation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
- Author
-
Nguyen TL, Li S, Dowty JG, Dite GS, Ye Z, Nguyen-Dumont T, Trinh HN, Evans CF, Tan M, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Southey MC, and Hopper JL
- Abstract
Cumulus , Cumulus-percent , Altocumulus , Cirrocumulus, and Cumulus-white are mammogram risk scores (MRSs) for breast cancer based on mammographic density defined in effect by different levels of pixel brightness and adjusted for age and body mass index. We measured these MRS from digitized film mammograms for 593 monozygotic (MZ) and 326 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs and 1592 of their sisters. We estimated the correlations in relatives ( r ) and the proportion of variance due to genetic factors (heritability) using the software FISHER and predicted the familial risk ratio (FRR) associated with each MRS. The ρ estimates ranged from: 0.41 to 0.60 (standard error [SE] 0.02) for MZ pairs, 0.16 to 0.26 (SE 0.05) for DZ pairs, and 0.19 to 0.29 (SE 0.02) for sister pairs (including pairs of a twin and her non-twin sister), respectively. Heritability estimates were 39% to 69% under the classic twin model and 36% to 56% when allowing for shared non-genetic factors specific to MZ pairs. The FRRs were 1.08 to 1.17. These MRSs are substantially familial, due mostly to genetic factors that explain one-quarter to one-half as much of the familial aggregation of breast cancer that is explained by the current best polygenic risk score.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing.
- Author
-
Southey MC, Dowty JG, Riaz M, Steen JA, Renault AL, Tucker K, Kirk J, James P, Winship I, Pachter N, Poplawski N, Grist S, Park DJ, Pope BJ, Mahmood K, Hammet F, Mahmoodi M, Tsimiklis H, Theys D, Rewse A, Willis A, Morrow A, Speechly C, Harris R, Sebra R, Schadt E, Lacaze P, McNeil JJ, Giles GG, Milne RL, Hopper JL, and Nguyen-Dumont T
- Abstract
Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing are urgently required. Most prior research has been based on women selected for high-risk features and more data is needed to make inference about breast cancer risk for women unselected for family history, an important consideration of population screening. We tested 1464 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 862 age-matched controls participating in the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS), and 6549 healthy, older Australian women enroled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study for rare germline variants using a 24-gene-panel. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age and other potential confounders. We identified pathogenic variants in 11.1% of the ABCFS cases, 3.7% of the ABCFS controls and 2.2% of the ASPREE (control) participants. The estimated breast cancer OR [95% confidence interval] was 5.3 [2.1-16.2] for BRCA1, 4.0 [1.9-9.1] for BRCA2, 3.4 [1.4-8.4] for ATM and 4.3 [1.0-17.0] for PALB2. Our findings provide a population-based perspective to gene-panel testing for breast cancer predisposition and opportunities to improve predictors for identifying women who carry pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes., (© 2021. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Repeatability of methylation measures using a QIAseq targeted methyl panel and comparison with the Illumina HumanMethylation450 assay.
- Author
-
Yu C, Dugué PA, Dowty JG, Hammet F, Joo JE, Wong EM, Hosseinpour M, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Nguyen-Dumont T, MacInnis RJ, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Genomics, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Paraffin Embedding, DNA Methylation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
- Abstract
Objective: In previous studies using Illumina Infinium methylation arrays, we have identified DNA methylation marks associated with cancer predisposition and progression. In the present study, we have sought to find appropriate technology to both technically validate our data and expand our understanding of DNA methylation in these genomic regions. Here, we aimed to assess the repeatability of methylation measures made using QIAseq targeted methyl panel and to compare them with those obtained from the Illumina HumanMethylation450 (HM450K) assay. We included in the analysis high molecular weight DNA extracted from whole blood (WB) and DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE)., Results: The repeatability of QIAseq-methylation measures was assessed at 40 CpGs, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The mean ICCs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.72 (0.62-0.81), 0.59 (0.47-0.71) and 0.80 (0.73-0.88) for WB, FFPE and both sample types combined, respectively. For technical replicates measured using QIAseq and HM450K, the mean ICCs (95% CI) were 0.53 (0.39-0.68), 0.43 (0.31-0.56) and 0.70 (0.59-0.80), respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between QIAseq and HM450K measurements. These results demonstrate that the QIAseq targeted methyl panel produces reliable and reproducible methylation measurements across the 40 CpGs that were examined., (© 2021. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
- Author
-
Nguyen TL, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Maskarinec G, Li S, Dite GS, Aung YK, Evans CF, Trinh HN, Baglietto L, Stone J, Song YM, Sung J, MacInnis RJ, Dugué PA, Dowty JG, Jenkins MA, Milne RL, Southey MC, Giles GG, and Hopper JL
- Subjects
- Case-Control Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Mammography methods
- Abstract
Mammograms contain information that predicts breast cancer risk. We developed two novel mammogram-based breast cancer risk measures based on image brightness (Cirrocumulus) and texture (Cirrus). Their risk prediction when fitted together, and with an established measure of conventional mammographic density (Cumulus), is not known. We used three studies consisting of: 168 interval cases and 498 matched controls; 422 screen-detected cases and 1197 matched controls; and 354 younger-diagnosis cases and 944 controls frequency-matched for age at mammogram. We conducted conditional and unconditional logistic regression analyses of individually- and frequency-matched studies, respectively. We estimated measure-specific risk gradients as the change in odds per standard deviation of controls after adjusting for age and body mass index (OPERA) and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). For interval, screen-detected and younger-diagnosis cancer risks, the best fitting models (OPERAs [95% confidence intervals]) involved: Cumulus (1.81 [1.41-2.31]) and Cirrus (1.72 [1.38-2.14]); Cirrus (1.49 [1.32-1.67]) and Cirrocumulus (1.16 [1.03 to 1.31]); and Cirrus (1.70 [1.48 to 1.94]) and Cirrocumulus (1.46 [1.27-1.68]), respectively. The AUCs were: 0.73 [0.68-0.77], 0.63 [0.60-0.66], and 0.72 [0.69-0.75], respectively. Combined, our new mammogram-based measures have twice the risk gradient for screen-detected and younger-diagnosis breast cancer (P ≤ 10
-12 ), have at least the same discriminatory power as the current polygenic risk score, and are more correlated with causal factors than conventional mammographic density. Discovering more information about breast cancer risk from mammograms could help enable risk-based personalised breast screening., (© 2020 UICC.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Rare Germline Pathogenic Variants Identified by Multigene Panel Testing and the Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Nguyen-Dumont T, Dowty JG, MacInnis RJ, Steen JA, Riaz M, Dugué PA, Renault AL, Hammet F, Mahmoodi M, Theys D, Tsimiklis H, Severi G, Bolton D, Lacaze P, Sebra R, Schadt E, McNeil J, Giles GG, Milne RL, and Southey MC
- Abstract
While gene panel sequencing is becoming widely used for cancer risk prediction, its clinical utility with respect to predicting aggressive prostate cancer (PrCa) is limited by our current understanding of the genetic risk factors associated with predisposition to this potentially lethal disease phenotype. This study included 837 men diagnosed with aggressive PrCa and 7261 controls (unaffected men and men who did not meet criteria for aggressive PrCa). Rare germline pathogenic variants (including likely pathogenic variants) were identified by targeted sequencing of 26 known or putative cancer predisposition genes. We found that 85 (10%) men with aggressive PrCa and 265 (4%) controls carried a pathogenic variant ( p < 0.0001). Aggressive PrCa odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Increased risk of aggressive PrCa (OR (95% confidence interval)) was identified for pathogenic variants in BRCA2 (5.8 (2.7-12.4)), BRCA1 (5.5 (1.8-16.6)), and ATM (3.8 (1.6-9.1)). Our study provides further evidence that rare germline pathogenic variants in these genes are associated with increased risk of this aggressive, clinically relevant subset of PrCa. These rare genetic variants could be incorporated into risk prediction models to improve their precision to identify men at highest risk of aggressive prostate cancer and be used to identify men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who require urgent treatment.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Population-Based Estimates of the Age-Specific Cumulative Risk of Breast Cancer for Pathogenic Variants in CHEK2 : Findings from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry.
- Author
-
Nguyen-Dumont T, Dowty JG, Steen JA, Renault AL, Hammet F, Mahmoodi M, Theys D, Rewse A, Tsimiklis H, Winship IM, Giles GG, Milne RL, Hopper JL, and Southey MC
- Abstract
Case-control studies of breast cancer have consistently shown that pathogenic variants in CHEK2 are associated with about a 3-fold increased risk of breast cancer. Information about the recurrent protein-truncating variant CHEK2 c.1100delC dominates this estimate. There have been no formal estimates of age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for all CHEK2 pathogenic (including likely pathogenic) variants combined. We conducted a population-based case-control-family study of pathogenic CHEK2 variants (26 families, 1071 relatives) and estimated the age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer using segregation analysis. The estimated hazard ratio for carriers of pathogenic CHEK2 variants (combined) was 4.9 (95% CI 2.5-9.5) relative to non-carriers. The HR for carriers of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant was estimated to be 3.5 (95% CI 1.02-11.6) and the HR for carriers of all other CHEK2 variants combined was estimated to be 5.7 (95% CI 2.5-12.9). The age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was estimated to be 18% (95% CI 11-30%) and 33% (95% CI 21-48%) to age 60 and 80 years, respectively. These findings provide important information for the clinical management of breast cancer risk for women carrying pathogenic variants in CHEK2 .
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. VTRNA2-1 : Genetic Variation, Heritable Methylation and Disease Association.
- Author
-
Dugué PA, Yu C, McKay T, Wong EM, Joo JE, Tsimiklis H, Hammet F, Mahmoodi M, Theys D, kConFab, Hopper JL, Giles GG, Milne RL, Steen JA, Dowty JG, Nguyen-Dumont T, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Aged, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Case-Control Studies, CpG Islands genetics, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study methods, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quantitative Trait Loci genetics, DNA Methylation genetics, MicroRNAs genetics, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide genetics
- Abstract
VTRNA2-1 is a metastable epiallele with accumulating evidence that methylation at this region is heritable, modifiable and associated with disease including risk and progression of cancer. This study investigated the influence of genetic variation and other factors such as age and adult lifestyle on blood DNA methylation in this region. We first sequenced the VTRNA2-1 gene region in multiple-case breast cancer families in which VTRNA2-1 methylation was identified as heritable and associated with breast cancer risk. Methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL) were investigated using a prospective cohort study (4500 participants with genotyping and methylation data). The cis -mQTL analysis (334 variants ± 50 kb of the most heritable CpG site) identified 43 variants associated with VTRNA2-1 methylation ( p < 1.5 × 10
-4 ); however, these explained little of the methylation variation (R2 < 0.5% for each of these variants). No genetic variants elsewhere in the genome were found to strongly influence VTRNA2-1 methylation. SNP-based heritability estimates were consistent with the mQTL findings (h2 = 0, 95%CI: -0.14 to 0.14). We found no evidence that age, sex, country of birth, smoking, body mass index, alcohol consumption or diet influenced blood DNA methylation at VTRNA2-1 . Genetic factors and adult lifestyle play a minimal role in explaining methylation variability at the heritable VTRNA2-1 cluster.- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. The Impact of a Comprehensive Risk Prediction Model for Colorectal Cancer on a Population Screening Program.
- Author
-
Saya S, Emery JD, Dowty JG, McIntosh JG, Winship IM, and Jenkins MA
- Abstract
Background: In many countries, population colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is based on age and family history, though more precise risk prediction could better target screening. We examined the impact of a CRC risk prediction model (incorporating age, sex, lifestyle, genomic, and family history factors) to target screening under several feasible screening scenarios., Methods: We estimated the model's predicted CRC risk distribution in the Australian population. Predicted CRC risks were categorized into screening recommendations under 3 proposed scenarios to compare with current recommendations: 1) highly tailored, 2) 3 risk categories, and 3) 4 sex-specific risk categories. Under each scenario, for 35- to 74-year-olds, we calculated the number of CRC screens by immunochemical fecal occult blood testing (iFOBT) and colonoscopy and the proportion of predicted CRCs over 10 years in each screening group., Results: Currently, 1.1% of 35- to 74-year-olds are recommended screening colonoscopy and 56.2% iFOBT, and 5.7% and 83.2% of CRCs over 10 years were predicted to occur in these groups, respectively. For the scenarios, 1) colonoscopy was recommended to 8.1% and iFOBT to 37.5%, with 36.1% and 50.1% of CRCs in each group; 2) colonoscopy was recommended to 2.4% and iFOBT to 56.0%, with 13.2% and 76.9% of cancers in each group; and 3) colonoscopy was recommended to 5.0% and iFOBT to 54.2%, with 24.5% and 66.5% of cancers in each group., Conclusions: A highly tailored CRC screening scenario results in many fewer screens but more cancers in those unscreened. Category-based scenarios may provide a good balance between number of screens and cancers detected and are simpler to implement., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Do the risks of Lynch syndrome-related cancers depend on the parent of origin of the mutation?
- Author
-
Gemechu SD, van Vliet CM, Win AK, Figueiredo JC, Le Marchand L, Gallinger S, Newcomb PA, Hopper JL, Lindor NM, Jenkins MA, and Dowty JG
- Subjects
- Adult, Alleles, Colonic Neoplasms genetics, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, DNA-Binding Proteins genetics, Endometrial Neoplasms genetics, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 genetics, MutL Protein Homolog 1 genetics, MutS Homolog 2 Protein genetics, Pedigree, Proportional Hazards Models, Registries statistics & numerical data, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis genetics, DNA Mismatch Repair, Genetic Carrier Screening methods, Mutation, Parents, Sex Factors
- Abstract
Individuals who carry pathogenic mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes have high risks of cancer, and small studies have suggested that these risks depend on the sex of the parent from whom the mutation was inherited. We have conducted the first large study of such a parent-of-origin effect (POE). Our study was based on all MMR gene mutation carriers and their relatives in the Colon Cancer Family Registry, comprising 18,226 people. The POE was estimated as a hazard ratio (HR) using a segregation analysis approach that adjusted for ascertainment. HR = 1 corresponds to no POE and HR > 1 corresponds to higher risks for maternal mutations. For all MMR genes combined, the estimated POE HRs were 1.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.39, p = 0.9) for male colorectal cancer, 1.12 (95% CI 0.81-1.54, p = 0.5) for female colorectal cancer and 0.84 (95% CI 0.52-1.36, p = 0.5) for endometrial cancer. Separate results for each MMR gene were similar. Therefore, despite being well-powered, our study did not find any evidence that cancer risks for MMR gene mutation carriers depend on the parent-of-origin of the mutation. Based on current evidence, we do not recommend that POEs be incorporated into the clinical guidelines or advice for such carriers.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. A New Comprehensive Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Family History, Personal Characteristics, and Environmental Factors.
- Author
-
Zheng Y, Hua X, Win AK, MacInnis RJ, Gallinger S, Marchand LL, Lindor NM, Baron JA, Hopper JL, Dowty JG, Antoniou AC, Zheng J, Jenkins MA, and Newcomb PA
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, DNA Mismatch Repair genetics, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, ROC Curve, Registries statistics & numerical data, Risk Assessment methods, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Colorectal Neoplasms epidemiology, Medical History Taking
- Abstract
Purpose: Reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality through early detection would improve efficacy if targeted. We developed a colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating personal, family, genetic, and environmental risk factors to enhance prevention., Methods: A familial risk profile (FRP) was calculated to summarize individuals' risk based on detailed cancer family history (FH), family structure, probabilities of mutation in major colorectal cancer susceptibility genes, and a polygenic component. We developed risk models, including individuals' FRP or binary colorectal cancer FH, and colorectal cancer risk factors collected at enrollment using population-based colorectal cancer cases ( N = 4,445) and controls ( N = 3,967) recruited by the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC). Model validation used CCFRC follow-up data for population-based ( N = 12,052) and clinic-based ( N = 5,584) relatives with no cancer history at recruitment to assess model calibration [expected/observed rate ratio (E/O)] and discrimination [area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC)]., Results: The E/O [95% confidence interval (CI)] for FRP models for population-based relatives were 1.04 (0.74-1.45) for men and 0.86 (0.64-1.20) for women, and for clinic-based relatives were 1.15 (0.87-1.58) for men and 1.04 (0.76-1.45) for women. The age-adjusted AUCs (95% CI) for FRP models for population-based relatives were 0.69 (0.60-0.78) for men and 0.70 (0.62-0.77) for women, and for clinic-based relatives were 0.77 (0.69-0.84) for men and 0.68 (0.60-0.76) for women. The incremental values of AUC for FRP over FH models for population-based relatives were 0.08 (0.01-0.15) for men and 0.10 (0.04-0.16) for women, and for clinic-based relatives were 0.11 (0.05-0.17) for men and 0.11 (0.06-0.17) for women., Conclusions: Both models calibrated well. The FRP-based model provided better risk stratification and risk discrimination than the FH-based model., Impact: Our findings suggest detailed FH may be useful for targeted risk-based screening and clinical management., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Going Beyond Conventional Mammographic Density to Discover Novel Mammogram-Based Predictors of Breast Cancer Risk.
- Author
-
Hopper JL, Nguyen TL, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Song YM, Sung J, Dite GS, Dowty JG, and Li S
- Abstract
This commentary is about predicting a woman's breast cancer risk from her mammogram, building on the work of Wolfe, Boyd and Yaffe on mammographic density. We summarise our efforts at finding new mammogram-based risk predictors, and how they combine with the conventional mammographic density, in predicting risk for interval cancers and screen-detected breast cancers across different ages at diagnosis and for both Caucasian and Asian women. Using the OPERA (odds ratio per adjusted standard deviation) concept, in which the risk gradient is measured on an appropriate scale that takes into account other factors adjusted for by design or analysis, we show that our new mammogram-based measures are the strongest of all currently known breast cancer risk factors in terms of risk discrimination on a population-basis. We summarise our findings graphically using a path diagram in which conventional mammographic density predicts interval cancer due to its role in masking, while the new mammogram-based risk measures could have a causal effect on both interval and screen-detected breast cancer. We discuss attempts by others to pursue this line of investigation, the measurement challenge that allows different measures to be compared in an open and transparent manner on the same datasets, as well as the biological and public health consequences.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. A Genomic Test for Colorectal Cancer Risk: Is This Acceptable and Feasible in Primary Care?
- Author
-
Saya S, McIntosh JG, Winship IM, Clendenning M, Milton S, Oberoi J, Dowty JG, Buchanan DD, Jenkins MA, and Emery JD
- Subjects
- Aged, Attitude to Health, Australia epidemiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psycho-Oncology, Social Perception, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, Colorectal Neoplasms psychology, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Early Detection of Cancer psychology, Genetic Testing methods, Primary Health Care methods, Primary Health Care organization & administration, Risk Assessment methods
- Abstract
Introduction: Genomic tests can predict risk and tailor screening recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC). Primary care could be suitable for their widespread implementation., Objective: We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of administering a CRC genomic test in primary care., Methods: Participants aged 45-74 years recruited from 4 Australian general practices were offered a genomic CRC risk test. Participants received brief verbal information about the test comprising 45 CRC-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms, before choosing whether to undertake the test. Personalized risks were given to testers. Uptake and knowledge of the genomic test, cancer-specific anxiety (Cancer Worry Scale), psychosocial impact (Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment [MICRA] score), and impact on CRC screening behaviour within 6 months were measured., Results: In 150 participants, test uptake was high (126, 84%), with 125 (83%) having good knowledge of the genomic test. Moderate risk participants were impacted more by the test (MICRA mean: 15.9) than average risk participants (mean: 9.5, difference in means: 6.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5, 11.2, p = 0.01), but all scores were low. Average risk participants' cancer-specific anxiety decreased (mean differences from baseline: 1 month -0.5, 95% CI: -1.0, -0.1, p = 0.03; 6 months -0.6, 95% CI: -1.0, -0.2, p = 0.01). We found limited evidence for genomic testers being more likely to complete the risk-appropriate CRC screening than non-testers (41 vs. 17%, odds ratio = 3.4, 95% CI: 0.6, 34.8, p = 0.19), but some mediators of screening behaviour were altered in genomic testers., Conclusions: Genomic testing for CRC risk in primary care is acceptable and likely feasible. Further development of the risk assessment intervention could strengthen the impact on screening behaviour., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Mortality after breast cancer as a function of time since diagnosis by estrogen receptor status and age at diagnosis.
- Author
-
Jayasekara H, MacInnis RJ, Chamberlain JA, Dite GS, Leoce NM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe A, Win AK, Milne RL, Giles GG, Terry MB, Eccles DM, Southey MC, and Hopper JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Australia, Breast metabolism, Breast pathology, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Case-Control Studies, Female, Humans, Lymph Nodes pathology, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Grading, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Breast Neoplasms mortality, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Receptors, Estrogen metabolism
- Abstract
Our aim was to estimate how long-term mortality following breast cancer diagnosis depends on age at diagnosis, tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, and the time already survived. We used the population-based Australian Breast Cancer Family Study which followed-up 1,196 women enrolled during 1992-1999 when aged <60 years at diagnosis with a first primary invasive breast cancer, over-sampled for younger ages at diagnosis, for whom tumor pathology features and ER status were measured. There were 375 deaths (median follow-up = 15.7; range = 0.8-21.4, years). We estimated the mortality hazard as a function of time since diagnosis using a flexible parametric survival analysis with ER status a time-dependent covariate. For women with ER-negative tumors compared with those with ER-positive tumors, 5-year mortality was initially higher (p < 0.001), similar if they survived to 5 years (p = 0.4), and lower if they survived to 10 years (p = 0.02). The estimated mortality hazard for ER-negative disease peaked at ~3 years post-diagnosis, thereafter declined with time, and at 7 years post-diagnosis became lower than that for ER-positive disease. This pattern was more pronounced for women diagnosed at younger ages. Mortality was also associated with lymph node count (hazard ratio (HR) per 10 nodes = 2.52 [95% CI:2.11-3.01]) and tumor grade (HR per grade = 1.62 [95% CI:1.34-1.96]). The risk of death following a breast cancer diagnosis differs substantially and qualitatively with diagnosis age, ER status and time survived. For women who survive >7 years, those with ER-negative disease will on average live longer, and more so if younger at diagnosis., (© 2019 UICC.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Ability of known susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk for persons with and without a family history.
- Author
-
Jenkins MA, Win AK, Dowty JG, MacInnis RJ, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Dite GS, Kapuscinski M, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Winship IM, Emery JD, Saya S, Macrae FA, Ahnen DJ, Duggan D, Figueiredo JC, Lindor NM, Haile RW, Potter JD, Cotterchio M, Gallinger S, Newcomb PA, Buchanan DD, Casey G, and Hopper JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Case-Control Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms prevention & control, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Abstract
Before SNP-based risk can be incorporated in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, the ability of these SNPs to estimate CRC risk for persons with and without a family history of CRC, and the screening implications need to be determined. We estimated the association with CRC of a 45 SNP-based risk using 1181 cases and 999 controls, and its correlation with CRC risk predicted from detailed family history. We estimated the predicted change in the distribution across predefined risk categories, and implications for recommended screening commencement age, from adding SNP-based risk to family history. The inter-quintile risk ratio for colorectal cancer risk of the SNP-based risk was 3.28 (95% CI 2.54-4.22). SNP-based and family history-based risks were not correlated (r = 0.02). For persons with no first-degree relatives with CRC, screening could commence 4 years earlier for women (5 years for men) in the highest quintile of SNP-based risk. For persons with two first-degree relatives with CRC, screening could commence 16 years earlier for men and women in the highest quintile, and 7 years earlier for the lowest quintile. This 45 SNP panel in conjunction with family history, can identify people who could benefit from earlier screening. Risk reclassification by 45 SNPs could inform targeted screening for CRC prevention, particularly in clinical genetics settings when mutations in high-risk genes cannot be identified. Yet to be determined is cost-effectiveness, resources requirements, community, patient and clinician acceptance, and feasibility with potentially ethical, legal and insurance implications.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Cirrus: An Automated Mammography-Based Measure of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Textural Features.
- Author
-
Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Goudey B, Dite GS, Stone J, Nguyen TL, Dowty JG, Baglietto L, Southey MC, Maskarinec G, Giles GG, and Hopper JL
- Abstract
Background: We applied machine learning to find a novel breast cancer predictor based on information in a mammogram., Methods: Using image-processing techniques, we automatically processed 46 158 analog mammograms for 1345 cases and 4235 controls from a cohort and case-control study of Australian women, and a cohort study of Japanese American women, extracting 20 textural features not based on pixel brightness threshold. We used Bayesian lasso regression to create individual- and mammogram-specific measures of breast cancer risk, Cirrus. We trained and tested measures across studies. We fitted Cirrus with conventional mammographic density measures using logistic regression, and computed odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation adjusted for age and body mass index., Results: Combining studies, almost all textural features were associated with case-control status. The ORs for Cirrus measures trained on one study and tested on another study ranged from 1.56 to 1.78 (all P < 10
-6 ). For the Cirrus measure derived from combining studies, the OR was 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73 to 2.09), equivalent to a fourfold interquartile risk ratio, and was little attenuated after adjusting for conventional measures. In contrast, the OR for the conventional measure was 1.34 (95% CI = 1.25 to 1.43), and after adjusting for Cirrus it became 1.16 (95% CI = 1.08 to 1.24; P = 4 × 10-5 )., Conclusions: A fully automated personal risk measure created from combining textural image features performs better at predicting breast cancer risk than conventional mammographic density risk measures, capturing half the risk-predicting ability of the latter measures. In terms of differentiating affected and unaffected women on a population basis, Cirrus could be one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer.- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Heritable methylation marks associated with breast and prostate cancer risk.
- Author
-
Dugué PA, Dowty JG, Joo JE, Wong EM, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, English DR, Hopper JL, Pedersen J, Severi G, MacInnis RJ, Milne RL, Giles GG, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Adenocarcinoma metabolism, Adenocarcinoma pathology, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Factual, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Grading, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Adenocarcinoma genetics, Breast Neoplasms genetics, DNA Methylation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: DNA methylation can mimic the effects of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. Recently, we identified twenty-four heritable methylation marks associated with breast cancer risk. As breast and prostate cancer share genetic risk factors, including rare, high-risk mutations (eg, in BRCA2), we hypothesized that some of these heritable methylation marks might also be associated with the risk of prostate cancer., Methods: We studied 869 incident prostate cancers (430 aggressive and 439 non-aggressive) and 869 matched controls nested within a prospective cohort study. DNA methylation was measured in pre-diagnostic blood samples using the Illumina Infinium HM450K BeadChip. Conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for prostate cancer risk factors and blood cell composition, were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between the 24 methylation marks and the risk of prostate cancer., Results: Five methylation marks within the VTRNA2-1 promoter region (cg06536614, cg00124993, cg26328633, cg25340688, and cg26896946), and one in the body of CLGN (cg22901919) were associated with the risk of prostate cancer. In stratified analyses, the five VTRNA2-1 marks were associated with the risk of aggressive prostate cancer., Conclusions: This work highlights a potentially important new area of investigation for prostate cancer susceptibility and adds to our knowledge about shared risk factors for breast and prostate cancer., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Walker JG, Macrae F, Winship I, Oberoi J, Saya S, Milton S, Bickerstaffe A, Dowty JG, De Abreu Lourenço R, Clark M, Galloway L, Fishman G, Walter FM, Flander L, Chondros P, Ait Ouakrim D, Pirotta M, Trevena L, Jenkins MA, and Emery JD
- Subjects
- Aged, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Victoria, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Decision Support Techniques, Early Detection of Cancer methods, General Practice, Primary Health Care
- Abstract
Background: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer, and over-referral of individuals at average risk for colonoscopy. Our pre-trial research has developed a novel Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) tool, which could be used to implement precision screening in primary care. This paper describes the protocol for a phase II multi-site individually randomised controlled trial of the CRISP tool in primary care., Methods: This trial aims to test whether a standardised consultation using the CRISP tool in general practice (the CRISP intervention) increases risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening compared to control participants who receive standardised information on cancer prevention. Patients between 50 and 74 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner for any reason, will be invited into the trial. A total of 732 participants will be randomised to intervention or control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice. The primary outcome (risk-appropriate screening at 12 months) will be measured using baseline data for colorectal cancer risk and objective health service data to measure screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes will include participant cancer risk perception, anxiety, cancer worry, screening intentions and health service utilisation measured at 1, 6 and 12 months post randomisation., Discussion: This trial tests a systematic approach to implementing risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening in primary care, based on an individual's absolute risk, using a state-of-the-art risk assessment tool. Trial results will be reported in 2020., Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12616001573448p . Registered on 14 November 2016.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Heritable DNA methylation marks associated with susceptibility to breast cancer.
- Author
-
Joo JE, Dowty JG, Milne RL, Wong EM, Dugué PA, English D, Hopper JL, Goldgar DE, Giles GG, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Australia, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, CpG Islands, Epigenesis, Genetic, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Breast Neoplasms genetics, DNA Methylation
- Abstract
Mendelian-like inheritance of germline DNA methylation in cancer susceptibility genes has been previously reported. We aimed to scan the genome for heritable methylation marks associated with breast cancer susceptibility by studying 25 Australian multiple-case breast cancer families. Here we report genome-wide DNA methylation measured in 210 peripheral blood DNA samples provided by family members using the Infinium HumanMethylation450. We develop and apply a new statistical method to identify heritable methylation marks based on complex segregation analysis. We estimate carrier probabilities for the 1000 most heritable methylation marks based on family structure, and we use Cox proportional hazards survival analysis to identify 24 methylation marks with corresponding carrier probabilities significantly associated with breast cancer. We replicate an association with breast cancer risk for four of the 24 marks using an independent nested case-control study. Here, we report a novel approach for identifying heritable DNA methylation marks associated with breast cancer risk.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Reproductive factors as risk modifiers of breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and high-risk non-carriers.
- Author
-
Park B, Hopper JL, Win AK, Dowty JG, Sung HK, Ahn C, Kim SW, Lee MH, Lee J, Lee JW, Kang E, Yu JH, Kim KS, Moon BI, Han W, Noh DY, and Park SK
- Abstract
This study was conducted to identify the role of reproductive factors as environmental modifiers for breast cancer (BC) risk in clinic-based, East-Asian BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers with high-risk criteria of BRCA mutations (family history (FH) of BC, early-onset BC (aged ≤40 years)). A total of 581 women who were BRCA carriers (222 BRCA1 and 359 BRCA2 ), 1,083 non-carriers with FH, and 886 non-carriers with early-onset BC were enrolled and interviewed to examine the reproductive factors, from 2007 to 2014. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) in the weighted Cox regression model were used to calculate the BC risk based on the reproductive factors. Earlier menarche increased BC risk by 3.49-fold in BRCA2 mutation carriers (95%CI=2.03-6.00) and 3.30-fold in non-carriers with FH (95%CI=1.73-6.34), but was insignificantly associated with BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers for early-onset BC (P-heterogeneity=0.047). Higher parity decreased BC risk in BRCA carriers and non-carriers with FH, especially in BRCA1 carriers (HR=0.27, 95% CI=0.09-0.83 for two parity; and HR=0.23, 95%CI=0.05-1.00 for ≥3 parity), but increased the early-onset BC risk (HR=4.63, 95%CI=2.56-8.51 for >3 parity, p-heterogeneity=0.045). Oral contraceptive (OC) use and longer estrogen exposure periods (≥30 years) were associated with an increased risk of early-onset BC (HR=3.99, 95%CI=1.65-9.67; HR=7.69, 95%CI=1.96-25.01), while OC use was not associated with BC risk in other groups and longer estrogen exposure had rather decreased risk for BC risk (both p-heterogeneity<0.001). Several reproductive factors as risk modifiers could heterogeneously be associated with BC among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, non-carriers with FH, and early-onset BC non-carriers., Competing Interests: COMPETING INTERESTS The authors state that they have no competing interests.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Genome-Wide Measures of Peripheral Blood Dna Methylation and Prostate Cancer Risk in a Prospective Nested Case-Control Study.
- Author
-
FitzGerald LM, Naeem H, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Dowty JG, Joo JE, Jung CH, Bassett JK, Dugue PA, Chung J, Lonie A, Milne RL, Wong EM, Hopper JL, English DR, Severi G, Baglietto L, Pedersen J, Giles GG, and Southey MC
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnosis, Risk Factors, CpG Islands physiology, DNA Methylation physiology, Genome-Wide Association Study methods, Prostatic Neoplasms blood, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: Global measures of peripheral blood DNA methylation have been associated with risk of some malignancies, including breast, bladder, and gastric cancer. Here, we examined genome-wide measures of peripheral blood DNA methylation in prostate cancer and its non-aggressive and aggressive disease forms., Methods: We used a matched, case-control study of 687 incident prostate cancer samples, nested within a larger prospective cohort study. DNA methylation was measured in pre-diagnostic, peripheral blood samples using the Illumina Infinium HM450K BeadChip. Genome-wide measures of DNA methylation were computed as the median M-value of all CpG sites and according to CpG site location and regulatory function. We used conditional logistic regression to test for associations between genome-wide measures of DNA methylation and risk of prostate cancer and its subtypes, and by time between blood draw and diagnosis., Results: We observed no associations between the genome-wide measure of DNA methylation based on all CpG sites and risk of prostate cancer or aggressive disease. Risk of non-aggressive disease was associated with higher methylation of CpG islands (OR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.68-0.94), promoter regions (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66-0.93), and high density CpG regions (OR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.68-0.94). Additionally, higher methylation of all CpGs (OR = 0.66; 95%CI = 0.48-0.89), CpG shores (OR = 0.62; 95%CI = 0.45-0.84), and regulatory regions (OR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.51-0.91) was associated with a reduced risk of overall prostate cancer within 5 years of blood draw but not thereafter., Conclusions: A reduced risk of overall prostate cancer within 5 years of blood draw and non-aggressive prostate cancer was associated with higher genome-wide methylation of peripheral blood DNA. While these data have no immediate clinical utility, with further work they may provide insight into the early events of prostate carcinogenesis. Prostate 77:471-478, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Cohort Profile: The Tasmanian Longitudinal Health STUDY (TAHS).
- Author
-
Matheson MC, Abramson MJ, Allen K, Benke G, Burgess JA, Dowty JG, Erbas B, Feather IH, Frith PA, Giles GG, Gurrin LC, Hamilton GS, Hopper JL, James AL, Jenkins MA, Johns DP, Lodge CJ, Lowe AJ, Markos J, Morrison SC, Perret JL, Southey MC, Thomas PS, Thompson BR, Wood-Baker R, Haydn Walters E, and Dharmage SC
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Child, Eczema epidemiology, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Rhinitis epidemiology, Tasmania epidemiology, Young Adult, Asthma epidemiology, Health Surveys statistics & numerical data, Health Surveys trends
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
- Author
-
Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF, Dite GS, Stone J, MacInnis RJ, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe A, Aujard K, Rommens JM, Song YM, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Southey MC, Giles GG, Apicella C, and Hopper JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Australia, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Early Detection of Cancer, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Registries, Risk Factors, Software, Breast diagnostic imaging, Breast Density, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Mammography
- Abstract
Background: Mammographic density defined by the conventional pixel brightness threshold, and adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI), is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. We asked if higher thresholds better separate women with and without breast cancer., Methods: We studied Australian women, 354 with breast cancer over-sampled for early-onset and family history, and 944 unaffected controls frequency-matched for age at mammogram. We measured mammographic dense area and percent density using the CUMULUS software at the conventional threshold, which we call Cumulus , and at two increasingly higher thresholds, which we call Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus , respectively. All measures were Box-Cox transformed and adjusted for age and BMI. We estimated the odds per adjusted standard deviation (OPERA) using logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)., Results: Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus were correlated with Cumulus (r ∼ 0.8 and 0.6 , respectively) . For dense area, the OPERA was 1.62, 1.74 and 1.73 for Cumulus, Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus , respectively (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus , Cumulus was not significant ( P > 0.6). The OPERAs for percent density were less but gave similar findings. The mean of the standardized adjusted Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus dense area measures was the best predictor; OPERA = 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-2.14] and AUC = 0.68 (0.65-0.71)., Conclusions: The areas of higher mammographically dense regions are associated with almost 30% stronger breast cancer risk gradient, explain the risk association of the conventional measure and might be more aetiologically important. This has substantial implications for clinical translation and molecular, genetic and epidemiological research., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Testing for Gene-Environment Interactions Using a Prospective Family Cohort Design: Body Mass Index in Early and Later Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bickerstaffe A, Dowty JG, Milne RL, Antoniou AC, Weideman P, Apicella C, Giles GG, Southey MC, Jenkins MA, Phillips KA, Win AK, Terry MB, and Hopper JL
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Australia epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms etiology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, New Zealand epidemiology, Proportional Hazards Models, Prospective Studies, Risk Assessment methods, Young Adult, Body Mass Index, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Family Health statistics & numerical data, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Reproductive History
- Abstract
The ability to classify people according to their underlying genetic susceptibility to a disease is increasing with new knowledge, better family data, and more sophisticated risk prediction models, allowing for more effective prevention and screening. To do so, however, we need to know whether risk associations are the same for people with different genetic susceptibilities. To illustrate one way to estimate such gene-environment interactions, we used prospective data from 3 Australian family cancer cohort studies, 2 enriched for familial risk of breast cancer. There were 288 incident breast cancers in 9,126 participants from 3,222 families. We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate whether associations of breast cancer with body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) at age 18-21 years, BMI at baseline, and change in BMI differed according to genetic risk based on lifetime breast cancer risk from birth, as estimated by BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) software, adjusted for age at baseline data collection. Although no interactions were statistically significant, we have demonstrated the power with which gene-environment interactions can be investigated using a cohort enriched for persons with increased genetic risk and a continuous measure of genetic risk based on family history., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Prevalence and Penetrance of Major Genes and Polygenes for Colorectal Cancer.
- Author
-
Win AK, Jenkins MA, Dowty JG, Antoniou AC, Lee A, Giles GG, Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Ahnen DJ, Thibodeau SN, Casey G, Gallinger S, Le Marchand L, Haile RW, Potter JD, Zheng Y, Lindor NM, Newcomb PA, Hopper JL, and MacInnis RJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, MutL Protein Homolog 1 genetics, Mutation, Population Surveillance, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms epidemiology, DNA Glycosylases genetics, DNA Mismatch Repair, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Penetrance
- Abstract
Background: Although high-risk mutations in identified major susceptibility genes (DNA mismatch repair genes and MUTYH ) account for some familial aggregation of colorectal cancer, their population prevalence and the causes of the remaining familial aggregation are not known. Methods: We studied the families of 5,744 colorectal cancer cases (probands) recruited from population cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia and screened probands for mutations in mismatch repair genes and MUTYH We conducted modified segregation analyses using the cancer history of first-degree relatives, conditional on the proband's age at diagnosis. We estimated the prevalence of mutations in the identified genes, the prevalence of HR for unidentified major gene mutations, and the variance of the residual polygenic component. Results: We estimated that 1 in 279 of the population carry mutations in mismatch repair genes ( MLH1 = 1 in 1,946, MSH2 = 1 in 2,841, MSH6 = 1 in 758, PMS2 = 1 in 714), 1 in 45 carry mutations in MUTYH , and 1 in 504 carry mutations associated with an average 31-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer in unidentified major genes. The estimated polygenic variance was reduced by 30% to 50% after allowing for unidentified major genes and decreased from 3.3 for age <40 years to 0.5 for age ≥70 years (equivalent to sibling relative risks of 5.1 to 1.3, respectively). Conclusions: Unidentified major genes might explain one third to one half of the missing heritability of colorectal cancer. Impact: Our findings could aid gene discovery and development of better colorectal cancer risk prediction models. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 404-12. ©2016 AACR ., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. The CRISP colorectal cancer risk prediction tool: an exploratory study using simulated consultations in Australian primary care.
- Author
-
Walker JG, Bickerstaffe A, Hewabandu N, Maddumarachchi S, Dowty JG, Jenkins M, Pirotta M, Walter FM, and Emery JD
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Australia, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Computer Simulation, Female, General Practitioners, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted methods, Medical Informatics Applications, Primary Health Care methods, Risk Assessment methods
- Abstract
Background: In Australia, screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with colonoscopy is meant to be reserved for people at increased risk, however, currently there is a mismatch between individuals' risk of CRC and the type of CRC screening they receive. This paper describes the development and optimisation of a Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction tool ('CRISP') for use in primary care. The aim of the CRISP tool is to increase risk-appropriate CRC screening., Methods: CRISP development was informed by previous experience with developing risk tools for use in primary care and a systematic review of the evidence. A CRISP prototype was used in simulated consultations by general practitioners (GPs) with actors as patients. GPs were interviewed to explore their experience of using CRISP, and practice nurses (PNs) and practice managers (PMs) were interviewed after a demonstration of CRISP. Transcribed interviews and video footage of the 'consultations' were qualitatively analyzed. Themes arising from the data were mapped onto Normalization Process Theory (NPT)., Results: Fourteen GPs, nine PNs and six PMs were recruited from 12 clinics. Results were described using the four constructs of NPT: 1) Coherence: Clinicians understood the rationale behind CRISP, particularly since they were familiar with using risk tools for other conditions; 2) Cognitive participation: GPs welcomed the opportunity CRISP provided to discuss healthy and unhealthy behaviors with their patients, but many GPs challenged the screening recommendation generated by CRISP; 3) Collective Action: CRISP disrupted clinician-patient flow if the GP was less comfortable with computers. GP consultation time was a major implementation barrier and overall consensus was that PNs have more capacity and time to use CRISP effectively; 4) Reflexive monitoring: Limited systematic monitoring of new interventions is a potential barrier to the sustainable embedding of CRISP., Conclusions: CRISP has the potential to improve risk-appropriate CRC screening in primary care but was considered more likely to be successfully implemented as a nurse-led intervention.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS.
- Author
-
Southey MC, Goldgar DE, Winqvist R, Pylkäs K, Couch F, Tischkowitz M, Foulkes WD, Dennis J, Michailidou K, van Rensburg EJ, Heikkinen T, Nevanlinna H, Hopper JL, Dörk T, Claes KB, Reis-Filho J, Teo ZL, Radice P, Catucci I, Peterlongo P, Tsimiklis H, Odefrey FA, Dowty JG, Schmidt MK, Broeks A, Hogervorst FB, Verhoef S, Carpenter J, Clarke C, Scott RJ, Fasching PA, Haeberle L, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Peto J, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Fletcher O, Johnson N, Bolla MK, Sawyer EJ, Tomlinson I, Kerin MJ, Miller N, Marme F, Burwinkel B, Yang R, Guénel P, Truong T, Menegaux F, Sanchez M, Bojesen S, Nielsen SF, Flyger H, Benitez J, Zamora MP, Perez JI, Menéndez P, Anton-Culver H, Neuhausen S, Ziogas A, Clarke CA, Brenner H, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Brauch H, Brüning T, Ko YD, Muranen TA, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Bogdanova NV, Antonenkova NN, Lindblom A, Margolin S, Mannermaa A, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Hartikainen JM, Spurdle AB, Investigators K, Wauters E, Smeets D, Beuselinck B, Floris G, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Seibold P, Flesch-Janys D, Olson JE, Vachon C, Pankratz VS, McLean C, Haiman CA, Henderson BE, Schumacher F, Le Marchand L, Kristensen V, Alnæs GG, Zheng W, Hunter DJ, Lindstrom S, Hankinson SE, Kraft P, Andrulis I, Knight JA, Glendon G, Mulligan AM, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Grip M, Kauppila S, Devilee P, Tollenaar RA, Seynaeve C, Hollestelle A, Garcia-Closas M, Figueroa J, Chanock SJ, Lissowska J, Czene K, Darabi H, Eriksson M, Eccles DM, Rafiq S, Tapper WJ, Gerty SM, Hooning MJ, Martens JW, Collée JM, Tilanus-Linthorst M, Hall P, Li J, Brand JS, Humphreys K, Cox A, Reed MW, Luccarini C, Baynes C, Dunning AM, Hamann U, Torres D, Ulmer HU, Rüdiger T, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Jaworska K, Durda K, Slager S, Toland AE, Ambrosone CB, Yannoukakos D, Swerdlow A, Ashworth A, Orr N, Jones M, González-Neira A, Pita G, Alonso MR, Álvarez N, Herrero D, Tessier DC, Vincent D, Bacot F, Simard J, Dumont M, Soucy P, Eeles R, Muir K, Wiklund F, Gronberg H, Schleutker J, Nordestgaard BG, Weischer M, Travis RC, Neal D, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Khaw KT, Stanford JL, Blot WJ, Thibodeau S, Schaid DJ, Kelley JL, Maier C, Kibel AS, Cybulski C, Cannon-Albright L, Butterbach K, Park J, Kaneva R, Batra J, Teixeira MR, Kote-Jarai Z, Olama AA, Benlloch S, Renner SP, Hartmann A, Hein A, Ruebner M, Lambrechts D, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Lambretchs S, Doherty JA, Rossing MA, Nickels S, Eilber U, Wang-Gohrke S, Odunsi K, Sucheston-Campbell LE, Friel G, Lurie G, Killeen JL, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Runnebaum I, Hillemanns PA, Pelttari LM, Butzow R, Modugno F, Edwards RP, Ness RB, Moysich KB, du Bois A, Heitz F, Harter P, Kommoss S, Karlan BY, Walsh C, Lester J, Jensen A, Kjaer SK, Høgdall E, Peissel B, Bonanni B, Bernard L, Goode EL, Fridley BL, Vierkant RA, Cunningham JM, Larson MC, Fogarty ZC, Kalli KR, Liang D, Lu KH, Hildebrandt MA, Wu X, Levine DA, Dao F, Bisogna M, Berchuck A, Iversen ES, Marks JR, Akushevich L, Cramer DW, Schildkraut J, Terry KL, Poole EM, Stampfer M, Tworoger SS, Bandera EV, Orlow I, Olson SH, Bjorge L, Salvesen HB, van Altena AM, Aben KK, Kiemeney LA, Massuger LF, Pejovic T, Bean Y, Brooks-Wilson A, Kelemen LE, Cook LS, Le ND, Górski B, Gronwald J, Menkiszak J, Høgdall CK, Lundvall L, Nedergaard L, Engelholm SA, Dicks E, Tyrer J, Campbell I, McNeish I, Paul J, Siddiqui N, Glasspool R, Whittemore AS, Rothstein JH, McGuire V, Sieh W, Cai H, Shu XO, Teten RT, Sutphen R, McLaughlin JR, Narod SA, Phelan CM, Monteiro AN, Fenstermacher D, Lin HY, Permuth JB, Sellers TA, Chen YA, Tsai YY, Chen Z, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Menon U, Wu AH, Pearce CL, Van Den Berg D, Pike MC, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Plisiecka-Halasa J, Moes-Sosnowska J, Kupryjanczyk J, Pharoah PD, Song H, Winship I, Chenevix-Trench G, Giles GG, Tavtigian SV, Easton DF, and Milne RL
- Subjects
- Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Case-Control Studies, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Humans, Male, Ovarian Neoplasms epidemiology, Ovarian Neoplasms genetics, Ovarian Neoplasms metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms epidemiology, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics, Risk, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins genetics, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Checkpoint Kinase 2 genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins genetics, Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism, Tumor Suppressor Proteins genetics
- Abstract
Background: The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study., Methods: We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant., Results: For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10
-5 ), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10-8 ) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants., Conclusions: This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: None declared., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH.
- Author
-
Win AK, Reece JC, Dowty JG, Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Southey MC, Young JP, Cleary SP, Kim H, Cotterchio M, Macrae FA, Tucker KM, Baron JA, Burnett T, Le Marchand L, Casey G, Haile RW, Newcomb PA, Thibodeau SN, Hopper JL, Gallinger S, Winship IM, Lindor NM, and Jenkins MA
- Subjects
- Aged, Alleles, Colonic Neoplasms enzymology, Colonic Neoplasms epidemiology, Datasets as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms enzymology, Neoplasms epidemiology, Registries, United States epidemiology, Colonic Neoplasms genetics, DNA Glycosylases genetics, Germ-Line Mutation, Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Germline mutations in the DNA base excision repair gene MUTYH are known to increase a carrier's risk of colorectal cancer. However, the risks of other (extracolonic) cancers for MUTYH mutation carriers are not well defined. We identified 266 probands (91% Caucasians) with a MUTYH mutation (41 biallelic and 225 monoallelic) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Mutation status, sex, age and histories of cancer from their 1,903 first- and 3,255 second-degree relatives were analyzed using modified segregation analysis conditioned on the ascertainment criteria. Compared with incidences for the general population, hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers were: urinary bladder cancer 19 (3.7-97) and ovarian cancer 17 (2.4-115). The HRs (95% CI) for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers were: gastric cancer 9.3 (6.7-13); hepatobiliary cancer 4.5 (2.7-7.5); endometrial cancer 2.1 (1.1-3.9) and breast cancer 1.4 (1.0-2.0). There was no evidence for an increased risk of cancers at the other sites examined (brain, pancreas, kidney or prostate). Based on the USA population incidences, the estimated cumulative risks (95% CI) to age 70 years for biallelic mutation carriers were: bladder cancer 25% (5-77%) for males and 8% (2-33%) for females and ovarian cancer 14% (2-65%). The cumulative risks (95% CI) for monoallelic mutation carriers were: gastric cancer 5% (4-7%) for males and 2.3% (1.7-3.3%) for females; hepatobiliary cancer 3% (2-5%) for males and 1.4% (0.8-2.3%) for females; endometrial cancer 3% (2%-6%) and breast cancer 11% (8-16%). These unbiased estimates of both relative and absolute risks of extracolonic cancers for people, mostly Caucasians, with MUTYH mutations will be important for their clinical management., (© 2016 UICC.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Clinical Models and 77 Independent Risk-Associated SNPs for Women Aged Under 50 Years: Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry.
- Author
-
Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bickerstaffe A, Dowty JG, Allman R, Apicella C, Milne RL, Tsimiklis H, Phillips KA, Giles GG, Terry MB, Southey MC, and Hopper JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Australia, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Registries, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Breast Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: The extent to which clinical breast cancer risk prediction models can be improved by including information on known susceptibility SNPs is not known., Methods: Using 750 cases and 405 controls from the population-based Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry who were younger than 50 years at diagnosis and recruitment, respectively, Caucasian and not BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, we derived absolute 5-year risks of breast cancer using the BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BCRAT, and IBIS risk prediction models and combined these with a risk score based on 77 independent risk-associated SNPs. We used logistic regression to estimate the OR per adjusted SD for log-transformed age-adjusted 5-year risks. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. We also constructed reclassification tables and calculated the net reclassification improvement., Results: The ORs for BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BCRAT, and IBIS were 1.80, 1.75, 1.67, and 1.30, respectively. When combined with the SNP-based score, the corresponding ORs were 1.96, 1.89, 1.80, and 1.52. The corresponding AUCs were 0.66, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.57 for the risk prediction models, and 0.70, 0.69, 0.66, and 0.63 when combined with the SNP-based score., Conclusions: By combining a 77 SNP-based score with clinical models, the AUC for predicting breast cancer before age 50 years improved by >20%., Impact: Our estimates of the increased performance of clinical risk prediction models from including genetic information could be used to inform targeted screening and prevention., (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Quantifying the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms to guide colorectal cancer screening.
- Author
-
Jenkins MA, Makalic E, Dowty JG, Schmidt DF, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Ait Ouakrim D, Clendenning M, Flander LB, Stanesby OK, Hopper JL, Win AK, and Buchanan DD
- Subjects
- Alleles, Colorectal Neoplasms epidemiology, Europe, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Risk, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Abstract
Aim: To determine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can be used to identify people who should be screened for colorectal cancer., Methods: We simulated one million people with and without colorectal cancer based on published SNP allele frequencies and strengths of colorectal cancer association. We estimated 5-year risks of colorectal cancer by number of risk alleles., Results: We identified 45 SNPs with an average 1.14-fold increase colorectal cancer risk per allele (range: 1.05-1.53). The colorectal cancer risk for people in the highest quintile of risk alleles was 1.81-times that for the average person., Conclusion: We have quantified the extent to which known susceptibility SNPs can stratify the population into clinically useful colorectal cancer risk categories., Competing Interests: Financial & competing interests disclosure This work was supported by Centre for Research Excellence grant APP1042021 and Program grant APP1074383 from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia. MA Jenkins is a NHMRC Senior Research Fellow. AK Win is a NHMRC Early Career Fellow. JL Hopper is a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Risk of colorectal cancer for people with a mutation in both a MUTYH and a DNA mismatch repair gene.
- Author
-
Win AK, Reece JC, Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Young JP, Cleary SP, Kim H, Cotterchio M, Dowty JG, MacInnis RJ, Tucker KM, Winship IM, Macrae FA, Burnett T, Le Marchand L, Casey G, Haile RW, Newcomb PA, Thibodeau SN, Lindor NM, Hopper JL, Gallinger S, and Jenkins MA
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2, MutL Protein Homolog 1, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing genetics, Adenosine Triphosphatases genetics, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, DNA Glycosylases genetics, DNA Repair Enzymes genetics, DNA-Binding Proteins genetics, MutS Homolog 2 Protein genetics, Mutation genetics, Nuclear Proteins genetics
- Abstract
The base excision repair protein, MUTYH, functionally interacts with the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. As genetic testing moves from testing one gene at a time, to gene panel and whole exome next generation sequencing approaches, understandin g the risk associated with co-existence of germline mutations in these genes will be important for clinical interpretation and management. From the Colon Cancer Family Registry, we identified 10 carriers who had both a MUTYH mutation (6 with c.1187G>A p.(Gly396Asp), 3 with c.821G>A p.(Arg274Gln), and 1 with c.536A>G p.(Tyr179Cys)) and a MMR gene mutation (3 in MLH1, 6 in MSH2, and 1 in PMS2), 375 carriers of a single (monoallelic) MUTYH mutation alone, and 469 carriers of a MMR gene mutation alone. Of the 10 carriers of both gene mutations, 8 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Using a weighted cohort analysis, we estimated that risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of both a MUTYH and a MMR gene mutation was substantially higher than that for carriers of a MUTYH mutation alone [hazard ratio (HR) 21.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.19-50.1; p < 0.001], but not different from that for carriers of a MMR gene mutation alone (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.63-5.99; p = 0.25). Within the limited power of this study, there was no evidence that a monoallelic MUTYH gene mutation confers additional risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of a MMR gene mutation alone. Our finding suggests MUTYH mutation testing in MMR gene mutation carriers is not clinically informative.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Lynch syndrome and cervical cancer.
- Author
-
Antill YC, Dowty JG, Win AK, Thompson T, Walsh MD, Cummings MC, Gallinger S, Lindor NM, Le Marchand L, Hopper JL, Newcomb PA, Haile RW, Church J, Tucker KM, Buchanan DD, Young JP, Winship IM, and Jenkins MA
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia, Canada, DNA Mismatch Repair genetics, Female, Humans, Incidence, Middle Aged, Mutation genetics, New Zealand, Registries, Risk, Risk Factors, United States, Young Adult, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis genetics, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Carriers of germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes are at increased risk of several cancers including colorectal and gynecologic cancers (Lynch syndrome). There is no substantial evidence that these mutations are associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer. A total of 369 families with at least one carrier of a mutation in a MMR gene (133 MLH1, 174 MSH2, 35 MSH6 and 27 PMS2) were ascertained via population cancer registries or via family cancer clinics in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and USA. Personal and family histories of cancer were obtained from participant interviews. Modified segregation analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (incidence rates for carriers relative to those for the general population), and age-specific cumulative risks of cervical cancer for carriers. A total of 65 cases of cervical cancer were reported (including 10 verified by pathology reports). The estimated incidence was 5.6 fold (95% CI: 2.3-13.8; p = 0.001) higher for carriers than for the general population with a corresponding cumulative risk to 80 years of 4.5% (95% CI: 1.9-10.7%) compared with 0.8% for the general population. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.1 years (95% CI: 40.0-46.2), 3.9 years younger than the reported USA population mean of 47.0 years (p = 0.02). Women with MMR gene mutations were found to have an increased risk of cervical cancer. Due to limited pathology verification we cannot be certain that a proportion of these cases were not lower uterine segment endometrial cancers involving the endocervix, a recognized cancer of Lynch syndrome., (© 2015 UICC.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Breast cancer risk for Korean women with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
- Author
-
Park B, Dowty JG, Ahn C, Win AK, Kim SW, Lee MH, Lee JW, Kang E, Hopper JL, and Park SK
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Asian People genetics, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Germ-Line Mutation, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms genetics, Penetrance, BRCA1 Protein genetics, BRCA2 Protein genetics, Breast Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
The average age-specific cumulative risk (penetrance) of breast cancer has been studied for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers living in Western countries, but not for those living in East Asian countries where the population breast cancer incidence is lower. From 2007 to 2011, the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study identified 151 BRCA1 and 225 BRCA2 mutation-carrying families from family cancer clinics. We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) for female carriers relative to the population, and hence the penetrance, using a modified segregation analysis of cancer family histories conditioned on ascertainment. The breast cancer HR estimates [95 % confidence interval (CI)] for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers were 18 (3-103) and 11 (5-27), respectively. The breast cancer penetrance estimates (95 % CI) to age 70 years were 49 % (11-98) and 35 % (16-65) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. The breast cancer HR and penetrance estimates were similar for Korean and Western women (all P > 0.4). The point estimates of breast cancer penetrance were similar to age 50 years, though less for Korean carriers at older ages. Breast cancer risk for Korean and Western mutation carriers might reflect underlying population risks which in turn likely reflect differences in environmental and lifestyle factors. This raises the possibility of identifying modifiers of cancer risk for carriers with implications for prevention.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.