1. Effectiveness and Implementation Outcome Measures of Mental Health Curriculum Intervention Using Social Media to Improve the Mental Health Literacy of Adolescents
- Author
-
Hassen HM, Behera MR, Jena PK, Dewey RS, and Disassa GA
- Subjects
adolescent mental health ,mental health promotion ,difference-in-differences ,effect size ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Hailemariam Mamo Hassen,1 Manas Ranjan Behera,1 Pratap Kumar Jena,1 Rebecca S Dewey,2 Getachew Abeshu Disassa3 1School of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 2School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 3College of Education and Behavioural Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, EthiopiaCorrespondence: Hailemariam Mamo Hassen, School of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Email 1781133@kiit.ac.inPurpose: Globally, adolescent mental health problems reportedly manifest more severely in individuals with lower mental health literacy. Mental health curriculum interventions using social media have been associated with positive implementation outcomes. This study aimed to investigate whether such an intervention significantly improves adolescent mental health literacy and is associated with positive implementation outcome measures.Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design, comparing the before-and-after difference between the intervention group (n1=77) and the control group (n1=76). A mental health literacy module was delivered using social media. Data were collected using validated questionnaires. Effect size and difference-in-differences model calculations (and associated 95% confidence intervals, CI) were conducted alongside other descriptive analyses.Results: The estimated intervention effect size and difference-in-differences estimates were greater than zero. The effect was greater in the intervention than in the control group (p< 0.05) despite sex and age differences. The effect size estimate provided by Cohen’s d and Hedges’ g values was medium-to-large (d/g=0.429– 0.767, p< 0.05). The difference-in-differences reflected a significant effect (DID=0.348, CI: 0.154– 0.542, p< 0.001) in increasing mental health literacy despite differences associated with sex, age, and school grade. The intervention program was acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and satisfactory, and more than 80% of participants said they agree to completely agree with these implementation outcomes. Resources and personal and family-related factors were among the perceived influencing factors determining the effectiveness and implementation outcome measures.Conclusion: The intervention program effectively improved the mental health literacy of adolescents. It has been highlighted that social media interventions for mental health promotion could be practical and scalable; however, there is a need to take into account socio-demographic differences and barriers to inclusion/compliance.Keywords: adolescent mental health, mental health promotion, difference-in-differences, effect size
- Published
- 2022