1. BNT162b2 Versus mRNA-1273 Vaccines: Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Protection Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe COVID-19 in Qatar.
- Author
-
Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, Coyle P, Tang P, Hasan MR, Yassine HM, Al Thani AA, Al-Kanaani Z, Al-Kuwari E, Jeremijenko A, Kaleeckal AH, Latif AN, Shaik RM, Abdul-Rahim HF, Nasrallah GK, Al-Kuwari MG, Butt AA, Al-Romaihi HE, Al-Thani MH, Al-Khal A, Bertollini R, and Abu-Raddad LJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Qatar epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Male, Adult, Middle Aged, Female, Young Adult, Vaccination, Immunization, Secondary, Adolescent, Aged, BNT162 Vaccine administration & dosage, BNT162 Vaccine immunology, COVID-19 prevention & control, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 immunology, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 immunology, SARS-CoV-2 immunology, SARS-CoV-2 genetics, COVID-19 Vaccines immunology, COVID-19 Vaccines administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: This study provides a head-to-head comparison of the protection provided by the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and against severe COVID-19, covering primary series and third dose/booster vaccinations over up to 3 years of follow-up, both before and after the emergence of the omicron variant., Methods: Two national, matched, retrospective cohort studies were conducted on Qatar's vaccinated population from December 16, 2020, to February 18, 2024. Subgroup analyses by pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection history, as well as sensitivity analyses, were also conducted., Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) comparing infection incidence in those vaccinated with BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02-1.05) after the primary series and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.09-1.13) after the third (booster) dose. The corresponding AHRs for any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 were 1.31 (95% CI: 0.81-2.11) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.20-4.94), respectively. Subgroup analyses by prior infection status hinted at a dose-dependent immune imprinting effect, where a combination of two types of immunity, pre-omicron and omicron, offered greater protection against infection than one type alone, with this effect being amplified by the higher antigen dose of mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the study findings., Conclusions: BNT162b2 provided slightly less protection against infection than mRNA-1273 following both primary series and booster vaccinations while offering comparable protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes. The findings suggested that the vaccine antigen dose in interaction with infection history may determine the extent of immune protection against infection., (© 2024 The Author(s). Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF