24 results on '"Aaron D. Smith"'
Search Results
2. State of knowledge of the Tenebrionidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Colombia based on bibliographic revision
- Author
-
Oscar Ascuntar-Osnas, Pablo A. López-Bedoya, Aaron D. Smith, M. Andrew Johnston, and Jennifer C. Girón
- Subjects
darklingbeetles ,biodiversity ,neotropical region ,checklist ,distribution ,Science ,Zoology ,QL1-991 ,Botany ,QK1-989 - Abstract
Tenebrionidae is one of the most diverse families in Coleoptera. However, research on the family in Colombia is limited. Based on a comprehensive literature review, a list of tenebrionid species known from the country was compiled and the state of knowledge is analyzed. Based on this information, the Ten-ebrionidae in Colombia are represented by 326 species, organized into 95 genera (seven subgenera), 30 tribes, and nine subfamilies. Cundinamarca, including Bogotá, presents the highest number of recorded species with 52, followed by Valle del Cauca with sixteen, and Bolívar with thirteen; eight departments have records for only a single species, and ten do not have records of any tenebrionid species. Potential reasons for the historically limited research on Colombian tenebrionids are discussed and actions to reduce these knowledge gaps are proposed.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Rapid, high-titer biosynthesis of melanin using the marine bacterium Vibrio natriegens
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith, Tanya Tschirhart, Jaimee Compton, Tiffany M. Hennessa, Eric VanArsdale, and Zheng Wang
- Subjects
Vibrio natriegens ,melanin ,melanin biosynthesis ,tyrosinase ,tyrosine ,biomanufacturing ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Melanin is one of the most abundant natural biomolecules on Earth. These macromolecular biopolymers display several unique physical and chemical properties and have garnered interest as biomaterials for various commercial and industrial applications. To this end, extensive research has gone into refining methods for the synthesis and extraction of melanin from natural and recombinant sources. In this study, we developed and refined a procedure using a recombinant microbial system for the biosynthesis of melanin using the tyrosinase enzyme Tyr1 and tyrosine as a substrate. Using the emergent microbial chassis organisms Vibrio natriegens, we achieved maximal yields of 7.57 g/L, and one of the highest reported volumetric productivities of 473 mg L−1 h−1 with 100% conversion rates in an optimized, minimally defined medium. Additionally, we identified and investigated the use of a native copper responsive promoter in V. natriegens for stringent regulation of heterologous protein expression as a cost effective alternative to traditional IPTG-based induction. This research represents a promising advancement towards a green, rapid, and economical alternative for the biomanufacture of melanin.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Recovery and analysis of ancient beetle DNA from subfossil packrat middens using high-throughput sequencing
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith, Marcin J. Kamiński, Kojun Kanda, Andrew D. Sweet, Julio L. Betancourt, Camille A. Holmgren, Elisabeth Hempel, Federica Alberti, and Michael Hofreiter
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract The study of ancient DNA is revolutionizing our understanding of paleo-ecology and the evolutionary history of species. Insects are essential components in many ecosystems and constitute the most diverse group of animals. Yet they are largely neglected in ancient DNA studies. We report the results of the first targeted investigation of insect ancient DNA to positively identify subfossil insects to species, which includes the recovery of endogenous content from samples as old as ~ 34,355 ybp. Potential inhibitors currently limiting widespread research on insect ancient DNA are discussed, including the lack of closely related genomic reference sequences (decreased mapping efficiency) and the need for more extensive collaborations with insect taxonomists. The advantages of insect-based studies are also highlighted, especially in the context of understanding past climate change. In this regard, insect remains from ancient packrat middens are a rich and largely uninvestigated resource for exploring paleo-ecology and species dynamics over time.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Different Strategies Affect Enzyme Packaging into Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles
- Author
-
Scott N. Dean, Meghna Thakur, Joseph R. Spangler, Aaron D. Smith, Sean P. Garin, Scott A. Walper, and Gregory A. Ellis
- Subjects
outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) ,phosphotriesterase (PTE) ,diisopropyl fluorophosphatase (DFPase) ,Technology ,Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 - Abstract
All Gram-negative bacteria are believed to produce outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), proteoliposomes shed from the outermost membrane. We previously separately engineered E. coli to produce and package two organophosphate (OP) hydrolyzing enzymes, phosphotriesterase (PTE) and diisopropylfluorophosphatase (DFPase), into secreted OMVs. From this work, we realized a need to thoroughly compare multiple packaging strategies to elicit design rules for this process, focused on (1) membrane anchors or periplasm-directing proteins (herein “anchors/directors”) and (2) the linkers connecting these to the cargo enzyme; both may affect enzyme cargo activity. Herein, we assessed six anchors/directors to load PTE and DFPase into OMVs: four membrane anchors, namely, lipopeptide Lpp’, SlyB, SLP, and OmpA, and two periplasm-directing proteins, namely, maltose-binding protein (MBP) and BtuF. To test the effect of linker length and rigidity, four different linkers were compared using the anchor Lpp’. Our results showed that PTE and DFPase were packaged with most anchors/directors to different degrees. For the Lpp’ anchor, increased packaging and activity corresponded to increased linker length. Our findings demonstrate that the selection of anchors/directors and linkers can greatly influence the packaging and bioactivity of enzymes loaded into OMVs, and these findings have the potential to be utilized for packaging other enzymes into OMVs.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Taxonomic revision of the genus Machleida Fåhraeus, 1870 (Tenebrionidae, Pimeliinae, Asidini)
- Author
-
Marcin J. Kamiński, Kojun Kanda, and Aaron D. Smith
- Subjects
Zoology ,QL1-991 - Abstract
The taxonomic concept of the genus Machleida Fåhraeus, 1870 is tested and revised based on newly identified material. The following new species are described: Machleida banachi, M. flagstaffensis, M. tarskii, and M. zofiae Kamiński. Machleida capillosa Wilke, 1925 is considered as a junior subjective synonym of Asida devia Péringuey, 1899. Asida lecta Péringuey, 1899 (= Pseudomachla recurva Wilke, 1925) (transferred to Afrasida), Machleida nossibiana Fairmaire, 1897 (transferred to Scotinesthes), and Machleida tuberosa Wilke, 1925 (interpreted as incertae sedis in Asidini) are excluded from Machleida. An identification key for the species of the newly revised Machleida is provided. The present paper brings the total number of species within the genus to six (M. banachi sp. nov.; M. devia (Péringuey, 1899); M. flagstaffensis sp. nov.; M. nodulosa Fåhraeus, 1870; M. tarskii sp. nov.; M. zofiae Kamiński sp. nov.). The morphology of female terminalia (ovipositor and genital tubes) is described for the genus for the first time.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. A catalogue of the tribe Sepidiini Eschscholtz, 1829 (Tenebrionidae, Pimeliinae) of the world
- Author
-
Marcin J. Kamiński, Kojun Kanda, Ryan Lumen, Jonah M. Ulmer, Christopher C. Wirth, Patrice Bouchard, Rolf Aalbu, Noël Mal, and Aaron D. Smith
- Subjects
Zoology ,QL1-991 - Abstract
This catalogue includes all valid family-group (six subtribes), genus-group (55 genera, 33 subgenera), and species-group names (1009 species and subspecies) of Sepidiini darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Pimeliinae), and their available synonyms. For each name, the author, year, and page number of the description are provided, with additional information (e.g., type species for genus-group names, author of synonymies for invalid taxa, notes) depending on the taxon rank. Verified distributional records (loci typici and data acquired from revisionary publications) for all the species are gathered. Distribution of the subtribes is illustrated and discussed. Several new nomenclatural acts are included. The generic names Phanerotomea Koch, 1958 [= Ocnodes Fåhraeus, 1870] and Parmularia Koch, 1955 [= Psammodes Kirby, 1819] are new synonyms (valid names in square brackets). The following new combinations are proposed: Ocnodes acuductus acuductus (Ancey, 1883), O. acuductus ufipanus (Koch, 1952), O. adamantinus (Koch, 1952), O. argenteofasciatus (Koch, 1953), O. arnoldi arnoldi (Koch, 1952), O. arnoldi sabianus (Koch, 1952), O. barbosai (Koch, 1952), O. basilewskyi (Koch, 1952), O. bellmarleyi (Koch, 1952), O. benguelensis (Koch, 1952), O. bertolonii (Guérin-Méneville, 1844), O. blandus (Koch, 1952), O. brevicornis (Haag-Rutenberg, 1875), O. brunnescens brunnescens (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. brunnescens molestus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1875), O. buccinator (Koch, 1952), O. bushmanicus (Koch, 1952), O. carbonarius (Gerstaecker, 1854), O. cardiopterus (Fairmaire, 1888), O. cataractus (Koch, 1952), O. cinerarius (Koch, 1952), O. complanatus (Koch, 1952), O. confertus (Koch, 1952), O. congruens (Péringuey, 1899), O. cordiventris (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. crocodilinus (Koch, 1952), O. dimorphus (Koch, 1952), O. distinctus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. dolosus (Péringuey, 1899), O. dorsocostatus (Gebien, 1910), O. dubiosus (Péringuey, 1899), O. ejectus (Koch, 1952), O. epronoticus (Koch, 1952), O. erichsoni (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. ferreirae ferreirae (Koch, 1952), O. ferreirae zulu (Koch, 1952), O. fettingi (Haag-Rutenberg, 1875), O. fistucans (Koch, 1952), O. fraternus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1875), O. freyi (Koch, 1952), O. freudei (Koch, 1952), O. fulgidus (Koch, 1952), O. funestus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. gemmeulus (Koch, 1952), O. gibberosulus (Péringuey, 1908), O. gibbus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1879), O. globosus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. granisterna (Koch, 1952), O. granulosicollis (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. gridellii (Koch, 1960), O. guerini guerini (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. guerini lawrencii (Koch, 1954), O. guerini mancus (Koch 1954), O. haemorrhoidalis haemorrhoidalis (Koch, 1952), O. haemorrhoidalis salubris (Koch, 1952), O. heydeni (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. humeralis (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. humerangula (Koch, 1952), O. imbricatus (Koch, 1952), O. imitator imitator (Péringuey, 1899), O. imitator invadens (Koch, 1952), O. inflatus (Koch, 1952), O. janssensi (Koch, 1952), O. javeti (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. junodi (Péringuey, 1899), O. kulzeri (Koch, 1952), O. lacustris (Koch, 1952), O. laevigatus (Olivier, 1795), O. lanceolatus (Koch, 1953), O. licitus (Peringey, 1899), O. luctuosus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. luxurosus (Koch, 1952), O. maputoensis (Koch, 1952), O. marginicollis (Koch, 1952), O. martinsi (Koch, 1952), O. melleus (Koch, 1952), O. mendicus estermanni (Koch, 1952), O. mendicus mendicus (Péringuey, 1899), O. miles (Péringuey, 1908), O. mimeticus (Koch, 1952), O. misolampoides (Fairmaire, 1888), O. mixtus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. monacha (Koch, 1952), O. montanus (Koch, 1952), O. mozambicus (Koch, 1952), O. muliebris curtus (Koch, 1952), O. muliebris muliebris (Koch, 1952), O. muliebris silvestris (Koch, 1952), O. nervosus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. notatum (Thunberg, 1787), O. notaticollis (Koch, 1952), O. odorans (Koch, 1952), O. opacus (Solier, 1843), O. osbecki (Billberg, 1815), O. overlaeti (Koch, 1952), O. ovulus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. pachysoma ornata (Koch, 1952), O. pachysoma pachysoma (Péringuey, 1892), O. papillosus (Koch, 1952), O. pedator (Fairmaire, 1888), O. perlucidus (Koch, 1952), O. planus (Koch, 1952), O. pretorianus (Koch, 1952), O. procursus (Péringuey, 1899), O. protectus (Koch, 1952), O. punctatissimus (Koch, 1952), O. puncticollis (Koch, 1952), O. punctipennis planisculptus (Koch, 1952), O. punctipennis punctipennis (Harold, 1878), O. punctipleura (Koch, 1952), O. rhodesianus (Koch, 1952), O. roriferus (Koch, 1952), O. rufipes (Harold, 1878), O. saltuarius (Koch, 1952), O. scabricollis (Gerstaecker, 1854), O. scopulipes (Koch, 1952), O. scrobicollis griqua (Koch, 1952), O. scrobicollis simulans (Koch, 1952), O. semirasus (Koch, 1952), O. semiscabrum (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. sericicollis (Koch, 1952), O. similis (Péringuey, 1899), O. sjoestedti (Gebien, 1910), O. spatulipes (Koch, 1952), O. specularis (Péringuey, 1899), O. spinigerus (Koch, 1952), O. stevensoni (Koch, 1952), O. tarsocnoides (Koch, 1952), O. temulentus (Koch, 1952), O. tenebrosus melanarius (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. tenebrosus tenebrosus (Erichson, 1843), O. tibialis (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. torosus (Koch, 1952), O. transversicollis (Haag-Rutenberg, 1879), O. tumidus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1871), O. umvumanus (Koch, 1952), O. vagus (Péringuey, 1899), O. vaticinus (Péringuey, 1899), O. verecundus (Péringuey, 1899), O. vetustus (Koch, 1952), O. vexator (Péringuey, 1899), O. virago (Koch, 1952), O. warmeloi (Koch, 1953), O. zanzibaricus (Haag-Rutenberg, 1875), Psammophanes antinorii (Gridelli, 1939), and P. mirei (Pierre, 1979). The type species [placed in square brackets] of the following genus-group taxa are designated for the first time, Ocnodes Fåhraeus, 1870 [Ocnodes scrobicollis Fåhraeus, 1870], Psammodophysis Péringuey, 1899 [Psammodophysis probes Péringuey, 1899], and Trachynotidus Péringuey, 1899 [Psammodes thoreyi Haag-Rutenberg, 1871]. A lectotype is designated for Histrionotus omercooperi Koch, 1955 in order to fix its taxonomic status. Ulamus Kamiński is introduced here as a replacement name for Echinotus Marwick, 1935 [Type species. Avicula echinata Smith, 1817] (Mollusca: Pteriidae) to avoid homonymy with Echinotus Solier, 1843 (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Catalogue of Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera) of North America
- Author
-
Yves Bousquet, Donald B. Thomas, Patrice Bouchard, Aaron D. Smith, Rolf L. Aalbu, M. Andrew Johnston, and Warren E. Steiner Jr.
- Subjects
Zoology ,QL1-991 - Abstract
This catalogue includes all valid family-group (8 subfamilies, 52 tribes, 14 subtribes), genus-group (349 genera, 86 subgenera), and species-group names (2825 species, 215 subspecies) of darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) known to occur in North America1 and their available synonyms. Data on extant, subfossil and fossil taxa are given. For each name the author and year and page number of the description are provided, with additional information (e.g., type species for genus-group names, author of synonymies for invalid taxa) depending on the taxon rank. Several new nomenclatural acts are included. One new genus, Lepidocnemeplatia Bousquet and Bouchard, is described. Spelaebiosis Bousquet and Bouchard [for Ardoinia Özdikmen, 2004], Blapstinus marcuzzii Aalbu [for Blapstinus kulzeri Marcuzzi, 1977], and Hymenorus campbelli Bouchard [for Hymenorus oculatus Doyen and Poinar, 1994] are proposed as new replacement names. Supporting evidence is provided for the conservation of usage of Tarpela micans (Fabricius, 1798) nomen protectum over Tarpela vittata (Olivier, 1793) nomen oblitum. The generic names Psilomera Motschulsky, 1870 [= Stenomorpha Solier, 1836], Steneleodes Blaisdell, 1909 [= Xysta Eschscholtz, 1829], Ooconibius Casey, 1895 and Euconibius Casey, 1895 [= Conibius LeConte, 1851] are new synonyms (valid names in square brackets). The following 127 new synonymies of species-group names, listed in their original combination, are proposed (valid names, in their current combination, placed in square brackets): Bothrasida mucorea Wilke, 1922 [= Pelecyphorus guanajuatensis (Champion, 1884)]; Parasida zacualpanicola Wilke, 1922 [= Pelecyphorus asidoides Solier, 1836]; Stenosides kulzeri Pallister, 1954, Stenosides bisinuatus Pallister, 1954, and Parasida trisinuata Pallister, 1954 [= Pelecyphorus dispar (Champion, 1892)]; Asida favosa Champion, 1884 and Asida similata Champion, 1884 [= Pelecyphorus fallax (Champion, 1884)]; Ologlyptus bicarinatus Champion, 1884 [= Pelecyphorus indutus (Champion, 1884)]; Parasida laciniata Casey, 1912 and Parasida cristata Pallister, 1954 [= Pelecyphorus liratus (LeConte, 1854)]; Parasida esperanzae Wilke, 1922 and Parasida mixtecae Wilke, 1922 [= Pelecyphorus longipennis (Champion, 1884)]; Parasida tolucana Casey, 1912 [= Pelecyphorus scutellaris (Champion, 1884)]; Parasida purpusi Wilke, 1922 [= Pelecyphorus tristis (Champion, 1884)]; Astrotus nosodermoides Champion, 1892 [= Pelecyphorus erosus (Champion, 1892)]; Astrotus seticornis var. humeralis Champion, 1884 [= Pelecyphorus seticornis (Champion, 1884)]; Pactostoma breviuscula Casey, 1912, Pactostoma exoleta Casey, 1912, Pactostoma luteotecta Casey, 1912, Pactostoma monticola Casey, 1912, Pactostoma obtecta Casey, 1912, and Pactostoma sigillata Casey, 1912 [=Pelecyphorus anastomosis (Say, 1824)]; Ologlyptus canus Champion, 1884 and Ologlyptus sinuaticollis Champion, 1884 [= Pelecyphorus graciliformis (Solier, 1836)]; Gonasida elata reducta Casey, 1912, Gonasida elata prolixa Casey, 1912, and Gonasida aucta Casey, 1912 [= Philolithus elatus compar (Casey, 1912)]; Gonasida alaticollis Casey, 1912 [= Philolithus elatus difformis (LeConte, 1854)]; Gonasida gravida Casey, 1912 [= Philolithus elatus elatus (LeConte, 1853)]; Pelecyphorus aegrotus limbatus Casey, 1912 [= Philolithus aegrotus aegrotus (LeConte, 1861)]; Pelecyphorus corporalis Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus reptans Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus socer Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus abscissus Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus fumosus Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus parvus Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus morbillosus pacatus Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus morbillosus sobrius Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus piceus Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus piceus crudelis Casey, 1912, Pelecyphorus snowi Casey, 1912, and Pelecyphorus subtenuis Casey, 1912 [= Philolithus morbillosus (LeConte, 1858)]; Bothrasida sanctae-agnae Wilke, 1922 [= Stenomorpha funesta (Champion, 1884)]; Asida flaccida Horn, 1896 [= Stenomorpha embaphionides (Horn, 1894)]; Asida angustula Casey, 1890, Stethasida stricta Casey, 1912, Stethasida muricatula languida Casey, 1912, Stethasida pertinax Casey, 1912, Stethasida socors Casey, 1912, Stethasida angustula inepta Casey, 1912, Stethasida tenax Casey, 1912, and Stethasida vegrandis Casey, 1912 [= Stenomorpha muricatula (LeConte, 1851)]; Stethasida obsoleta expansa Casey, 1912, Stethasida obsoleta opacella Casey, 1912, Stethasida brevipes Casey, 1912, Stethasida torpida Casey, 1912, Stethasida convergens Casey, 1912, Stethasida discreta Casey, 1912, Stethasida longula Casey, 1912, Stethasida adumbrata Casey, 1912, Stethasida occulta Casey, 1912, Stethasida tarsalis Casey, 1912, Stethasida unica Casey, 1912, and Pelecyphorus laevigatus Papp, 1961 [= Stenomorpha obsoleta (LeConte, 1851)]; Trichiasida eremica Wilke, 1922 [= Stenomorpha difficilis (Champion, 1884)]; Trichiasida lineatopilosa Casey, 1912 [= Stenomorpha hirsuta (LeConte, 1851)]; Trichiasida tenella Casey, 1912 [= Stenomorpha hispidula (LeConte, 1851)]; Trichiasida duplex Casey, 1912 [= Stenomorpha villosa (Champion, 1884)]; Alaudes squamosa Blaisdell, 1919, Alaudes testacea Blaisdell, 1919, and Alaudes fallax Fall, 1928 [= Alaudes singularis Horn, 1870]; Edrotes barrowsi Dajoz, 1999 [=Edrotes ventricosus LeConte, 1851]; Nyctoporis tetrica Casey, 1907 and Nyctoporis maura Casey, 1907 [= Nyctoporis aequicollis Eschscholtz, 1831]; Nyctoporis pullata Casey, 1907 [= Nyctoporis sponsa Casey, 1907]; Eleodes tibialis forma oblonga Blaisdell, 1909 [= Eleodes tibialis Blaisdell, 1909]; Eleodes (manni var.) variolosa Blaisdell, 1917 [= Eleodes constrictus LeConte, 1858]; Eleodes cordata forma sublaevis Blaisdell, 1909, Eleodes cordata forma intermedia Blaisdell, 1909, Eleodes cordata forma oblonga Blaisdell, 1909, Eleodes cordata forma elongata Blaisdell, 1909, and Eleodes (cordata var.) adulterina Blaisdell, 1917 [= Eleodes cordata Eschscholtz, 1829]; Eleodes hornii var. monticula Blaisdell, 1918 and Eleodes manni sierra Blaisdell, 1925 [= Eleodes fuchsii Blaisdell, 1909]; Eleodes parvicollis var. squalida Blaisdell, 1918 [= Eleodes parvicollis Eschscholtz, 1829]; Eleodes reflexicollis Mannerheim, 1843 and Eleodes parvicollis forma farallonica Blaisdell, 1909 [= Eleodes planata Eschscholtz, 1829]; Eleodes indentata Blaisdell, 1935 [= Eleodes rotundipennis LeConte, 1857]; Eleodes intricata Mannerheim, 1843 [= Eleodes scabrosa Eschscholtz, 1829]; Eleodes horni fenyesi Blaisdell, 1925 [= Eleodes tenebrosa Horn, 1870]; Eleodes cordata var. horrida Blaisdell, 1918 [= Eleodes tuberculata Eschscholtz, 1829]; Eleodes oblonga Blaisdell, 1933 [= Eleodes versatilis Blaisdell, 1921]; Eleodes dentipes marinae Blaisdell, 1921 [= Eleodes dentipes Eschscholtz, 1829]; Eleodes carbonaria forma glabra Blaisdell, 1909 [= Eleodes carbonaria carbonaria (Say, 1824)]; Eleodes granosa forma fortis Blaisdell, 1909 [= Eleodes granosa LeConte, 1866]; Eleodes pilosa forma ordinata Blaisdell, 1909 [= Eleodes pilosa Horn, 1870]; Trogloderus costatus pappi Kulzer, 1960 [= Trogloderus tuberculatus Blaisdell, 1909]; Trogloderus costatus mayhewi Papp, 1961 [= Trogloderus vandykei La Rivers, 1946]; Bolitophagus cristatus Gosse, 1840 [= Bolitotherus cornutus (Fabricius, 1801)]; Eleates explanatus Casey, 1890 [= Eleates depressus (Randall, 1838)]; Blapstinus sonorae Casey, 1890 [= Blapstinus brevicollis LeConte, 1851]; Blapstinus falli Blaisdell, 1929 [= Blapstinus castaneus Casey, 1890]; Blapstinus brunneus Casey, 1890 and Blapstinus coronadensis Blaisdell, 1892 [=Blapstinus histricus Casey, 1890]; Blapstinus hesperius Casey, 1890 [=Blapstinus intermixtus Casey, 1890]; Blapstinus cinerascens Fall, 1929 [= Blapstinus lecontei Mulsant and Rey, 1859]; Blapstinus niger Casey, 1890 and Blapstinus cribricollis Casey, 1890 [= Blapstinus pimalis Casey, 1885]; Blapstinus arenarius Casey, 1890 [= Blapstinus pratensis LeConte, 1859]; Blapstinus gregalis Casey, 1890 [= Blapstinus substriatus Champion, 1885]; Blapstinus hydropicus Casey, 1890 [= Blapstinus sulcatus LeConte, 1851]; Blapstinus hospes Casey, 1890 [= Blapstinus vestitus LeConte, 1859]; Notibius reflexus Horn, 1894 [= Conibius opacus (LeConte, 1866)]; Notibius affinis Champion, 1885 [=Conibius rugipes (Champion, 1885)]; Conibius parallelus LeConte, 1851 [= Conibius seriatus LeConte, 1851]; Nocibiotes rubripes Casey, 1895 [=Nocibiotes caudatus Casey, 1895]; Nocibiotes gracilis Casey, 1895 and Nocibiotes acutus Casey, 1895 [=Nocibiotes granulatus (LeConte, 1851)]; Conibius alternatus Casey, 1890 [= Tonibius sulcatus (LeConte, 1851)]; Pedinus suturalis Say, 1824 [= Alaetrinus minimus (Palisot de Beauvois, 1817)]; Menedrio longipennis Motschulsky, 1872 [= Tenebrio obscurus Fabricius, 1792]; Hymenophorus megops Hatch, 1965 and Telesicles magnus Hatch, 1965 [= Hymenorus sinuatus Fall, 1931]; Andrimus concolor Casey, 1891 and Andrimus convergens Casey, 1891 [= Andrimus murrayi (LeConte, 1866)]; Mycetochara marshalli Campbell, 1978 [= Mycetochara perplexata Marshall, 1970]; Phaleria globosa LeConte, 1857 [= Phaleria picta Mannerheim, 1843]. The following subspecies of Trogloderus costatus LeConte, 1879 are given species rank: Trogloderus nevadus La Rivers, 1943, Trogloderus tuberculatus Blaisdell, 1909, and Trogloderus vandykei La Rivers, 1946. The following taxa, previously thought to be junior synonyms, are considered valid: Amphidora Eschscholtz, 1829; Xysta Eschscholtz, 1829; Helops confluens (Casey, 1924). Two new combinations are proposed: Stenomorpha spinimana (Champion, 1892) and Stenomorpha tenebrosa (Champion, 1892) [from the genus Parasida Casey, 1912]. The type species [placed in square brackets] of the following 12 genus-group taxa are designated for the first time: Lagriola Kirsch, 1874 [Lagriola operosa Kirsch, 1874]; Locrodes Casey, 1907 [Emmenastus piceus Casey, 1890]; Falacer Laporte, 1840 [Acanthopus cupreus Laporte, 1840 (= Helops contractus Palisot de Beauvois, 1812)]; Blapylis Horn, 1870 [Eleodes cordata Eschscholtz, 1829]; Discogenia LeConte, 1866 [Eleodes scabricula LeConte, 1858]; Metablapylis Blaisdell, 1909 [Eleodes nigrina LeConte, 1858]; Steneleodes Blaisdell, 1909 [Eleodes longicollis LeConte, 1851]; Scaptes Champion, 1886 [Scaptes squamulatus Champion, 1886 (= Asida tropica Kirsch, 1866)]; Aspidius Mulsant and Rey, 1859 [Blaps punctata Fabricius, 1792]; Cryptozoon Schaufuss, 1882 [Cryptozoon civile Schaufuss, 1882]; Halophalerus Crotch, 1874 [Phaleria rotundata LeConte, 1851]; Dignamptus LeConte, 1878 [Dignamptus stenochinus LeConte, 1878]. Two species previously known from South America [Nilio lebasi J. Thomson and Platydema erotyloides Chevrolat] are reported for the first time from North America.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Reinstatement of Eschatoporiini Blaisdell, 1906, a unique tribe of blind cavernicolous Tenebrionidae from California, with a new species from Napa County (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Lagriinae)
- Author
-
Rolf L. Aalbu, Kojun Kanda, and Aaron D. Smith
- Subjects
Zoology ,QL1-991 - Abstract
The tribe Eschatoporini Blaisdell, 1906 is reinstated, based on molecular and morphological data, and the spelling corrected as Eschatoporiini. The tribe currently includes only the cave-dwelling genus Eschatoporis Blaisdell, 1906 from California, which is associated with underground aquifers. A second species of Eschatoporis is described from a cave in Napa County, California. The phylogenetic placement of Eschatoporiini within the Lagriinae is examined, and notes on the biology of Eschatoporis are provided.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Computer and Internet Use by Great Plains Farmers
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith, W. Richard Goe, Martin Kemey, and Paul Catherine Morrison J.
- Subjects
agriculture ,competitiveness ,net benefits ,technology adoption ,Agriculture - Abstract
This study uses data from a 2001 survey of Great Plains farmers to explore the adoption, usage patterns, and perceived benefits of computers and the Internet. Adoption results suggest that exposure to the technology through college, outside employment, friends, and family is ultimately more influential than farmer age and farm size. Notably, about half of those who use the Internet for farm-related business report zero economic benefits from it. Whether a farmer perceives that the Internet generates economic benefits depends primarily on how long the farmer has used the Internet for farm business and for what purposes.
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Essentials of Applied Econometrics
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith, J. Edward Taylor
- Published
- 2016
12. Formalizing Insect Morphological Data: A Model-Based, Extensible Insect Anatomy Ontology and Its Potential Applications in Biodiversity Research and Informatics
- Author
-
Jennifer C. Girón, Sergei Tarasov, Luis A. González Montaña, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Aaron D. Smith, Markus Koch, Brendon E. Boudinot, Patrice Bouchard, Roger Burks, Lars Vogt, Matt Yoder, David Osumi-Sutherland, Frank Friedrich, Rolf Beutel, and István Mikó
- Subjects
ComputingMethodologies_SIMULATIONANDMODELING ,anatomy_morphology ,ComputingMethodologies_ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE - Abstract
The spectacular radiation of insects has produced a stunning diversity of phenotypes. During the last 250 years, research on insect systematics has generated hundreds of terms for naming and comparing those phenotypes. In its current form, this terminological diversity is presented in natural language and lacks formalization, which prohibits computer-assisted comparison using semantic web technologies. Here we propose a Model for Describing Insect Anatomical Structures (MoDIAS) which incorporates structural properties and positional relationships for standardized, consistent, and reproducible descriptions of insect phenotypes. We applied the MoDIAS framework in creating the ontology for the Anatomy of the Insect Skeleto-Muscular system (AISM). The AISM is the first general insect ontology that aims to cover all taxa by providing generalized, fully logical, and queryable, definitions for each term. It was built using the Ontology Development Kit (ODK), which maximizes interoperability with Uberon (Uberon multi-species anatomy ontology) and other basic ontologies, enhancing the integration of insect anatomy into the broader biological sciences. A template system for adding new terms, extending and linking the AISM to additional anatomical, phenotypic, genetic, and chemical ontologies is also introduced. The AISM is proposed as the backbone for taxon-specific insect ontologies and has potential applications spanning systematic biology and biodiversity informatics, allowing users to (1) use controlled vocabularies and create semi-automated computer-parsable insect morphological descriptions; (2) integrate insect morphology into broader fields of research, including ontology-informed phylogenetic methods, logical homology hypothesis testing, evo-devo studies, and genotype to phenotype mapping; and (3) automate the extraction of morphological data from the literature, enabling the generation of large-scale phenomic data, by facilitating the production and testing of informatic tools able to extract, link, annotate, and process morphological data. This system will allow for clear and semantically interoperable integration of insect phenotypes in biodiversity studies.
- Published
- 2022
13. Ground-dwelling arthropods of pinyon-juniper woodlands: Arthropod community patterns are driven by climate and overall plant productivity, not host tree species
- Author
-
Richard W. Hofstetter, Derek A. Uhey, Hannah Lee Riskas, and Aaron D. Smith
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,Vapor Pressure ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Rain ,Climate ,Woodland ,Forests ,01 natural sciences ,Trees ,Beetles ,Abundance (ecology) ,Multidisciplinary ,Ecology ,Physics ,Eukaryota ,Classical Mechanics ,Vegetation ,Plants ,Terrestrial Environments ,Insects ,Habitat ,Productivity (ecology) ,Physical Sciences ,Medicine ,Seasons ,Juniper ,Research Article ,Arthropoda ,Plant Exudates ,Science ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,Ecosystems ,Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ,Meteorology ,Pressure ,Animals ,Arthropods ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Ants ,Ecology and Environmental Sciences ,Organisms ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Pinus ,biology.organism_classification ,Invertebrates ,Hymenoptera ,Juniperus ,Earth Sciences ,Species richness ,Zoology ,Entomology - Abstract
Pinyon-juniper (PJ) woodlands have drastically changed over the last century with juniper encroaching into adjacent habitats and pinyon experiencing large-scale mortality events from drought. Changes in climate and forest composition may pose challenges for animal communities found in PJ woodlands, especially if animals specialize on tree species sensitive to drought. Here we test habitat specialization of ground-dwelling arthropod (GDA) communities underneath pinyon and juniper trees. We also investigate the role of climate and productivity gradients in structuring GDAs within PJ woodlands using two elevational gradients. We sampled 12,365 individuals comprising 115 taxa over two years. We found no evidence that GDAs differ under pinyon or juniper trees, save for a single species of beetle which preferred junipers. Climate and productivity, however, were strongly associated with GDA communities and appeared to drive differences between sites. Precipitation was strongly associated with arthropod richness, while differences in GDA composition were associated with environmental variables (precipitation, temperature, vapor pressure, and normalized difference vegetation index). These relationships varied among different arthropod taxa (e.g. ants and beetles) and community metrics (e.g. richness, abundance, and composition), with individual taxa also responding differently. Overall, our results suggest that GDAs are not dependent on tree type, but are strongly linked to primary productivity and climate, especially precipitation in PJ woodlands. This implies GDAs in PJ woodlands are more susceptible to changes in climate, especially at lower elevations where it is hot and dry, than changes in dominant vegetation. We discuss management implications and compare our findings to GDA relationships with vegetation in other systems.
- Published
- 2020
14. A catalogue of the tribe Sepidiini Eschscholtz, 1829 (Tenebrionidae, Pimeliinae) of the world
- Author
-
Marcin Jan Kamiński, Aaron D. Smith, Rolf L. Aalbu, Kojun Kanda, Ryan Lumen, Patrice Bouchard, Jonah M. Ulmer, Noël Mal, and Christopher C. Wirth
- Subjects
Insecta ,Arthropoda ,Heliotaurus ,Nomen novum ,Nephrozoa ,Protostomia ,new combinations ,Carbotriplurida ,Tribe (biology) ,Circumscriptional names of the taxon under ,Page number ,Catalogue ,nomen novum ,Botany ,lcsh:Zoology ,distribution ,Bilateria ,Sepidiini ,Animalia ,Pimeliinae ,lcsh:QL1-991 ,Nomenclature ,Tenebrionoidea ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Pterygota ,Pharotarsus ,Wuhua ,biology ,type species ,Tenebrionidae ,Cephalornis ,Baromiamima ,biology.organism_classification ,Circumscriptional names ,Coleoptera ,new synonyms ,Boltonocostidae ,Type species ,Notchia ,Africa ,Molurini ,Ecdysozoa ,nomenclature ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parmularia ,Subgenus ,Coelenterata - Abstract
This catalogue includes all valid family-group (six subtribes), genus-group (55 genera, 33 subgenera), and species-group names (1009 species and subspecies) of Sepidiini darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Pimeliinae), and their available synonyms. For each name, the author, year, and page number of the description are provided, with additional information (e.g., type species for genus-group names, author of synonymies for invalid taxa, notes) depending on the taxon rank. Verified distributional records (loci typici and data acquired from revisionary publications) for all the species are gathered. Distribution of the subtribes is illustrated and discussed.Several new nomenclatural acts are included. The generic namesPhanerotomeaKoch, 1958 [=OcnodesFåhraeus, 1870] andParmulariaKoch, 1955 [=PsammodesKirby, 1819] are new synonyms (valid names in square brackets).The following new combinations are proposed:Ocnodesacuductusacuductus(Ancey, 1883),O. acuductusufipanus(Koch, 1952),O. adamantinus(Koch, 1952),O. argenteofasciatus(Koch, 1953),O. arnoldiarnoldi(Koch, 1952),O. arnoldisabianus(Koch, 1952),O.barbosai(Koch, 1952),O.basilewskyi(Koch, 1952),O.bellmarleyi(Koch, 1952),O. benguelensis(Koch, 1952),O. bertolonii(Guérin-Méneville, 1844),O. blandus(Koch, 1952),O. brevicornis(Haag-Rutenberg, 1875),O. brunnescensbrunnescens(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. brunnescensmolestus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1875),O. buccinator(Koch, 1952),O. bushmanicus(Koch, 1952),O. carbonarius(Gerstaecker, 1854),O. cardiopterus(Fairmaire, 1888),O. cataractus(Koch, 1952),O. cinerarius(Koch, 1952),O. complanatus(Koch, 1952),O. confertus(Koch, 1952),O. congruens(Péringuey, 1899),O. cordiventris(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. crocodilinus(Koch, 1952),O. dimorphus(Koch, 1952),O. distinctus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. dolosus(Péringuey, 1899),O. dorsocostatus(Gebien, 1910),O. dubiosus(Péringuey, 1899),O. ejectus(Koch, 1952),O. epronoticus(Koch, 1952),O. erichsoni(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. ferreiraeferreirae(Koch, 1952),O. ferreiraezulu(Koch, 1952),O. fettingi(Haag-Rutenberg, 1875),O. fistucans(Koch, 1952),O. fraternus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1875),O. freyi(Koch, 1952),O. freudei(Koch, 1952),O. fulgidus(Koch, 1952),O. funestus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. gemmeulus(Koch, 1952),O. gibberosulus(Péringuey, 1908),O. gibbus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1879),O. globosus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. granisterna(Koch, 1952),O. granulosicollis(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O.gridellii(Koch, 1960),O. gueriniguerini(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. guerinilawrencii(Koch, 1954),O. guerinimancus(Koch 1954),O. haemorrhoidalishaemorrhoidalis(Koch, 1952),O. haemorrhoidalissalubris(Koch, 1952),O. heydeni(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. humeralis(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. humerangula(Koch, 1952),O. imbricatus(Koch, 1952),O.imitatorimitator(Péringuey, 1899),O. imitatorinvadens(Koch, 1952),O. inflatus(Koch, 1952),O. janssensi(Koch, 1952),O. javeti(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. junodi(Péringuey, 1899),O. kulzeri(Koch, 1952),O. lacustris(Koch, 1952),O. laevigatus(Olivier, 1795),O. lanceolatus(Koch, 1953),O. licitus(Peringey, 1899),O. luctuosus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. luxurosus(Koch, 1952),O. maputoensis(Koch, 1952),O. marginicollis(Koch, 1952),O. martinsi(Koch, 1952),O. melleus(Koch, 1952),O. mendicusestermanni(Koch, 1952),O. mendicusmendicus(Péringuey, 1899),O. miles(Péringuey, 1908),O. mimeticus(Koch, 1952),O. misolampoides(Fairmaire, 1888),O. mixtus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. monacha(Koch, 1952),O. montanus(Koch, 1952),O. mozambicus(Koch, 1952),O. muliebriscurtus(Koch, 1952),O. muliebrismuliebris(Koch, 1952),O. muliebrissilvestris(Koch, 1952),O. nervosus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O.notatum(Thunberg, 1787),O. notaticollis(Koch, 1952),O. odorans(Koch, 1952),O. opacus(Solier, 1843),O. osbecki(Billberg, 1815),O. overlaeti(Koch, 1952),O. ovulus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. pachysomaornata(Koch, 1952),O. pachysomapachysoma(Péringuey, 1892),O. papillosus(Koch, 1952),O. pedator(Fairmaire, 1888),O. perlucidus(Koch, 1952),O. planus(Koch, 1952),O. pretorianus(Koch, 1952),O. procursus(Péringuey, 1899),O. protectus(Koch, 1952),O. punctatissimus(Koch, 1952),O. puncticollis(Koch, 1952),O. punctipennisplanisculptus(Koch, 1952),O. punctipennispunctipennis(Harold, 1878),O. punctipleura(Koch, 1952),O. rhodesianus(Koch, 1952),O. roriferus(Koch, 1952),O. rufipes(Harold, 1878),O. saltuarius(Koch, 1952),O.scabricollis(Gerstaecker, 1854),O. scopulipes(Koch, 1952),O. scrobicollisgriqua(Koch, 1952),O. scrobicollissimulans(Koch, 1952),O. semirasus(Koch, 1952),O. semiscabrum(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. sericicollis(Koch, 1952),O.similis(Péringuey, 1899),O. sjoestedti(Gebien, 1910),O. spatulipes(Koch, 1952),O. specularis(Péringuey, 1899),O. spinigerus(Koch, 1952),O. stevensoni(Koch, 1952),O. tarsocnoides(Koch, 1952),O. temulentus(Koch, 1952),O. tenebrosusmelanarius(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. tenebrosustenebrosus(Erichson, 1843),O. tibialis(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. torosus(Koch, 1952),O. transversicollis(Haag-Rutenberg, 1879),O. tumidus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1871),O. umvumanus(Koch, 1952),O. vagus(Péringuey, 1899),O. vaticinus(Péringuey, 1899),O. verecundus(Péringuey, 1899),O. vetustus(Koch, 1952),O. vexator(Péringuey, 1899),O. virago(Koch, 1952),O. warmeloi(Koch, 1953),O. zanzibaricus(Haag-Rutenberg, 1875),Psammophanesantinorii(Gridelli, 1939), andP.mirei(Pierre, 1979).The type species [placed in square brackets] of the following genus-group taxa are designated for the first time,OcnodesFåhraeus, 1870 [OcnodesscrobicollisFåhraeus, 1870],PsammodophysisPéringuey, 1899 [PsammodophysisprobesPéringuey, 1899], andTrachynotidusPéringuey, 1899 [PsammodesthoreyiHaag-Rutenberg, 1871].A lectotype is designated forHistrionotusomercooperiKoch, 1955 in order to fix its taxonomic status.UlamusKamiński is introduced here as a replacement name forEchinotusMarwick, 1935 [Type species.AviculaechinataSmith, 1817] (Mollusca: Pteriidae) to avoid homonymy withEchinotusSolier, 1843 (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).
- Published
- 2019
15. Essentials of Applied Econometrics
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith, J. Edward Taylor, Aaron D. Smith, and J. Edward Taylor
- Subjects
- Econometrics--Textbooks
- Abstract
Essentials of Applied Econometrics prepares students for a world in which more data surround us every day and in which econometric tools are put to diverse uses. Written for students in economics and for professionals interested in continuing an education in econometrics, this succinct text not only teaches best practices and state-of-the-art techniques, but uses vivid examples and data obtained from a variety of real world sources. The book's emphasis on application uniquely prepares the reader for today's econometric work, which can include analyzing causal relationships or correlations in big data to obtain useful insights.
- Published
- 2017
16. Editorial: Third International Tenebrionoidea Symposium
- Author
-
Patrice Bouchard, Rolf L. Aalbu, and Aaron D. Smith
- Subjects
Questions and answers ,Tenebrionoidea ,Smithsonian institution ,biology ,Computer science ,National park ,Arizona ,Art history ,biology.organism_classification ,Institutional support ,Editorial ,editoria ,Honor ,lcsh:Zoology ,Animal Science and Zoology ,lcsh:QL1-991 ,China ,Anatomy ontology ,symposium ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics - Abstract
The Third International Tenebrionoidea Symposium (ITS) was held at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona USA on August 7th and 8th, 2013. Researchers from ten countries participated with a total of 36 attendees (Figure 1). It was the first formal meeting of the international tenebrionoid research community since the October 2005 in Lyon, France. Though the previous meetings did not list themselves as the beginning of a series, we consider it fitting to acknowledge them as the first two modern international meetings specifically organized for the sharing and dissemination of Tenebrionoidea research. Figure 1. August 7th, before the first talk. The 1st International Tenebrionid Symposium, entitled “Systematics and Biogeography of Tenebrionoidea”, was held in 2002 at the Zoologisches Staatssammlung, Munchen (Germany) to honor Dr. Hans J. Bremer’s work on tenebrionids and celebrate the museum’s acquisition of his collection. This event organized by Dr. Martin Baehr resulted in a highly successful meeting. The 2nd International Tenebrionoidea Symposium, entitled “Coleoptera Tenebrionoidea: Taxonomy, Biogeography, and Faunistics”, was held in 2005 at the Lyon Museum (France) following the acquisition of the remarkable tenebrionid collection of Jaroslav Picka. Following the symposium, many of the presentations were published in Cahiers Scientifiques (Fascicule 10). Again a highly successful meeting this time organized by Dr. Harold LaBrique. To continue this successful tradition, and encourage tenebrionoid workers from around the world to meet, share their research, and form new collaborations, researchers in the US and Canada decided to host the 3nd International Tenebrionoidea Symposium. A steering committee was assembled with representatives from Arizona State University, California Academy of Sciences, the Canadian National Collection of Insects, and the Smithsonian Institution. Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona was ultimately chosen to host the symposium due to its institutional support, excellent facilities, and multiple opportunities for field work both before and after the meeting. Presentations were given on August 7th and 8th, 2013. Before the meeting, researchers visited US collections on both the west and east coasts and held a pre-meeting collecting trip through California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. Gustavo Flores had the most impressive itinerary of museum visits. After flying into New York City from Mendoza, Argentina, Gustavo visited the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH – New York, New York), the Smithsonian Institution (NMNH – Washington, D.C.), the C.A. Triplehorn Insect Collection at Ohio State University (OSUC – Columbus, Ohio), the Field Museum (FMNH – Chicago, Illinois), and Rolf Aalbu’s personal collection (RLAC – El Dorado Hills, California). In Sacramento, Gustavo joined Wolfgang Schawaller, Roland Grimm, and Rene Fouque who had been working in the California Academy of Sciences (CASC – San Francisco, California), California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA – Sacramento, California), and RLAC collections the prior week. Rolf, Gustavo, Rene, Roland, and Wolfgang then drove from Sacramento to Tempe while doing field work through California, Nevada, Utah, and north central Arizona (Figure 2). Figure 2. Pre-meeting sightseeing stop at Zion National Park, Utah. Left to right: Wolfgang Schawaller, Rene Fouque, Gustavo Flores. During the meeting 21 presentations, seventeen 20-minute talks and four posters, where given (see http://insectbiodiversitylab.org/3ITS_presentations.html) ranging from species-level revisions to broad scale Tenebrionidae phylogenies and inventories, darkling beetles intercepted by USDA-APHIS during agricultural quarantine interceptions, and the first steps towards the construction of a Coleopteran Anatomy Ontology. Presentations were generally well received and elicited animated question and answer sessions. Many of the attendees had previously corresponded by email, but never met in person. For example, Guodong Ren’s research group (Figure 3) has been remarkably productive, but this was the first time any of the American (North and South) or European visitors were able to meet him face to face. Others, such as Chuck Triplehorn (Figure 4) are well known to almost all attendees through both research and previous visits. Following the first day’s presentations, Bill Warner led an evening collecting expedition to Oak Flat Campground in Pinal County. Figure 3. Visiting Chinese and US-based Chinese researchers. Left to right: Yuxia Yang, Li Zhong, Guodong Ren, Guanyang Zhang (ASU postdoc), Shanshan Liu, Caixia Yuan Figure 4. Dr. Charles A. Triplehorn showing off a Triplehornia metallica Matthews and Lawrence shirt made by his grandson. Group discussions were also held during the symposium on potential large scale tenebrionid projects that could be undertaken as a community, the organization of a Proceedings volume from the Symposium, collecting localities for the post-meeting trip, and potential localities and dates for the Fourth International Tenebrionoidea Symposium. Informal talks on these and other tenebrionoid related matters extend far into the evening and past the closing session on August 8th (Figure 5). Pat Bouchard agreed to act as lead editor for a Proceedings volume in the journal Zookeys, for which we were and remain very grateful. Most articles included in this resulting special issue of ZooKeys are based on the contents of presentations during the Third International Tenebrionoidea Symposium, although papers submitted by all attendants were also welcome. Figure 5. Post meeting dinner. Left to right, back row: Bill Warner, Rich Cunningham, Pat Bouchard, Wolfgang Schawaller, Aaron Smith, Milton Campbell, Andrew Johnston, Marcin Kaminski; front row: Ron Somerby, Gael Kergoat, Roland Grimm, Rolf Aalbu, Rebecca ... After the formal symposium, attendees went their separate ways, with some doing solo collecting and some visiting US museums (California Academy of Sciences and the University of Arizona Insect Collection to name just two). Twelve researchers from five countries went to the Beetle Infestation VI on August 10th hosted by Pat and Lisa Sullivan in Ramsey Canyon, Huachuca Mountains, one of the most biologically diverse localities in the United States, before collecting through southern and central Arizona (Figures 6 & 7) eventually disbursing into smaller field groups or heading home. While a full tally of tenebrionoid species collected in association with the symposium will likely never be assembled, the first author collected approximately 40 darkling beetles species during and after the meeting. Most of the species collected can be sight IDed, at least to genus, using Bugguide. Figure 6. Post meeting collecting. Marcin Kaminski and Andrew Johnston near Madera Canyon. Figure 7. Post meeting afternoon break at Fred Skillman’s house, Cochise, AZ. Left to right: Wolfgang Schawaller, Pat Bouchard, Rolf Aalbu, Kojun Kanda, Andrew Johnston, Fred Skillman, Warren Steiner, Marcin Kaminski, Rene Fouque. ... Many of the presentations, a list of collecting localities, and additional pictures from the symposium are online at: http://www.insectbiodiversitylab.org/3ITS.html. Two researchers graciously volunteered to host the next symposium at their institutions: Gustavo Flores (CCT CONICET – Mendoza, Argentina) for 2016, or Guodong Ren (Hebei University – Baoding City, China) for 2015, and presented short talks highlighting the advantages of their respective cities. A survey was set up to allow the attendees of the Third symposium, current tenebrionoid researchers (those with at least one tenebrionioid manuscript in print), and graduate students working on tenebrionoids to vote for the host city of the Fourth International Tenebrionoidea Symposium. Voting was open until September 30th, 2013 and turnout was excellent. After over a month of voting, Mendoza, Argentina was chosen to host the next meeting in November 2015. See you in Mendoza!
- Published
- 2014
17. Larvae of the genus Eleodes (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae): matrix-based descriptions, cladistic analysis, and key to late instars
- Author
-
Quentin D. Wheeler, Rebecca Dornburg, and Aaron D. Smith
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Larva ,biology ,Tenebrionidae ,010607 zoology ,Zoology ,larvae ,biology.organism_classification ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,matrix-based descriptions ,Cladistics ,Darkling beetle ,Genus ,Eleodes hispilabris ,Eleodes ,lcsh:Zoology ,Instar ,Key (lock) ,Animal Science and Zoology ,lcsh:QL1-991 ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Content management system ,Research Article - Abstract
Darkling beetle larvae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) are collectively referred to as false wireworms. Larvae from several species in the genus Eleodes are considered to be agricultural pests, though relatively little work has been done to associate larvae with adults of the same species and only a handful of species have been characterized in their larval state.Morphological characters from late instar larvae were examined and coded to produce a matrix in the server-based content management system mx. The resulting morphology matrix was used to produce larval species descriptions, reconstruct a phylogeny, and build a key to the species included in the matrix.Larvae are described for the first time for the following 12 species: Eleodes anthracinus Blaisdell, Eleodes carbonarius (Say), Eleodes caudiferus LeConte, Eleodes extricatus (Say), Eleodes goryi Solier, Eleodes hispilabris (Say), Eleodes nigropilosus LeConte, Eleodes pilosus Horn, Eleodes subnitens LeConte, Eleodes tenuipes Casey, Eleodes tribulus Thomas, and Eleodes wheeleri Aalbu, Smith & Triplehorn. The larval stage of Eleodes armatus LeConte is redescribed with additional characters to differentiate it from the newly described congeneric larvae.
- Published
- 2014
18. The Tenebrionidae of California: A Time Sensitive Snapshot Assessment
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith and Rolf L. Aalbu
- Subjects
Ecology ,Tenebrionidae ,Biodiversity ,Conservation ,15. Life on land ,Biology ,Structural basin ,biology.organism_classification ,Arid ,California ,Floristics ,Darkling beetle ,Habitat ,lcsh:Zoology ,Hotspots ,Animal Science and Zoology ,lcsh:QL1-991 ,Endemism ,Floristic Regions ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Research Article ,Global biodiversity - Abstract
Due to a diversity of habitats and its geologic history, the US state of California hosts a spectacular assemblage of darkling beetle species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). In addition to being part of the California Floristic Province, one of 34 global biodiversity hotspots identified by Conservation International, California also has additional areas which are parts of the Great Basin, Mojave, and Sonoran deserts. California is divided into nine floristic regions. Each region is assessed in terms of faunal composition and endemism. A “snapshot” of our present knowledge of the Tenebrionidae indicates that 447 currently recognized species, representing 108 genera, occur in California of which one hundred and ninety are endemic. California is compared to other nearby regions in diversity and endemism. An analysis of currently valid species vs a more realistic species account based on unpublished records of likely synonyms and known species yet to be described in the scientific literature is presented. The California Floristic Region, rather than other more arid parts of California, has the highest number of total and endemic species. Because of their high diversity and endemism, tenebrionids could potentially provide a valuable tool for monitoring the environment for conservation purposes.
- Published
- 2014
19. Beetles (Coleoptera) of Peru: A Survey of the Families. Tenebrionidae
- Author
-
Rolf L. Aalbu, Alfredo Edgardo Giraldo Mendoza, Aaron D. Smith, and Gustavo E. Flores
- Subjects
Diversity ,biology ,Amazon rainforest ,Range (biology) ,Ecology ,Opatrini ,Detritivore ,Tenebrionidae ,Zoología, Ornitología, Entomología, Etología ,Subspecies ,biology.organism_classification ,Ciencias Biológicas ,Taxon ,Habitat ,Insect Science ,Distribution and habitats ,Peru ,Epiphyte ,CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS - Abstract
Diversity in Peru: 8 subfamilies, 37 tribes, 105 genera, and 353 species/subspecies. Recognition: Adult tenebrionids, commonly called darkling beetles, are highly variable in terms of color (from black or brown to a wide variety of bright or metallic colors), size (from approximately 1–80 mm), and morphology (from flat wingless species to elongate cylindrical winged taxa). However, with few exceptions tenebrionids can be identified based on their: 5-5-4 tarsal formula (rarely 4-4-4 or 3-3-3); antennal insertions concealed under frons; five visible abdominal sternites, with the basal three sternites connate and the apical two hinged; and 10- to 11segmented antennae (rarely 9-segmented). Detailed descriptions, including for immature stages, are provided in Aalbu et al. (2002) and Matthews et al. (2010). Geographic distribution and habitats: Tenebrionids are found in a wide variety of habitats in Peru, from coastal dunes to tropical forests and through the Andes mountain range, with many tribes and genera restricted to specific biogeographic regions or specialized microhabitats. - The coastal deserts of western Peru (,1000 m): Caenocrypticini (Caenocrypticoides), Edrotini (Kocakia), Elenophorini (Psammetichus), Epitragini (Parepitragus, Hemasodes, Omopheres), Evaniosomini (Aryenis, Chorasmius, Evaniosomus, Melaphorus), Physogasterini (Philorea, Physogasterinus), Praociini (Parapraocis), Thinobatini (Cordibates), Opatrini (Blapstinus), Scotobiini (Ammophorus), and Tenebrionini (Hipalmus). These genera include epigaeic detritivores and epiphytic groups (Edrotini, Epitragini) associated with various vegetation types on sandy soils. - The Andes, including the Western Andean range (1000 m–3800 m), interandean valleys (1500 m–3300 m) and the high plateaus (.3800 m): Nycteliini (Pilobalia, Psectrascelis), Praociini (Praocis, Praocidia, Pilobaloderes, Platyholmus), Edrotini (Hylithus), Evaniosomini (Vaniosus), Trilobocarini (Eremoecus). These genera are epigaeic detritivores associated with grasslands and scrubs. - Amazonia, including the Eastern Andean range (800 m–3500 m) and the Amazonian plain (,800 m): Goniaderini, Lagriini, Nilio, Phrenapatini, Penetini
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Differential Contributions of the Outer Membrane Receptors PhuR and HasR to Heme Acquisition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa*
- Author
-
Aaron D. Smith and Angela Wilks
- Subjects
Models, Molecular ,Operon ,Cell Biology ,Heme ,Biology ,Membrane transport ,Biochemistry ,Cell biology ,Bacterial genetics ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Metabolism ,chemistry ,Cell surface receptor ,Cytoplasm ,Pseudomonas aeruginosa ,Bacterial outer membrane ,Receptor ,Molecular Biology ,Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 encodes two outer membrane receptors, PhuR (Pseudomonas heme uptake) and HasR (heme assimilation system). The HasR and PhuR receptors have distinct heme coordinating ligands and substrate specificities. HasR is encoded in an operon with a secreted hemophore, HasAp. In contrast the non-hemophore-dependent PhuR is encoded within an operon along with proteins required for heme translocation into the cytoplasm. Herein we report on the contributions of the HasR and PhuR receptors to heme uptake and utilization. Employing bacterial genetics and isotopic [(13)C]heme labeling studies we have shown both PhuR and HasR are required for optimal heme utilization. However, the unique His-Tyr-ligated PhuR plays a major role in the acquisition of heme. In contrast the HasR receptor plays a primary role in the sensing of extracellular heme and a supplementary role in heme uptake. We propose PhuR and HasR represent non-redundant heme receptors, capable of accessing heme across a wide range of physiological conditions on colonization of the host.
- Published
- 2015
21. Finding our way through phenotypes
- Author
-
Christian S. Wirkner, Monte Westerfeld, Bruno Chanet, Michael J. Sharkey, Rui Diogo, Erik Segerdell, John G. Lundberg, Suzanna E. Lewis, Christopher J. Mungall, Carolyn J. Lawrence, James Macklin, Anne E. Thessen, Katja C. Seltmann, Matthew J. Yoder, Andrew R. Deans, Ramona Walls, Peter E. Midford, Christina James-Zorn, Salvatore S. Anzaldo, Sandip Das, Sandor Csösz, Michael Ashburner, Peter D. Vize, J. Gordon Burleigh, Guillaume Lecointre, Melissa A. Haendel, T. Alexander Dececchi, Hong Cui, Mélanie Courtot, Laura M. Jackson, Hilmar Lapp, Paula M. Mabee, Robert W. Thacker, Pankaj Jaiswal, Jose Fernandez-Triana, Mauno Vihinen, Aaron D. Smith, Heather M. Hines, Alan Ruttenberg, Austin Mast, Wasila M. Dahdul, Agnès Dettai, Barry Smith, Aaron M. Zorn, Chelsea D. Specht, Nizar Ibrahim, Frank Friedrich, Michel Dumontier, Lars Vogt, István Mikó, Peter N. Robinson, Robert A. Wharton, Luke J. Harmon, James P. Balhoff, David Osumi-Sutherland, George Gkoutos, Christine E. Wall, Katja Schulz, David C. Blackburn, James B. Woolley, Stefan Richter, R. Burke Squires, Yongqun He, Helen Parkinson, Laurel Cooper, Nico M. Franz, Judith A. Blake, Eva Huala, Robert E. Druzinsky, Martín J. Ramírez, Anika Oellrich, Terry F. Hayamizu, Nicolas Le Novère, Sebastian Köhler, Department of Genetics University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM), University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB ), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University (OSU), Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency (BCCRC)-British Columbia Cancer Agency Research Centre, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), GeneDx [Gaithersburg, MD, USA], Département Systématique et Évolution, and Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)
- Subjects
Computer and Information Sciences ,Databases, Factual ,QH301-705.5 ,Ecology (disciplines) ,Systems biology ,Genomics ,Computational biology ,Biology ,[SDV.BID.SPT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Systematics, Phylogenetics and taxonomy ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Bottleneck ,Computer Applications ,Phenomics ,Terminology as Topic ,Controlled vocabulary ,Animals ,Humans ,Biology (General) ,Data Curation ,Genetic Association Studies ,Data Management ,Evolutionary Biology ,Computing Systems ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,Data curation ,Library Science ,General Neuroscience ,Computational Biology ,Reproducibility of Results ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Biological Sciences ,Reference Standards ,Data science ,Data resources ,ComputingMethodologies_PATTERNRECOGNITION ,Phenotype ,Perspective ,Gene-Environment Interaction ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,Information Technology ,Developmental Biology ,Computer Modeling - Abstract
Imagine if we could compute across phenotype data as easily as genomic data; this article calls for efforts to realize this vision and discusses the potential benefits., Despite a large and multifaceted effort to understand the vast landscape of phenotypic data, their current form inhibits productive data analysis. The lack of a community-wide, consensus-based, human- and machine-interpretable language for describing phenotypes and their genomic and environmental contexts is perhaps the most pressing scientific bottleneck to integration across many key fields in biology, including genomics, systems biology, development, medicine, evolution, ecology, and systematics. Here we survey the current phenomics landscape, including data resources and handling, and the progress that has been made to accurately capture relevant data descriptions for phenotypes. We present an example of the kind of integration across domains that computable phenotypes would enable, and we call upon the broader biology community, publishers, and relevant funding agencies to support efforts to surmount today's data barriers and facilitate analytical reproducibility.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Priority determines Tribolium competitive outcome in a food-limited environment.
- Author
-
Zane Holditch and Aaron D Smith
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Flour beetles are a classic model system for studying competitive dynamics between species occupying the same ecological niche. Competitive performance is often interpreted in terms of biological species traits such as fecundity, resource use, and predation. However, many studies only measure competitive ability when species enter an environment simultaneously, and thus do not consider how the relative timing of species' arrival may determine competitive outcome (i.e., priority effects). Whether priority effects may influence competition in Tribolium remains to be tested. The present study examined the importance of priority effects in competitions between two common species of flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Tribolium castaneum and T. confusum. To investigate whether priority effects confer competitive advantages to Tribolium beetles, relative introduction times of T. castaneum and T. confusum to competitive arenas were manipulated, and adult populations were measured for seven months. Four important patterns were noted: (1) Tribolium species given two-weeks priority access to experimental arenas attained larger populations than their late-arriving competitor, (2) when founding adults were introduced simultaneously, T. castaneum was competitively dominant, (3) T. castaneum benefited more from priority arrival than T. confusum, and (4) available bran resources largely predicted population decline in adult beetles toward the end of the experiment. These results suggest competitive outcome in Tribolium is not always predicted by species' identity, and that performance could instead be determined by the timing of species' arrivals and available resources.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Spliceosomal Prp8 intein at the crossroads of protein and RNA splicing.
- Author
-
Cathleen M Green, Zhong Li, Aaron D Smith, Olga Novikova, Valjean R Bacot-Davis, Fengshan Gao, Saiyang Hu, Nilesh K Banavali, Dennis J Thiele, Hongmin Li, and Marlene Belfort
- Subjects
Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 - Abstract
The spliceosome is a large ribonucleoprotein complex that removes introns from pre-mRNAs. At its functional core lies the essential pre-mRNA processing factor 8 (Prp8) protein. Across diverse eukaryotes, this protein cofactor of RNA catalysis harbors a self-splicing element called an intein. Inteins in Prp8 are extremely pervasive and are found at 7 different sites in various species. Here, we focus on the Prp8 intein from Cryptococcus neoformans (Cne), a human fungal pathogen. We solved the crystal structure of this intein, revealing structural homology among protein splicing sequences in eukaryotes, including the Hedgehog C terminus. Working with the Cne Prp8 intein in a reporter assay, we find that the biologically relevant divalent metals copper and zinc inhibit intein splicing, albeit by 2 different mechanisms. Copper likely stimulates reversible modifications on a catalytically important cysteine, whereas zinc binds at the terminal asparagine and the same critical cysteine. Importantly, we also show that copper treatment inhibits Prp8 protein splicing in Cne. Lastly, an intein-containing Prp8 precursor model is presented, suggesting that metal-induced protein splicing inhibition would disturb function of both Prp8 and the spliceosome. These results indicate that Prp8 protein splicing can be modulated, with potential functional implications for the spliceosome.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Finding our way through phenotypes.
- Author
-
Andrew R Deans, Suzanna E Lewis, Eva Huala, Salvatore S Anzaldo, Michael Ashburner, James P Balhoff, David C Blackburn, Judith A Blake, J Gordon Burleigh, Bruno Chanet, Laurel D Cooper, Mélanie Courtot, Sándor Csösz, Hong Cui, Wasila Dahdul, Sandip Das, T Alexander Dececchi, Agnes Dettai, Rui Diogo, Robert E Druzinsky, Michel Dumontier, Nico M Franz, Frank Friedrich, George V Gkoutos, Melissa Haendel, Luke J Harmon, Terry F Hayamizu, Yongqun He, Heather M Hines, Nizar Ibrahim, Laura M Jackson, Pankaj Jaiswal, Christina James-Zorn, Sebastian Köhler, Guillaume Lecointre, Hilmar Lapp, Carolyn J Lawrence, Nicolas Le Novère, John G Lundberg, James Macklin, Austin R Mast, Peter E Midford, István Mikó, Christopher J Mungall, Anika Oellrich, David Osumi-Sutherland, Helen Parkinson, Martín J Ramírez, Stefan Richter, Peter N Robinson, Alan Ruttenberg, Katja S Schulz, Erik Segerdell, Katja C Seltmann, Michael J Sharkey, Aaron D Smith, Barry Smith, Chelsea D Specht, R Burke Squires, Robert W Thacker, Anne Thessen, Jose Fernandez-Triana, Mauno Vihinen, Peter D Vize, Lars Vogt, Christine E Wall, Ramona L Walls, Monte Westerfeld, Robert A Wharton, Christian S Wirkner, James B Woolley, Matthew J Yoder, Aaron M Zorn, and Paula Mabee
- Subjects
Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 - Abstract
Despite a large and multifaceted effort to understand the vast landscape of phenotypic data, their current form inhibits productive data analysis. The lack of a community-wide, consensus-based, human- and machine-interpretable language for describing phenotypes and their genomic and environmental contexts is perhaps the most pressing scientific bottleneck to integration across many key fields in biology, including genomics, systems biology, development, medicine, evolution, ecology, and systematics. Here we survey the current phenomics landscape, including data resources and handling, and the progress that has been made to accurately capture relevant data descriptions for phenotypes. We present an example of the kind of integration across domains that computable phenotypes would enable, and we call upon the broader biology community, publishers, and relevant funding agencies to support efforts to surmount today's data barriers and facilitate analytical reproducibility.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.