1. Questions in two-dimensional logic
- Author
-
Thom Van Gessel, Logic and Language (ILLC, FNWI/FGw), and Brain and Cognition
- Subjects
Philosophy ,Mathematics (miscellaneous) ,Logic ,Computer science ,060302 philosophy ,010102 general mathematics ,06 humanities and the arts ,0101 mathematics ,0603 philosophy, ethics and religion ,01 natural sciences - Abstract
Since Kripke, philosophers have distinguished a priori true statements from necessarily true ones. A statement is a priori true if its truth can be established before experience, and necessarily true if it could not have been false according to logical or metaphysical laws. This distinction can be captured formally using two-dimensional semantics.There is a natural way to extend the notions of apriority and necessity so they can also apply to questions. Questions either can or cannot be resolved before experience, and either are or are not about necessary facts. Classical two-dimensionalism has no account of question meanings, so it has to be combined with a framework for question semantics in order to capture these observations. It is shown in [14] how two-dimensional semantics can be combined with inquisitive semantics, in which questions are analyzed in terms of information. The present paper investigates the logic of two-dimensional inquisitive semantics, and provides a complete proof system.
- Published
- 2022