7 results on '"Quach, Binh"'
Search Results
2. The hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype is associated with fatty liver and glycometabolic profiles in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study
- Author
-
Zhou, Meiling, Li, Feifei, Tang, Haokai, Wu, Si, Meng, Li, Dong, Yanhui, Wang, Fei, Quach, Binh, Yang, Yide, Ma, Jun, and Baker, Julien Steven
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The Evolution of Effort-Reward Imbalance in Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in France—An Observational Study in More than 8000 Workers
- Author
-
Delamarre, Louis, Tannous, Salma, Lakbar, Ines, Couarraze, Sébastien, Pereira, Bruno, Leone, Marc, Marhar, Fouad, Baker, Julien, Bagheri, Reza, Berton, Mickael, Rabbouch, Hana, Zak, Marek, Sikorski, Tomasz, Wasik, Magdalena, Nasir, Hijrah, Quach, Binh, Jiao, Jiao, Aviles, Raimundo, Network, Covistress, Clinchamps, Maëlys, Dutheil, Fréderic, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), CHU Marseille, Education, Formation, Travail, Savoirs (EFTS), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville (ENSFEA), Direction de la recherche clinique et de l’innovation [CHU Clermont-Ferrand] (DRCI), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU), University of Isfahan, Université de Tunis, The Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce (UJK ), École d'économie - Clermont Auvergne, Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Universidad Finis Terrae, Service Santé Travail Environnement [CHU Clermont-Ferrand], CHU Gabriel Montpied [Clermont-Ferrand], and CHU Clermont-Ferrand-CHU Clermont-Ferrand
- Subjects
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,COVID-19 ,[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology ,Workload ,SARS-CoV-2 ,France ,work-related stress ,Siegrist’s framework ,lockdowns ,Job Satisfaction ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Reward ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Communicable Disease Control ,Humans ,[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie ,Prospective Studies ,Pandemics ,Stress, Psychological - Abstract
(1) Background: The effects of lockdown repetition on work-related stress, expressed through Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI), during the COVID-19 pandemic are poorly documented. We investigated the effect of repetitive lockdowns on the ERI in French workers, its difference across occupations, and the change in its influencing factors across time. (2) Methods: Participants were included in a prospective cross-sectional observational study from 30 March 2020 to 28 May 2021. The primary outcome was the ERI score (visual analog scale). The ERI score of the population was examined via Generalized Estimating Equations. For each period, the factors influencing ERI were studied by multivariate linear regression. (3) Results: In 8121 participants, the ERI score decreased in the first 2 lockdowns (53.2 ± 0.3, p < 0.001; 50.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and after lockdown 2 (54.8 ± 0.8, p = 0.004) compared with the pre-pandemic period (59 ± 0.4). ERI was higher in medical than in paramedical professionals in the pre-pandemic and the first 2 lockdowns. Higher workloads were associated with better ERI scores. (4) Conclusions: In a large French sample, Effort-Reward Imbalance worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic until the end of the 2nd lockdown. Paramedical professionals experienced a higher burden of stress compared with medical professionals.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Changes in Cannabis Consumption During the Global COVID-19 Lockdown: The International COVISTRESS Study.
- Author
-
Salles, Juliette, Yrondi, Antoine, Marhar, Fouad, Andant, Nicolas, Dorlhiac, Raimundo Avilés, Quach, Binh, Jiao, Jiao, Antunes, Samuel, Ugbolue, Ukadike Chris, Guegan, Julien, Rouffiac, Karine, Pereira, Bruno, Clinchamps, Maélys, Mestres, Stéphanie, Miele, Cécile, Navel, Valentin, Parreira, Lénise, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Yves Boirie, Maria Livia Fantini, Martine Duclos, and Schmidt, Jeannot
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,STAY-at-home orders ,MARIJUANA ,COMPULSIVE behavior ,PUBLIC spaces ,EMOTIONAL experience ,ALCOHOL drinking - Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 lockdown measures have been sources of both potential stress and possible psychological and addiction complications. A lack of activity and isolation during lockdown are among the factors thought to be behind the growth in the use of psychoactive substances and worsening addictive behaviors. Previous studies on the pandemic have attested to an increase in alcohol consumption during lockdowns. Likewise, data suggest there has also been a rise in the use of cannabis, although it is unclear how this is affected by external factors. Our study used quantitative data collected from an international population to evaluate changes in cannabis consumption during the lockdown period between March and October, 2020. We also compared users and non-users of the drug in relation to: (1) socio-demographic differences, (2) emotional experiences, and (3) the information available and the degree of approval of lockdown measures. Methods: An online self-report questionnaire concerning the lockdown was widely disseminated around the globe. Data was collected on sociodemographics and how the rules imposed had influenced the use of cannabis and concerns about health, the economic impact of the measures and the approach taken by government(s). Results: One hundred eighty two respondents consumed cannabis before the lockdown vs. 199 thereafter. The mean cannabis consumption fell from 13 joints per week pre-lockdown to 9.75 after it (p < 0.001). Forty-nine respondents stopped using cannabis at all and 66 admitted to starting to do so. The cannabis users were: less satisfied with government measures; less worried about their health; more concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on the economy and their career; and more frightened of becoming infected in public areas. The risk factors for cannabis use were: age (OR = 0.96); concern for physical health (OR = 0.98); tobacco (OR = 1.1) and alcohol consumption during lockdown (OR = 1.1); the pre-lockdown anger level (OR = 1.01); and feelings of boredom during the restrictions (OR = 1.1). Conclusion: In a specific sub-population, the COVID-19 lockdown brought about either an end to the consumption of cannabis or new use of the drug. The main risk factors for cannabis use were: a lower age, co-addictions and high levels of emotions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The major worldwide stress of healthcare professionals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic – the international COVISTRESS survey.
- Author
-
Couarraze, Sébastien, Delamarre, Louis, Marhar, Fouad, Quach, Binh, Jiao, Jiao, Avilés Dorlhiac, Raimundo, Saadaoui, Foued, Liu, Andy Su-I, Dubuis, Benoït, Antunes, Samuel, Andant, Nicolas, Pereira, Bruno, Ugbolue, Ukadike C., Baker, Julien S., Clinchamps, Maëlys, and Dutheil, Frédéric
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,MEDICAL personnel ,JOB stress ,PHYSICIANS ,OLDER men ,VISUAL analog scale ,LIFE change events - Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has initiated an upheaval in society and has been the cause of considerable stress during this period. Healthcare professionals have been on the front line during this health crisis, particularly paramedical staff. The aim of this study was to assess the high level of stress of healthcare workers during the first wave of the pandemic. Materials and methods: The COVISTRESS international study is a questionnaire disseminated online collecting demographic and stress-related data over the globe, during the pandemic. Stress levels were evaluated using non-calibrated visual analog scale, from 0 (no stress) to 100 (maximal stress). Results: Among the 13,537 individuals from 44 countries who completed the survey from January to June 2020, we included 10,051 workers (including 1379 healthcare workers, 631 medical doctors and 748 paramedical staff). The stress levels during the first wave of the pandemic were 57.8 ± 33 in the whole cohort, 65.3 ± 29.1 in medical doctors, and 73.6 ± 27.7 in paramedical staff. Healthcare professionals and especially paramedical staff had the highest levels of stress (p < 0.001 vs non-healthcare workers). Across all occupational categories, women had systematically significantly higher levels of work-related stress than men (p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between age and stress level (r = -0.098, p < 0.001). Healthcare professionals demonstrated an increased risk of very-high stress levels (>80) compared to other workers (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.87–2.41). Paramedical staff risk for very-high levels of stress was higher than doctors' (1.88, 1.50–2.34). The risk of high levels of stress also increased in women (1.83, 1.61–2.09; p < 0.001 vs. men) and in people aged <50 (1.45, 1.26–1.66; p < 0.001 vs. aged >50). Conclusions: The first wave of the pandemic was a major stressful event for healthcare workers, especially paramedical staff. Among individuals, women were the most at risk while age was a protective factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Transnational and Transdisciplinary Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.
- Author
-
Dutheil, Frédéric, Navel, Valentin, Baker, Julien S., Tran, Emilie, Cole, Alistair, Quach, Binh, Jiao Jiao, Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste, and Clinchamps, Maëlys
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,TRANSNATIONAL education - Abstract
The article examines long-term comprehension of the effects of the pandemic, to create effective preventive strategies. Topics discussed include ways in which COVID-19 pandemic also exacerbated the inequalities in public health, impact of prolonged period of social distancing aiming to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV2, and increase in boredom and sadness experienced in lockdown situations.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Association Between Eating Speed and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Yuan SQ, Liu YM, Liang W, Li FF, Zeng Y, Liu YY, Huang SZ, He QY, Quach B, Jiao J, Baker JS, and Yang YD
- Abstract
Objective: This review aimed to systematically summarize and meta-analyze the association between eating speed and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews, and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) were searched until March 2021 to identify eligible articles based on a series of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was examined using I
2 statistics. Using random-effects models, the pooled odds ratios (ORs), and 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the association between eating speed with MetS and its components, including central obesity, blood pressure (BP), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglyceride (TG), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Results: Of the 8,500 original hits generated by the systematic search, 29 eligible studies with moderate-to-high quality were included, involving 465,155 subjects. The meta-analysis revealed that eating faster was significantly associated with higher risks of MetS (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.27-1.86), central obesity (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.37-1.73), elevated BP (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.13-1.40), low HDL (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15-1.31), elevated TG (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18-1.42), and elevated FPG (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27) compared to eating slowly. Conclusions: The results of the review indicated that eating speed was significantly associated with MetS and its components. Interventions related to decreasing eating speed may be beneficial for the management of MetS. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021242213, identifier: CRD42021242213., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Yuan, Liu, Liang, Li, Zeng, Liu, Huang, He, Quach, Jiao, Baker and Yang.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.