Search

The literature on cerebellar liponeurocytoma (CL) has never been systematically assessed using bibliometric analytic methodologies. We quantitatively analyzed the major trends and scientific output regarding CL, highlighting potential avenues for research. Elsevier's Scopus database was used to collect all published studies relevant to cerebellar liponeurocytoma from 1978 to 2021. The specific bibliometric parameters were extracted and analyzed with R v4.1.2. Our search yielded 108 documents published in 67 sources from 1978 to 2021. The annual growth rate of publications regarding CL has been 7.47% per year since 1978. Journals with the most publications on CL include Clinical Neuropathology and Neurology India (n = 5), followed by Acta Neuropathologica and Journal of Neuro-oncology (n = 4). A total of 529 authors have published on CL and they have been cited 598 times. The 10 most influential authors in the field were determined using their total number of citations and the local H-index. Kleihues P has the highest number of citations (n = 177) with a local H index of 3, followed by Chimelli L with 167 citations and a local H index of 4. Davis DG has 149 citations and a local H index of 3. China had the most single country publications followed by India, Italy, and the USA. France and Austria have the most multiple country publications followed by China, Tunisia, Brazil, United Kingdom, Egypt, and Israel. Our study is the first bibliometric analysis evaluating the present literature and publication trends in CL. Generally, the current literature has a few studies regarding CL relative to other neuro-oncological pathologies. This can be due to the low incidence of the disease and highlights a need for high volume database studies that can offer high quality evidence on the subject. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cerebellar liponeurocytoma (cLNC) is a rare benign glioneuronal tumor with only ~60 cases reported since its first description in 1978. They have occurred largely as sporadic cases; however, familial cases with possible autosomal dominant inheritance have also been reported. Surgical excision has been considered the main modality of treatment, even for recurrent lesions. Uncertainties exist regarding the natural history, long-term outcomes, and optimal postoperative management and follow-up protocols for cLNC in general and multifocal cLNC in particular. Multifocality is exceedingly rare, with only 4 cases reported previously. Case Description We present a case of multifocal cLNC in a young woman who had presented with progressive cerebellar symptoms of 5 months' duration. Her diagnostic neuroimaging evaluations revealed 2 asymmetric mass lesions (1 on each cerebellar hemisphere). We excised the larger lesion to relieve the mass effect and decided to monitor the smaller lesion radiologically. However, she developed a new lesion during the follow-up period and required adjuvant radiotherapy. Conclusion Surgical excision forms the cornerstone of management of cLNCs. However, it is necessary to vigilantly monitor these patients owing to the high recurrence rates of cLNC despite the innocuous histologic features. Highlights • cLNCs are rare benign glioneuronal tumor with unknown natural history and long-term outcomes. • Multifocality is exceedingly rare, with only 4 cases reported previously. • The clinical course is usually marred by frequent recurrences. • Surgical excision is considered the main treatment modality, even for recurrent lesions. • The optimal postoperative management and follow-up protocol remain controversial particularly for multifocal lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]