Search

We conducted a field evaluation using qualitative and quantitative methods to assess freeze prevention of vaccines transported and stored in a recently developed, World Health Organization-prequalified freeze-preventive cold box (FPCB) as compared to currently used standard cold boxes (SCBs). The study assessed the FPCB's practical use, health worker acceptance, health system fit (including cost considerations), and challenges faced by health workers in variable conditions and geographical settings. The evaluation took place in five health facilities across hilly and plains districts of Nepal in two phases: Phase 1 involved FPCBs in simulated use alongside SCBs. In Phase 2, actual vaccines were used in the FPCBs. The study gathered quantitative data from logbooks and electronic temperature monitors placed inside and outside the cold boxes. Qualitative data were collected from health workers, cold chain personnel, and immunization program managers involved in the vaccine cold chain at multiple levels. No damage, durability issues, or freezing incidents were observed when using FPCBs, but two incidents of freezing occurred when using SCBs. FPCBs also took longer to cool down than SCBs. Participants mostly found the FPCB to be safe and user friendly for vaccine transportation and short-term storage. Advantages of the FPCB as compared to the SCB include its ability to minimize vaccine wastage, to keep freeze-sensitive vaccines safe (the average value of freeze-sensitive vaccines transported per shipment was $1,704), and to ease preparation through elimination of the need to condition ice packs. Procurement price ranges for FPCBs overlap those for SCBs. Disadvantages of the FPCB include its greater size and weight, which require more personnel and vehicles during transportation. This suggests that lighter and smaller FPCBs would be more effective and acceptable for the Nepal immunization program and other, similar immunization programs conducted globally., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Shigella is the leading bacterial cause of diarrheal mortality in children and can cause long-term effects on growth and development. No licensed Shigella vaccines currently exist but several promising candidates are in development and could be available in the next five years. Despite Shigella being a well-known public health target of the World Health Organization for decades, given current burden estimates and competing preventable disease priorities in low-income settings, whether the availability of an effective Shigella vaccine will lead to its prioritization and widespread introduction among countries at highest risk is unknown., Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of national stakeholders and healthcare providers in five countries in Asia and Africa and regional stakeholders in the Pan American Health Organization to identify preferences and priorities for forthcoming Shigella vaccines., Results: In our study of 89 individuals, diarrhea was the most frequently mentioned serious health concern for children under five years. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was more often considered very concerning than diarrhea or stunting. Shigella awareness was high but not considered a serious health concern by most stakeholders. Most participants were willing to consider adding a new vaccine to the routine immunization schedule but expressed reservations about a Shigella vaccine because of lower perceived burden relative to other preventable diseases and an already crowded schedule; interest was highest among national stakeholders in countries receiving more financial support for immunization. The priority of a Shigella vaccine rose when participants considered vaccine impacts on reducing stunting and AMR. Participants strongly preferred oral and combination vaccines compared to injectable and a single-antigen presentations, citing greater perceived community acceptability., Conclusions: This study provides a critical opportunity to hear directly from country and regional stakeholders about health priorities and preferences around new vaccines. These findings should inform ongoing Shigella vaccine development efforts and eventual vaccine introduction and implementation planning., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jessica A Fleming, Nikki Gurley, Sophia Knudson, Lassane Kabore, John Tanko Bawa, Patience Dapaah, Sandeep Kumar, Thang Tran, Chris Odero, Christopher Obong’o, Kofi Aburam, Stella Wanjiru, and William P Hausdorff report financial support was provided by Wellcome Trust and financial support and article publishing charges were provided by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Preventing vaccine freezing is one of the biggest challenges in vaccine management. Until 2018, vaccine carriers used in the immunization program lacked features to prevent vaccine freezing. Freeze-preventive vaccine carriers (FPVCs) have an engineered liner that buffers vaccines from direct exposure to frozen ice packs. A field evaluation of three FPVCs was conducted in 24 health posts in eastern Nepal. The objective was to evaluate the FPVCs' performance, acceptability, systems fit, and cost, to inform prequalification and introduction planning. The study was carried out in two phases: in the first phase, FPVCs containing dummy vaccines (labeled "Not for Human Use") were transported to outreach sessions along with a standard vaccine carrier (SVC); in the second phase, the FPVCs were used for transporting vaccines taken to outreach sessions and used for vaccinating eligible children. The study gathered quantitative and qualitative data from health workers, logbooks, and electronic temperature monitors placed inside and outside the FPVCs. Results indicate the FPVCs successfully prevented temperatures below 0 °C more than 99% of the time-except at one site, where ambient temperatures were below the minimum rated testing temperature specified by the World Health Organization. Internal cool-down times for the FPVCs were highly variable, as were mean kinetic temperatures, possibly driven by the wide range of ambient temperatures and higher-than-expected variations in freezer performance, which, along with the need to transport ice packs to some locations, affected ice-pack temperatures. Almost all health workers requested smaller, lighter-weight FPVCs but appreciated the FPVCs' ability to prevent vaccines from freezing while avoiding undue heat exposure. FPVCs had benefit-cost ratios greater than 1 and hence good value for money. Results point to the importance of understanding the intended environment of use and the need for smaller, short-range as well as long-range carriers., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)