Back to Search Start Over

Exploring Shigella vaccine priorities and preferences: Results from a mixed-methods study in low- and middle-income settings.

Authors :
Fleming JA
Gurley N
Knudson S
Kabore L
Bawa JT
Dapaah P
Kumar S
Uranw S
Tran T
Mai LTP
Odero C
Obong'o C
Aburam K
Wanjiru S
Hanh NTM
Dung LP
Hausdorff WP
Source :
Vaccine: X [Vaccine X] 2023 Aug 09; Vol. 15, pp. 100368. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 09 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Shigella is the leading bacterial cause of diarrheal mortality in children and can cause long-term effects on growth and development. No licensed Shigella vaccines currently exist but several promising candidates are in development and could be available in the next five years. Despite Shigella being a well-known public health target of the World Health Organization for decades, given current burden estimates and competing preventable disease priorities in low-income settings, whether the availability of an effective Shigella vaccine will lead to its prioritization and widespread introduction among countries at highest risk is unknown.<br />Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of national stakeholders and healthcare providers in five countries in Asia and Africa and regional stakeholders in the Pan American Health Organization to identify preferences and priorities for forthcoming Shigella vaccines.<br />Results: In our study of 89 individuals, diarrhea was the most frequently mentioned serious health concern for children under five years. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was more often considered very concerning than diarrhea or stunting. Shigella awareness was high but not considered a serious health concern by most stakeholders. Most participants were willing to consider adding a new vaccine to the routine immunization schedule but expressed reservations about a Shigella vaccine because of lower perceived burden relative to other preventable diseases and an already crowded schedule; interest was highest among national stakeholders in countries receiving more financial support for immunization. The priority of a Shigella vaccine rose when participants considered vaccine impacts on reducing stunting and AMR. Participants strongly preferred oral and combination vaccines compared to injectable and a single-antigen presentations, citing greater perceived community acceptability.<br />Conclusions: This study provides a critical opportunity to hear directly from country and regional stakeholders about health priorities and preferences around new vaccines. These findings should inform ongoing Shigella vaccine development efforts and eventual vaccine introduction and implementation planning.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jessica A Fleming, Nikki Gurley, Sophia Knudson, Lassane Kabore, John Tanko Bawa, Patience Dapaah, Sandeep Kumar, Thang Tran, Chris Odero, Christopher Obong’o, Kofi Aburam, Stella Wanjiru, and William P Hausdorff report financial support was provided by Wellcome Trust and financial support and article publishing charges were provided by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation..<br /> (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2590-1362
Volume :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Vaccine: X
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37636544
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100368