1. Risks and benefits of weaning immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients: Long-term follow-up
- Author
-
George V. Mazariegos, T. E. Starzl, John J. Fung, Ignazio R. Marino, Bridget Flynn, and Jorge Reyes
- Subjects
Graft Rejection ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Long term follow up ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Drug Administration Schedule ,Article ,Cohort Studies ,Postoperative Complications ,medicine ,Humans ,Weaning ,Risks and benefits ,Child ,Intensive care medicine ,Immunosuppression Therapy ,Transplantation ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Immunosuppression ,Liver Transplantation ,Allograft rejection ,Female ,Surgery ,business ,Immunosuppressive Agents ,Follow-Up Studies ,Cohort study - Abstract
THE MORBIDITY arising from the chronic use of .1. anti-rejection medications is an incentive to establish the lowest posSIble level of immunosuppression necessary to maintain stable graft function. The finding that freedom from immunosuppression was sporadically possible in longsurviving recipients of liver allografts and the concurrent evidence that chimerism was uniformly demonstrable in such tolerant patients! have led to a prospective trial of complete drug weaning. In our initial experience, it was shown that significant reductions in medication or their discontinuance could be safely accomplished in liver,: and even in a handful of living-related kidney recipients who have been drug free for as long as 30 years.3 However, the danger of consequent allograft rejection has not been completely assessed and guidelines for judicious weaning need to be clarified. We present here further follow-up on our previously reported weaning trial in liver allograft recipients2 and results from additiona.l patients subsequently entered.
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF