1. Using molecular testing and whole-genome sequencing for tuberculosis diagnosis in a low-burden setting: a cost-effectiveness analysis using transmission-dynamic modelling
- Author
-
Tendai Mugwagwa, Ibrahim Abubakar, Peter J White, National Institute for Health Research, and Medical Research Council (MRC)
- Subjects
DNA, Bacterial ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Tuberculosis ,diagnosis ,Cost effectiveness ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Respiratory System ,Health benefits ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cost of Illness ,Tuberculosis diagnosis ,Active tb ,Humans ,transmission-dynamic modelling ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Intensive care medicine ,cost-effectiveness ,molecular testing ,GeneXpert MTB/RIF ,Whole Genome Sequencing ,Transmission dynamic ,business.industry ,1103 Clinical Sciences ,Mycobacterium tuberculosis ,Cost-effectiveness analysis ,medicine.disease ,Models, Economic ,Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ,tuberculosis ,030228 respiratory system ,whole-genome sequencing ,business - Abstract
BackgroundDespite progress in TB control in low-burden countries like England and Wales, there are still diagnostic delays. Molecular testing and/or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provide more rapid diagnosis but their cost-effectiveness is relatively unexplored in low-burden settings.MethodsAn integrated transmission-dynamic health economic model is used to assess the cost-effectiveness of using WGS to replace culture-based drug-sensitivity testing, versus using molecular testing versus combined use of WGS and molecular testing, for routine TB diagnosis. The model accounts for the effects of faster appropriate treatment in reducing transmission, benefiting health and reducing future treatment costs. Cost-effectiveness is assessed using incremental net benefit (INB) over a 10-year horizon with a quality-adjusted life-year valued at £20 000, and discounting at 3.5% per year.ResultsWGS shortens the time to drug sensitivity testing and treatment modification where necessary, reducing treatment and hospitalisation costs, with an INB of £7.1 million. Molecular testing shortens the time to TB diagnosis and treatment. Initially, this causes an increase in annual costs of treatment, but averting transmissions and future active TB disease subsequently, resulting in cost savings and health benefits to achieve an INB of £8.6 million (GeneXpert MTB/RIF) or £11.1 million (Xpert-Ultra). Combined use of Xpert-Ultra and WGS is the optimal strategy we consider, with an INB of £16.5 million.ConclusionRoutine use of WGS or molecular testing is cost-effective in a low-burden setting, and combined use is the most cost-effective option. Adoption of these technologies can help low-burden countries meet the WHO End TB Strategy milestones, particularly the UK, which still has relatively high TB rates.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF