1. Effect of the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Pandemic on Invasive Pneumococcal Pneumonia
- Author
-
David K. Shay, Catherine Lexau, Katherine E. Fleming-Dutra, Seema Jain, Ann Thomas, Thomas H. Taylor, Nancy M. Bennett, Lyn Finelli, Bernard Beall, Lee H. Harrison, Shikha Garg, Ruth Link-Gelles, Ken Gershman, Patricia Ryan, Kimberly Yousey-Hindes, Art Reingold, William Schaffner, Sandra S. Chaves, Emily B. Hancock, Matthew R. Moore, Ruth Lynfield, Monica M. Farley, S. Zansky, Susan Petit, Michael A. Jhung, and Joan Baumbach
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Databases, Factual ,Population ,medicine.disease_cause ,Severity of Illness Index ,Young Adult ,Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Influenza, Human ,Pandemic ,Confidence Intervals ,Odds Ratio ,Influenza A virus ,Humans ,Immunology and Allergy ,Medicine ,Poisson Distribution ,Child ,education ,Pandemics ,Aged ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,Pneumonia, Pneumococcal ,medicine.disease ,United States ,Confidence interval ,Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 ,Hospitalization ,Pneumonia ,Streptococcus pneumoniae ,Infectious Diseases ,Child, Preschool ,Population Surveillance ,Pneumococcal pneumonia ,Human mortality from H5N1 ,Female ,Seasons ,business - Abstract
Background Because pneumococcal pneumonia was prevalent during previous influenza pandemics, we evaluated invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) rates during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. Methods We identified laboratory-confirmed, influenza-associated hospitalizations and IPP cases (pneumococcus isolated from normally sterile sites with discharge diagnoses of pneumonia) using active, population-based surveillance in the United States. We compared IPP rates during peak pandemic months (April 2009-March 2010) to mean IPP rates in nonpandemic years (April 2004-March 2009) and, using Poisson models, to 2006-2008 influenza seasons. Results Higher IPP rates occurred during the peak pandemic month compared to nonpandemic periods in 5-24 (IPP rate per 10 million: 48 vs 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-13), 25-49 (74 vs 53 [CI, 41-65]), 50-64 (188 vs 114 [CI, 85-143]), and ≥65-year-olds (229 vs 187 [CI, 159-216]). In the models with seasonal influenza rates included, observed IPP rates during the pandemic peak were within the predicted 95% CIs, suggesting this increase was not greater than observed with seasonal influenza. Conclusions The recent influenza pandemic likely resulted in an out-of-season IPP peak among persons ≥5 years. The IPP peak's magnitude was similar to that seen during seasonal influenza epidemics.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF