Search

Opioids play an important role in pain management after surgery but also increase the risk of prolonged opioid use in patients. The identification of patients who are more likely to use opioids after intended short-term treatment is critical for employing alternative management approaches or targeted interventions for the prevention of opioid-related problems. We used patient-reported data (PRD) and electronic health record information to identify factors predictive of prolonged opioid use after surgery.We used our institutional registry containing data on all patients who underwent elective upper extremity surgeries. We evaluated factors associated with prolonged opioid use in the cohort from the year 2018 to 2019. We then validated our results using the 2020 cohort. The predictive variables included preoperative PRD and electronic health record data. Opioid use was determined based on patient reports and/or filled opioid prescriptions 3 months after surgery. We conducted bivariate regression, followed by multivariable regression analyses, and model validation using area under the receiver operating curve.We included 2,114 patients. In our final model on the 2018-2019 electronic health records and PRD data (n = 1,589), including numerous patient-reported outcome questionnaire scores, patients who were underweight and had undergone trauma-related surgery had higher odds of being on opioids at 3 months. Additionally, each 5-unit decrease in the preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Physical Health score was associated with a 30% increased odds of being on opioids at 3 months. The area under the receiver operating curve of our model was 70.4%. On validation using data from the 2020 cohort, the area under the receiver operating curve was 60.3%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good fit.We found that preoperative questionnaire scores were associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use, independent of other variables. Furthermore, PRD may provide unique patient-level insights, alongside other factors, to improve our understanding of postsurgical pain management.Prognostic II.

Purpose The A2 and A4 pulleys of the flexor tendon system have traditionally been considered critical components of efficient digital flexion. This dogma has recently been challenged. Using fresh human cadaveric hands and a model to measure force and excursion, we sought to clarify the clinical importance of releasing different pulleys. Methods Combinations of A1, A2, and A4 pulleys were released on the index, middle, ring, and little fingers of fresh, cadaveric hands. The excursion was measured as the distance the tendon was pulled by the motor to achieve palm touchdown. The force applied by the motor was constant (25 N); work was derived from the product of force and excursion (distance). The change in excursion and work needed to achieve palm touchdown before and after pulley release was measured. Excursion varies among digits and specimens at baseline; therefore, the percentage change from the intact state was used to compare groups. We compared A2 versus A1, A4 versus A1, A4 versus A2, A1 + A2 versus A2, and A1 + A4 versus A4. Results Isolated A2 or A4 release had the greatest individual impact on the excursion (4.77% ± 1.52% and 3.88% ± 1.93%, respectively). When A1 was released with A2 (9.90% ± 2.52%), the additional impact on the excursion was significant; however, when A1 was released with A4 (2.63% ± 2.81%), the impact was marginal. No clinically or statistically significant change in the work of flexion was detected. Conclusions A1 release was clinically significant when added to A2 release but not when added to A4 release. Sacrifice of the A2 and A4 pulleys resulted in a statistically significant, but clinically negligible, difference in flexor tendon excursion. These data suggest that the A1 pulley should be preserved when other proximal pulley components are likely to be compromised. These data also add further support to the concept that the A2 pulley or the A4 pulley can be released as needed for optimal tenorrhaphy. Clinical relevance During flexor tendon repair, the length of contiguous pulley release may have more impact on final tendon excursion than which specific pulleys are released.

A persistent challenge that has limited access and delivery of digit replantation surgery is timing, as ischemia time has traditionally been considered an important determinant of success. However, reports that the viability of amputated digits decreases after 6 hours of warm ischemia and 12 hours of cold ischemia are largely anecdotal. This review evaluates the quality and generalizability of available evidence regarding ischemia times after digit amputation and reported outcomes of “delayed” replantation. We identify substantial limitations in the literature supporting ischemia time cutoffs and recent evidence supporting the feasibility of delayed digit replantation. The current treatment approach for amputation injuries often necessitates transfers or overnight emergency procedures that increase costs and limit availability of digit replantation nationwide. Evidence-based changes to digit replantation protocols could lead to broader availability of this service, as well as improved care quality.

Purpose To compare the short-term outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), including patient-reported outcomes, pain and satisfaction scores, return to work, and postoperative prescription pain medication use. Methods We included all patients over 18 years of age undergoing carpal tunnel release at a single hand center between January 2018 and December 2019. The carpal tunnel release method was driven by variations in surgeon practice. Data from patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) questionnaires and brief Michigan hand outcomes questionnaires and data on patient-reported pain levels, satisfaction with care, return to work, and postoperative prescription pain medication use were collected at preoperative visits and the first follow-up visit between postoperative days 7 and 14. Results We included 678 (586 ECTR and 92 OCTR) patients. The median age was 58 years, and 75% of the patients were women. At early follow up, patients who underwent OCTR reported significantly lower postoperative PROMIS upper-extremity scores than those who underwent ECTR (median, 32 vs 36 points, respectively) but similar postoperative PROMIS pain interference, global physical health, global mental health, and brief Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire scores. The postoperative pain and satisfaction scores were similar between the 2 groups. In multivariable models, patients who underwent OCTR had 62% lower odds of returning to work and 30% greater odds of remaining on a postoperative pain prescription at the first follow-up visit. Conclusions This study found no evidence suggesting the definitive superiority of 1 surgical technique with regard to clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period . However, OCTR was associated with lower postoperative PROMIS upper-extremity scores of unclear clinical significance, higher odds of remaining on pain medication, and lower odds of returning to work by the first postoperative visit. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release may be preferred in patients who need to return to work within the first 2 weeks after the procedure. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

To characterize the periosteal and endosteal arterial perfusion of the proximal phalanx using micro-computed tomography angiography (micro-CTA).Cadaveric upper extremities were injected with a barium sulfate/gelatin suspension. Phalanges were imaged using micro-CTA and analyzed with a focus on osseous arterial anatomy. Periosteal and endosteal perfusion was characterized by number of vessels, length, anatomic course, and caliber.The base of the proximal phalanx had a significantly greater number (8.0 ± 3.5) of periosteal vessels than those of the shaft (4.1 ± 1.6) and head (1.3 ± 1.1). One-third (34.4%) of the specimens demonstrated a complete absence of periosteal vessels in the head. A nutrient endosteal vessel was noted in 100% of the specimens. Entering at the junction of the middle and distal third of the bone (25.8 ± 3.9 mm from base), the nutrient vessel entered the proximal phalanx of the index finger along its ulnar aspect (8 of 8 specimens), the middle finger along its radial aspect (6 of 8), the ring finger along its ulnar aspect (5 of 8), and the little finger along its radial aspect (7 of 8). The nutrient vessel branched into proximal and distal extensions toward the shaft and head, respectively, with an average endosteal length of 10.7 ± 5.2 mm and average diameter of 0.36 ± 0.11 mm.Periosteal contributions to the perfusion of the proximal phalanx appear to diminish distally. The endosteal arterial anatomy remains consistent, with a single nutrient vessel entering the intramedullary canal with reliable laterality on each digit. This is often the only vessel supplying the head of the proximal phalanx, making this area particularly susceptible to vascular compromise.An understanding of the patterns of perfusion of the proximal phalanx provides some insight into clinically observed pathology, as well as guidance for operative management.

Timely and accurate triage of upper extremity injuries is critical, but current perfusion monitoring technologies have shortcomings. These limitations are especially pronounced in patients with darker skin tones. This pilot study evaluates a Eulerian Video Magnification (EVM) algorithm combined with color channel waveform extraction to enable video-based measurement of hand and finger perfusion.Videos of 10 volunteer study participants with Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI were taken in a controlled environment during normal perfusion and tourniquet-induced ischemia. Videos were EVM processed, and red/green/blue color channel characteristics were extracted to produce waveforms. These videos were assessed by surgeons with a range of expertise in hand injuries. The videos were randomized and presented in 1 of 3 ways: unprocessed, EVM processed, and EVM with waveform output (EVM+waveform). Survey respondents indicated whether the video showed an ischemic or perfused hand or if they were unable to tell. We used group comparisons to evaluate response accuracy across video types, skin tones, and respondent groups.Of the 51 providers to whom the surveys were sent, 25 (49%) completed them. Using the Pearson χVideo-based EVM processing combined with waveform extraction from color channels improved the surgeon's ability to identify tourniquet-induced finger ischemia via video across all skin types tested.Eulerian Video Magnification with waveform extraction improved the assessment of perfusion in the distal upper extremity and has potential future applications, including triage, postsurgery vascular assessment, and telemedicine.

A patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) is responsive if it is sensitive to clinical status changes. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is used to indicate meaningful change, helpful in designing studies and adding context to some study results, and is related to instrument responsiveness. Our purpose was to provide MCID estimates for the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (bMHQ) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) in a hand and upper extremity surgery cohort within the context of varying patient-reported mental health.Data were analyzed from 1,262 adult patients who received surgical care at a single center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Patients completed PROMIS PI, PROMIS Global Health (including global mental health [GMH] component), bMHQ, and a pain-focused anchor question before each clinic visit. Data were collected 8 ± 2 weeks before and after surgery. A distribution-based MCID then was calculated for the general patient population, lowest 10th percentile of GMH scores, and top 10th percentile of GMH scores.Minimal clinically important difference estimates were 10.4 for the bMHQ and 4.3 for PROMIS PI. Analysis of MCID across different GMH score groups showed a mean score of 11.5 for bMHQ for the lowest 10th percentile of GMH, 9.6 for bMHQ for the top 10th percentile, 4.5 for PI for the lowest 10th percentile, and 4.9 for PI for the top 10th percentile.Analysis of subgroups stratified by preoperative patient-reported mental health condition found that preoperative mental health status, as indicated by GMH score, does not have a meaningful impact on responsiveness of bMHQ or PROMIS PI.A patient's reported mental health condition does not meaningfully change how these common PRO instruments reflect the patient condition after hand and upper extremity surgery.

We compared 2 suturing techniques for reattachment of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) via all-suture anchor.We used fresh, matched-pair, cadaveric hands. We disarticulated the fingers at the proximal interphalangeal joints, preserving the proximal FDP. We released the FDPs at their distal insertion and placed an all-suture, 1.0-mm anchor at the center of each FDP footprint. Each anchor's sutures were used to reattach each FDP using 1 of 2 techniques: group H (n = 14) via horizontal mattress; group H + K (n = 12) via horizontal mattress with knots thrown and, with each suture tail, 3 proximal, running-locking, Krackow-type passes on the radial and ulnar FDP sides with the suture ends tied together. We excluded 2 specimens from the H + K group because of improper anchor placement. All other fingers in both groups were individually mounted in an MTS machine for FDP loading in the following sequence for 500 cycles each: (1) to 15 N to simulate passive motion forces; (2) to 19 N for short-arc active motion forces; and (3) to 28 N for full active motion forces. Specimens that had not failed during cyclic testing were then loaded to failure. We measured FDP-to-bone gapping via a digital transducer. We defined failure as3-mm gapping.The H + K group had significantly less gapping during cyclic loading up to 19 N and significantly higher load to failure. The H + K group failed exclusively at the anchor-bone level; the H group failed mostly by suture-tendon pullout.The H + K group performed significantly better regarding cyclic and load-to-failure testing after FDP reattachment.The H + K technique combines the benefits of horizontal-mattress tendon-to-bone apposition and Krackow-tendon locking. It converts the point of failure to the bone level rather than the suture-tendon level.

Surprise billing occurs when insured patients receive unexpected out-of-network charges and fees even when the emergency department, facility, or primary physician who provided care is in their insurance network. This issue is particularly relevant for hand surgery. The multidisciplinary nature of hand care and the number of ancillary services involved result in various levels at which out-of-network billing can be introduced, even when the hand surgeon is in-network for the patient. In addition, surprise billing is often associated with emergency department encounters, elective surgeries, and ambulance and helicopter transfers. In this article, we review surprise billing as it pertains to hand surgery. Little is known about surprise billing in hand care; however, we believe that these practices may substantially affect the patient population. We define key elements of surprise billing, review the literature, discuss the relevance and potential of surprise billing in hand surgery in various settings, and provide an overview of the status of health policy surrounding this practice. It is imperative for hand surgery as a field to understand the prevalence, operationalization, and policies of surprise billing better to prevent the exploitation of patients.

Purpose To evaluate factors that predict the use of electrodiagnostic testing (EDS) for patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods In this cohort study, we analyzed 553 patients who underwent primary CTR from 8 practices between July 1, 2019 and December 1, 2019 by 32 surgeons in the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery (M-CHIQS). The M-CHIQS is a collaborative initiative aimed at improving quality in hand surgery. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including the 6-item carpal tunnel symptoms scale (CTS-6) scores and EDS timing. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess practice and surgeon variation in EDS use related to clinical diagnostic criteria. Results Of the 553 patients who underwent CTR during the study period, 461 (83.3%) received preoperative EDS. After controlling for patient clinical and demographic characteristics, CTS-6 scores were not associated with receiving any preoperative EDS (lower probability of CTS: odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59–1.51), preconsultation EDS (low probability of CTS: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.73–1.38), or postconsultation EDS (low probability of CTS, OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.77–1.60). For use of any EDS, 9.3% of the variation in testing was explained at the practice level and 31.1% of the variation in testing was explained at the surgeon level. Conclusions Variation in EDS use is explained primarily at the practice and surgeon levels and is not related to patient clinical criteria. We recommend that providers and practices assess their use of preoperative EDS and limit its use to patients with an unclear clinical CTS diagnosis, as stated in current clinical practice guidelines. Likewise, providers should be encouraged to use the CTS-6 before prescribing EDS. Clinical relevance Limiting the use of EDS to patients with an unclear clinical diagnosis of CTS will reduce costs and improve patient care by eliminating the discomfort and time associated with this test.

Several improvised dynamic external fixation devices are used for treating unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture-dislocations. We compared the effectiveness of 3 constructs for simulated dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations in a cadaver model.We tested 30 digits from 10 fresh-frozen, thawed cadaver hands. We aimed to remove the palmar 50% of the base of each digit's middle phalanx (P2), simulating an unstable dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocation. Each PIP joint was then stabilized via external fixation with either a pins-and-rubber-bands construct, pins-only construct, or tuberculin syringe-pins construct. We allocated 10 digits per fixation group. The finger tendons were secured to a computer-controlled stepper motor-driven linear actuator. Via this mechanism, all PIP joints were taken through 1,400 cycles of flexion-extension. With the PIP joint in neutral extension, we measured the P2 dorsal translation at baseline, after fixator stabilization, and after the motion protocol.The actual mean P2 palmar defect created was 48% of the base. All PIP joints were unstable after creating the defect, with a mean initial P2 dorsal displacement of 3.7 mm. After application of the fixators, all PIP joint dislocations were reduced. The median residual P2 dorsal displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group, 0.1 mm for the pins-only group, and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group. There were no cases of PIP joint redislocation after flexion-extension cycling, and the median dorsal P2 displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group; 0.0 mm for the pins-only group; and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group.All 3 external fixators restored PIP joint stability following simulated dorsal fracture-dislocation, with all reductions maintained after motion testing. The syringe-pins construct had significantly greater median residual P2 dorsal displacement after the initial reduction and motion testing, which is of unclear clinical importance.This study informs surgeon decision-making when considering dynamic external fixator options for dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations.

We investigated closed passive manipulation as an alternative to surgery for certain proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint extension contractures.We retrospectively reviewed all patients with PIP joint extension contractures treated with passive manipulation at our institution between 2015 and 2019. The included patients were a minimum of 12 weeks from their initial injury/surgery (median 179 days; interquartile range: 130-228 days), had plateaued with therapy, and underwent a 1-time passive manipulation. All included fingers had congruent PIP joints and no indwelling hardware that could have had direct adhesions. Most (80%) patients had a direct injury to the finger ray(s) that led to the contractures. Most (75%) patients had the manipulation performed under local anesthesia in the office. Available measures of passive range of motion (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM) immediately, within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at12 weeks after the manipulation were recorded.Twenty-eight patients and 46 digits met the criteria. The median PIP joint PROM improved from 50° to 90° immediately following the manipulation. The median PROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at12 weeks following manipulation were 80°, 85°, and 85°, respectively. The median AROM immediately after the manipulation improved from 40° to 90°, and the median AROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at12 weeks were 70°, 50°, and 60°, respectively. None of the patients experienced worsening of PIP joint range of motion. One patient who had 4 fingers manipulated had a 45° distal interphalangeal joint extension lag for one of the fingers after the manipulation. Eight fingers underwent later flexor tenolysis or reconstruction to improve AROM after the gains in PROM via manipulation were maintained.Passive manipulation is an alternative to surgical release for select PIP joint extension contractures.Therapeutic IV.

Emergency department (ED) visits for postoperative concerns that could be safely addressed in outpatient clinics have an impact on cost, quality measures, and care workflows. Patient-reported data (PRD) may give unique insights into individual-level factors that predict overuse of health care resources, and guide opportunities for intervention and prevention. We investigated the relationship between preoperative PRD and preventable ED use after outpatient hand surgery to determine whether the preoperative PRD can be used to identify patients at higher odds of having preventable ED visits.All adult patients undergoing outpatient surgery at our hand center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were included. Questionnaires, including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI) scales, were completed before surgery. We used our regional health information exchange to identify ED visits within 90 days of surgery.Our cohort included 2,819 patients. Within 90 days after surgery, 106 (3.8%) had preventable ED visits. Race, insurance status, and transportation issues increased odds of a preventable ED visit. Multivariable models found that each 1-point increase in the preoperative PROMIS UE score was associated with 4% decreased odds of ED presentation (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99), and each 1-point increase in the preoperative PROMIS PI score was associated with 4% increased odds of ED presentation (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.1). Any PROMIS UE or PI scores ≥1SDs worse than population norms increased the probability of a preventable ED visit, independent of other factors.Worse preoperative PROMIS UE and PI scores were associated with increased odds of preventable ED visits. Preoperative PRD may allow for identification of outliers at higher risk for preventable ED use, and facilitate preventative interventions.Prognostic IV.

Purpose Comminuted intra-articular fractures and fracture dislocations of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal joints are challenging. Dynamic external fixation, permitting early joint motion while still minimizing forces across the healing joint, can result in acceptable postoperative active range of motion (AROM). However, some fractures are not initially stable enough for early dynamic motion; further, many available dynamic external fixation systems are costly and cumbersome. We reviewed our experience using an external fixator made from a 1-mL syringe and K-wires and report outcomes using it as a static fixator, dynamic fixator, or configured as a static fixator and then converted to a dynamic fixator in the clinic. Methods Patients with intra-articular fractures and fracture dislocations of the MCP and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints treated between 2014 and 2020 using syringe external fixators were retrospectively reviewed. We reviewed demographics, mechanisms, treatment types and durations, and postoperative AROM, as well as complications including infection, pin loosening, nonunion, hardware failure, and need for further surgery. Patients were analyzed by the level of joint injury (MCP versus PIP) and by treatment pattern. Results After excluding 23 patients with 25 joint injuries who were lost to follow-up or had inadequate outcome data, 27 patients with 29 joint injuries were reviewed. The average follow-up was 171 days after surgery. The postoperative AROM at the MCP level averaged 55° for static fixation and 30° for static-to-dynamic fixation. The postoperative AROM at the PIP level averaged 64° for static fixation, 66° for static-to-dynamic fixation, and 80° for dynamic fixation. Three pin site infections and 2 loose pins were reported. Conclusions The syringe external fixator is an inexpensive, effective, and customizable treatment for intra-articular MCP and interphalangeal fractures and fracture dislocations, and results in acceptable postoperative AROM outcomes and complication rates. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

Purpose Patients may receive surprise out-of-network bills even when they present to in-network facilities. Surprise bills are common following emergency care. We sought to characterize and determine risk factors for surprise billing in hand and upper extremity trauma patients in the emergency department (ED). Methods We used IBM MarketScan data to evaluate hand and upper extremity trauma patients who received care in the ED from 2010 to 2017. Our primary outcome was the surprise billing incidence, defined as encounters in in-network EDs with out-of-network claims. We used descriptive and bivariate analyses to characterize surprise billing and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate independent factors associated with surprise billing. Results Of 710,974 ED encounters, 97,667 (14%) involved surprise billing. The incidence decreased from 26% in 2010 to 11% in 2017. Mean coinsurance payments were higher for surprise billing encounters and had double the growth from 2010 to 2017 compared to those without surprise billing. Receiving care from different provider types—especially therapists, radiologists, and pathologists , as well as hand surgeons—was associated with significantly higher odds of surprise billing. Transfer to another facility was not significantly associated with surprise billing. Conclusions Although the incidence of surprise billing decreased, more than 10% of patients treated in an ED for hand trauma remain at risk. Coinsurance for surprise billing encounters increased by twice as much as encounters without surprise billing. Patients requiring services from therapists, radiologists, pathologists, and hand surgeons were at greater risk for surprise bills. The federal No Surprises Act, passed in 2020, targets surprise billing and may help address some of these issues. Clinical relevance Many hand and upper extremity patients requiring ED care receive surprise bills from various sources that result in higher out-of-pocket costs.

Orthobiologic agents are used as innovative adjuvant therapy to treat common upper-extremity pathology, including carpal tunnel syndrome, de Quervain tenosynovitis, and distal radius fractures. In this article, we perform a narrative review and evaluate current literature on orthobiologics in the upper extremity. Orthobiologics evaluated include bone morphogenetic proteins, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, mesenchymal stem cells, and amniotic membrane. Studies selected include randomized control trials, case studies, and animal studies. Although there is some clinical evidence regarding the use of orthobiologic agents in the treatment of shoulder, elbow, and sports injuries, there is a paucity of literature regarding their use to treat pathology of the hand and wrist. Further investigation is necessary to determine their effectiveness and therapeutic value in treatment of upper extremity injuries.

PURPOSE Whether low bone mineral density affects loss of reduction for distal radius fractures (DRFs) managed without surgery is unknown. Our purpose was to understand how bone mineral density, based on second metacarpal cortical percentage (2MCP) measurement, affects DRF healing after nonsurgical treatment. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients from 2 health systems with DRFs treated without surgery. The AO classification, 2MCP (

The decision regarding the use of vascularized bone grafting (VBG) or nonvascularized bone grafting for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion (SNU) needs guidelines based on patient- and fracture-specific risk factors. Historically, the presence of avascular necrosis was viewed as the primary indication for VBG; however, avascular necrosis is not the only indicator to determine whether VBG can improve our treatment of difficult SNU cases. The methods of detecting scaphoid avascular necrosis lack consensus and accuracy, limiting their use as decision-making tools. Additionally, many other preoperative risk factors for SNU surgery failure have been reported and require careful and standardized study, including the location of nonunion in the scaphoid proximal pole, the duration of nonunion, previous failed nonunion surgery, smoking, and fracture nonunion displacement or collapse. An appropriate study size and design are needed to determine the factors that guide the use of VBG or nonvascularized bone grafting to optimize the outcomes of SNU surgery.

Purpose We evaluated the concurrent validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health (GMH), Global Physical Health (GPH), Upper Extremity (UE), Pain Interference (PI), and Self-Efficacy for Managing Medications and Treatment (SE-MMT) by analyzing correlation to the brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ) in patients with 5 common hand conditions: carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren contracture, trigger finger, thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis, and wrist ganglion cysts. Methods Our cohort included 11,782 unique visits representing 4,401 patients. Patient demographics, PROMIS Computer Adaptive Test questionnaires, and bMHQ were collected prospectively at all visits for all patients. Spearman rank correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between the PROMIS and bMHQ scores. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between questionnaires and patient demographics. Results The PROMIS UE and PI showed strong correlations to the bMHQ. The PROMIS GPH showed moderate correlation to the bMHQ. The PROMIS GMH and SE-MMT were weakly correlated with the bMHQ. These results for the overall group were consistent across subgroup analysis for each condition, and regression models confirmed these correlation findings when controlling for demographic variables. The bMHQ had the smallest ceiling and floor effects compared with the PROMIS questionnaires. The PROMIS UE, PI, and SE-MMT took significantly less time to complete than the bMHQ. Conclusion Correlations between the PROMIS questionnaires and the bMHQ were similar regardless of condition. Clinical relevance Given their moderate-to-strong correlations with the bMHQ and consistency across conditions, the PROMIS UE and PI may be adequate replacements for the bMHQ for evaluating these domains in both clinical and research applications in patients with these common upper extremity pathologies. The PROMIS GPH, GMH, and SE-MMT, in conjunction with the bMHQ, may provide more information regarding patient’s physical and mental health and ability to manage medications and treatment without substantially increasing patient burden. Clinicians and researchers can use these findings to guide questionnaire selection based on the clinical or research question(s) of interest.