Back to Search
Start Over
Scaphoid Nonunion Vascularized Bone Grafting in 2021: Is Avascular Necrosis the Sole Determinant?
- Source :
- The Journal of Hand Surgery. 46:801-806.e2
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2021.
-
Abstract
- The decision regarding the use of vascularized bone grafting (VBG) or nonvascularized bone grafting for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion (SNU) needs guidelines based on patient- and fracture-specific risk factors. Historically, the presence of avascular necrosis was viewed as the primary indication for VBG; however, avascular necrosis is not the only indicator to determine whether VBG can improve our treatment of difficult SNU cases. The methods of detecting scaphoid avascular necrosis lack consensus and accuracy, limiting their use as decision-making tools. Additionally, many other preoperative risk factors for SNU surgery failure have been reported and require careful and standardized study, including the location of nonunion in the scaphoid proximal pole, the duration of nonunion, previous failed nonunion surgery, smoking, and fracture nonunion displacement or collapse. An appropriate study size and design are needed to determine the factors that guide the use of VBG or nonvascularized bone grafting to optimize the outcomes of SNU surgery.
- Subjects :
- musculoskeletal diseases
medicine.medical_specialty
Grafting (decision trees)
medicine.medical_treatment
Nonunion
Scaphoid nonunion
Scaphoid fracture
Avascular necrosis
030230 surgery
Bone grafting
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Fractures, Bone
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
medicine
Humans
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Displacement (orthopedic surgery)
Scaphoid Bone
030222 orthopedics
Bone Transplantation
business.industry
Osteonecrosis
medicine.disease
Surgery
surgical procedures, operative
Vascularized bone
Fractures, Ununited
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03635023
- Volume :
- 46
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Journal of Hand Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6e014729260c7f968b09324337e913fc