Search

In 1975 an outbreak of group A meningococcal disease began in Seattle, Washington, and cases subsequently were recognized throughout the Pacific Northwest. Nearly one-half of the affected persons were Native Americans; two-thirds were alcohol abusers and/or habitués of skid road communities. In Seattle, group A meningococci colonized asymptomatic persons only if these individuals had contact with skid road (P = .006). The epidemic strain may have spread from American Indians in Manitoba, Canada. Traditional migration routes connect the two populations; asymptomatic American Indians on reservations in Washington carried group A meningococci. Vaccination programs were undertaken in four cities but only after cases occurred. In Seattle, vaccination reached 80% of the target population and was associated with a significant decrease in incidence of the disease, but cases recurred after the program ended. The social habits of skid road communities, combined with the "case-triggering" approach to, and premature termination of, vaccination programs, may have resulted in 56% of regional cases occurring after the start of the vaccination program in Seattle.

The efficacy of a single dose (four tablets) and of 10-day courses of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) was studied in 77 women with symptomatic cystitis and negative tests for antibody-coated bacteria. Cure rates after six weeks were 76% for single-dose therapy and 87% for 10 days of treatment. For Escherichia coli infections, cure rates after six weeks were 80% and 86%, respectively. However, 10-day treatment eliminated enteric bacilli from urethral and vaginal sites more often than did single-dose therapy. Two weeks after completion of treatment, perineal colonization was observed more often in the women who developed recurrent infections than in those who did not (P = 0.01). During these two weeks, recurrent infections were found somewhat more often in the women who had received single-dose therapy than in those who had undergone 10-day treatment (5 of 38 vs. 2 of 39; P = 0.07). With conventional courses of antibiotics, retreatment of all recurrent infections was less successful in women previously given single-dose therapy. Recurrent infections were also more frequent in women infected with bacteria other than E. coli. Both drug regimens were well tolerated. However, serious adverse reactions were fewer in patients treated with a single dose (8.5%) than in patients treated for 10 days (15%). Single-dose therapy with TMP-SMZ appears as effective as 10-day therapy in acute uncomplicated cystitis caused by E. coli.

Low-dose trimethoprim (TMP), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), and nitrofurantoin macrocrystals were found to be safe and effective as prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infections. Women given placebo had 2.8 infections per patient-year during the six-month study period, while women given TMP, TMP-SMZ, or nitrofurantoin had significantly lower infection rates (0.015 per patient-year). The effect of prophylaxis appeared to be limited to the period when the agents were taken. Only one patient had a TMP-resistant coliform isolated from cultures obtained during prophylaxis and six months afterwards. The sole factor associated with the recurrence of infection after prophylaxis was a history of three or more infections in the year preceding prophylaxis. Thirty-one of the 60 women in the trial were monitored for a mean of 6.1 years before and 3.2 years after they entered the study. Analysis of infection rates indicated that about half these women were experiencing an infection cluster when they entered the study and that the prestudy baseline infection rate correlated with the poststudy rate. Thus, prophylaxis did not appear to exert a long-term effect on the baseline infection rate. Urinary prophylaxis generally appears to become cost-effective when the baseline infection rate exceeds two per patient-year.

Cefoxitin has become one of the most used parenteral antibiotics in the United States, perhaps because of a broad spectrum of activity, including activity against Bacteroides fragilis, which makes the drug suitable for prevention and treatment of intraabdominal and pelvic infections. This review focuses on the use of cefoxitin in obstetric and gynecologic infections, with comparisons to older and newer antibiotics. Numerous studies have shown that cefoxitin is clearly effective; in most of these studies, however, either the initial infection rates were low or the sample sizes were small--circumstances making it difficult to establish the superiority of any one agent. Thus, the necessity of using a drug with activity against B. fragilis for prevention and treatment of pelvic infections has not been proven. Several antibiotics without such activity have been equally effective. Cefoxitin may be of particular value when combined with surgical drainage of pelvic abscesses, infections in which control of B. fragilis may be especially important to outcome.