Search

Background: Previous studies have reported race-based health disparities in North America. It is unknown if emergency medical service (EMS) treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies based on race. We sought to compare markers of resuscitation intensity among different racial groups. Methods: Using data of adult EMS-treated OHCAs from the Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions During CPR, we analyzed data from participants for whom on-scene return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not achieved. We fit multivariate regression models using a generalized estimating equation, to estimate the association between patient race (White vs. Black vs. “Other”) and the following markers for resuscitation intensity: (1) resuscitation attempt duration; (2) intra-arrest transport; (3) number of epinephrine doses; (4) EMS arrival-to-CPR interval, and (5) 9–1–1 to first shock. Results: From our study cohort of 5370 cases, the median age was 65 years old (IQR: 53–78), 2077 (39 %) were women, 2121 (39 %) were Black, 596 (11 %) were “Other race”, 2653 (49 %) were White, and 4715 (88 %) occurred in a private location. With reference to White race, Black race was associated with a longer resuscitation attempt duration and a lower number of epinephrine doses; Black and “Other” race were both associated with a lower odds of intra-arrest transport. Conclusion: We identified race-based differences in EMS resuscitation intensity for OHCA within a North American cohort, although 40% of race data was missing from this dataset. Future research investigating race-based differences in OHCA management may be warranted.

Background: Airway management is a core component of the treatment of cardiac arrest. Where a rescuer cannot establish a patent airway to provide oxygenation and ventilation using standard basic and advanced airway techniques, there may be a need to consider emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA, e.g., cricothyroidotomy), but there is limited evidence to inform this approach. Objectives: This scoping review aims to identify the evidence for the use of eFONA techniques in patients with cardiac arrest. Methods: In November 2023, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify studies on eFONA in adults. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and case series with at least five cases that described any use of eFONA. We extracted data, including study setting, population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Our analysis focused on four key areas: incidence of eFONA, eFONA success rates, clinical outcomes, and complications. Results: The search identified 21,565 papers, of which 18,934 remained after de-duplication. After screening, we included 69 studies (53 reported incidence, 40 reported success rate, 38 reported clinical outcomes; 36 studies reported complications). We identified only one randomised controlled trial. Across studies, there was a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts, with a median of 31 attempts (interquartile range 16–56.5) per study. There was marked heterogeneity across studies that precluded any pooling of data. There were no studies that included only patients in cardiac arrest. Conclusion: The available evidence for eFONA is extremely heterogeneous, with no studies specifically focusing on its use in adults with cardiac arrest.

Background: The impact of extreme heat on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence and outcomes is under-studied. We investigated OHCA incidence and outcomes over increasing temperatures. Methods: We included non-traumatic EMS (Emergency Medical Services)-assessed OHCAs in British Columbia during the warm seasons of 2020–2021. We fit a time-series quasi-Poisson generalized linear model to estimate the association between temperature and incidence of both EMS-assessed, EMS-treated, and EMS-untreated OHCAs. Second, we employed a logistic regression model to estimate the association between “heatwave” periods (defined as a daily mean temperature > 99th percentile for ≥ 2 consecutive days, plus 3 lag days) with survival and favourable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category ≤ 2) at hospital discharge. Results: Of 5478 EMS-assessed OHCAs, 2833 were EMS-treated. OHCA incidence increased with increasing temperatures, especially exceeding a daily mean temperature of 25 °C Compared to the median daily mean temperature (16.9 °C), the risk of EMS-assessed (relative risk [RR] 3.7; 95%CI 3.0–4.6), EMS-treated (RR 2.9; 95%CI 2.2–3.9), and EMS-untreated (RR 4.3; 95%CI 3.2–5.7) OHCA incidence were higher during days with a temperature over the 99th percentile. Of EMS-treated OHCAs, during the heatwave (n = 179) and non-heatwave (n = 2654) periods, 4 (2.2%) and 270 (10%) survived and 4 (2.2%) and 241 (9.2%) had favourable neurological outcomes, respectively. Heatwave period OHCAs had decreased odds of survival (adjusted OR 0.28; 95%CI 0.10–0.79) and favourable neurological outcome (adjusted OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.11–0.89) at hospital discharge, compared to other periods. Conclusion: Extreme heat was associated with a higher incidence of OHCA, and lower odds of survival and favourable neurological status at hospital discharge.

Aim: Cardiac arrest (CA) is the cessation of circulation to vital organs that can only be reversed with rapid and appropriate interventions. Sensor technologies for early detection and activation of the emergency medical system could enable rapid response to CA and increase the probability of survival. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the literature surrounding the performance of sensor technologies in detecting OHCA. Methods: We searched the academic and grey literature using keywords related to cardiac arrest, sensor technologies, and recognition/detection. We included English articles published up until June 6, 2022, including investigations and patent filings that reported the sensitivity and specificity of sensor technologies to detect cardiac arrest on human or animal subjects. (Prospero# CRD42021267797). Results: We screened 1666 articles and included four publications examining sensor technologies. One tested the performance of a physical sensor on human participants in simulated CA, one tested performance on audio recordings of patients in cardiac arrest, and two utilized a hybrid design for testing including human participants and ECG databases. Three of the devices were wearable and one was an audio detection algorithm utilizing household smart technologies. Real-world testing was limited in all studies. Sensitivity and specificity for the sensors ranged from 97.2 to 100% and 90.3 to 99.9%, respectively. All included studies had a medium/high risk of bias, with 2/4 having a high risk of bias. Conclusions: Sensor technologies show promise for cardiac arrest detection. However, current evidence is sparse and of high risk of bias. Small sample sizes and databases with low external validity limit the generalizability of findings.

Background: Jurisdictions have reported COVID-19-related increases in the incidence and mortality of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We hypothesized that changes in suicide incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to these changes. We investigated whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with changes in the: (1) incidence of suicide-related OHCA, and (2) characteristics and outcomes of such cases. Methods: We used the provincial British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry, including non-traumatic emergency medical system (EMS)-assessed OHCA, to compare suicide-related OHCA (defined as clear self-harm or a priori communication of intent) one-year prior to, and one year after, the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020). We calculated differences in incidence (with 95% CI), overall and within subgroups of mechanism (hanging, suffocation, poisoning, or unclear mechanism), and in case characteristics and hospital-discharge favourable neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2). Results: Of 13,785 EMS-assessed OHCA, we included 274/6430 (4.3%) pre-pandemic and 221/7355 (3.0%) pandemic-period suicide-related cases. The median age was 43 years (IQR 30–57), 157 (32%) were female, and 7 (1.4%) survived with favourable neurological status. Suicide-related OHCA incidence decreased from 5.4 pre-pandemic to 4.3 per 100 000 person-years (-1.1, 95% CI −2.0 to −0.28). Hanging-related OHCA incidence also decreased. Patient characteristics and hospital discharge outcomes between periods were similar. Conclusion: Suicide-related OHCA incidence decreased with the COVID-19 pandemic and we did not detect changes in patient characteristics or outcomes, suggesting that suicide is not a contributor to increases in COVID-related OHCA incidence or mortality. Overall suicide-related OHCA outcomes in both time periods were poor.

Objective: There is currently no existing data examining the opinions of patients and families after treatment with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We sought to interview family members and patients to learn from their experiences and satisfaction with treatment. Methods: We contacted family members and survivors for all cases treated with ECPR for refractory OHCA at St. Paul’s Hospital between January 2014 and July 2018. We performed semi-structured interviews with participants, specifically within the topics of: information sharing (including impressions of an ECPR informational pamphlet), prognostication, organ donation, and perceived value of ECPR. Due to low participant enrolment, we described all interviews in a narrative approach. Results: Within the study period, there were 23 OHCAs treated with ECPR; two survivors and three family members agreed to participate. Participants were satisfied with the treatment provided, including information sharing and prognostication. There were mixed opinions about the best method of information-sharing (verbal vs written), as well as the timing of organ donation conversations. All participants believed ECPR for OHCA to be of high value. Conclusion: Patient’s conveyed satisfaction with ECPR treatment, with mixed views on the best information sharing strategy. Further study is needed to define the optimal methods and timing for discussions of organ donation, especially for treatments of with a relatively low likelihood success.

Objectives: We evaluated the effect of sex and age on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes in a Canadian population. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the British Columbia (BC) Cardiac Arrest Registry (2011–16). We included adult, non-traumatic, EMS-treated OHCA. We stratified the cohort into four groups by age and sex: younger females (18–47 years of age), younger males (18–47 years of age), older females, and older males (>53 years old). We used logistic regression to examine the effect of sex and interaction effect of sex and age on ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Results: We included 8115 patients; 31.4% were females. Females had a lower proportion of OHCA in public locations, bystander witnessed arrests, and with initial shockable rhythms. Overall, females had greater adjusted odds of ROSC (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15–1.42, p < 0.001). The ROSC advantage was significant in females with non-shockable rhythms (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.24–1.78, p < 0.001) and females of premenopausal age. However, there was no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge between females and males overall or by sex-age groups. Both younger females and younger males have higher odds of survival to hospital discharge compared to older females and males. Older females had the lowest survival rate among all other sex-age groups. Conclusions: Female sex was associated with ROSC but not survival to hospital discharge. In the post-arrest phase, females, specifically those in the older age group, had a higher death rate, demonstrating the need for sex- and age-specific research in pre-and-post-OHCA care.

Aim: The COVID-19 pandemic may influence the willingness of bystanders to engage in resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We sought to determine if and how the pandemic has changed willingness to intervene, and the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE). Methods: We distributed a 12-item survey to the general public through social media channels from June 4 to 23, 2020. We used 100-point scales to inquire about participants’ willingness to perform interventions on “strangers or unfamiliar persons” and “family members or familiar persons”, and compared mean willingness during time periods prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic using paired t-tests. Results: Survey participants (n = 1360) were from 26 countries; the median age was 38 years (IQR 24–50) and 45% were female. Compared to prior to the pandemic, there were significant decreases in willingness to check for breathing or a pulse (mean difference −10.7% [95%CI −11.8, −9.6] for stranger/unfamiliar persons, −1.2% [95%CI −1.6, −0.8] for family/familiar persons), perform chest compressions (−14.3% [95%CI −15.6, −13.0], −1.6% [95%CI −2.1, −1.1]), provide rescue breaths (−19.5% [95%CI −20.9, −18.1], −5.5% [95%CI −6.4, −4.6]), and apply an automated external defibrillator (−4.8% [95%CI −5.7, −4.0], −0.9% [95%CI −1.3, −0.5]) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Willingness to intervene increased significantly if PPE was available (+8.3% [95%CI 7.2, 9.5] for stranger/unfamiliar, and +1.4% [95%CI 0.8, 1.9] for family/familiar persons). Conclusion: Willingness to perform bystander resuscitation during the pandemic decreased, however this was ameliorated if simple PPE were available.