Back to Search Start Over

Emergency front-of-neck access in cardiac arrest: A scoping review

Authors :
Mohammed Aljanoubi
Abdulkarim A. Almazrua
Samantha Johnson
Ian R Drennan
Joshua C. Reynolds
Jasmeet Soar
Keith Couper
Katherine M. Berg
Bernd W. Böttiger
Yew Woon Chia
Conor Crowley
Sonia D'Arrigo
Charles D. Deakin
Shannon M. Fernando
Rakesh Garg
Asger Granfeldt
Brian Grunau
Karen G. Hirsch
Mathias J. Holmberg
Eric Lavonas
Carrie Leong
Peter J. Kudenchuk
Peter Morley
Ari Moskowitz
Robert Neumar
Tonia C. Nicholson
Nikolaos Nikolaou
Jerry P. Nolan
Brian O'Neil
Shinichiro Ohshimo
Michael Parr
Helen Pocock
Claudio Sandroni
Tommaso Scquizzato
Markus Skrifvars
Neville Vlok
Michelle Welsford
Carolyn Zelop
Source :
Resuscitation Plus, Vol 18, Iss , Pp 100653- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a core component of the treatment of cardiac arrest. Where a rescuer cannot establish a patent airway to provide oxygenation and ventilation using standard basic and advanced airway techniques, there may be a need to consider emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA, e.g., cricothyroidotomy), but there is limited evidence to inform this approach. Objectives: This scoping review aims to identify the evidence for the use of eFONA techniques in patients with cardiac arrest. Methods: In November 2023, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify studies on eFONA in adults. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and case series with at least five cases that described any use of eFONA. We extracted data, including study setting, population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Our analysis focused on four key areas: incidence of eFONA, eFONA success rates, clinical outcomes, and complications. Results: The search identified 21,565 papers, of which 18,934 remained after de-duplication. After screening, we included 69 studies (53 reported incidence, 40 reported success rate, 38 reported clinical outcomes; 36 studies reported complications). We identified only one randomised controlled trial. Across studies, there was a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts, with a median of 31 attempts (interquartile range 16–56.5) per study. There was marked heterogeneity across studies that precluded any pooling of data. There were no studies that included only patients in cardiac arrest. Conclusion: The available evidence for eFONA is extremely heterogeneous, with no studies specifically focusing on its use in adults with cardiac arrest.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26665204
Volume :
18
Issue :
100653-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Resuscitation Plus
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b4fc54a3f3944d6183abf6885b0fc37a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100653