Search

Objective: Increasing service user involvement and collaboration with providers has become an important facet of the recovery movement. This study explored perspectives on the implementation and delivery of an intervention (Just Do You [JDY]) designed to improve treatment engagement among marginalized young adults diagnosed with serious mental illnesses. Method: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted in-depth interviews (N = 11) with nine participants that included agency leaders, clinical providers, and researchers involved with the planning, delivery, and evaluation of JDY. We used grounded theory coding techniques and constant comparison to develop themes that capture the data on implementation and collaboration related to the delivery of JDY. Results: Two broad themes emerged: (a) collaboration between the clinician and person with lived experience and (b) collaborative culture within and between organizations. Findings capture how collaboration occurred between providers within the clinical encounter (e.g., combined strengths of clinicians and peers) and within and between organizations, clustering around several CFIR domains (e.g., inner setting, process, characteristics of individuals, intervention characteristics). Findings speak to the importance of a "culture of collaboration" in which collaboration is occurring across multiple levels of an organization to support the delivery and implementation of JDY. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: JDY can complement other collaborative approaches given its focus on improving initial engagement. Findings point to the perceived benefits of interventions that are facilitated by a clinician and a person with lived experience along with how their combined expertise can support recovery. Impact and Implications: This study examines the perspectives of agency leaders, clinical providers, and researchers on the implementation and delivery of an engagement intervention for young adults diagnosed with serious mental illnesses. Results point to the benefits of initial engagement interventions that are facilitated by a clinician and a person with lived experience, as a step toward participation in more long-term treatment decision making. Their combined expertise can support recovery and can complement other treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Stigma jeopardizes recovery and successful implementation of mental health services (MHS) globally. Despite cultural variation in how stigma manifests, few studies have examined how culture fundamentally impacts the concept of "personhood" in Latin America. Chile has expanded MHS, providing universal coverage for evaluation and treatment of first episode psychosis (FEP). We applied the "what matters most" (WMM) framework of stigma to identify culturally salient factors that shape or protect against stigma in urban Chile, identifying potential implications for MHS and recovery. Methods: In-depth interviews (n = 48) were conducted with MHS users with psychotic disorders (n = 18), their family members (n = 15), and community members (n = 15), from two urban regions in Chile. Interviews were coded and analyzed to identify WMM, how WMM shapes stigma, and how MHS can influence achieving WMM. Results: Traditional values emphasizing physical/social appearance, gender roles, family, and social connectedness are highly valued. Socioeconomic transitions have engendered capitalistic variations on traditional values, with increasing emphasis on professional careers for men and women, individualism, and independence. Psychotic disorders interfere with fulfillment of both traditional and capitalist values, thereby reinforcing stigma. However, MHS are seen as partially effective in enabling fulfillment of some goals, including employment, appearance, and independence, while often remaining insufficient in enabling capacity to achieve marriage and having a family. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: MHS that facilitate recovery by engaging users in services, such as pharmacotherapy, education/vocational rehabilitation, and family-centered care aligned with cultural values can mitigate stigma and facilitate recovery by enabling users to fulfill WMM. Impact and Implications: Both traditional and capitalist values influence users of mental health services in urban Chile. Mental illness shapes stigma by interfering with widely valued goals of maintaining a good appearance, marriage and family formation, social connectedness, and independence. Mental health services have both positive and negative impacts on users' achievement of these goals. Future mental health services development can reduce stigma by aligning services with lived values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study investigated the mediating roles of self-esteem and self-efficacy on the relationship between family social networks and personal recovery among Chinese people with mental illness in Hong Kong. Methods: One hundred and twenty-five Chinese adults with mental illness from community mental health centers in Hong Kong were recruited for this study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Results: Study results indicated that a large family network size was indirectly related to high levels of personal recovery through high self-efficacy. High perceived family support was directly related to high levels of personal recovery. In addition, high family criticalness was related to low levels of personal recovery directly and indirectly through low self-esteem. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: These findings suggest that using a family approach to enhance individuals' self-esteem and self-efficacy might promote personal recovery among people with mental illness in the Chinese context. Impact and Implications: This study found that family network size is indirectly related to personal recovery, via the effect of self-efficacy. Self-esteem mediates the relationship between family criticalness and personal recovery. Study findings underscore the importance of incorporating strategies to enhance self-esteem and self-efficacy into family interventions aiming to promote personal recovery among people with mental illness in the Chinese context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy (NECT) intervention aims to reduce self-stigma among people with severe mental illness. Based on previous studies that showed the intervention's beneficial outcomes, we conducted an uncontrolled pilot study of NECT in the Netherlands to assess both feasibility in delivering NECT and outcomes of the intervention for self-stigma, hope, recovery, and self-concept clarity. Methods: Feasibility was assessed through uptake and implementation data that included an assessment of enhancing and impeding factors according to surveys with NECT facilitators, and interviews with participants. Outcomes of NECT were studied through scales that assess self-stigma, self-concept clarity, hope, personal recovery, and quality of life. Results: Forty-one participants from five treatment sites participated in the pilot study, among whom 78% were considered "exposed" (i.e., attended at least six sessions). The analysis of enhancing and impeding factors indicated that support from the organization, sense of ownership, expectations of outcomes, and content of the intervention were reported as important in the implementation process. Participants reported decreases in self-stigma and increases in hope during the intervention. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Assessments of feasibility provided valuable insights regarding ways to improve implementation of the intervention (such as increasing facilitators' sense of ownership of the intervention). Outcomes of NECT showed a decrease in self-stigma and improvement of hope among participants in this pilot study, supporting the previously found positive effects of the intervention. Impact and Implications: In this pilot study, NECT was found to be feasible and effective in reducing stigma and increasing hope among people with serious mental illness. The study highlights important factors related to feasibility including facilitators' and contextual factors. Results support the effectiveness of NECT. Accordingly, this pilot study gives important implications for policy makers, mental health clinicians, and peer workers in the Netherlands to further dissemination of NECT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Although recovery for people with serious mental illness (SMI) has received considerable attention, there is a research gap on the related topics of well-being and happiness—subjects that have been widely studied in the general population. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of happiness, well-being, and recovery from the perspectives of persons with SMI, and to examine similarities and differences among these constructs. Method: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of 30 adults with SMI to explore experiences of happiness, well-being, and recovery. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to generate themes related to each concept. Results: Happiness was facilitated through relationships with natural and professional supports, engaging in meaningful activities that conferred a sense of accomplishment, using coping skills to reduce distress, engaging in recreational activities, and meeting basic material needs. Well-being was promoted through self-care activities and enhanced through relationships with professional supports. However, nearly one-fourth of participants expressed uncertainty about what well-being meant to them. Recovery was characterized as a process of overcoming illness or adversity through which personal control over symptoms and stressors is increased; recovery is also facilitated by supportive professional relationships. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Most factors relating to the happiness of people with SMI are also factors that have been identified in theory and research as facilitating the happiness of the general population. Findings suggest that happiness should be considered an important new area of research, policy, and practice in the fields of psychiatric rehabilitation. Impact and Implications: Happiness, well-being, and recovery are important and fulfilling experiences for persons with serious mental illness. However, it is unclear how these concepts overlap or diverge from one another. Our findings suggest significant similarities but also important distinctions between happiness and recovery and that promoting happiness should be a priority area for mental health professionals, policymakers, and researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The literature on the experience of mental health providers (MHPs) working with people with serious mental illness (SMI) in community-based mental health programs related to sex, sexuality, and intimacy is scarce. The purpose of the present study was to explore the situations, thoughts, feelings, dilemmas, and challenges experienced by MHPs around these issues. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 MHPs working with people with SMI in six different community mental health programs in Israel. Results: Four main themes emerged: (a) lack of professional training and skill sets to discuss clients' sexuality and intimacy issues, (b) ambivalence regarding the status and appropriateness of sexual relationships and intimacy as recovery-related goals, (c) discomfort discussing sexuality as a barrier to shared decision making and person-centered care, and (d) distinct programmatic and structural barriers to discussing and addressing needs and preferences related to sexuality and intimacy. Discussion: The study highlights challenges experienced by MHPs working with people with SMI when confronted with sexual activities, relationships, and intimacy issues raised by service users. The development and implementation of trainings and resources designed to bolster MHPs' skill sets addressing sexuality and intimacy should be a priority for the field of psychiatric rehabilitation. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: MHPs who work with people with SMI in community-based settings often experience complex thoughts, feelings, dilemmas, and challenges related to clients' desire for or involvement in intimate and sexual relationships. Our study indicates a need to develop and implement stronger training and supervision to support MHPs to respond effectively to these complex situations and associated challenges. Impact and Implications: Mental health providers (MHPs) who work with people with serious mental illness (SMI) in community-based settings often experience complex thoughts, feelings, dilemmas, and challenges related to clients' desire for or involvement in intimate and sexual relationships. Our study indicates a need to develop and implement stronger training and supervision to support MHP to respond effectively to these complex situations and associated challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recovery-oriented, strengths-based intervention engages service users' strengths and resources to support their recovery process. This model was developed in an American context and has been applied in Hong Kong. It is important to formulate an understanding of strengths better fit to Hong Kong Chinese. Aims: This exploratory qualitative study examined Hong Kong Chinese service users' views on strengths and preferred translation for the word strengths, along with its cultural nuances. Method: Twenty-six people with serious mental illnesses were individually interviewed at a mental health center in Hong Kong, based on a photo-elicitation technique and reflection on Chinese terms related to strengths. Analysis of data employed the constant comparative method. Results: Participants reported that social factors, such as support by helping professionals and engagement in family roles, as well as spiritual beliefs and practices, are important for recovery. These insights and their preferred translations of strengths generate a culturally nuanced understanding of strengths. Conclusions & Implications for Practice: The strengths model applied in Hong Kong can be enhanced by a more culturally nuanced perspective, for example, including the importance of family-based identity and filial piety, beliefs related to harmony and fate, and practices such as a temple or church attendance. Impact and Implications: This study investigates how Hong Kong Chinese people view strengths in facilitating recovery from mental illnesses. The term "strengths" in recovery was deemed synonymous with the terms ability (néng lì; 能力) and expertise (zhuān cháng; 專長) in Chinese. This study sheds light on how Chinese conceptualizations of "strengths" in recovery may be applied in interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The current article describes efforts to develop and test a measure of recovery-oriented inpatient care. Method: The Recovery-oriented Acute INpatient (RAIN) scale was based on prior literature and current Veterans Health Administration (VHA) policy and resources and further revised based on data collection from 34 VHA acute inpatient units. Results: A final scale of 23, behaviorally anchored items demonstrated a four-factor structure including the following factors: inpatient treatment planning, outpatient treatment planning, group programming, and milieu. While several items require additional revision to address psychometric concerns, the scale demonstrated adequate model fit and was consistent with prior literature on recovery-oriented inpatient care. Conclusions and Implementations for Practice: The RAIN scale represents an important tool for future implementation and empirical study of recovery-oriented inpatient care. Impact and Implications: This study focused on developing a scale to measure recovery-oriented inpatient mental health care. The study found a 23-item scale matched prior literature and included four general areas of recovery-oriented inpatient care: inpatient treatment planning, outpatient treatment planning, group programming, and milieu. This scale can be used to improve the recovery orientation of inpatient programming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A growing body of literature indicates that mobile health (mHealth) interventions that utilize smartphones for illness management are feasible, acceptable, and clinically promising. In this study, we examine how individuals with serious mental illness use a mHealth intervention--FOCUS--to selfmanage their illnesses. Additionally, we explored participant perceptions of the intervention's impact on their subjective illness experience. Method: We analyzed qualitative data from 30 individuals with serious mental illness who participated in 1 of 2 community-based, 3-month trials of FOCUS. In Study 1, weekly calls were conducted by a mHealth specialist to facilitate and enhance intervention use. In Study 2, researchers conducted qualitative interviews to gather detailed perspectives of intervention use. Data were sampled from the weekly call notes and qualitative interviews and analyzed using a thematic and collaborative approach. Results: Thematic analyses revealed 6 recurring themes. Three themes emerged in regard to participants' ongoing daily use of FOCUS: "back-up" support, symptom management, and self-awareness. Another 3 themes emerged related to the intervention's impact on participants' recovery processes: acceptance of symptoms, motivation and supporting positive outlook. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: This qualitative study offers insight into how individuals with serious mental illness made use of a mHealth intervention designed to support illness self-management. Our findings suggest that individuals may benefit differently from mHealth interventions depending on where they are in the recovery process. As mHealth interventions become increasingly popular in clinical settings, it is important to understand consumers' short-term and long-term benefits from these interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Parenting is an important life domain for many people, but little research examines the parenting experience and its role in recovery for those with a severe mental illness. The current study provides preliminary evidence of how these concepts are related in a sample of individuals living with severe mental illness attending a community mental health center. We also explored potential differences between mothers and fathers, which could help better tailor services to meet the needs of parents with severe mental illness. Method: Data were obtained during baseline interviews for a study testing an intervention designed to increase shared decision making in psychiatric treatment. Participants (N = 167) were administered measures of patient activation, recovery, autonomy preference, hope, and trust in providers. We compared parents and nonparents and compared mothers and fathers using chi-square tests, t tests, and, when appropriate, analysis of covariance. Results: Parents had a significantly higher level of trust in their psychiatric care provider than nonparents. Contrary to hypotheses, parents were less active in their treatment and preferred less information-seeking autonomy than did nonparents, but did not differ on other recovery-related indices. No differences on recovery-related indices were detected between mothers and fathers. Secondary analyses revealed parents with minor children had more hope than parents of older children. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Although parents may have higher levels of trust in their physicians, our preliminary findings suggest that parents with severe mental illness may benefit from increased efforts to help them be more active and interested in information about their illnesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Loneliness can impede subjective experiences of recovery. This study examines the relationship between clubhouse participation and loneliness using standardized instruments while controlling for age, gender, living status, and social network characteristics. Method: A random sample of 126 members from one clubhouse was recruited for this cross-sectional investigation. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the association between participation and loneliness. Results: A greater number of clubhouse visits, greater perceived availability of social support and higher levels of overall satisfaction with social network relationships were significantly related to a lower level of loneliness after controlling for covariates. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Service providers may want to pay more attention to those members experiencing loneliness and help them connect with others. Future studies using longitudinal analyses are needed to further assess the causal relationship between clubhouse participation and loneliness. Multiple aspects of participation should be examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a mental illness self-management intervention, called Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP), on the use of and need for mental health services over time compared with nutrition and wellness education. Method: Participants were recruited from outpatient community mental health settings in Chicago, Illinois. Using a single-blind, randomized controlled trial design, 143 individuals were assigned to WRAP or to a nutrition education course and assessed at baseline and at 2-month and 8-month follow-up. The WRAP intervention was delivered by peers in recovery from serious mental illness who were certified WRAP educators over nine weekly sessions lasting 2.5 hrs. The nutrition education curriculum was taught by trained non-peer educators using the same schedule. Mixed-effects random regression analysis tested for differences between the two interventions in (a) self-reported use of 19 clinical, rehabilitation, peer, emergent, and ancillary services; and (b) self-reported need for these services. Results: Results of mixed-effects random regression analysis indicated that, compared with controls, WRAP participants reported significantly greater reduction over time in service utilization (total, individual, and group), and service need (total and group services). Participants in both interventions improved significantly over time in symptoms and recovery outcomes. Discussion: Training in mental illness self-management reduced the self-reported need for and use of formal mental health services over time. This confirms the importance of WRAP in an era of dwindling behavioral health service availability and access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Most research on the Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) program for people with severe mental illnesses has focused on individuals with stable symptoms living in the community, with less attention to persons being treated in an inpatient setting. We evaluated the feasibility and effects of an IMR program adapted for individuals with schizophrenia who were awaiting discharge into the community. Method: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at 2 hospitals in Taiwan to compare the adapted IMR program with treatment as usual (TAU). Ninety-seven individuals with schizophrenia were randomized to the adapted IMR program or TAU. Four outcome indicators including illness-management knowledge, attitudes toward medication, insight, and symptoms were assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and at a 1-month follow-up following discharge from the hospital. Results: Participants in the adapted IMR group showed significantly greater improvements at posttreatment and 1-month follow-up in illness-management knowledge, attitudes toward medication, insight, and negative symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) than individuals in the TAU group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups on other subscales of the BPRS. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: This is the first controlled evaluation of a version of the IMR program in an East Asian culture, and the first to evaluate it in an acute care inpatient setting. Our findings support the feasibility and potential benefits of implementing an adapted IMR program, focused on the prevention of relapses and rehospitalizations, during the discharge period of an inpatient treatment stay to prepare individuals to reenter the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore mental health consumer and provider responses to a computerized version of the Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) program. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted to gather data from 6 providers and 12 consumers who participated in a computerized prototype of the IMR program. An inductive-consensus-based approach was used to analyze the interview responses. Results: Qualitative analysis revealed consumers perceived various personal benefits and ease of use afforded by the new technology platform. Consumers also highly valued provider assistance and offered several suggestions to improve the program. The largest perceived barriers to future implementation were lack of computer skills and access to computers. Similarly, IMR providers commented on its ease and convenience, and the reduction of time intensive material preparation. Providers also expressed that the use of technology creates more options for the consumer to access treatment. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The technology was acceptable, easy to use, and well-liked by consumers and providers. Clinician assistance with technology was viewed as helpful to get clients started with the program, as lack of computer skills and access to computers was a concern. Access to materials between sessions appears to be desired; however, given perceived barriers of computer skills and computer access, additional supports may be needed for consumers to achieve full benefits of a computerized version of IMR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Peer providers experience unique recovery and growth processes. This study examines the relationship of these processes with multiple occupational characteristics related so peer work. Outcomes are examined using positive psychology concepts: psychological well-being, posttraumatic growth, and generatively, as well as established recovery and empowerment measures. Method: Thirty peer providers employed in s variety of mental-health agencies participated in the study and completed standardized measures of recovery and growth processes. Multiple past and present occupational characteristics were identified and coded based on a semistructured interview and a background questionnaire. Results: Multivariate analyses revealed a significant association between participants' generatively and past participation in peer-support/self-help groups, as well as past work in a helping profession. No associations were found between the characteristics of participants' present peer jobs and the examined recovery and growth processes. Conclusions and implications for Practice: The present findings have implications for the expansion of the peer-provider workforce, They suggest that encouraging and enabling peer-support groups and peer-run organizations may have positive impact on the generatively of peer providers, and may draw generative individuals to thin emerging occupational modality of mental- health recovery oriented service. Study findings underscore the need for future research on recovery processes from the perspective of positive psychology and highlight the value of peer exposure as a catalyst of recovery and growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: With the use of a qualitative approach, this study focuses on service providers' experiences and perspectives on recovery-oriented reform. Methods: Nine focus groups were conducted with a sample of 68 service providers recruited from three Canadian sites. Results: Three major themes were identified: 1) positive attitudes towards recovery-oriented reform; 2) skepticism towards recovery-oriented reform; and 3) challenges associated with implementing recovery-oriented practice. These challenges pertained to conceptual uncertainty and consistency around the meanings of recovery; application of recovery-oriented practice with certain populations and in certain contexts; bureaucratization of recovery-oriented tools; limited leadership support; and, societal stigma and social exclusion of persons with mental illnesses. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The findings point towards challenges that might arise as system planners move ahead in their efforts toward implementing recovery within the mental health system. In this regard, we offer several recommendations for the planning of organizational and educational practices that support the implementation of recovery-oriented practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study investigated what women identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, uansgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ) think about mental health "recovery." Method We used a grounded theory analysis of 13 pailicipant interviews. Results: Three novel critiques emerged, including rejection of mental health "leeovely" based on participants' identities as "mad," sexual assault survivors, and/or LGBTQ. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: While a medicalized interpretation of "recovery" may not work for some women, alternative understandings, such as using "recovery" to heal from discrimination and demand systemic changes, have liberatory potential. It is essential that supporters discern and utilize each woman's chosen language. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]