1. Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
- Author
-
Mèlanie V. Bénard, Clara M. A. de Bruijn, Aline C. Fenneman, Koen Wortelboer, Judith Zeevenhoven, Bente Rethans, Hilde J. Herrema, Tom van Gool, Max Nieuwdorp, Marc A. Benninga, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen, Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Internal medicine, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, AGEM - Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition, Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School, Vascular Medicine, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Experimental Vascular Medicine, Paediatric Gastroenterology, and ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development
- Subjects
Adult ,Young Adult ,Feces ,Multidisciplinary ,Adolescent ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Clostridium Infections ,Humans ,COVID-19 ,Middle Aged ,Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ,Aged ,Donor Selection - Abstract
Background The increasing interest to perform and investigate the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has generated an urge for feasible donor screening. We report our experience with stool donor recruitment, screening, follow-up, and associated costs in the context of clinical FMT trials. Methods Potential stool donors, aged between 18−65 years, underwent a stepwise screening process starting with an extensive questionnaire followed by feces and blood investigations. When eligible, donors were rescreened for MDROs and SARS-CoV-2 every 60-days, and full rescreening every 4−6 months. The costs to find and retain a stool donor were calculated. Results From January 2018 to August 2021, 393 potential donors underwent prescreening, of which 202 (51.4%) did not proceed primarily due to loss to follow-up, medication use, or logistic reasons (e.g. COVID-19 measures). 191 potential donors filled in the questionnaire, of which 43 (22.5%) were excluded. The remaining 148 candidates underwent parasitology screening: 91 (61.5%) were excluded, mostly due to Dientamoeba fragilis and/or high amounts of Blastocystis spp. After additional feces investigations 18/57 (31.6%) potential donors were excluded (mainly for presence of Helicobacter Pylori and ESBL-producing organisms). One donor failed serum testing. Overall, 38 out of 393 (10%) potential donors were enrolled. The median participation time of active stool donors was 13 months. To recruit 38 stool donors, €64.112 was spent. Conclusion Recruitment of stool donors for FMT is challenging. In our Dutch cohort, failed eligibility of potential donors was often caused by the presence of the protozoa Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis spp.. The exclusion of potential donors that carry these protozoa, especially Blastocystis spp., is questionable and deserves reconsideration. High-quality donor screening is associated with substantial costs.
- Published
- 2022