Search

Introduction: Chiari type 3 is a rare hindbrain malformation that has been reported in the literature primarily as case reports and case series. Radiological, pathophysiological and surgical definitions of the malformation are inconsistent in the literature and subsequently can be confusing, and outcomes have also been uniformly poor. The definition of this rare malformation will be clarified through a case presentation. Methods: A retrospective review of prior publications in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed looking for reports of 'Chiari 3 +/- malformation' and 'occipital encephalocele'. Relevant papers were reviewed and compiled into table format with associated descriptions of a Chiari type 3 malformation. A case illustration is presented with radiological and intraoperative imaging to reinforce and clarify the definition. Results: Upon review of the prior publications in the detail of the descriptions and imaging associated with each article, there is a wide range of variability in the description of what is considered a Chiari 3 malformation. Occipital, occipitocervical and high cervical defects have all been described as Chiari 3 malformation. Our case illustration presents a patient with an occipitocervical encephalocele with neural elements, which is the classic and accepted definition of the Chiari 3 malformation. Conclusion: Chiari type 3 is a rare congenital malformation, and prior publications describing this developmental disorder have not demonstrated a consensus in its definition. In addition, outcomes have traditionally been reported as poor. This case illustration of a Chiari type 3 enforces the definition of an occipitocervical encephalocele with hindbrain herniation, and with proper management not all Chiari 3 malformation patients have bad outcomes. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both occipital encephalocele and teratomas are midline congenital malformations. Encephalocele is a form of neural tube defect in which there is a congenital defect of the cranium through which occurs a protrusion of brain matter or meninges, while teratoma is a tumor derived from all three germ layers. The association between occipital encephalocele and teratoma has not been reported to date. In the present study, the authors present a series of four such cases. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Meningomyelocele (MMC) is a common central nervous system birth defect. Various congenital and acquired abnormalities have been reported with MMC, some of which are secondary to the pathophysiology and some are morbidities of the underlying disease. The aim of this study was to discuss current possible theories explaining diverse anomalies/abnormalities seen in a series of 390 patients with MMC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using the records of 390 patients with MMC at Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Tehran, Iran, from January 2001 to January 2007. A series of 17 cases of MMC with attributed organ anomalies, not explained by a causal effect of the underlying disorder, were compiled. There were 3 cardiac anomalies including ventricular septal defect, pulmonary artery atresia and tetralogy of Fallot, 4 musculoskeletal malformations, consisting of missing rib, polydactylia and complex distal limb anomaly, 4 urological anomalies such as bladder exstrophy, horseshoe kidney and dysplastic kidneys, 2 occipital encephaloceles, 2 congenital adrenal hyperplasia patients with ambiguous genitalia, 1 omphalocele, 1 albinism and 1 Klippel-Feil syndrome. A review of the literature and discussion explaining each of these observations, have been performed and some possible theories have been proposed.Conclusions: Although various organ anomalies with different embryological origin had been observed and reported with MMC, it is difficult to explain their development using one of the current theories of MMC formation. It could be attributed to a possible genetic defect or merely an incidental finding. A teratological insult during the embryogenic phase would be an alternative assumption. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]