The present research concerns the teaching of the Political Education of the A' High School with the distance education - synchronous and asynchronous, in the middle of a pandemic (CoV-19). The courses were conducted the digital environment Cisco Webex Meetings (synchronous teaching) and the e-class (asynchronous teaching). The issues that concerned us were current affairs related to political security, social sensitivity, digital citizenship and personal data-creative commons. Our main goal was to reconnect students with the learning process, to cultivate social skills of responsibility, interaction, cooperation, and the construction of social meaning by all students - future citizens. The importance of synchronous e-learning lies in enabling students with low learning motivation to be more active during the learning procedure. It utilizes learning strategies that promote responsibility, autonomy and at the same time the interaction between students and teacher as well as the evaluation of learning procedure. Asynchronous distance learning enables the collection and further processing of reference material, assignments and feedback. The scientific framework on which the research was based concerns the theories of a) social constructivism b) situated learning, (c) authentic learning d) discovery learning e) distributed cognition (f) activity theory. Furthermore, it was also based on the view that creativity can engage students and make the learning process more interesting and effective through teaching creativity and teaching actively. Our effort focused on the personality of the creator (person-oriented models), the process of creation (process-oriented models), the product (product-oriented models) in the social or general environment (place, press, pressure), in his persuasion student and teacher (persuasion), inherent momentum for creation (potential). The teacher emphasized more on the imagination, the divergent thinking, humor, "playing" and rewarding the "mistake". In the present paper, the stages of the creative process which were followed are preparation, activation, cogitation, illumination, verification, communication, validation. What is more, creative learning techniques were used such as six thinking hats of De Bono, brainstorming, reverse brainstorming, artful thinking, SCAMPER method in writing poems. The active participation of students was enhanced through creative writing workshops. Emphasis was placed on self-expression, their reading response and cultural critical approach, to include all identities and "conflicting" reasons produced in the social field. The process was enriched with representative experiences. Representations from theater, cinema and painting were selected that promote dialogue, pluralism of views and the cultivation of critical thinking. More specifically, in terms of the implementation of the intervention and the research process, the distance learning concerned the 16 students (8 boys, 8 girls) of the A2 department of the General Lyceum of Doxato Drama, the philologist and lasted 2 months (from 16-3 -2020 to 16-5-2020). The teaching period in the classroom lasted about one more month. The research effort took the form of qualitative research and was conducted in the context of action research - case study by an individual teacher. The organizational model was followed by planning, organization, application, evaluation, while its evolution was done in spiral circles. In synchronous distance education the lessons were implemented through dialogue, file sharing or audiovisual material (music, videos, presentations) and with "reason fights", with feedback, process and game evaluations. The material as well as the works were redesigned, in order to be more attractive and to encourage the participation and enhance the students' creativity. They were also posted in the e- class, so that they are accessible to all students before the lessons (flipped classroom). They were assigned reading lists, lesson plans, self-help tasks - individual and group and time-limited exercises. They had a playful character and could be used in more than one way. We worked collectively and in groups providing mutual feedback during the lesson, via chat rooms, e-mails and during breakout sessions. The teacher participated in all the assignments. The starting point was the official material of the Institute of Educational Policy, regarding the rights-obligations of the student. We formulated the rules of operation of our department and then digital "arguments" (1st marathon) was organized with the technique "six hats of thought" by De Bono. We focused on the issues of formal and informal control, self-control through material that acquired from free resources (images, poems, journalistic speech), in normal circumstances and in "extraordinary" data with the motivation "take a stand". Timeliness gave us the opportunity to talk about the responsibility of the student-citizen towards himself, the group, the vulnerable groups and to deconstruct conspiracy theories. The process was framed by a creative writing workshop. At the same time, the terms digital citizen, creative commons and fair use became the subject of elaboration. We positioned ourselves regarding the use of material from blogs, repositories, libraries, bibliographic or digital references. We did a drama workshop on "in the age of the coronavirus", "if we do not do it, who will do it?", "Don't become a racist...". The animation exercises at the beginning of the digital lessons started with the instruction "speak everyone in the group". Theatrical performances that were broadcast digitally gave us the opportunity to talk about utopia and the vision for a better world at the Reading Club. The 2nd Marathon concerned issues of social sensitivity (People with special needs, volunteering, social responsibility, blood donation, digital citizen, coronavirus protection, Global Book Day, anniversary events for Gianni Rondari) and was done with letters, verses, spots, limerick, paintings, poems, diaries, digital narratives. The students' creations were posted in the e-class and are hosted in an e-book edited by the students and in a padlet. Our artistic expression was supported by the coordinator of the educational project of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace for sustainability, Anna Afentoulidou, who "taught" us limerick techniques (With Rodari and a dice we build bridges and wherever he takes us). During May, the classes were conducted in the school. We discussed the concepts business-competitiveness-innovation-social responsibility and solidarity-respect for each other-tolerance-citizenship-poverty-unemployment. The students continued to submit their work digitally, but more subtly, because the year was coming to an end. The effort was evaluated by "observing" the students' participation in the "chat", a practice that served as an initial and formative evaluation (I like... I do not like because...). The evaluation was also conducted by a questionnaire provided to students after their return to their classes on 25/5 regarding the subjects taught up to that time and whether they were in favor of returning to school or continue digitally. The final evaluation was done with focus groups in the Reading Room of the school on the second and third of June and lasted about two hours in total. Mixed groups were formed and the students discussed about how they experienced the process, what they gained, what difficulties they faced, what part of the material or what exercises did or did not enjoy during the pandemic, what was their feeling about distance learning in relation to life, with what criteria they would like to be evaluated (participation, collaboration, effectiveness, interaction, creativity, scoring or descriptive). This method of discussion was selected because students are more open-minded and do not give standardized answers. The answers were recorded, after the consent of their guardians, and transcribed. The discourse analysis was done with hermeneutic phenomenology, which allows the interpretation of students' views, attitude and experiences through the subjectivity of the researcher. The students, in the beginning, faced difficulties due to the network overload and inequalities, as many attended the lessons via their mobile phones. In general, they found the process demanding, yet interesting and they considered that it supported them psychologically during the quarantine and made them more responsible. They actively participated in "teleconferences" and developed skills of literacy, academic, digital communication, "visual", social. Key values that emerged were responsibility - individual and collective, cooperation and empathy. They appreciated the fact that the educational material was framed, enriched with images, and motivated them to reflect, do research, take a stand and express their creativity. They responded to the learning process with a number of creative tasks, individually or in groups, depending on their personal interest and abilities (differentiated learning). The process made visible to us students, within the formal context of the classroom, who actively participated in the construction of meaning in the new condition while they did not use to. These students, mainly boys, had shown little interest and participation in traditional teaching. In general, the students showed more interest in the sections "Citizen Security", "Digital Citizen", personal data and work related to the pandemic. The boys showed a preference for "reason fights", while the girls showed a preference for creative work. However, they agreed that they would prefer the classroom with the support of distance learning. They also considered it worthwhile to evaluate such efforts and commented positively on the fact that their teacher constantly supported and encouraged them. Overall, we realized that designing a course in digital environments takes time and effort, but utilizes a variety of semiotic resources, representations, roles and "tools". In addition, there are possibilities to make the traditional lesson more "open" and creative and to provoke the interaction of the participants with each other, with the educational material and with the context. However, difficulties were the preparation "on the material before the lesson", the work within a certain time, which was difficult due to the use of mobile phones and the evaluation of the degree of participation in the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]