1. Comparison of AI-integrated pathways with human-AI interaction in population mammographic screening for breast cancer
- Author
-
Helen M. L. Frazer, Carlos A. Peña-Solorzano, Chun Fung Kwok, Michael S. Elliott, Yuanhong Chen, Chong Wang, The BRAIx Team, Jocelyn F. Lippey, John L. Hopper, Peter Brotchie, Gustavo Carneiro, and Davis J. McCarthy
- Subjects
Science - Abstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) readers of mammograms compare favourably to individual radiologists in detecting breast cancer. However, AI readers cannot perform at the level of multi-reader systems used by screening programs in countries such as Australia, Sweden, and the UK. Therefore, implementation demands human-AI collaboration. Here, we use a large, high-quality retrospective mammography dataset from Victoria, Australia to conduct detailed simulations of five potential AI-integrated screening pathways, and examine human-AI interaction effects to explore automation bias. Operating an AI reader as a second reader or as a high confidence filter improves current screening outcomes by 1.9–2.5% in sensitivity and up to 0.6% in specificity, achieving 4.6–10.9% reduction in assessments and 48–80.7% reduction in human reads. Automation bias degrades performance in multi-reader settings but improves it for single-readers. This study provides insight into feasible approaches for AI-integrated screening pathways and prospective studies necessary prior to clinical adoption.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF