Search

Purpose: To investigate the prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant treatment on uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Methods: A retrospective review of UCS patients treated between 2005 and 2019 was conducted. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging system was used. Multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify the independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 138 patients were eligible for descriptive analysis. Excluding 12 patients without surgery, 126 patients with adequate clinicopathologic data were included for prognostic analysis. The median follow-up for survivors was 51.8 months. 5-year OS and PFS rates for FIGO stage I, II, III, IV were 64.5% and 51.8%, 60.8% and 57.7%, 47.7% and 45.9%, 5.1% and 4.1%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, six models each for PFS and OS were formulated including highly correlated variables alternatively. Adjuvant chemoradiation was consistently selected as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.10–0.22, all p

Background/Purpose: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) accounts for approximately 18% of all epithelial ovarian malignancies in Taiwan and portends a poor prognosis. Here, we sought to investigate whether immunohistochemistry with an anti-pan-cytokeratin antibody cocktail (AE1/AE3) can be used as an adjunct to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for improving the detection of isolated tumor cells (ITCs) and micrometastasis to pelvic lymph nodes (LNs). We also assessed whether these lesions may predict disease recurrence. Methods: Pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens were obtained from 197 patients with stage 1 OCCC who had undergone surgery between 2000 and 2018 from Linkou and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Immunohistochemical staining with AE1/AE3 was applied to a total of 1186 slides. Clusters of metastatic tumor cells, detected immunohistochemically, were classified as ITCs (clusters with diameters of ≤0.2 mm) or micrometastases (tumor cell clusters of >0.2 but ≤2.0 mm). We also assessed the diameter of metastases in patients with positive lymph nodes (stage IIIA1, n = 3, 7 positive nodes). Results: Clusters with a positive AE1/AE3 staining were identified in five (2.53%) of the 197 patients (ITCs, n = 3; micrometastasis, n = 2). Four patients had no evidence of disease recurrence but a patient recurred at follow-up. Metastatic foci of patients with stage IIIA1 disease were all >2.0 mm in size. Conclusion: Immunohistochemical staining with AE1/AE3 can identify micrometastasis or ITCs in LNs missed on routine H&E staining. The role of micrometastasis in predicting recurrent OCCC and implementing on treatment strategies requires further investigation.

Background/purpose: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) with recurrence/progression after treatment has dismal prognosis. We aimed to investigate the management and outcomes of such patients. Methods: OCCC patients who were treated between 2000 and 2013 with cancer recurrence or progression after primary treatment were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the independent predictors of survival after recurrence (SAR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: A total of 64 patients experienced treatment failure (49 recurred after remission and 15 progressed without remission). The 5-year CSS rates of recurrent/progressive OCCC patients were 22.9% (progression group: median CSS 5.9 months [range, 0.8–25.2] vs recurrence group: 43.6 months [range, 7.1–217.8]; p 12 months (HR: 0.22–0.40, p = 0.001 and p = 0.023), CA125

To compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) and serous carcinomas (SCs). Methods: We retrieved the clinical records of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (Stage I–IV) who received primary surgeries between 2000 and 2013. Cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival, and survival after recurrence (SAR) of CCC and SC patients were retrospectively compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of survival. Results: Of 891 women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer, 169 CCCs and 351 high-grade SCs were analyzed. The 5-year CSS rates of CCC patients were significantly lower than those of SC for both Stage III (22.3% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.001) and Stage IV (0% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.001) disease. In the absence of gross residual malignancies, the 5-year CSS rate was better for CCC (82.3%) than SC (75.2%, p = 0.010). The 5-year SAR rate was significantly lower for CCC than SC (14.3% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.002). Old age and residual malignancies were independent prognostic factors for CSS in the entire cohort of CCC patients. In the subgroup of Stage I CCC, positive cytology was identified as the only adverse prognostic factor for CSS. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of CCC are generally poorer than SC. Complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease should be ideally achieved in CCC patients. A greater understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of CCC may lead to tailored therapies, ultimately optimizing outcomes.

To prospectively evaluate the value of positron emission tomography (PET) or integrated computed tomography (CT) and PET (PET/CT) in the management of documented or suspected recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods: Patients with ovarian cancer who had completed primary cytoreductive surgery and standard adjuvant chemotherapy were studied to evaluate the following indications: (1) CA125 elevation after complete remission with negative CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) result; (2) post-therapy surveillance CT/MRI-detected suspicious lesions that guided biopsy was not feasible; (3) documented relapse for restaging prior to or after curative salvage therapy. The clinical impact of PET, as compared with those of CT/MRI, was determined on a per scan basis. Results: From 2002 to 2009, 73 patients were recruited, and 92 PET scans were performed. Up to June 2015, 53 patients had died of disease, four were alive with disease, and the remaining 16 were alive without disease. Among the 92 scans, PET had positive impacts in 72.8%, no clinical impacts in 21.7%, and negative impacts in 5.4%. For indication 1, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of PET in detecting recurrence were 80.0% and 92.3%, respectively. For indication 2, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET were 91.2%, 62.5%, 91.2%, and 62.5%, respectively. For indication 3, PET provided positive impact in 85.3% and negative impact in 2.9% of the 34 scans. Conclusion: PET has value in the management of suspected or documented recurrent ovarian cancer, with positive impacts on confirming recurrent status and offering a better treatment plan.