Search

With the ongoing dramatic growth of radiopharmaceutical therapy, research and development in internal radiation dosimetry continue to advance both at academic medical centers and in industry. The basic paradigm for patient-specific dosimetry includes administration of a pretreatment tracer activity of the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical; measurement of its time-dependent biodistribution; definition of the pertinent anatomy; integration of the measured time-activity data to derive source-region time-integrated activities; calculation of the tumor, organ-at-risk, and/or whole-body absorbed doses; and prescription of the therapeutic administered activity. This paper provides an overview of the state of the art of patient-specific dosimetry for radiopharmaceutical therapy, including current methods and commercially available software and other resources.

The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration-labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.

Radiopharmaceutical therapies are gaining increasing prominence as they improve survival in patients with common diseases such as metastatic prostate cancer ([ 1 ][1],[ 2 ][2]). However, whereas sodium iodide (131I) therapy has been used for over 70 y in treating malignant and benign thyroid

In 2013, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) partnered for the first time to host a joint workshop on targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) ([1][1]). Broad discussion at that gathering suggested the need for a follow-up workshop

The growing interest in targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) for a broad range of applications is shared by a diverse group of medical professionals, including but not limited to physicians and basic scientists in several fields, as well as members of industry, regulatory bodies, and patients.

Targeted therapies often depend on the expression of the target present in the tumor. This expression can be difficult to ascertain in widespread metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT, although sensitive, is nonspecific for particular tumor markers. Here, we compare the use of a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–specific (18)F-Z(HER2:342)-Affibody and (18)F-FDG in HER2-expressing pulmonary metastases in a murine model of breast cancer. METHODS: The lung metastasis model was established by intravenous injection of MDA-MB-231(HER2)-Luc human breast cancer cells into the tail vein. Bioluminescence imaging was used to evaluate metastasis progression. Uptake of (18)F-Z(HER2:342)-Affibody and (18)F-FDG was confirmed by coregistration of the PET images with MR and CT images. At the end of the study, the presence of neoplastic cells and HER2 expression in lung tissues, and distribution of the tracer, were assessed ex vivo by immunohistochemistry and autoradiography. RESULTS: (18)F-Z(HER2:342)-Affibody successfully targeted HER2-positive lesions in the lung and allowed detection of metastases as early as 9 wk after injection of cells. In contrast, (18)F-FDG uptake was often masked by surrounding inflammatory changes and was nonspecific for HER2 expression. HER2 expression at a cellular level correlated well with tracer uptake on autoradiography. CONCLUSION: (18)F-Z(HER2:342)-Affibody is a promising tracer for evaluation of HER2 status of breast cancer metastases and is more specific for detecting HER2-positive lesions than (18)F-FDG.

In vivo imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression may allow direct assessment of HER2 status in tumor tissue and provide a means to quantify changes in receptor expression after HER2-targeted therapies. This work describes the in vivo characterization of the HER2-specific N-2-(4-(18)F-fluorobenzamido)ethyl]maleimide ((18)F-FBEM)-Z(HER2:342) Affibody molecule and its application to study the effect of 17 (dimethylaminoethylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG) on HER2 expression by PET.To assess the correlation of signal observed by PET with receptor expression, we administered the tracer to athymic nude mice bearing subcutaneous human breast cancer xenografts with different levels of HER2 expression. To study the downregulation of HER2, we treated the mice with 4 doses (40 mg/kg) of 17-DMAG, an inhibitor of heat-shock protein 90, known to decrease HER2 expression. The animals were scanned before and after treatment. After the last scan, the mice were euthanized and tumors were frozen for receptor analysis.The tracer was eliminated quickly from the blood and normal tissues, providing high tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios as early as 20 min after injection. The high-contrast images between normal and tumor tissue were recorded for BT474 and MCF7/clone18 tumors. Low but still detectable uptake was observed for MCF7 tumors, and none for MDA-MB-468. The signal correlated with the receptor expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The levels of HER2 expression estimated by post-treatment PET decreased 71% (P4 x 10(-6)) and 33% (P0.002), respectively, for mice bearing BT474 and MCF7/clone18 tumors. These changes were confirmed by the biodistribution studies, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and Western blot.Our results suggest that the described (18)F-FBEM-Z(HER2:342) Affibody molecule can be used to assess HER2 expression in vivo by PET and monitor possible changes of receptor expression in response to therapeutic interventions.

REPLY: The work that we have recently described tested the feasibility of the use of Affibody molecules (Affibody AB) and PET to predict tumor response to ErbB2-targeted therapy. It is clear that additional studies will be needed to dissect the mechanistic events underlying the observed changes.