Search

To describe the clinical associations of SOX1 antibodies (SOX1-Abs), determine the accuracy of various detection techniques, and propose laboratory criteria to identify definite paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) associated with SOX1-Abs.Single-center, retrospective study of patients referred to the French Reference Center between 2009 and 2019 for confirmation of SOX1-Ab positivity, without concurrent neural antibodies. Patients were classified according to the updated diagnostic PNS criteria; biological samples were systematically retested with three distinct techniques (line blot, cell-based assay, indirect immunofluorescence).Among 77 patients with isolated SOX1-Ab positivity, 23 (29.9%) fulfilled the criteria for definite PNS; all of them had lung cancer (mostly small-cell) and presented mainly with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (10/23) and rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia (6/23). SOX1-Ab positivity varied depending on the laboratory methods which were used, and a single technique was not sufficient to draw conclusions about the PNS diagnosis. The combination of an antigen-specific test (line blot and/or cell-based assay) and immunofluorescence showed the highest accuracy (81.5%, 95% CI 70.0-90.1) in identifying definite PNS. Moreover, when the PNS-Care score was recalculated assigning three points at the laboratory-level only to patients with positive "antigenic-specific test + immunofluorescence" and 0 points to the remaining cases, a higher certainty for definite and non-PNS was achieved (from 41/77, 53.2%, to 60/77, 77.9%; p 0.001).SOX1-Abs should be considered high-risk antibodies only when detected with a positive antigenic-specific test and immunofluorescence. Other laboratory results and clinical associations different from Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia should be carefully reassessed to rule out false positivity and alternative diagnoses.

Background and objectives: To explore cognitive, EEG, and MRI features in COVID-19 survivors up to 10months after hospital discharge. Methods: Adult patients with a recent diagnosis of COVID-19 and reporting subsequent cognitive complaints underwent neuropsychological assessment and 19-channel-EEG within 2months (baseline, N = 49) and 10months (follow-up, N = 33) after hospital discharge. A brain MRI was obtained for 36 patients at baseline. Matched healthy controls were included. Using eLORETA, EEG regional current densities and linear lagged connectivity values were estimated. Total brain and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) volumes were measured. Clinical and instrumental data were evaluated between patients and controls at baseline, and within patient whole group and with/without dysgeusia/hyposmia subgroups over time. Correlations among findings at each timepoint were computed. Results: At baseline, 53% and 28% of patients showed cognitive and psychopathological disturbances, respectively, with executive dysfunctions correlating with acute-phase respiratory distress. Compared to healthy controls, patients also showed higher regional current density and connectivity at delta band, correlating with executive performances, and greater WMH load, correlating with verbal memory deficits. A reduction of cognitive impairment and delta band EEG connectivity were observed over time, while psychopathological symptoms persisted. Patients with acute dysgeusia/hyposmia showed lower improvement at memory tests than those without. Lower EEG delta band at baseline predicted worse cognitive functioning at follow-up. Discussion: COVID-19 patients showed interrelated cognitive, EEG, and MRI abnormalities 2months after hospital discharge. Cognitive and EEG findings improved at 10months. Dysgeusia and hyposmia during acute COVID-19 were related with increased vulnerability in memory functions over time.