Back to Search Start Over

SOX1 antibody-related paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: clinical correlates and assessment of laboratory diagnostic techniques

Authors :
Marco Vabanesi
Anne-Laurie Pinto
Alberto Vogrig
David Goncalves
Véronique Rogemond
Bastien Joubert
Nicole Fabien
Jérôme Honnorat
Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo
Source :
Journal of Neurology. 270:1691-1701
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022.

Abstract

To describe the clinical associations of SOX1 antibodies (SOX1-Abs), determine the accuracy of various detection techniques, and propose laboratory criteria to identify definite paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) associated with SOX1-Abs.Single-center, retrospective study of patients referred to the French Reference Center between 2009 and 2019 for confirmation of SOX1-Ab positivity, without concurrent neural antibodies. Patients were classified according to the updated diagnostic PNS criteria; biological samples were systematically retested with three distinct techniques (line blot, cell-based assay, indirect immunofluorescence).Among 77 patients with isolated SOX1-Ab positivity, 23 (29.9%) fulfilled the criteria for definite PNS; all of them had lung cancer (mostly small-cell) and presented mainly with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (10/23) and rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia (6/23). SOX1-Ab positivity varied depending on the laboratory methods which were used, and a single technique was not sufficient to draw conclusions about the PNS diagnosis. The combination of an antigen-specific test (line blot and/or cell-based assay) and immunofluorescence showed the highest accuracy (81.5%, 95% CI 70.0-90.1) in identifying definite PNS. Moreover, when the PNS-Care score was recalculated assigning three points at the laboratory-level only to patients with positive "antigenic-specific test + immunofluorescence" and 0 points to the remaining cases, a higher certainty for definite and non-PNS was achieved (from 41/77, 53.2%, to 60/77, 77.9%; p 0.001).SOX1-Abs should be considered high-risk antibodies only when detected with a positive antigenic-specific test and immunofluorescence. Other laboratory results and clinical associations different from Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia should be carefully reassessed to rule out false positivity and alternative diagnoses.

Subjects

Subjects :
Neurology
Neurology (clinical)

Details

ISSN :
14321459 and 03405354
Volume :
270
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7266623ae62cb5294ee16f53b5b6b67e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11523-y