1. Should mild obstructive sleep apnoea be treated? A systematic review from the standpoint of disease progression.
- Author
-
Fong, P Y, Tay, Z Y, Soh, R Y, Fook, S M C, Li, H H, and Phua, C Q
- Subjects
SLEEP apnea syndrome treatment ,DISEASE progression ,ONLINE information services ,META-analysis ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,SLEEP apnea syndromes ,BODY mass index ,MEDLINE ,LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Objective: This study was a systematic review to investigate the progression of untreated obstructive sleep apnoea in order to evaluate whether mild obstructive sleep apnoea should be treated from the standpoint of disease progression. Method: The database search study outcomes that were collected included Apnea Hypopnea Index and Respiratory Disturbance Index. A meta-analysis of obstructive sleep apnoea severity over time intervals was performed. Results: A total of 17 longitudinal studies and 1 randomised, controlled trial were included for review. For patients with mild obstructive sleep apnoea, mean pre-study and post-study Apnea Hypopnea Index was 5.21 and 8.03, respectively, over a median interval of 53.1 months. In patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea, mean pre-study and post-study Apnea Hypopnea Index was 28.9 and 30.3, respectively, over a median interval of 57.8 months. Predictors for disease progression in mild obstructive sleep apnoea are patients aged less than 60 years and those with a baseline body mass index less than 25. Conclusion: Mild obstructive sleep apnoea progression is observed, but it does not appear to reach any clinically significant progression to moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnoea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF