Search

Purpose: We compared risk factors for high disease- and treatment-related symptom burden over 15 weeks of therapy in medically underserved patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and in patients treated at a tertiary cancer center., Patients and Methods: We monitored symptom severity weekly during chemotherapy. Patients were recruited from a tertiary cancer center (n=101) and three public hospitals treating the medically underserved (n=80). We used a composite symptom-severity score and group-based trajectory analysis to form two groups: one with consistently more severe symptoms and another with less severe symptoms. We examined predictors of group membership., Results: Seventy percent of the sample (n=126) reported low symptom-severity levels that decreased during therapy; 30% (n=55) had consistently severe symptoms throughout the study. In multivariate analysis, patients with good performance status being treated in public hospitals were significantly more likely than patients treated at the tertiary cancer center to be in the high-symptom group (odds ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.1 to 14.6; P = .001) and to report significantly higher symptom interference (P = .001). Other univariate predictors of high-symptom group membership included variables associated with being medically underserved (eg, having less education, being single, and being nonwhite). No group differences by ethnicity were observed in the public hospitals. Medically underserved patients were less likely to receive adequate pain management., Conclusion: Patients with advanced lung cancer and good performance status treated at public hospitals were more likely than those treated at a tertiary cancer center to experience substantial symptoms during chemotherapy.

Purpose: Previous studies found that African American and Hispanic cancer patients are at risk for undertreatment of pain. We evaluated the efficacy of a pain education intervention for underserved minority patients., Patients and Methods: Ninety-seven underserved African American and Hispanic outpatients with cancer-related pain were enrolled onto a randomized clinical trial of pain management education. The patients in the education group received a culture-specific video and booklet on pain management. The control group received a video and booklet on nutrition. A research nurse met with each patient to review the materials. We measured changes in pain intensity and pain-related interference 2 to 10 weeks after the intervention, as well as changes in quality of life, perceived pain control, functional status, analgesics, and physician pain assessments., Results: Physicians underestimated baseline pain intensity and provided inadequate analgesics for more than 50% of the sample. Although the ratings for pain intensity and pain interference decreased over time for both groups, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Pain education did not affect quality of life, perceived pain control, or functional status. African American patients in the education but not the control group reported a significant decrease in pain worst ratings from baseline to first follow-up (P < .01), although this decrease was not maintained at subsequent assessments., Conclusion: Brief education had limited impact on pain outcomes for underserved minority patients, suggesting that more intensive education for patients and interventions for physicians are needed.

Purpose: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial was performed to determine the efficacy and safety of pamidronate disodium (APD) in comparison to etidronate disodium (EHDP) in the treatment of cancer-related hypercalcemia., Patients and Methods: Sixty-five male and female adult patients with cancer and corrected calcium levels of greater than or equal to 12.0 mg/dL after 24 hours of hydration were randomized to receive either 60 mg APD given as a single 24-hour infusion or 7.5 mg/kg EHDP given as a 2-hour infusion daily for 3 days., Results: APD normalized corrected calcium levels in 70% (21 of 30) of patients, whereas EHDP did so in 41% (14 of 34) of patients (P = .026). The mean corrected serum calcium level decreased from 14.6 to 10.5 mg/dL in the APD-treated group and from 13.8 to 11.6 mg/dL in the EHDP-treated group within the first week of treatment. There was no difference in response to APD in patients without versus those with bone metastases (78% v 67%). Both drugs were well tolerated., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a single 60-mg infusion of APD is safe and more effective than EHDP given at the dose of 7.5 mg/kg for 3 days in the treatment of cancer-related hypercalcemia.

Twenty-seven patients (25 males and 2 females) with histologically confirmed, unresectable, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were entered on a combination chemotherapy protocol including cisplatinum and vinblastine sulfate (DDP)(VLB). Patients had to have measurable disease as defined by the presence of two clearly measurable perpendicular diameters, be untreated with either chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and give informed consent to be eligible for study entry. The median age was 57 yr and the median performance status was 70 (Karnofsky scale); 10 patients had epidermoid carcinoma, 9 adenocarcinoma, 4 large cell carcinoma, and 4 undifferentiated carcinoma. All patients had intrathoracic disease, 12 also had extrathoracic lymph node involvement, 8 bone involvement, 2 liver metastasis, and 2 central nervous system metastasis prior to beginning chemotherapy; 9 patients had involvement of one site, 12 of two sites, 5 of three sites, and 1 of four sites. Cisplatinum was given as a short intravenous infusion of 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28, and then every 6 wk. Vinblastine was administered as an intravenous injection of 8 mg/m2 on days 1, 14, and 28, and then every 3 wk. Patients were evaluated prior to each course of cisplatinum. If progression occurred, therapy was discontinued. If stabilization or response was noted, then therapy was continued until intolerable toxicity or progression supervened. Every patient entered is considered evaluable for toxicity and response. There were no complete remissions; 14 patients achieved a partial response, 3 had a minimal response, 5 had stabilization of their disease, 1 had disease progression, and 4 are considered to have had drug deaths. Responses were seen after the first cisplatinum course in 13 patients and after the second in 1. Toxicities seen were universal nausea and vomiting; elevation of creatinine occurred in 6 patients, ranging from 2.1 to 14.6 mg/dl, and was clinically significant in 2 patients. Myelosuppression, with a leukocyte nadir of less than 3.0 X 10(9)l in 10 cases and platelet nadir of less than 100.0 X 10(9)l was seen in 5 cases and partial hearing deficit occurred in 2 patients. Median survival was 22 wk for the whole group (24 wk for the whole group if the 4 early drug deaths are excluded). Median survival was 26 wk for responding patients and 13 wk for nonresponding patients (remains the same if the early deaths are excluded from the latter group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with locally advanced or metastatic measurable disease were given a combination of cisplatin, 200 mg/m2 divided in five daily doses, and simultaneously, vinblastine, 7.5 mg/m2 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over five days. Five courses of chemotherapy were planned. Afterwards or on progression, patients were randomized to receive maximally tolerated radiation to all sites of disease v observation only. Forty males and seven females were entered. Median age was 60 years (range, 37 to 74), median Karnofsky performance status was 70 (range, 30 to 90). Five patients had previous brain radiation therapy for metastatic disease, all others were previously untreated. Side effects in the 87 courses of chemotherapy administered included leukopenia (WBC less than 1,000/microL following nine courses) and thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 20,000/microL following four courses). Ten patients became septic, nine of them while leukopenic. Elevations of serum creatinine followed eight courses; in all cases the level was less than 3.0 mg/dL. Nausea and vomiting were mild to moderate. Five patients experienced mild hypoacusis and six had sensory polyneuropathy. The deaths of three patients were considered drug-related. The response rate was 28%. The median survival for the group was 22 weeks, 63.2 weeks for responders and 17.9 weeks for nonresponders. Twenty-six patients received radiation therapy, 16 randomized to this arm as planned, ten to palliate symptoms. Median survival of all irradiated patients was 24.8 weeks. Seven responders to chemotherapy were randomized to receive radiotherapy; their median survival was 25 weeks. In six responders randomized not to receive radiation, the median survival was 77.8 weeks (P greater than .3). Among nonresponding patients, the median survival of those radiated was 22.2 weeks, while that of nonradiated patients was 11 weeks. This regimen is cumbersome and toxic. It has offered no major survival benefits, or improvement in response rates, therefore, we do not recommend it for the standard treatment of NSCLC.