1. Interpatient distributions of bloodspot area per fixed volume of application: Comparison between filter paper and non-cellulose dried matrix spotting cards
- Author
-
Douglas F. Stickle, Laura J. McCloskey, and Janet H. Yoo
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Population ,Blood volume ,Hematocrit ,Biochemistry ,Young Adult ,Humans ,Medicine ,education ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Blood Specimen Collection ,education.field_of_study ,Chromatography ,Filter paper ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Biochemistry (medical) ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Spotting ,Female ,Dried Blood Spot Testing ,business ,Filtration - Abstract
Background Non-cellulose dried matrix spotting (DMS) cards are an alternative to filter paper (FP) for bloodspots. We compared the interpatient distributions of bloodspot areas between DMS and FP for a fixed volume of application of whole blood, and examined correlations of areas with hematocrit. Methods EDTA-whole blood adult patient samples (n = 49; 25 males, 24 females) were utilized after routine measurement of hemoglobin and hematocrit. Replicate (4 ×) bloodspots were produced by bolus drop application of 50 μL whole blood via a fixed-volume pipettor to either FP or DMS. Dried bloodspot areas were determined by image analysis. Results Hematocrits (HCT) were normally distributed (HCT = 30.9 ± 5.3%). For both FP and DMS, bloodspot areas (a, cm2) across patients were normally distributed: for FP, a = 1.11 ± 0.056 cm2 (± 5.0%); for DMS, a = 0.378 ± 0.037 cm2 (± 9.9%). Relative bloodspot area differences across the population range were > 20% for both DMS and FP. Correlation of bloodspot areas to hematocrit was negative for FP (r = − 0.80) but positive for DMS (r = + 0.78). Conclusions Interpatient variation in blood volume per area is a preanalytical variable for both DMS and FP bloodspots. Hematocrit is but one interpatient variable, as correlations of fixed-volume bloodspot areas with hematocrit across patients were substantially inexact (r2
- Published
- 2014